Shiva Global Agro Industries Q2 FY26: Mounting Losses Signal Deepening Operational Crisis

Nov 25 2025 04:58 PM IST
share
Share Via
Shiva Global Agro Industries Limited, a Maharashtra-based fertiliser manufacturer with a market capitalisation of ₹39.00 crores, reported a consolidated net loss of ₹1.99 crores for Q2 FY26, marking a sharp deterioration from the ₹2.42 crores profit posted in the previous quarter. The alarming 182.23% quarter-on-quarter decline has intensified concerns about the company's operational viability, with the stock trading at ₹39.00, down 12.20% over the past year and significantly underperforming the broader fertiliser sector.





Consolidated Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

-₹1.99 Cr

▼ 182.23% QoQ



Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹46.32 Cr

▼ 40.55% QoQ



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

-4.86%

Q2 FY26



Return on Equity (Latest)

1.33%

Weak capital efficiency




The September quarter results represent a continuation of the company's troubling financial trajectory, with revenue plummeting to its lowest quarterly level in recent periods at ₹46.32 crores. This 40.55% sequential decline and 50.88% year-on-year contraction underscore severe demand challenges and operational inefficiencies plaguing the micro-cap fertiliser manufacturer. The company's inability to generate positive operating profits, with PBDIT excluding other income turning negative at ₹-2.25 crores, reveals fundamental structural weaknesses in the business model.



With a proprietary Mojo score of just 28 out of 100 and a "Strong Sell" rating, Shiva Global Agro Industries faces mounting pressures across multiple fronts—deteriorating margins, negative financial trends, and persistent underperformance against benchmark indices. The company's below-average quality grade and weak return ratios further compound investor concerns about its long-term sustainability.





































































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24 Mar'24
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 46.32 77.91 93.96 98.93 94.30 92.75 91.39
QoQ Growth -40.55% -17.08% -5.02% +4.91% +1.67% +1.49%
Consolidated PAT (₹ Cr) -1.99 2.42 2.06 7.47 -2.65 -3.59 0.63
PAT Margin (%) -4.73% 3.58% 0.27% 7.40% -3.70% -4.15% -1.11%
Operating Margin (Excl OI) % -4.86% 6.62% 4.60% -0.05% -0.60% -0.86% -6.35%



Financial Performance: Revenue Collapse Drives Operating Losses



The September quarter witnessed a catastrophic revenue decline, with net sales plummeting to ₹46.32 crores from ₹77.91 crores in Q1 FY26—a sequential contraction of 40.55%. Year-on-year comparisons paint an even bleaker picture, with revenues down 50.88% from ₹94.30 crores in Q2 FY25. This dramatic topline erosion has pushed the company into deep operating losses, with PBDIT excluding other income turning negative at ₹-2.25 crores compared to a positive ₹5.16 crores in the previous quarter.



Operating margins collapsed to -4.86% in Q2 FY26 from 6.62% in Q1 FY26, reflecting not just volume pressures but also deteriorating pricing power and cost absorption challenges. The company's gross profit margin similarly plunged to -5.31% from 5.37% sequentially, indicating severe stress across the entire value chain. Interest costs, whilst declining to ₹0.45 crores from ₹1.19 crores, remain a burden relative to the negative operating profits, resulting in an operating profit to interest coverage ratio of -5.00 times—the lowest on record.





Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹46.32 Cr

▼ 40.55% QoQ | ▼ 50.88% YoY



Consolidated Net Profit

-₹1.99 Cr

▼ 182.23% QoQ | ▼ 24.91% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

-4.86%

vs 6.62% in Q1 FY26



PAT Margin

-4.73%

vs 3.58% in Q1 FY26




The consolidated net loss of ₹1.99 crores represents a dramatic reversal from the ₹2.42 crores profit reported in Q1 FY26, translating to a PAT margin of -4.73%. This marks the company's return to loss-making territory after a brief respite in the June quarter. On a half-yearly basis for H1 FY26, the company managed a marginal consolidated profit of ₹0.43 crores, but the momentum has clearly shifted negative in the latter half of the period.




Critical Operating Weakness


The company's operating profit to net sales ratio of -4.86% in Q2 FY26 represents the lowest level across all recent quarters, indicating fundamental operational stress. With revenues at multi-quarter lows and negative operating leverage, the business model faces existential questions about sustainability without significant restructuring.




Profitability Crisis: Weak Returns Signal Capital Inefficiency



Shiva Global Agro Industries' profitability metrics paint a concerning picture of capital inefficiency and weak value creation. The company's latest Return on Equity (ROE) stands at a meagre 1.33%, significantly below the 5.09% average over recent years and far below acceptable thresholds for equity investors. This weak ROE indicates that the company generates barely any returns on shareholder capital, with each rupee of equity producing just 1.33 paise of profit—a clear sign of value destruction rather than creation.



Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) tells a similarly troubling story, with the latest figure at 4.78% compared to a five-year average of 5.43%. The half-yearly ROCE of 5.30%, whilst marginally higher, remains inadequate relative to the cost of capital and industry standards. The company's average EBIT to interest coverage ratio of just 1.53 times over recent periods highlights the precarious nature of debt servicing, with operating profits barely sufficient to cover interest obligations.



The balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹89.13 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹93.63 crores a year earlier, reflecting the erosion of equity value. Long-term debt stood at ₹15.50 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.24—relatively modest in absolute terms but concerning given the weak earnings generation. The company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.91 times suggests elevated leverage relative to cash generation capacity, constraining financial flexibility.




Balance Sheet Deterioration


Fixed assets declined to ₹26.19 crores from ₹35.18 crores year-on-year, indicating potential asset impairments or limited capital expenditure. Current assets fell sharply to ₹127.21 crores from ₹190.51 crores, whilst current liabilities compressed to ₹44.59 crores from ₹105.62 crores, suggesting significant working capital adjustments and possible liquidity management challenges.




Sector Context: Underperforming Amidst Fertiliser Industry Recovery



The fertiliser sector has witnessed a modest recovery over the past year, with the broader industry returning 9.35%. However, Shiva Global Agro Industries has dramatically underperformed this trend, posting a negative return of -12.20% over the same period—translating to a concerning 21.55 percentage point underperformance versus the sector. This divergence highlights company-specific operational challenges rather than broader industry headwinds.



India's fertiliser industry has benefited from government support through subsidy schemes and rising agricultural activity, yet Shiva Global has failed to capitalise on these tailwinds. The company's consistent revenue declines—with five-year sales growth at -9.28% and five-year EBIT growth at -21.72%—stand in stark contrast to peers who have managed to sustain or grow their market positions. This persistent underperformance suggests structural issues with the company's product mix, distribution network, or operational efficiency.



The micro-cap nature of Shiva Global, with a market capitalisation of just ₹39.00 crores, limits institutional participation and liquidity. With virtually no FII or mutual fund holdings (institutional holding at 0.02%), the stock lacks the support of informed institutional capital. This absence of institutional validation further underscores the market's scepticism about the company's prospects and quality of management.

































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield
Shiva Global 33.73 0.45 5.09 0.24
Basant Agro Tech 22.70 0.63 6.70 0.71 0.40%
Teesta Agro Ind. 8.34 0.54 5.34 -0.02
Phosphate Co 25.67 0.61 3.55 0.13
Bharat Agri Fert 186.84 3.34 0.76 1.49
Bluegod Enterta. 95.90 4.20 0.00 0.13



Compared to immediate peers, Shiva Global trades at a P/E ratio of 33.73 times—elevated given the weak profitability and negative growth trajectory. The company's ROE of 5.09% ranks in the middle of the peer group but remains inadequate in absolute terms. The price-to-book ratio of 0.45 times suggests the market assigns minimal value to the company's assets, reflecting deep scepticism about future earnings potential and asset quality.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Metrics Mask Fundamental Weakness



Despite the company's operational struggles, valuation metrics appear superficially attractive—a classic value trap scenario. The stock trades at a price-to-book value of 0.45 times, implying the market values the company at less than half its stated book value of ₹89.20 per share. The EV-to-sales ratio of 0.19 times and EV-to-EBITDA of 8.57 times further suggest depressed valuations relative to historical norms.



However, these seemingly cheap multiples must be viewed through the lens of deteriorating fundamentals. With negative operating margins, declining revenues, and a return to loss-making in the latest quarter, the low valuation reflects genuine concerns about business viability rather than a mispricing opportunity. The P/E ratio of 33.73 times, whilst moderate in isolation, appears expensive when considering the negative earnings trajectory and weak quality metrics.



The company's proprietary valuation grade has oscillated between "Attractive" and "Very Attractive" in recent months, most recently graded as "Attractive" as of November 3, 2025. However, this valuation assessment is heavily influenced by the depressed stock price rather than improving fundamentals. The PEG ratio of 0.32 times appears favourable but is rendered meaningless given the negative five-year growth rates in both sales (-9.28%) and EBIT (-21.72%).





P/E Ratio (TTM)

33.73x

vs Industry 24x



Price to Book Value

0.45x

Book Value: ₹89.20



EV/EBITDA

8.57x

Below peer average



Mojo Score

28/100

Strong Sell territory




The stock's 52-week range of ₹34.50 to ₹52.65 shows significant volatility, with the current price of ₹39.00 positioned 25.93% below the high and just 13.04% above the low. This proximity to 52-week lows, combined with negative technical momentum, suggests limited near-term upside potential absent a significant operational turnaround.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base Amidst Retail Exodus



The shareholding pattern reveals a stable promoter holding of 57.69% as of September 2025, down marginally from 59.96% in December 2024 following a 2.27 percentage point reduction in March 2025. The promoter group, led by Omprakash Kannaiyalal Gilda (11.91%), Deepak Shyamsunder Maliwal (6.98%), and Rekha Deepak Maliwal (5.13%), maintains majority control with no pledged shares—a positive signal regarding promoter confidence and financial stability.


























































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24
Promoter Holding 57.69% 57.69% 57.69% 59.96%
QoQ Change 0.00% 0.00% -2.27% 0.00%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02%
Non-Institutional 42.28% 42.28% 42.28% 40.02%



The complete absence of FII and mutual fund holdings underscores the stock's lack of institutional appeal. With just 0.02% held by other domestic institutional investors, the company operates entirely outside the radar of professional fund managers. Non-institutional holdings of 42.28% comprise predominantly retail investors, who absorbed the 2.26 percentage point increase when promoters reduced their stake in March 2025.



This shareholding structure creates a liquidity challenge, with average daily volumes of just 1,359 shares traded on November 26, 2025. The absence of institutional support also means limited analyst coverage and research, reducing market visibility and price discovery efficiency. For potential investors, this illiquidity presents both an entry and exit challenge, with significant bid-ask spreads likely during periods of volatility.



Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Shiva Global Agro Industries has delivered consistently negative returns across virtually all meaningful timeframes, significantly underperforming both the Sensex and its fertiliser sector peers. Over the past year, the stock has declined 12.20% whilst the Sensex gained 6.57%, resulting in a negative alpha of 18.77 percentage points. This underperformance accelerates over longer periods, with three-year returns of -61.54% versus the Sensex's 36.87% gain—a staggering 98.41 percentage point underperformance.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -1.54% 0.09% -1.63%
1 Month -9.60% 1.25% -10.85%
3 Months -15.25% 5.54% -20.79%
6 Months -2.94% 3.75% -6.69%
YTD -10.73% 9.11% -19.84%
1 Year -12.20% 6.57% -18.77%
3 Years -61.54% 36.87% -98.41%
5 Years 2.36% 92.64% -90.28%



The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates amplified volatility relative to the broader market, with volatility at 46.85% over the past year—nearly four times the Sensex's 11.93% volatility. This high-risk profile, combined with negative returns, places the stock firmly in the "high risk, low return" category. The risk-adjusted return of -0.26 versus the Sensex's 0.55 highlights the poor compensation for the elevated risk borne by shareholders.



Technical indicators paint a uniformly bearish picture. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹39.78), 20-day (₹43.58), 50-day (₹45.04), 100-day (₹44.92), and 200-day (₹42.56)—indicating sustained downward momentum. The overall technical trend is classified as "Sideways" as of November 17, 2025, having transitioned from "Mildly Bullish" earlier. Weekly MACD signals remain bearish, whilst Bollinger Bands indicate bearish momentum on both weekly and monthly timeframes.




"With negative operating margins, collapsing revenues, and a return to loss-making, Shiva Global Agro Industries exemplifies a classic value trap—superficially cheap valuations masking deteriorating fundamentals and structural business challenges."


Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Overwhelm Limited Positives



The investment case for Shiva Global Agro Industries is fundamentally challenged across all critical parameters. The company's Mojo score of 28 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting the convergence of negative financial trends, weak quality metrics, unfavourable technical momentum, and deteriorating operational performance. The below-average quality grade underscores long-term fundamental weaknesses that extend beyond cyclical challenges.





Valuation

Attractive

Low multiples



Quality Grade

Below Average

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

Negative

Q2 FY26



Technical Trend

Sideways

Weak momentum




Whilst the valuation appears attractive on surface-level metrics—trading at 0.45 times book value and low EV multiples—this reflects genuine concerns about business sustainability rather than a mispricing opportunity. The negative financial trend designation, assigned in September 2025, captures the deteriorating quarterly performance, with PAT falling 1,608% versus the previous four-quarter average and operating profit to interest coverage at multi-quarter lows.



The company's weak quality parameters include negative five-year sales growth (-9.28%), negative five-year EBIT growth (-21.72%), low average ROCE (5.43%), and weak average ROE (5.09%). The EBIT-to-interest coverage of just 1.53 times and debt-to-EBITDA of 3.91 times further constrain financial flexibility. Zero institutional holdings (0.02%) and absence of dividend payments underscore the market's lack of confidence in the company's prospects.





✓ Key Strengths



  • No Promoter Pledging: 57.69% promoter holding with zero pledged shares indicates financial stability at the promoter level

  • Low Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.24 provides some cushion, though limited given weak cash generation

  • Attractive Valuation Multiples: P/BV of 0.45x and low EV/Sales reflect depressed valuations, though justified by fundamentals

  • Established Presence: Operating since 1993 with manufacturing capabilities in fertilisers and agricultural products

  • Half-Year Profitability: H1 FY26 showed marginal consolidated profit of ₹0.43 crores before Q2 deterioration




⚠ Key Concerns



  • Severe Revenue Decline: Q2 FY26 sales collapsed 40.55% QoQ and 50.88% YoY to multi-quarter lows of ₹46.32 crores

  • Negative Operating Margins: Operating margin at -4.86% with PBDIT of ₹-2.25 crores indicates fundamental business model stress

  • Return to Losses: Consolidated net loss of ₹1.99 crores in Q2 after brief profitability in Q1

  • Weak Return Ratios: ROE of 1.33% and ROCE of 4.78% signal poor capital efficiency and value destruction

  • Persistent Underperformance: Three-year returns of -61.54% versus Sensex +36.87%, with negative alpha across all timeframes

  • Zero Institutional Support: No FII or MF holdings; total institutional at 0.02% reflects lack of professional validation

  • Negative Long-Term Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of -9.28% and EBIT CAGR of -21.72% indicate structural decline





Outlook: What to Watch for Turnaround or Further Deterioration



The path forward for Shiva Global Agro Industries hinges on the company's ability to arrest the revenue decline and restore positive operating margins in the coming quarters. Investors and stakeholders should monitor several critical indicators that will determine whether the current crisis represents a temporary trough or the beginning of terminal decline.





Positive Catalysts to Monitor



  • Revenue Stabilisation: Sequential improvement in quarterly sales above ₹70 crores would signal demand recovery

  • Margin Recovery: Return to positive operating margins above 3% would indicate improved cost management

  • Working Capital Improvement: Enhanced debtor turnover and inventory management could release trapped cash

  • Product Mix Optimisation: Shift towards higher-margin products or value-added offerings




Red Flags Requiring Immediate Action



  • Continued Revenue Decline: Further sequential drops below ₹40 crores would signal existential crisis

  • Sustained Operating Losses: Negative PBDIT for two consecutive quarters would raise viability concerns

  • Liquidity Stress: Inability to service debt or delays in supplier payments

  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Further decline in promoter holding below 55% would signal loss of confidence

  • Asset Impairments: Write-downs or disposal of fixed assets at distressed valuations





The December 2025 quarter (Q3 FY26) results will be critical in determining whether the September quarter represented an aberration or the beginning of a deeper crisis. Given the seasonal nature of fertiliser demand, any failure to show improvement in the peak season would significantly diminish hopes for near-term recovery. Management commentary on demand trends, pricing environment, and strategic initiatives will provide crucial insights into the company's action plan.



For the stock to merit reconsideration, investors would need to see at minimum: (1) two consecutive quarters of positive operating profits, (2) revenue stabilisation above ₹75 crores quarterly, (3) operating margins sustainably above 4%, and (4) visible progress on working capital efficiency. Absent these improvements, the current "Strong Sell" rating remains justified given the confluence of operational, financial, and market headwinds.




The Verdict: Exit Recommended—Fundamental Deterioration Outweighs Valuation Appeal


STRONG SELL

Score: 28/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation. The company faces severe operational challenges with negative operating margins, collapsing revenues, and weak return ratios. The superficially attractive valuation is a value trap, with depressed multiples reflecting genuine concerns about business viability rather than mispricing. The absence of institutional support and persistent multi-year underperformance underscore fundamental quality issues. Better opportunities exist in the fertiliser space with stronger operational track records and positive momentum.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any price strength. The return to loss-making in Q2 FY26, combined with the 40.55% sequential revenue decline and negative operating margins, signals deepening operational stress. With the stock already down 61.54% over three years and showing no signs of turnaround, continuing to hold exposes portfolios to further downside risk. The micro-cap nature and illiquidity add to exit challenges, making any relief rallies opportunities to reduce exposure.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹28-32 per share (28-18% downside from current ₹39), based on 0.35x P/BV multiple reflecting below-average quality and negative earnings trajectory. Upside scenario to ₹45-48 (15-23% upside) only plausible if company demonstrates two consecutive quarters of positive operating profits and revenue stabilisation—currently low probability outcome.





Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed are based on publicly available information and proprietary analysis as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News