The results paint a troubling picture of a company struggling with virtually non-existent operational momentum. The quarter's performance was heavily reliant on other income of ₹0.29 crores, which constituted the bulk of profitability, masking underlying operational losses of ₹0.17 crores. The company's operating profit margin excluding other income stood at a deeply negative 212.50%, highlighting the complete absence of core business viability.
Trading at ₹34.84 as of February 13, 2026, the stock has declined 1.86% from its previous close and currently trades below all key moving averages, signalling persistent bearish momentum. With a proprietary advisory score of just 12 out of 100, Rishabh Digha Steel carries a "Strong Sell" rating, reflecting fundamental weaknesses across valuation, quality, and operational parameters.
Financial Performance: Operational Vacuum Persists
The Q3 FY26 results reveal a company in operational hibernation. Net sales of ₹0.08 crores represent a catastrophic 73.33% quarter-on-quarter decline from Q2 FY26's already anaemic ₹0.30 crores. On a year-on-year basis, comparisons are rendered meaningless as Q3 FY25 recorded zero sales. The nine-month period of FY26 has generated cumulative sales of merely ₹0.38 crores, an amount that barely registers as meaningful commercial activity for even a micro-cap enterprise.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3) | 0.08 | -73.33% | 0.06 | -62.50% | 75.00% |
| Sep'25 (Q2) | 0.30 | N/A | 0.16 | -5.88% | 53.33% |
| Jun'25 (Q1) | 0.00 | -100.00% | 0.17 | -67.31% | 0.00% |
| Mar'25 (Q4) | 1.05 | N/A | 0.52 | N/A | 49.52% |
| Dec'24 (Q3) | 0.00 | N/A | -0.75 | -426.09% | 0.00% |
| Sep'24 (Q2) | 0.00 | N/A | 0.23 | +187.50% | 0.00% |
| Jun'24 (Q1) | 0.00 | N/A | 0.08 | N/A | 0.00% |
Net profit of ₹0.06 crores in Q3 FY26, whilst technically positive, derives almost entirely from other income rather than operational strength. The company recorded other income of ₹0.29 crores against operating losses of ₹0.17 crores, indicating that without non-operating income, the business would be deeply unprofitable. Interest costs of ₹0.03 crores and tax provisions of ₹0.03 crores (representing a 33.33% effective tax rate) further constrained profitability.
The PAT margin of 75.00% appears deceptively strong but is entirely misleading given the minuscule revenue base. When sales are virtually zero, margin percentages lose all practical meaning. The gross profit margin of 112.50% similarly reflects the distorted arithmetic of negligible operations rather than genuine business strength.
Operational Challenges: A Business in Name Only
Rishabh Digha Steel's operational metrics reveal a company that has essentially ceased meaningful commercial activity. The five-year sales growth rate of -2.34% understates the severity of the decline, as recent quarters show near-complete operational shutdown. The company's five-year EBIT growth of -20.38% reflects persistent value destruction, whilst the average return on capital employed (ROCE) of -44.97% indicates catastrophic capital inefficiency.
Critical Operational Deficiencies
Near-Zero Revenue Generation: With quarterly sales of just ₹0.08 crores, the company is operating at a scale that barely qualifies as a going concern. The sales-to-capital-employed ratio of 0.03x demonstrates virtually no productive utilisation of invested capital.
Profitability Illusion: The company's reported profits are entirely dependent on other income rather than core steel manufacturing and trading operations. Operating losses of ₹0.17 crores in Q3 FY26 expose the underlying business weakness.
Structural Decline: The company has recorded zero or negligible sales in six of the last seven quarters, indicating not temporary disruption but fundamental business failure.
Return on equity (ROE) averaged 13.33% over five years, which appears reasonable in isolation but is misleading given the company's operational reality. The latest ROE of just 0.54% more accurately reflects current performance. Higher ROE typically indicates better capital efficiency and profitability, but in this case, the historical average is inflated by earlier periods and does not reflect the company's current dormant state.
The balance sheet shows shareholder funds of ₹18.06 crores as of March 2025, comprising share capital of ₹5.49 crores and reserves of ₹12.57 crores. Current assets stood at ₹1.32 crores against current liabilities of ₹0.53 crores, providing minimal liquidity cushion. Fixed assets have dwindled to just ₹0.03 crores, suggesting the company has liquidated or written down most of its productive capacity.
Industry Context: Massive Underperformance vs Peers
The iron and steel products sector has delivered robust returns of 28.19% over the past year, making Rishabh Digha Steel's 29.76% decline all the more striking. The company has underperformed its sector by a staggering 57.95 percentage points, signalling company-specific distress rather than industry headwinds. Peer companies have navigated the same market environment with far greater success, highlighting Rishabh Digha's unique operational failings.
| Company | Market Cap (₹ Cr) | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rish.Digh.Steel | 19.00 | 191.15 | 1.04 | 13.33 | -0.98 |
| Bloom Industries | N/A | 44.69 | 2.39 | 4.32 | 0.53 |
| T N Steel Tubes | N/A | 286.92 | 2.11 | 2.03 | 0.76 |
| Earthstahl & All. | N/A | 40.42 | 0.57 | 22.36 | 0.49 |
| Modern Steels | N/A | 4.00 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Rishabh Digha Steel trades at an astronomical P/E ratio of 191.15x, making it the most expensive stock in its peer group despite having amongst the weakest operational metrics. The company's P/BV ratio of 1.04x appears reasonable, but given the absence of earnings power, this represents a premium that is difficult to justify. The average ROE of 13.33% exceeds most peers, but this historical metric is rendered meaningless by current operational paralysis.
Valuation Analysis: Risky at Any Price
At the current price of ₹34.84, Rishabh Digha Steel carries a "Risky" valuation grade, reflecting the fundamental disconnect between market pricing and business reality. The P/E ratio of 191.15x is absurdly elevated for a company with virtually no revenue generation, whilst the sector average P/E of 28x provides context for how overvalued the stock appears relative to operational peers.
The enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of -1.03x reflects negative operating profitability, making traditional valuation metrics inapplicable. The EV to sales ratio of 0.77x might appear attractive in isolation, but given sales are essentially zero, this metric provides no meaningful valuation anchor. The stock has declined 46.39% from its 52-week high of ₹64.99, yet even at current levels appears overvalued given operational realities.
The company's book value per share of ₹32.92 provides a theoretical floor, with the stock trading at just 1.04x book value. However, the quality of these book assets is questionable given the absence of productive operations. Fixed assets have shrunk to ₹0.03 crores, suggesting most book value resides in current assets and reserves rather than income-generating capacity.
Shareholding: Stable but Unengaged Ownership
Promoter holding has remained static at 74.31% across the last five quarters, indicating neither additional capital infusion nor divestment. The absence of institutional participation is telling – FII, mutual fund, insurance, and other DII holdings all stand at zero, reflecting complete institutional disinterest in the company's prospects.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Insurance % | Other DII % | Non-Inst % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 74.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.69 |
| Sep'25 | 74.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.69 |
| Jun'25 | 74.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.69 |
| Mar'25 | 74.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.69 |
| Dec'24 | 74.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.69 |
The complete absence of institutional participation – zero holdings by FIIs, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors – represents a damning verdict on the company's investment merit. Non-institutional shareholders hold the remaining 25.69%, likely comprising retail investors unaware of the operational deterioration. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, eliminating one potential risk factor.
Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across Timeframes
Rishabh Digha Steel's stock has delivered negative alpha across virtually all meaningful timeframes. Over the past year, the stock has declined 29.76% whilst the Sensex gained 8.52%, resulting in negative alpha of 38.28 percentage points. The two-year performance shows a 20.64% decline against the Sensex's 15.47% gain, producing negative alpha of 36.11 percentage points.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +4.59% | -1.14% | +5.73% |
| 1 Month | -8.32% | -1.20% | -7.12% |
| 3 Months | -7.24% | -2.19% | -5.05% |
| 6 Months | +1.34% | +2.59% | -1.25% |
| YTD | -10.02% | -3.04% | -6.98% |
| 1 Year | -29.76% | +8.52% | -38.28% |
| 2 Years | -20.64% | +15.47% | -36.11% |
| 3 Years | +86.31% | +36.73% | +49.58% |
The stock trades below all key moving averages – the 5-day MA of ₹34.87, 20-day MA of ₹35.04, 50-day MA of ₹36.47, 100-day MA of ₹36.70, and 200-day MA of ₹40.30 – signalling persistent bearish momentum. The technical trend turned bearish on February 9, 2026, at ₹34.99, with multiple technical indicators including MACD, Bollinger Bands, and KST all flashing bearish signals.
The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates significantly higher volatility than the broader market, with annualised volatility of 72.97% classifying it as a high-risk, low-return investment. The risk-adjusted return of -0.41 over the past year compares unfavourably to the Sensex's positive risk-adjusted return of 0.74, confirming that investors have been penalised for taking on additional risk.
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Converge
The investment thesis for Rishabh Digha Steel is comprehensively negative across all four key parameters. The "Risky" valuation grade reflects absurdly elevated multiples for a company with minimal operations. The "Below Average" quality grade captures weak long-term financial performance characterised by negative ROCE of -44.97% and declining sales. The "Flat" financial trend indicates stagnation rather than recovery, whilst the "Bearish" technical trend confirms negative market sentiment.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
Key Strengths ✓
- Zero Debt Position: Net debt to equity of -0.98 indicates the company is a net cash entity, eliminating financial leverage risk.
- No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares remove concerns about forced selling or loss of control.
- Stable Promoter Holding: Consistent 74.31% promoter stake demonstrates ownership commitment, albeit without operational turnaround.
- Positive Book Value: Shareholder funds of ₹18.06 crores provide some asset backing, though productive utility is questionable.
- Historical ROE: Five-year average ROE of 13.33% shows the business once generated reasonable returns, though this is now historical.
Key Concerns ⚠
- Operational Collapse: Quarterly sales of ₹0.08 crores represent near-complete cessation of commercial activity.
- Profitability Illusion: Net profit entirely dependent on other income (₹0.29 crores) rather than core operations (loss of ₹0.17 crores).
- Extreme Valuation: P/E ratio of 191.15x is unjustifiable for a company with minimal revenue and no earnings visibility.
- Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings signals professional investor avoidance.
- Persistent Underperformance: 29.76% decline over past year vs sector gain of 28.19% indicates company-specific distress.
- Capital Inefficiency: Average ROCE of -44.97% and sales-to-capital-employed of 0.03x demonstrate value destruction.
- Negative Momentum: Stock below all moving averages with bearish technical indicators across timeframes.
Outlook: What to Watch
Positive Catalysts
- Resumption of meaningful commercial operations with quarterly sales exceeding ₹5 crores
- Achievement of positive operating profit excluding other income
- Capital reallocation or business restructuring announcement from promoters
- Entry of institutional investors signalling professional validation
Red Flags
- Continued quarterly sales below ₹1 crore indicating permanent operational shutdown
- Increasing dependence on other income to mask operating losses
- Promoter stake reduction signalling loss of confidence in turnaround
- Further deterioration in book value through accumulated losses
- Stock breaking below ₹30 support level (52-week low)
The forward outlook for Rishabh Digha Steel remains deeply concerning. With no visible catalyst for operational revival and a pattern of near-zero revenue generation extending across multiple quarters, the company appears to be in permanent decline rather than temporary distress. The absence of any management commentary on turnaround plans or strategic initiatives further undermines confidence in recovery prospects.
The Verdict: Avoid at All Costs
Score: 12/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The company exhibits virtually no operational activity, with quarterly sales of ₹0.08 crores representing a business in name only. The absurd P/E ratio of 191.15x and complete absence of institutional participation signal a value trap rather than opportunity. Fresh capital should be deployed in operationally viable businesses.
For Existing Holders: Exit at current levels despite tax implications. The stock has declined 29.76% over the past year and shows no signs of operational revival. With profits dependent entirely on other income rather than core business, and technical indicators uniformly bearish, holding represents hope over analysis. Consider tax-loss harvesting opportunities.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹25.00 (28.24% downside from current price of ₹34.84), reflecting book value discount appropriate for a non-operating entity.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
