Sayaji Hotels Q3 FY26: Losses Deepen Amid Margin Pressure and Rising Costs

Feb 10 2026 08:07 PM IST
share
Share Via
Sayaji Hotels Ltd., a micro-cap hospitality player operating hotels in Vadodara and other cities, reported a consolidated net loss of ₹9.85 crores for Q3 FY26 (October-December 2025), marking a significant deterioration from the ₹6.38 crore profit recorded in Q3 FY25. The loss widened by 92.01% sequentially from the ₹5.13 crore loss in Q2 FY26, reflecting mounting operational challenges despite revenue growth.
Sayaji Hotels Q3 FY26: Losses Deepen Amid Margin Pressure and Rising Costs

With a market capitalisation of ₹477.00 crores, the stock has declined 0.62% in the trading session following the results announcement, closing at ₹279.25 on February 10, 2026. The company's shares have underperformed significantly over the past year, posting a negative return of 5.77% compared to the Sensex's 9.01% gain, though outperforming the broader Hotels & Resorts sector which declined 9.71%.

Consolidated Net Loss (Q3 FY26)
-₹9.85 Cr
▼ 657.69% YoY
Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹31.67 Cr
▲ 12.58% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
14.37%
▼ 460 bps YoY
Return on Equity
-8.86%
Negative profitability

The results paint a concerning picture for the Vadodara-based hotel chain, which has struggled with profitability despite posting double-digit revenue growth. The company's operating margins have compressed sharply, whilst employee costs and depreciation have surged, eroding profitability. The transition from profit to loss in the latest quarter raises serious questions about the sustainability of the business model and management's ability to navigate the current operating environment.

Financial Performance: Revenue Growth Fails to Translate into Profits

In Q3 FY26, Sayaji Hotels reported net sales of ₹31.67 crores, representing a 12.58% year-on-year increase from ₹28.13 crores in Q3 FY25. However, this growth came at a steep cost, as the company posted a consolidated net loss of ₹9.85 crores compared to a loss of ₹1.30 crores in the same quarter last year—a deterioration of 657.69%. On a sequential basis, the loss widened by 92.01% from ₹5.13 crores in Q2 FY26, indicating accelerating financial distress.

The revenue decline of 10.86% quarter-on-quarter from ₹35.53 crores in Q2 FY26 reflects typical seasonality in the hospitality sector, where the October-December quarter often sees softer demand compared to the July-September period. However, the magnitude of margin compression suggests deeper structural issues beyond normal seasonal patterns.

Metric Q3 FY26 Q2 FY26 Q3 FY25 QoQ Change YoY Change
Net Sales ₹31.67 Cr ₹35.53 Cr ₹28.13 Cr -10.86% +12.58%
Operating Profit (Excl OI) ₹4.55 Cr ₹8.42 Cr ₹5.32 Cr -45.96% -14.47%
Operating Margin (Excl OI) 14.37% 23.70% 18.91% -933 bps -454 bps
Consolidated Net Profit -₹9.85 Cr -₹5.13 Cr -₹1.30 Cr -92.01% -657.69%
PAT Margin -31.10% -14.44% -4.62% -1,666 bps -2,648 bps

The operating profit excluding other income collapsed to ₹4.55 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹8.42 crores in the previous quarter, a decline of 45.96%. Year-on-year, operating profit fell 14.47% despite the revenue increase, indicating severe margin pressure. The operating margin contracted to 14.37% from 23.70% in Q2 FY26 and 18.91% in Q3 FY25, representing a compression of 933 basis points sequentially and 454 basis points annually.

Employee costs surged to ₹11.45 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹8.06 crores in Q3 FY25, an increase of 42.06%. This represents 36.16% of net sales, up from 28.65% a year ago, highlighting significant wage inflation or staffing inefficiencies. Depreciation also rose sharply to ₹6.38 crores from ₹3.36 crores year-on-year, suggesting recent capital expenditure or asset revaluations that have not yet translated into revenue growth.

Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹31.67 Cr
▼ 10.86% QoQ | ▲ 12.58% YoY
Consolidated Net Loss
-₹9.85 Cr
▼ 92.01% QoQ | ▼ 657.69% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
14.37%
▼ 933 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
-31.10%
▼ 1,666 bps QoQ

Operational Challenges: Margin Erosion and Cost Pressures Mount

The most alarming aspect of Sayaji Hotels' Q3 FY26 performance is the severe margin compression despite revenue growth. The company's inability to convert top-line expansion into bottom-line profitability suggests fundamental operational inefficiencies or an unsustainable cost structure. The operating margin of 14.37% in Q3 FY26 is significantly below the company's historical average of 29.30% achieved in FY23, indicating a sharp deterioration in operational efficiency.

Return on equity has turned deeply negative at -8.86%, down from an average of 7.00% over the past five years. This represents a critical concern for shareholders, as it indicates the company is destroying capital rather than generating returns. The negative ROE is particularly troubling given the company's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.11, which suggests the business is leveraged whilst failing to generate adequate returns to service that debt.

⚠️ Critical Operational Red Flags

Employee Cost Explosion: Employee costs surged to 36.16% of sales in Q3 FY26 from 28.65% in Q3 FY25, indicating either wage inflation, overstaffing, or revenue productivity issues.

Depreciation Surge: Depreciation nearly doubled year-on-year to ₹6.38 crores, suggesting recent capital investments that have not yet yielded revenue benefits.

Negative ROE: Return on equity of -8.86% indicates capital destruction, particularly concerning given the company's leverage of 1.11x debt-to-equity.

Interest Coverage Deterioration: With EBIT-to-interest coverage averaging just 2.54x over five years, the company has limited cushion to absorb further profit declines.

The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) stands at just 4.56% on a latest basis, far below the cost of capital and indicating poor asset utilisation. The average ROCE of 8.69% over the past five years is also weak, suggesting persistent challenges in generating adequate returns from deployed capital. For a capital-intensive hospitality business, these metrics raise serious questions about the viability of the current operating model.

The balance sheet shows shareholder funds of ₹159.52 crores as of March 2025, with long-term debt of ₹13.24 crores. Whilst the debt levels are not excessive in absolute terms, the company's inability to generate profits means that even modest leverage becomes a burden. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.14x on average suggests the company would require more than three years of current EBITDA to repay its debt, assuming no further deterioration.

Quarterly Trend Analysis: Persistent Losses Across Multiple Quarters

Examining the quarterly trend reveals that Sayaji Hotels has struggled with profitability throughout FY26. The company reported losses in both Q2 FY26 (₹5.13 crores) and Q3 FY26 (₹9.85 crores), following a marginal profit of ₹1.73 crores in Q1 FY26 (March quarter). This pattern suggests the losses are not merely seasonal but reflect deeper structural issues.

Quarter Net Sales Operating Margin Consolidated Net Profit PAT Margin
Sep'25 (Q3 FY26) ₹31.67 Cr 14.37% -₹9.85 Cr -31.10%
Jun'25 (Q2 FY26) ₹35.53 Cr 23.70% -₹5.13 Cr -14.44%
Mar'25 (Q1 FY26) ₹39.65 Cr 22.47% -₹4.28 Cr -10.79%
Dec'24 (Q4 FY25) ₹42.54 Cr 31.08% ₹6.38 Cr 15.00%
Sep'24 (Q3 FY25) ₹28.13 Cr 18.91% -₹1.30 Cr -4.62%
Jun'24 (Q2 FY25) ₹27.96 Cr 29.26% ₹1.27 Cr 4.54%
Mar'24 (Q1 FY25) ₹33.76 Cr 37.00% ₹8.01 Cr 23.73%

The data shows a clear deterioration in margins over time. Operating margins have compressed from 37.00% in Q1 FY25 to just 14.37% in Q3 FY26, whilst PAT margins have swung from a positive 23.73% to a deeply negative -31.10% over the same period. This trend is unsustainable and requires urgent management intervention.

Industry Context: Hospitality Sector Faces Headwinds

The broader Hotels & Resorts sector has faced challenges over the past year, with the sector declining 9.71% compared to the Sensex's 9.01% gain. Sayaji Hotels' 5.77% decline over the same period actually represents relative outperformance of 3.94% versus the sector, though this provides little comfort given the absolute losses being reported.

The hospitality industry is characterised by high fixed costs, making it particularly vulnerable to revenue fluctuations. Employee costs and depreciation remain constant regardless of occupancy rates, meaning that any decline in revenue or pricing power flows directly to the bottom line. Sayaji Hotels' margin compression suggests the company is facing both revenue pressure (lower occupancy or room rates) and cost inflation, a particularly toxic combination.

Sector Dynamics: Capital Intensity Meets Cyclicality

The hotel industry requires significant upfront capital investment in property, plant, and equipment, which generates substantial depreciation charges. Sayaji Hotels' depreciation of ₹6.38 crores in Q3 FY26 represents 20.15% of net sales, highlighting the capital-intensive nature of the business. Unlike asset-light business models, hotels cannot easily scale back costs during downturns, making profitability highly sensitive to occupancy rates and average room rates (ARR). The company's inability to maintain margins despite revenue growth suggests it may be sacrificing pricing power to maintain occupancy, a concerning sign in a competitive market.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Disconnect Amid Operational Underperformance

Comparing Sayaji Hotels to its peers in the Hotels & Resorts sector reveals a mixed picture. The company's price-to-book ratio of 3.36x is below the peer average of approximately 4.90x, suggesting the stock trades at a relative discount. However, this discount appears justified given the company's negative profitability and weak return metrics.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield
Sayaji Hotels NA (Loss Making) 3.36x 7.00% 1.11 NA
Mac Charles(I) NA (Loss Making) 12.44x 0.00% 15.38 NA
Praveg NA (Loss Making) 1.77x 28.25% 0.22 0.33%
HLV 58.26x 1.28x 2.57% -0.26 NA
Kamat Hotels 19.25x 2.02x 15.66% 0.77 NA
Advani Hotels 21.84x 7.08x 30.13% -0.71 5.08%

Sayaji Hotels' ROE of 7.00% (five-year average) lags significantly behind peers like Praveg (28.25%) and Advani Hotels (30.13%), though it outperforms Mac Charles and HLV. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.11 is moderate compared to Mac Charles' highly leveraged 15.38, but higher than most other peers. The lack of dividend payments reflects the company's inability to generate consistent profits.

The valuation discount appears rational given the operational underperformance. Investors are not willing to pay premium multiples for a business generating negative returns on equity and posting widening losses. Until the company demonstrates a credible path back to profitability, the valuation is likely to remain depressed.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Mask Fundamental Concerns

At the current price of ₹279.25, Sayaji Hotels trades at a price-to-book value of 3.36x, which appears attractive relative to historical levels and peer comparisons. The stock's valuation grade is classified as "Attractive," having oscillated between "Attractive" and "Fair" in recent months. However, this attractive valuation must be viewed in the context of the company's deteriorating fundamentals.

The company's enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 18.53x and EV-to-EBIT of 46.56x appear elevated, particularly given the negative earnings trajectory. The EV-to-sales ratio of 4.35x suggests investors are paying a significant premium for each rupee of revenue, despite the company's inability to convert that revenue into profits. These valuation metrics highlight the disconnect between market pricing and operational reality.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
NA (Loss Making)
Negative earnings
Price to Book Value
3.36x
Below peer average
EV/EBITDA
18.53x
Elevated multiple
Dividend Yield
NA
No dividends paid

The stock's 52-week range of ₹240.00 to ₹322.25 shows significant volatility, with the current price sitting 13.34% below the high and 16.35% above the low. This volatility reflects investor uncertainty about the company's prospects and the lack of a clear earnings trajectory.

"Attractive valuations mean little when the underlying business is destroying capital—Sayaji Hotels must demonstrate operational improvement before the market rewards the stock with a re-rating."

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Confidence Amidst Institutional Apathy

The shareholding pattern reveals a promoter-dominated structure with limited institutional participation. As of December 2025, promoter holding stood at 66.82%, up from 65.84% in the previous quarter, suggesting promoters have increased their stake despite the operational challenges. This sequential increase of 0.98% could be interpreted as a vote of confidence from insiders, though it may also reflect a lack of external investor interest.

Shareholder Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter Holding 66.82% 65.84% 65.84% 74.95% +0.98%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund Holding 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.00%
Insurance Holdings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII Holdings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 33.15% 34.14% 34.14% 25.03% -0.99%

The near-total absence of institutional investors is striking. Foreign institutional investors (FII) hold 0.00%, whilst mutual funds hold a negligible 0.02%. Insurance companies and other domestic institutional investors (DII) also have zero exposure to the stock. This institutional apathy reflects the company's micro-cap status, poor liquidity, and weak fundamentals. With just one mutual fund holding shares, the stock lacks the institutional support that typically provides stability and research coverage.

The non-institutional shareholding of 33.15% represents primarily retail investors, who have marginally reduced their stake by 0.99% in the latest quarter. The lack of institutional buying suggests sophisticated investors see limited value in the current risk-reward profile, despite the apparently attractive valuation multiples.

Stock Performance: Underperformance Across All Timeframes

Sayaji Hotels' stock performance has been disappointing across virtually all timeframes, with the stock generating negative alpha versus the Sensex in every period examined. Over the past year, the stock declined 5.77% whilst the Sensex gained 9.01%, resulting in negative alpha of 14.78 percentage points. This underperformance extends across longer periods, with the stock down 14.73% over two years compared to the Sensex's 17.71% gain.

Period Sayaji Hotels Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +2.72% +0.64% +2.08%
1 Month +3.37% +0.83% +2.54%
3 Months +3.56% +0.88% +2.68%
6 Months -0.64% +5.53% -6.17%
YTD -6.20% -1.11% -5.09%
1 Year -5.77% +9.01% -14.78%
2 Years -14.73% +17.71% -32.44%
3 Years -19.62% +38.88% -58.50%
5 Years +25.22% +64.25% -39.03%

The only silver lining is the recent short-term performance, with the stock generating positive alpha of 2.08% over the past week and 2.54% over the past month. However, this recent strength appears to be a temporary bounce rather than a sustainable trend reversal, particularly given the deteriorating fundamentals revealed in the latest quarterly results.

The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility, with movements 50% more volatile than the broader market. Combined with negative returns, this creates a "high risk, low return" profile that is unattractive for most investors. The risk-adjusted return of -0.13 over the past year compares unfavourably to the Sensex's 0.78, highlighting the poor risk-reward trade-off.

Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal

The investment thesis for Sayaji Hotels rests on four key pillars: valuation, quality, financial trend, and technical positioning. Whilst the valuation appears attractive on surface metrics, the other three pillars present significant concerns that outweigh this apparent cheapness.

Valuation Grade
Attractive
P/BV: 3.36x
Quality Grade
Average
ROE: 7.00%
Financial Trend
Flat
Recent deterioration
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish
Below key MAs

The quality assessment of "Average" masks some concerning underlying metrics. The company's five-year sales growth of just 0.36% is anaemic, whilst the EBIT-to-interest coverage of 2.54x provides limited cushion for further profit deterioration. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.14x is elevated for a business with such weak profitability, whilst the net debt-to-equity ratio of 1.11 indicates meaningful leverage.

The financial trend classification of "Flat" as of December 2025 appears generous given the widening losses in subsequent quarters. The technical trend remains "Mildly Bearish," with the stock trading below all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), suggesting weak price momentum and lack of buying interest.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

✅ KEY STRENGTHS

  • Revenue Growth: 12.58% YoY sales growth in Q3 FY26 demonstrates some demand resilience
  • Promoter Commitment: Promoters increased stake to 66.82%, signalling insider confidence
  • Valuation Discount: P/BV of 3.36x below peer average, offering potential upside if operations improve
  • Sector Outperformance: Stock down 5.77% vs sector decline of 9.71%, showing relative strength
  • Asset Base: Fixed assets and investments of ₹149.42 crores provide tangible value
  • Moderate Debt: Long-term debt of ₹13.24 crores is manageable if profitability returns

⚠️ KEY CONCERNS

  • Widening Losses: Consolidated net loss of ₹9.85 crores, up 657.69% YoY, indicates severe profitability crisis
  • Margin Collapse: Operating margin compressed to 14.37% from 18.91% YoY, eroding competitive position
  • Negative ROE: ROE of -8.86% shows capital destruction, unacceptable for equity investors
  • Cost Inflation: Employee costs at 36.16% of sales, up from 28.65%, suggest structural inefficiency
  • Weak Returns: ROCE of 4.56% far below cost of capital, indicating poor asset productivity
  • Zero Institutional Interest: No FII/DII holding reflects lack of confidence from sophisticated investors
  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 with negative returns creates unfavourable risk-reward profile

Outlook: Critical Juncture Requires Operational Turnaround

Sayaji Hotels stands at a critical juncture. The company must demonstrate tangible progress on margin improvement and cost control in the coming quarters to regain investor confidence. The widening losses and deteriorating returns on capital suggest the current business model is unsustainable without significant operational changes.

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Successful cost rationalisation programme reducing employee costs as % of sales
  • Revenue recovery in Q4 FY26 driven by seasonal demand uptick
  • Margin expansion through pricing power or occupancy improvements
  • Return to profitability demonstrating business model viability
  • Promoter capital infusion or strategic initiatives announced

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Further margin compression in Q4 FY26 results
  • Continued losses extending into FY27
  • Increase in debt levels to fund operating losses
  • Promoter stake reduction or pledging of shares
  • Deterioration in working capital or cash flow metrics

The hospitality sector's recovery trajectory post-pandemic has been uneven, and Sayaji Hotels' struggles suggest it is not participating effectively in any industry upturn. The company's small scale, limited geographic diversification, and operational inefficiencies leave it vulnerable to competitive pressures from larger, better-capitalised players.

The Verdict: Operational Crisis Warrants Caution Despite Cheap Valuation

SELL

Score: 42/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions until the company demonstrates a credible path back to profitability. The widening losses, margin collapse, and negative return on equity create an unfavourable risk-reward profile that outweighs the apparently attractive valuation multiples. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of margin improvement and positive earnings before considering entry.

For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure or exiting positions, particularly if holding at losses. The deteriorating fundamentals suggest further downside risk, and the lack of institutional interest limits potential for near-term re-rating. Those with long-term conviction should closely monitor Q4 FY26 results for signs of operational improvement, but be prepared to exit if losses continue to widen.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹240.00 (14.05% downside from current price), based on book value discount reflecting negative ROE and operational challenges. Upside potential exists only if management successfully executes a turnaround, which remains unproven.

Rationale: Whilst the stock trades at superficially attractive valuation multiples, the underlying fundamentals are deteriorating rapidly. The company is destroying shareholder value with negative ROE of -8.86%, widening losses, and collapsing margins. Until management demonstrates the ability to control costs and return to profitability, the stock remains a value trap rather than a value opportunity. The lack of institutional interest and high volatility further compound the investment risks.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News