Rishi Techtex Q2 FY26: Modest Growth Masks Persistent Profitability Concerns

Nov 13 2025 09:35 AM IST
share
Share Via
Rishi Techtex Ltd., a micro-cap packaging manufacturer specialising in HDPE/PP woven sacks and shade nets, continues to grapple with wafer-thin profitability despite posting steady revenue growth. The Mumbai-based company, with a market capitalisation of just ₹35.00 crores, trades at ₹46.76 per share as of November 13, 2025, down 1.93% on the day and languishing 35.50% below its 52-week high of ₹72.50. The stock's technical indicators have turned mildly bearish, reflecting investor concerns over the company's inability to translate top-line expansion into meaningful bottom-line growth.
Rishi Techtex Q2 FY26: Modest Growth Masks Persistent Profitability Concerns





Annual Revenue (FY25)

₹125.00 Cr

▲ 12.6% YoY



PAT Margin (FY25)

1.6%

▲ from 0.9%



Return on Equity

8.64%

Latest FY25



Stock Returns (1 Year)

-14.98%

vs Sensex +8.93%




Founded in 1984 and originally incorporated as Rishi Packers Limited, the company rebranded to Rishi Techtex Limited in March 2011 to reflect its focus on technical textiles. Operating two manufacturing facilities in the Union Territories of Daman and Dadra, Rishi Techtex serves the fertiliser and cement industries with its packaging solutions. However, the company's financial performance reveals a troubling pattern: whilst revenues have grown at a respectable 15.40% compound annual growth rate over five years, profitability remains stubbornly anaemic.



Financial Performance: Growth Without Profit Power



For the full year ended March 2025, Rishi Techtex reported net sales of ₹125.00 crores, marking a 12.6% year-on-year increase from ₹111.00 crores in FY24. This represents the company's sixth consecutive year of revenue growth, with sales climbing from ₹76.00 crores in FY20 to current levels. However, the top-line expansion tells only half the story.



Net profit for FY25 stood at ₹2.00 crores, doubling from ₹1.00 crore in the previous year. Whilst this represents 100% growth in absolute terms, the profit after tax margin remains desperately thin at 1.6%, barely improved from 0.9% in FY24. Operating profit (PBDIT) excluding other income reached ₹8.00 crores with a margin of 6.4%, marginally up from 6.3% the prior year but well below the 7.9% achieved in FY20.





Revenue FY25

₹125.00 Cr

▲ 12.6% YoY



Net Profit FY25

₹2.00 Cr

▲ 100% YoY



Operating Margin

6.4%

▲ from 6.3%



PAT Margin

1.6%

▲ from 0.9%




The company's cost structure reveals persistent pressure points. Total expenditure for FY25 reached ₹117.00 crores, representing 93.6% of revenues. Employee costs increased to ₹12.00 crores from ₹10.00 crores, whilst interest expenses remained flat at ₹2.00 crores and depreciation held steady at ₹2.00 crores. Notably, the company reported zero other income for FY25, indicating no cushion from non-operating sources.



Tax expenses surged to ₹1.00 crore in FY25 after three consecutive years of nil tax payments, resulting in an effective tax rate of 33.3% and further compressing net margins. The quality of earnings remains questionable given the razor-thin profitability and absence of any meaningful operating leverage despite consistent revenue growth.








































































Financial Year Net Sales (₹ Cr) YoY Growth Operating Profit (₹ Cr) Op. Margin PAT (₹ Cr) PAT Margin
Mar'25 125.00 +12.6% 8.00 6.4% 2.00 1.6%
Mar'24 111.00 +4.7% 7.00 6.3% 1.00 0.9%
Mar'23 106.00 +6.0% 5.00 4.7% 1.00 0.9%
Mar'22 100.00 +23.5% 6.00 6.0% 1.00 1.0%
Mar'21 81.00 +6.6% 4.00 4.9% 0.00 0.0%
Mar'20 76.00 6.00 7.9% 0.00 0.0%



Operational Challenges: Weak Returns on Capital Employed



The most concerning aspect of Rishi Techtex's financial profile lies in its capital efficiency metrics. The company's return on equity for FY25 improved to 8.64% from historically weak levels, but the five-year average ROE stands at just 4.13%. This places Rishi Techtex well below industry standards and signals fundamental issues in generating adequate returns for shareholders. Higher ROE typically indicates superior capital efficiency and profitability, yet this company struggles to cross even double-digit thresholds.



Return on capital employed tells a similar story. The latest ROCE of 10.02% represents an improvement from the five-year average of 8.00%, but remains inadequate for a manufacturing business. The company's EBIT to interest coverage ratio averages just 1.92 times, indicating limited cushion for servicing debt obligations. With average debt to EBITDA at 3.54 times and net debt to equity at 0.67, the leverage profile adds further pressure on already strained profitability.




Capital Efficiency Concern: Rishi Techtex's average ROCE of 8.00% over five years highlights weak capital productivity. The company requires ₹1.94 in sales to generate ₹1.00 of capital employed, yet struggles to convert this into meaningful profits. Operating leverage remains elusive despite consistent revenue growth, with margins failing to expand materially even as scale increases.




Balance sheet quality presents a mixed picture. Shareholder funds have grown steadily from ₹26.19 crores in FY20 to ₹34.14 crores in FY25, supported by retained earnings accumulation. Long-term debt has decreased from ₹6.10 crores in FY22 to ₹1.25 crores in FY25, demonstrating prudent deleveraging. However, current liabilities have swelled to ₹36.60 crores, driven by trade payables of ₹11.06 crores, raising questions about working capital management.



Fixed assets have declined from ₹25.23 crores in FY23 to ₹22.10 crores in FY25, suggesting limited capital expenditure for capacity expansion or modernisation. Current assets stand at ₹51.60 crores, but the company maintains negligible cash balances, indicating tight liquidity. Cash flow from operations reached ₹5.00 crores in FY25, consistent with prior years, but after accounting for investing and financing activities, net cash inflow remained flat at zero.



Industry Context: Packaging Sector Headwinds



The broader packaging industry in India has faced challenging conditions over the past year, with the sector delivering returns of -2.65%. Rishi Techtex has underperformed this already weak benchmark by 12.33 percentage points, posting a one-year return of -14.98% against the sector's -2.65%. This underperformance reflects both company-specific issues and broader industry pressures from raw material cost volatility and competitive intensity.



The company operates in a commoditised segment serving fertiliser and cement manufacturers, where pricing power remains limited and customer concentration poses risks. The lack of differentiation in HDPE/PP woven sacks means Rishi Techtex competes primarily on price, constraining margin expansion opportunities. Moreover, the company's micro-cap status with zero institutional holdings suggests limited analyst coverage and market attention.




Market Positioning Weakness


Rishi Techtex's market capitalisation of ₹35.00 crores positions it as one of the smallest players in the packaging sector. With no foreign institutional investor, mutual fund, or insurance company holdings, the stock lacks institutional support and suffers from poor liquidity. Average daily trading volumes remain minimal, making entry and exit difficult for investors beyond promoters and retail participants.




Peer Comparison: Lagging on Profitability Metrics



When benchmarked against packaging sector peers, Rishi Techtex's valuation appears superficially attractive but masks underlying quality concerns. The company trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 11.95 times, below the sector average and peers such as Rex Sealing (25.09x) and Rajeshwari Cans (15.56x). However, this discount reflects justified concerns about profitability sustainability rather than a compelling opportunity.



















































Company P/E (TTM) Price/Book ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Rishi Techtex 11.95 1.03 4.13 0.67
Rex Sealing 25.09 2.86 8.36 0.63
Rajeshwari Cans 15.56 2.49 10.44 0.78
Polyspin Exports 9.02 0.55 10.30 1.21
Innovative Tech NA (Loss Making) 1.46 2.17 0.59



Rishi Techtex's ROE of 4.13% ranks among the lowest in the peer group, trailing Rajeshwari Cans (10.44%), Polyspin Exports (10.30%), and Rex Sealing (8.36%). Only Innovative Technologies posts a weaker ROE at 2.17%, and that company is loss-making. The price-to-book ratio of 1.03 times appears reasonable, but given the sub-par return on equity, investors are essentially paying book value for a business that generates minimal returns on that capital.



Valuation Analysis: Discount Justified by Quality Concerns



At the current price of ₹46.76, Rishi Techtex trades at attractive valuation multiples on surface metrics. The P/E ratio of 11.95 times compares favourably to the industry P/E of 17 times, whilst the EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.27 times and EV/Sales of 0.42 times suggest the stock is inexpensive relative to revenues and cash generation. The PEG ratio of 0.14 indicates the stock trades well below its growth rate, typically a sign of value.



However, these metrics must be interpreted in context. The low multiples primarily reflect the market's assessment of poor profitability quality and weak competitive positioning. With PAT margins of just 1.6% and ROE below 9%, the business model lacks the characteristics that would justify premium valuations. The stock's price-to-book ratio of 1.03 times essentially values the company at replacement cost, offering no premium for franchise value or competitive advantages.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

11.95x

vs Industry 17x



EV/EBITDA

6.27x

Below peer avg



Price/Book

1.03x

Near book value



Dividend Yield

NA

No dividends




The stock's 52-week range of ₹41.00 to ₹72.50 demonstrates significant volatility, with the current price 35.50% below the high. Whilst this might appear to present a recovery opportunity, the technical deterioration and fundamental concerns suggest the lower price reflects appropriate risk assessment rather than temporary pessimism. The company's valuation grade of "Very Attractive" must be viewed sceptically given the quality shortcomings.



Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Confidence Building Marginally



Promoter holdings have increased modestly over recent quarters, rising from 34.45% in March 2025 to 35.07% in September 2025. This represents sequential increases of 0.29% in June 2025 and 0.33% in September 2025, suggesting some degree of promoter confidence in the business outlook. Key promoters include Abhishek Harshad Patel (14.06%), Smita Harshad Patel (8.61%), and Aakanksha H Patel (5.42%), along with group entity Rishi Laser Ltd (3.70%).

























































Quarter Promoter % QoQ Change FII % MF % Non-Institutional %
Sep'25 35.07 +0.33% 0.00 0.00 64.93
Jun'25 34.74 +0.29% 0.00 0.00 65.26
Mar'25 34.45 0.00 0.00 65.55
Dec'24 34.45 0.00 0.00 65.55
Sep'24 34.45 0.00 0.00 65.55



Critically, the company has zero institutional shareholding—no foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, insurance companies, or other domestic institutional investors hold stakes. The remaining 64.93% is classified as non-institutional holdings, primarily comprising retail investors. This absence of institutional participation reflects the stock's micro-cap status, poor liquidity, and lack of investment appeal to sophisticated investors who typically demand higher quality standards.



The positive aspect is the complete absence of promoter pledging, indicating the promoter group has not leveraged their holdings for external financing. However, with promoters holding just 35% and no institutional interest, the stock lacks the shareholder base typically associated with stability and long-term value creation.



Stock Performance: Significant Underperformance Across Timeframes



Rishi Techtex's stock has delivered disappointing returns across most meaningful timeframes, particularly over the past year. The one-year return of -14.98% compares unfavourably to the Sensex's gain of 8.93%, resulting in negative alpha of -23.91 percentage points. Year-to-date performance stands at -14.90%, again underperforming the Sensex's 8.31% gain by 23.21 percentage points.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +6.51% +1.58% +4.93%
1 Month -0.51% +2.80% -3.31%
3 Months -8.35% +5.08% -13.43%
6 Months -4.53% +4.29% -8.82%
1 Year -14.98% +8.93% -23.91%
2 Years +46.17% +30.33% +15.84%
3 Years +68.81% +36.95% +31.86%
5 Years +182.54% +94.81% +87.73%



The longer-term picture shows more encouraging results. Over three years, the stock has returned 68.81% versus the Sensex's 36.95%, generating positive alpha of 31.86 percentage points. The five-year return of 182.54% significantly outpaces the Sensex's 94.81% gain, with alpha of 87.73 percentage points. These longer-term returns reflect the company's revenue growth trajectory and recovery from pandemic-era lows.



However, recent momentum has turned decisively negative. The stock trades below all major moving averages—5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day—a technical configuration that typically signals sustained downtrends. With a beta of 1.50, the stock exhibits 50% higher volatility than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. The risk-adjusted return over one year stands at -0.24, indicating investors have been penalised for taking on the stock's elevated volatility of 62.44%.



Investment Thesis: Value Trap Characteristics Evident



Rishi Techtex presents a classic value trap scenario—superficially attractive valuation metrics masking fundamental quality issues that justify the discount. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 34 out of 100 places it firmly in "SELL" territory, reflecting the convergence of weak fundamentals, deteriorating technicals, and poor market performance despite attractive valuation grades.





Valuation Grade

Very Attractive




Quality Grade

Below Average




Financial Trend

Positive




Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish





The investment case rests on three positive factors: attractive valuation multiples, consistent revenue growth, and a positive short-term financial trend. However, these are overwhelmed by structural weaknesses: below-average quality with weak ROCE averaging 7.97%, persistent underperformance versus benchmarks, deteriorating technical indicators, and complete absence of institutional interest.




"When a stock trades at a discount to peers despite consistent revenue growth, the market is usually right about underlying quality concerns rather than wrong about value."


Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Consistent Revenue Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 15.40% demonstrates market acceptance

  • Deleveraging Progress: Long-term debt reduced from ₹6.10 crores to ₹1.25 crores

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares indicates financial stability at promoter level

  • Attractive Valuation: P/E of 11.95x below industry average of 17x

  • Rising Promoter Stake: Sequential increases in promoter holdings signal confidence




KEY CONCERNS



  • Anaemic Profitability: PAT margin of just 1.6% leaves no cushion for shocks

  • Weak Capital Returns: ROE of 4.13% and ROCE of 8.00% well below acceptable thresholds

  • Zero Institutional Holdings: Complete absence of sophisticated investor interest

  • Persistent Underperformance: -14.98% return versus Sensex +8.93% over one year

  • Poor Liquidity: Micro-cap status with minimal trading volumes

  • Commoditised Business: Limited pricing power in woven sacks segment

  • Technical Deterioration: Trading below all major moving averages





Outlook: What to Watch





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Material margin expansion above 3% PAT margin

  • Institutional investor participation

  • Sustained improvement in ROCE above 12%

  • Value-accretive capital allocation decisions




RED FLAGS



  • Further margin compression below 1% PAT

  • Renewed increase in debt levels

  • Promoter stake reduction

  • Sustained breakdown below ₹41 support level






The Verdict: Value Trap Masquerading as Opportunity


SELL

Score: 34/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation. The combination of weak profitability, poor capital returns, and absence of institutional interest suggests limited upside potential. Whilst valuation appears attractive, the quality concerns justify the discount. Better opportunities exist in the packaging sector with superior margin profiles and capital efficiency.


For Existing Holders: Consider exit on any technical bounce towards the ₹50-52 levels. The stock's inability to sustain gains above key moving averages and persistent fundamental weaknesses suggest limited prospects for meaningful rerating. The micro-cap nature and poor liquidity add execution risk to any exit strategy.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹42-44 (10-15% downside from current levels based on sustainable earnings power and peer multiples adjusted for quality differential)





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News