Sangal Papers Q2 FY26: Margin Pressures Mount as Profitability Plunges 81% YoY

Nov 17 2025 11:54 PM IST
share
Share Via
Sangal Papers Ltd., a micro-cap newsprint manufacturer based in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, reported a concerning Q2 FY26 performance with net profit plummeting 81% year-on-year to just ₹0.30 crores from ₹1.56 crores in Q2 FY25. The company, which commands a modest market capitalisation of ₹25.00 crores, witnessed its profit after tax margin compress sharply to 0.62% from 3.05% in the year-ago quarter, highlighting severe operational pressures in an increasingly competitive paper industry landscape.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.30 Cr

▼ 81% YoY



Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹48.35 Cr

▼ 5.55% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

2.38%

▼ 413 bps YoY



Return on Equity

6.00%

Below Average




The September 2025 quarter results reveal a company grappling with fundamental operational challenges. Despite a modest sequential revenue increase of 1.64% to ₹48.35 crores from ₹47.57 crores in Q1 FY26, the year-on-year comparison paints a troubling picture with top-line declining 5.55%. More concerning is the dramatic erosion in profitability metrics, with operating profit margin (excluding other income) collapsing to a multi-quarter low of 2.38% from 6.51% in Q2 FY25—a staggering compression of 413 basis points that signals severe pricing pressures or escalating input costs.









































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin
Sep'25 48.35 +1.64% 0.30 -62.50% 2.38%
Jun'25 47.57 +1.62% 0.80 +86.05% 4.16%
Mar'25 46.81 +18.03% 0.43 +152.94% 3.20%
Dec'24 39.66 -22.52% 0.17 -89.10% 2.75%
Sep'24 51.19 +20.14% 1.56 +132.84% 6.51%
Jun'24 42.61 -12.47% 0.67 -22.09% 4.44%
Mar'24 48.68 0.86 3.94%



Financial Performance: Profitability Under Siege



Sangal Papers' Q2 FY26 financial performance reveals a company struggling to maintain profitability amidst challenging market conditions. Net sales of ₹48.35 crores, whilst showing a marginal 1.64% sequential improvement from Q1 FY26's ₹47.57 crores, represents a concerning 5.55% year-on-year decline from ₹51.19 crores in Q2 FY24. This revenue contraction, coupled with margin compression, has created a perfect storm for the bottom line.



The operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) stood at a meagre ₹1.15 crores in Q2 FY26, translating to an operating margin of just 2.38%—the lowest recorded in the trailing seven quarters. This represents a dramatic deterioration from the 6.51% operating margin achieved in the year-ago quarter and even falls short of Q1 FY26's 4.16%. The 178-basis-point sequential decline and 413-basis-point year-on-year compression underscore fundamental operational challenges that extend beyond normal business cyclicality.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹48.35 Cr

▼ 5.55% YoY | ▲ 1.64% QoQ



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.30 Cr

▼ 80.77% YoY | ▼ 62.50% QoQ



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

2.38%

▼ 413 bps YoY | ▼ 178 bps QoQ



PAT Margin

0.62%

▼ 243 bps YoY | ▼ 106 bps QoQ




Profit before tax collapsed 82.28% year-on-year to ₹0.42 crores from ₹2.37 crores, whilst sequentially declining 61.47% from Q1 FY26's ₹1.09 crores. After accounting for tax expenses of ₹0.12 crores (effective tax rate of 28.57%), net profit settled at ₹0.30 crores, yielding an anaemic PAT margin of 0.62% compared to 3.05% in the year-ago period. The half-yearly performance for H1 FY26 shows net profit of ₹1.10 crores, representing a 50.67% decline from the corresponding period, reinforcing the negative trajectory.



Employee costs remained relatively stable at ₹2.10 crores in Q2 FY26, marginally higher than ₹2.08 crores in Q1 FY26 but lower than ₹2.16 crores in Q2 FY24. Interest expenses have shown consistency at ₹0.56 crores for both Q2 and Q1 FY26, whilst depreciation stood at ₹0.49 crores. The company generated ₹0.32 crores in other income during Q2 FY26, more than doubling from ₹0.15 crores in the previous quarter, providing some cushion to the operating performance.



Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and High Leverage



Sangal Papers' operational metrics paint a picture of a company struggling with fundamental efficiency and capital productivity issues. The average return on capital employed (ROCE) stands at a weak 6.60%, with the latest reported ROCE at an even more concerning 5.34%. This low level of return indicates that the company is generating insufficient profits relative to the capital invested in the business, raising questions about the sustainability of its competitive position in the paper manufacturing sector.



Return on equity (ROE) tells a similar story, averaging 6.00% over the long term and declining to just 3.74% in the latest period. These subpar returns—significantly below the cost of capital for most investors—suggest that the company is destroying shareholder value rather than creating it. For context, quality manufacturing businesses typically generate ROE in the range of 15-20%, highlighting the substantial performance gap Sangal Papers must bridge to be considered an attractive investment proposition.




⚠️ Critical Concerns: Capital Efficiency & Leverage


Weak ROCE: At 5.34%, the company generates barely adequate returns on deployed capital, suggesting operational inefficiencies or intense competitive pressures limiting pricing power.


High Debt Burden: Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.35x indicates elevated leverage, whilst EBIT-to-interest coverage of just 2.12x leaves minimal margin for error if profitability deteriorates further.


Moderate Net Leverage: Net debt-to-equity ratio of 0.57 suggests manageable but not insignificant financial risk given the weak profitability profile.




The company's leverage metrics warrant close attention. With an average debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.35x, Sangal Papers carries a relatively high debt burden for a company generating such modest cash flows. The EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of 2.12x provides some comfort but leaves limited cushion should operational performance deteriorate further. Long-term debt stood at ₹9.36 crores as of March 2025, whilst shareholder funds totalled ₹44.34 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 0.21 on a long-term basis, though net debt-to-equity averages 0.57 when considering working capital dynamics.



Balance sheet quality presents a mixed picture. Fixed assets increased to ₹39.50 crores in FY25 from ₹34.97 crores in FY24, suggesting ongoing capital expenditure, whilst current assets stood at ₹52.84 crores against current liabilities of ₹33.08 crores, providing a current ratio of approximately 1.60x. However, the company maintains no investments on its balance sheet, limiting financial flexibility. Working capital management appears adequate, with sales-to-capital-employed averaging 2.68x, though this metric has likely weakened given recent revenue pressures.



Industry Context: Paper Sector Headwinds



The paper manufacturing industry in India has faced considerable headwinds over recent quarters, with fluctuating raw material costs, particularly for recycled paper and pulp, impacting margins across the sector. Sangal Papers, as a newsprint manufacturer, operates in a particularly challenging segment given the secular decline in print media consumption and the shift towards digital alternatives. This structural challenge adds another layer of difficulty beyond cyclical industry pressures.



The company's 5-year sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.00% demonstrates historical growth capability, though this appears to be moderating based on recent quarterly trends. The 5-year EBIT growth CAGR of 7.83% lags revenue growth, indicating margin compression has been a persistent theme rather than a recent phenomenon. This suggests that competitive intensity or structural cost pressures have been building over an extended period.




Market Positioning: Micro-Cap Vulnerability


With a market capitalisation of just ₹25.00 crores, Sangal Papers operates at the smaller end of the listed paper manufacturers. This micro-cap status limits access to capital markets for growth funding and reduces negotiating leverage with suppliers and customers. The company's stock has delivered a 1-year return of -29.99%, underperforming both the Sensex (+9.48%) and the broader Paper, Forest & Jute Products sector (-0.20%) by 29.79 percentage points, reflecting investor concerns about its deteriorating fundamentals.




Annual financial data reveals revenue peaked at ₹226.00 crores in FY23 before declining to ₹190.00 crores in FY24 and further to ₹180.00 crores in FY25—a 5.30% year-on-year decline that has continued into FY26. Operating profit (excluding other income) improved slightly to ₹7.00 crores in FY25 from ₹6.00 crores in FY24, but this represents a margin of just 3.90%, barely sufficient to cover interest and depreciation costs. Net profit for FY25 stood at ₹2.00 crores, matching FY24 levels but down from ₹3.00 crores in FY23.



Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Weakness



Comparative analysis against peer companies in the paper manufacturing sector reveals why Sangal Papers trades at a significant valuation discount. Whilst the company's price-to-earnings ratio of 14.97x appears reasonable on an absolute basis, it must be contextualised against the weak underlying profitability and return metrics.


























































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Sangal Papers 14.97 0.56 6.00 0.57
Kay Power & Paper 30.88 0.66 49.63 0.04
Abril Paper 23.66 3.17 0.00 -0.11
Aten Papers 3.74 0.59 0.00 -0.07
Cella Space 29.64 -1.38 0.00 -2.78
Bangalore Fort 51.39 3.52 2.95 1.07



Sangal Papers' price-to-book value of 0.56x appears attractive on the surface, trading below its book value of ₹335.48 per share. However, this discount exists for good reason—the company's 6.00% ROE falls far short of peers like Kay Power & Paper, which generates an impressive 49.63% ROE whilst commanding a P/BV of 0.66x. The market is effectively pricing in the low return profile and questioning whether the book value truly represents recoverable economic value.



The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.57 sits in the middle of the peer range, neither a significant strength nor weakness relative to competitors. However, when combined with weak profitability, this moderate leverage becomes more concerning than it would be for a higher-quality business. Kay Power & Paper, for instance, operates with minimal debt (0.04 debt-to-equity) whilst generating substantially superior returns, highlighting the quality differential.



Valuation Analysis: Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness



At the current market price of ₹196.00, Sangal Papers trades at valuation multiples that appear optically attractive but reflect genuine concerns about the business quality and earnings sustainability. The P/E ratio of 14.97x sits below the industry average of 17x, whilst the price-to-book value of 0.56x suggests the market values the company's assets at a 44% discount to their stated book value.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

14.97x

Below Industry Avg



Price to Book Value

0.56x

44% Discount



EV/EBITDA

9.01x

Moderate



Mojo Score

36/100

SELL Rating




The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 9.01x and EV-to-EBIT of 13.49x appear reasonable for a manufacturing business, but these metrics must be assessed in the context of declining margins and weak cash generation. The EV-to-sales ratio of 0.28x highlights that the market values the entire enterprise at less than one-third of annual revenue, reflecting scepticism about the company's ability to convert sales into sustainable profits.



The stock's 52-week range of ₹151.10 to ₹325.00 illustrates significant volatility, with the current price sitting 39.69% below the 52-week high achieved earlier in the year. This decline reflects deteriorating fundamentals that became apparent through FY26. The valuation grade has fluctuated between "Fair", "Attractive", and "Very Attractive" over recent months, currently classified as "Very Attractive" since August 2025—though this attractiveness is largely a function of price decline rather than improving fundamentals.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Concerning Promoter Pledge



The shareholding structure of Sangal Papers has remained remarkably stable over recent quarters, with promoter holding steady at 38.76% across the last five quarters. The promoter group is led by the Sangal family, with Amit Sangal (9.26%), Renu Sangal (8.61%), Himanshu Sangal (8.26%), and Charu Sangal (7.15%) being the major stakeholders. This concentrated family ownership provides management continuity but also limits free float and institutional participation.

























































Quarter Promoter FII Mutual Fund Insurance Non-Institutional
Sep'25 38.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 60.52%
Jun'25 38.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 60.52%
Mar'25 38.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 60.52%
Dec'24 38.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 60.52%
Sep'24 38.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 60.52%



A significant red flag emerges from the promoter pledging data, which indicates 38.76% of shares are pledged—effectively the entire promoter holding. This high level of pledging raises serious concerns about the financial health of the promoter group and their confidence in the business. Pledged shares create risks of forced selling if margin calls are triggered during periods of stock price weakness, potentially creating a downward spiral.



The complete absence of institutional investors—zero foreign institutional investor (FII) holding, zero mutual fund participation, and zero insurance company investment—speaks volumes about the company's attractiveness to sophisticated investors. Institutional investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence and their collective absence suggests concerns about corporate governance, growth prospects, or financial transparency. The 60.52% non-institutional holding comprises primarily retail investors who may lack the resources for detailed fundamental analysis.



Stock Performance: Sustained Underperformance



Sangal Papers' stock performance over the past year has been decidedly negative, with the shares declining 29.99% compared to a 9.48% gain in the Sensex, resulting in negative alpha of -39.47 percentage points. This underperformance extends across multiple timeframes, with the stock down 31.23% year-to-date whilst the broader market gained 8.36%—a 39.59 percentage point underperformance that reflects investor concerns about deteriorating fundamentals.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -2.12% +0.96% -3.08%
1 Month -1.31% +0.86% -2.17%
3 Month +2.62% +4.18% -1.56%
6 Month -0.20% +2.85% -3.05%
YTD -31.23% +8.36% -39.59%
1 Year -29.99% +9.48% -39.47%
3 Years +3.65% +37.31% -33.66%
5 Years +154.55% +91.65% +62.90%



The stock's technical profile has shifted to "Mildly Bullish" as of November 17, 2025, though this represents a marginal improvement from the "Mildly Bearish" trend that prevailed previously. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹195.90), 20-day (₹205.78), 50-day (₹220.92), 100-day (₹204.89), and 200-day (₹210.92)—indicating sustained selling pressure and lack of conviction amongst buyers.



Risk-adjusted metrics paint an unfavourable picture, with the stock categorised as "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" given its 1-year absolute return of -29.99% and high volatility of 70.12%. The negative risk-adjusted return of -0.43 compares poorly to the Sensex's positive risk-adjusted return of 0.77, highlighting that investors have been penalised rather than rewarded for taking on the stock's elevated volatility. The beta of 1.50 indicates the stock is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both upside and downside movements.



Longer-term returns provide some perspective, with the stock delivering 154.55% over five years and 345.45% over ten years, both outperforming the Sensex substantially. However, these historical gains appear increasingly disconnected from current operational reality, with recent performance deterioration suggesting the business model may be facing structural rather than cyclical challenges.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags



The investment case for Sangal Papers is undermined by multiple fundamental weaknesses that collectively justify caution. The proprietary Mojo scoring system assigns the stock an overall score of just 36 out of 100, placing it firmly in "SELL" territory with a recommendation to consider exit opportunities. This low score reflects the convergence of negative factors across valuation, quality, financial trends, and technical indicators.





Valuation Grade

Very Attractive

✓ Positive



Quality Grade

Below Average

✗ Negative



Financial Trend

Negative

✗ Negative



Technical Trend

Mildly Bullish

Mixed




Whilst the valuation grade appears "Very Attractive", this attractiveness is a function of price decline reflecting deteriorating fundamentals rather than a genuine bargain opportunity. The quality grade of "Below Average" accurately captures the company's weak return metrics, with average ROCE of 6.60% and ROE of 6.00% falling far short of acceptable thresholds for manufacturing businesses. The financial trend is classified as "Negative" based on the latest quarterly results, with PAT for H1 FY26 declining 50.67% year-on-year.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





✓ Key Strengths



Attractive Valuation Multiples: P/E of 14.97x and P/BV of 0.56x provide potential upside if operations stabilise, though this remains a significant "if".


Established Manufacturing Base: Operating since 1980 with current capacity of 36,000 TPA provides infrastructure foundation for potential turnaround.


Stable Shareholding: Consistent promoter holding of 38.76% provides management continuity, though pledging remains a concern.


Historical Growth Track Record: 5-year sales CAGR of 13.00% demonstrates past capability to grow the business, though recent trends have reversed.


Adequate Liquidity: Current ratio of approximately 1.60x suggests sufficient working capital to meet near-term obligations.



⚠️ Key Concerns



Collapsing Profitability: Net profit down 81% YoY to ₹0.30 crores with PAT margin at just 0.62%, raising questions about business viability.


Severe Margin Compression: Operating margin at multi-quarter low of 2.38%, down 413 bps YoY, indicating fundamental operational challenges.


Weak Return Metrics: ROE of 6.00% and ROCE of 6.60% far below acceptable thresholds, suggesting value destruction rather than creation.


100% Promoter Pledging: Entire promoter holding of 38.76% pledged creates risk of forced selling and questions promoter confidence.


Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance participation signals quality concerns amongst sophisticated investors.


High Leverage Burden: Debt-to-EBITDA of 4.35x combined with weak profitability limits financial flexibility and increases vulnerability to shocks.


Structural Industry Headwinds: Newsprint segment faces secular decline from digital media shift, creating long-term revenue pressures beyond cyclical factors.




Outlook: What to Watch





Positive Catalysts



Margin Recovery: Any improvement in operating margins back towards 4-5% levels would signal operational stabilisation.


Revenue Stabilisation: Arresting the top-line decline and returning to modest growth trajectory.


Promoter Unpledging: Reduction in pledged shares would remove overhang and signal improved promoter financial health.


Institutional Entry: Any mutual fund or insurance participation would validate improved quality perception.



Red Flags



Further Margin Erosion: Operating margins falling below 2% would raise serious viability concerns.


Continued Profit Decline: Another quarter of sequential profit deterioration would confirm negative trend.


Increased Pledging: Any increase in promoter pledging beyond current 38.76% would be extremely concerning.


Working Capital Stress: Deterioration in current ratio or increase in debtor days signalling cash flow pressures.


Covenant Breaches: Any debt covenant violations that could trigger accelerated repayment requirements.





"With profitability down 81% year-on-year, operating margins at multi-quarter lows, and 100% of promoter shares pledged, Sangal Papers faces fundamental challenges that extend beyond normal business cyclicality."


The path forward for Sangal Papers requires urgent operational improvements to arrest the margin decline and stabilise profitability. Management must address the cost structure challenges that have driven operating margins to unsustainable levels whilst simultaneously navigating the structural headwinds facing the newsprint segment. The complete absence of institutional investors and high promoter pledging create additional concerns about governance and financial health that must be addressed to restore investor confidence.



For investors, the key question is whether the current valuation discount adequately compensates for the fundamental risks. Whilst the stock trades at 0.56x book value and appears statistically cheap, this discount exists for valid reasons—weak returns, declining profitability, high leverage, and structural industry challenges. The quality of the business does not support a "value trap" thesis, and the negative financial trend suggests conditions may deteriorate further before any stabilisation occurs.




The Verdict: Avoid Until Fundamentals Stabilise


SELL

Score: 36/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions given the confluence of negative factors—collapsing profitability, weak return metrics, 100% promoter pledging, and zero institutional interest. The valuation discount does not adequately compensate for fundamental risks and deteriorating trends. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of margin improvement and profit stabilisation before considering entry.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure or exiting positions, particularly if holding unrealised losses. The negative financial trend, severe margin compression, and high promoter pledging create meaningful downside risks. Any technical bounce towards ₹210-220 levels (near moving averages) could provide exit opportunities with reduced losses. Only long-term holders with high risk tolerance should maintain positions, and even then, close monitoring of quarterly results is essential.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹150-170 (15-23% downside risk from current levels) based on sustainable earnings power of ₹1.50-2.00 crores annually and P/E multiple of 12-14x appropriate for a below-average quality business facing structural headwinds.





Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News