Rushil Decor Q2 FY26: Margin Pressures Persist Despite Revenue Recovery

The stock has been under severe pressure throughout 2025, declining 31.42% over the past year and trading at ₹25.25 as of November 07, 2025, significantly below its 52-week high of ₹38.07. The company's shares have underperformed the broader market by a staggering 36.04% over the 12-month period, reflecting investor concerns about deteriorating profitability and operational challenges in the highly competitive plywood and laminates sector.

Financial Performance: Recovery Masks Deeper Concerns

Rushil Decor's Q2 FY26 performance presents a tale of two narratives. On the surface, the company demonstrated strong sequential recovery, with net sales surging 31.53% quarter-on-quarter to ₹235.65 crores—the highest quarterly revenue in recent history. This rebound from Q1 FY26's depressed base of ₹179.16 crores suggests improved demand conditions or successful inventory liquidation. However, the year-on-year comparison reveals a more sobering reality, with revenue growth of just 2.27% indicating minimal market share gains or pricing power.

The profitability picture remains deeply concerning. Operating profit excluding other income stood at ₹22.49 crores in Q2 FY26, translating to an operating margin of 9.54%—a significant contraction from 12.86% in the corresponding quarter last year. This 332 basis point margin erosion reflects the company's inability to pass on rising input costs to customers in a competitive market environment. The gross profit margin compressed to 6.82% from 9.96% year-on-year, highlighting intense pressure on pricing and product mix.

The bottom line deterioration is particularly stark. Net profit of ₹5.38 crores represents a 53.18% year-on-year decline, whilst PAT margin compressed by 276 basis points to 2.18%. Interest costs remained elevated at ₹7.04 crores, consuming nearly 3% of revenues and highlighting the company's leveraged balance sheet. The tax rate of 31.87% in Q2 FY26 was significantly higher than the 26.09% rate in the year-ago quarter, further pressuring net profitability.

Operational Challenges: Capital Efficiency Remains Weak

Beyond the headline numbers, Rushil Decor's operational metrics paint a picture of a business struggling with capital efficiency. The company's average return on equity (ROE) of 9.88% lags significantly behind industry leaders, whilst the latest quarterly ROE has plummeted to just 3.26%—a concerning indicator of diminishing shareholder value creation. The average return on capital employed (ROCE) of 7.89% similarly underperforms, reflecting suboptimal utilisation of the company's asset base.

The balance sheet reveals a capital-intensive business model with fixed assets of ₹704.90 crores as of March 2025, representing the bulk of the company's ₹1,205.65 crores in total assets. With shareholder funds of ₹632.56 crores and long-term debt of ₹138.77 crores, the company maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.41—relatively modest but still requiring consistent cash generation to service. The average EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of 2.95 times provides limited cushion, particularly concerning given the recent profitability volatility.

Working capital management appears strained, with current liabilities of ₹381.98 crores including ₹220.50 crores in trade payables. The company's sales-to-capital employed ratio of 0.83 times suggests it requires more than ₹1 of capital to generate ₹1 of sales—an inefficient conversion that limits scalability. Cash flow from operations stood at ₹108.00 crores for FY25, but this was largely absorbed by investing activities of ₹97.00 crores, leaving minimal free cash flow for debt reduction or shareholder returns.

Industry Context: Navigating a Fragmented Market

The plywood boards and laminates industry in India remains highly fragmented and intensely competitive, characterised by low barriers to entry and significant pricing pressure. Rushil Decor operates in a market dominated by larger players like Century Plyboards, Greenlam Industries, and Greenply Industries, all of whom possess superior brand recognition, distribution networks, and economies of scale. The company's micro-cap status (₹736 crores market capitalisation) limits its ability to invest aggressively in brand building or capacity expansion relative to peers.

The sector has faced headwinds from volatile raw material costs, particularly resin and wood-based inputs, which have compressed margins across the industry. Additionally, the shift towards organised retail and e-commerce has intensified competition, favouring brands with stronger marketing capabilities and established dealer networks. Rushil Decor's revenue growth of just 2.27% year-on-year in Q2 FY26 suggests the company is struggling to gain market share in this challenging environment.

On a positive note, the long-term structural drivers for the industry remain intact. India's growing urbanisation, rising disposable incomes, and robust real estate activity—particularly in the affordable housing segment—should support steady demand for decorative laminates and particle boards. The government's focus on infrastructure development and the "Housing for All" initiative provide tailwinds. However, Rushil Decor's ability to capitalise on these opportunities depends critically on improving operational efficiency and restoring margin health.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness

A comparative analysis with industry peers reveals why Rushil Decor trades at a significant valuation discount. Whilst the company's price-to-earnings ratio of 35.91 times appears elevated in absolute terms, it is substantially lower than the peer group average of approximately 75 times. More tellingly, Rushil Decor's price-to-book value of 1.17 times is dramatically lower than peers like Century Plyboards (7.03x), Greenlam Industries (5.90x), and Stylam Industries (5.33x).

This valuation gap is justified by fundamental performance differentials. Rushil Decor's ROE of 9.88% trails the peer average of approximately 15%, reflecting inferior profitability and capital efficiency. The company's dividend yield of 0.39%, whilst higher than most peers, is supported by an unsustainably low payout ratio of just 5.94%, suggesting management's reluctance to commit to higher distributions given cash flow constraints.

The market is clearly pricing in continued operational challenges and limited near-term earnings growth potential. Whilst Rushil Decor's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.41 is more conservative than some peers, this financial prudence has not translated into superior returns. The company's positioning as the smallest player in the peer group (ranked #6 by market capitalisation) further limits its competitive advantages and bargaining power with suppliers and customers.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?

At the current market price of ₹25.25, Rushil Decor trades at a P/E ratio of 35.91 times trailing twelve-month earnings and a price-to-book value of 1.17 times. The company's enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 12.90 times and EV-to-sales ratio of 1.19 times appear reasonable in isolation. However, these multiples must be assessed in the context of deteriorating fundamentals and negative earnings momentum.

The stock's valuation grade has oscillated between "Attractive" and "Very Attractive" over recent months, currently sitting at "Attractive" as of November 2025. This assessment reflects the significant de-rating from the 52-week high of ₹38.07, with the stock now trading 33.67% below that peak. The book value per share of ₹21 provides some downside support, implying a price-to-book ratio of just 1.20 times at current levels.

However, the quality of earnings remains questionable. With PAT margins compressed to 2.18% in Q2 FY26 and ROE declining to 3.26%, the company is generating minimal returns on shareholder equity. The proprietary Mojo Score of 34 out of 100 with a "SELL" rating reflects the challenging combination of negative financial trends, bearish technical momentum, and only average business quality—despite the attractive valuation.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Minimal Institutional Interest

The shareholding structure of Rushil Decor reveals a promoter-dominated company with minimal institutional participation. Promoter holding stood at 55.10% as of September 2025, unchanged from the previous quarter but down from 56.37% in March 2025. The promoter group, led by Krupesh Ghanshyambhai Thakkar and family members, has maintained stable ownership with zero pledged shares—a positive indicator of promoter confidence and financial stability.

Foreign institutional investor (FII) holding increased marginally to 1.24% in September 2025 from 1.18% in the previous quarter, representing 10 FII entities. However, the absolute level of FII participation remains negligible, reflecting limited global investor interest in this micro-cap stock. More concerning is the complete absence of mutual fund and insurance company holdings, indicating that domestic institutional investors have no exposure to Rushil Decor.

The non-institutional shareholding of 43.60% comprises retail investors and non-institutional entities. The lack of institutional ownership is a significant red flag, as it suggests sophisticated investors have evaluated the company's prospects and chosen to remain on the sidelines. This absence of institutional support limits potential catalysts for re-rating and contributes to lower liquidity, with average daily volumes of just 66,986 shares.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes

Rushil Decor's stock price performance has been disappointing across nearly all timeframes, with particularly severe underperformance relative to the broader Sensex index. Over the past year, the stock has declined 31.42% whilst the Sensex gained 4.62%, resulting in negative alpha of 36.04 percentage points. This dramatic underperformance reflects investor concerns about the company's deteriorating profitability and competitive positioning.

The year-to-date performance is particularly alarming, with the stock down 24.45% in 2025 whilst the Sensex has gained 6.50%. The stock has also underperformed its sector benchmark, declining 31.42% versus the Plywood Boards/Laminates sector return of -14.44%—an underperformance of 16.98 percentage points. This suggests company-specific issues rather than sector-wide headwinds.

From a technical perspective, the stock is currently in a "Mildly Bearish" trend, trading below all key moving averages including the 5-day (₹26.07), 20-day (₹26.77), 50-day (₹28.01), 100-day (₹27.20), and 200-day (₹26.55) moving averages. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. With a risk-adjusted return of -0.66 over the past year and volatility of 47.65%, Rushil Decor falls squarely into the "High Risk, Low Return" category.

Investment Thesis: Weak Fundamentals Outweigh Valuation Appeal

The investment case for Rushil Decor rests on a single pillar: valuation. At 1.17 times book value and trading 33.67% below its 52-week high, the stock appears statistically cheap. However, this apparent bargain is undermined by deteriorating fundamentals across multiple dimensions. The company's Mojo Score of 34 out of 100 reflects the challenging combination of factors confronting investors.

The four-pillar Mojo analysis reveals significant weaknesses. First, near-term drivers are decidedly negative, with the quarterly financial trend rated as "Negative" and technicals showing "Mildly Bearish" momentum. Second, whilst business quality is rated "Average," this masks weak capital returns (ROE: 9.88%, ROCE: 7.89%) and high leverage (debt-to-EBITDA: 6.29). Third, valuation is rated "Attractive," providing the sole positive factor. Fourth, the overall assessment remains "Cautious" given the mixed signals.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch