Shivam Autotech Q3 FY26: Losses Deepen Amid Mounting Debt Crisis

4 hours ago
share
Share Via
Shivam Autotech Ltd., a micro-cap auto component manufacturer from the Hero Group stable, reported a significantly widened net loss of ₹24.53 crores for Q3 FY26 (October-December 2025), marking a sharp 97.43% increase from the ₹12.42 crores loss in Q2 FY26. The deterioration represents the company's worst quarterly performance in recent history, with revenue declining 15.06% quarter-on-quarter to ₹96.18 crores and operating margins collapsing to just 5.25%.
Shivam Autotech Q3 FY26: Losses Deepen Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
Net Loss (Q3 FY26)
₹24.53 Cr
▼ 97.43% QoQ
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹96.18 Cr
▼ 15.06% QoQ | ▼ 14.69% YoY
Operating Margin
5.25%
Down from 9.06% in Q2
Interest Burden
₹19.05 Cr
Highest quarterly interest ever

The ₹300 crore market capitalisation company, which manufactures gear blanks, spline shafts, finished gears and plungers for original equipment manufacturers, is grappling with a crippling debt burden that pushed interest costs to a record ₹19.05 crores in Q3 FY26—45.31% higher than the previous quarter. This interest expense alone exceeded the company's entire operating profit, resulting in a loss before tax of ₹23.23 crores. The stock has plunged 45.38% over the past year, significantly underperforming the auto components sector which gained 24.65% during the same period.

What makes the situation particularly concerning is the structural nature of the challenges. With a debt-to-equity ratio of 190.74 times and net debt consuming nearly twice the company's shareholder equity, Shivam Autotech faces severe financial constraints that limit its ability to invest in growth or weather industry downturns. The company's operating profit coverage of interest has deteriorated to just 0.27 times in Q3 FY26, the lowest in recent quarters, raising serious questions about debt serviceability.

Financial Performance: A Downward Spiral Accelerates

The third quarter of FY26 witnessed a dramatic deterioration across all financial parameters. Net sales declined 15.06% quarter-on-quarter to ₹96.18 crores from ₹113.23 crores in Q2 FY26, and fell 14.69% year-on-year from ₹112.74 crores in Q3 FY25. This marks the third consecutive quarter of declining revenues, with the company unable to arrest the downward momentum despite operating in an otherwise robust auto components sector.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin Net Profit (₹ Cr) PAT Margin
Dec'25 96.18 -15.06% 5.25% -24.53 -25.50%
Sep'25 113.23 +24.80% 9.06% -12.42 -10.97%
Jun'25 90.73 -15.87% 5.85% -17.66 -19.46%
Mar'25 107.84 -4.35% 7.60% -14.76 -13.69%
Dec'24 112.74 -6.39% 10.08% -11.86 -10.52%
Sep'24 120.43 +6.60% 10.13% -11.09 -9.21%
Jun'24 112.97 11.20% -10.33 -9.14%

Operating profitability collapsed in Q3 FY26, with EBITDA (excluding other income) plunging 50.78% quarter-on-quarter to ₹5.05 crores from ₹10.26 crores in Q2 FY26. The operating margin contracted sharply to 5.25% from 9.06% in the previous quarter, reflecting both revenue pressure and deteriorating cost management. Year-on-year, the operating margin has declined from 10.08% in Q3 FY25, highlighting the sustained erosion in profitability.

The interest burden reached crisis proportions at ₹19.05 crores, representing 19.80% of quarterly revenues—an unsustainable level that effectively wipes out all operating profits. Depreciation added another ₹8.34 crores, pushing the loss before tax to ₹23.23 crores. After accounting for minimal tax credits, the net loss stood at ₹24.53 crores, translating to a negative PAT margin of 25.50%. For the nine months ended December 2025, cumulative losses have reached ₹54.61 crores on revenues of ₹300.14 crores.

Revenue (9M FY26)
₹300.14 Cr
▼ 13.41% YoY
Net Loss (9M FY26)
₹54.61 Cr
Losses widening
Operating Margin (9M FY26)
6.72%
Down from 10.47% in 9M FY25
Interest Coverage
0.27x
Critically low

The Debt Trap: Structural Weakness Exposed

The fundamental issue plaguing Shivam Autotech is its overwhelming debt burden, which has transformed what should be modest operating losses into catastrophic bottom-line results. As of March 2025, the company carried long-term debt of ₹120.12 crores against shareholder equity of just ₹31.48 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 192.05 times for the first half of FY26—the highest in the company's recent history.

Critical Debt Metrics Signal Distress

Debt-to-Equity Ratio: 192.05 times (H1 FY26) – amongst the highest in the auto components sector

Interest Coverage: 0.27 times (Q3 FY26) – operating profits insufficient to service debt

Debt-to-EBITDA: 6.94 times (average) – indicating 7 years needed to repay debt from operations

Net Debt-to-Equity: 190.74 times – virtually no equity cushion remaining

The company's capital structure has deteriorated progressively over recent years. Shareholder equity has eroded from ₹138.55 crores in March 2022 to ₹31.48 crores in March 2025, a decline of 77.28% driven by cumulative losses. Meanwhile, long-term debt has fluctuated but remained elevated, whilst current liabilities have surged to ₹347.06 crores, creating severe working capital pressures. Trade payables alone stand at ₹63.96 crores, suggesting potential strain in supplier relationships.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) has collapsed to just 0.58% in the latest period, down from an already weak 3.15% average, whilst return on equity (ROE) stands at a shocking negative 3,221.59%. These metrics underscore the value destruction occurring for shareholders, with each rupee of capital generating negligible returns whilst being consumed by interest expenses and operational inefficiencies.

Industry Context: Swimming Against the Tide

What makes Shivam Autotech's struggles particularly stark is the contrasting performance of the broader auto components sector. Over the past year, the Auto Components & Equipments industry has delivered returns of 24.65%, benefiting from robust domestic automobile demand, strong export opportunities, and the ongoing shift towards electric vehicles that requires new component suppliers. Against this favourable backdrop, Shivam Autotech has underperformed by a staggering 70.03 percentage points, with its stock declining 45.38% whilst peers flourished.

The company's five-year sales growth of negative 0.18% contrasts sharply with the industry's expansion, suggesting market share losses and inability to capitalise on sectoral tailwinds. Revenues have stagnated around ₹450-470 crores annually for the past several years, indicating limited success in winning new business or expanding with existing customers. The persistent negative profit margins—averaging negative 10.6% over FY21-25—suggest fundamental issues with product mix, pricing power, or operational efficiency that transcend cyclical factors.

Company Market Cap (₹ Cr) P/E Ratio P/BV Ratio Debt-to-Equity 1-Year Return
Shivam Autotech 300 NA (Loss Making) 170.57 190.74 -45.38%
Triton Valves 69.87 2.88 0.97
Autoline Industries 25.23 2.06 1.49
Jay Ushin 24.12 2.70 0.86
Talbros Engineering 14.33 1.97 0.78
Menon Pistons 11.83 1.82 0.01

The peer comparison reveals Shivam Autotech's extreme outlier status. Whilst comparable companies maintain debt-to-equity ratios below 1.5 times and generate positive returns on equity averaging around 13%, Shivam Autotech operates with leverage exceeding 190 times and destroys shareholder value. The price-to-book ratio of 170.57 times appears absurdly high until one realises it reflects a severely depleted book value of just ₹2.39 per share, rather than any premium valuation. In reality, the company trades at a significant discount to even its eroded book value when accounting for the ongoing losses.

Valuation Analysis: A Value Trap, Not a Bargain

At the current price of ₹22.00, Shivam Autotech might superficially appear inexpensive given its ₹300 crore market capitalisation and ₹453 crore annual revenue run rate. However, traditional valuation metrics break down for loss-making companies with deteriorating fundamentals. The company's P/E ratio is meaningless given sustained losses, whilst the EV/EBITDA multiple of 18.10 times appears elevated considering the poor quality of earnings and high financial leverage.

Valuation Snapshot

Current Price: ₹22.00 (down 3.64% on February 5, 2026)

52-Week Range: ₹18.42 - ₹40.75

Book Value per Share: ₹2.39

Price-to-Book: 170.57x (reflects depleted equity base)

EV/Sales: 1.50x

Valuation Grade: EXPENSIVE (despite absolute price decline)

The stock has declined 46.01% from its 52-week high of ₹40.75 but remains 19.44% above its 52-week low of ₹18.42, suggesting the market is still assessing the extent of the company's troubles. With the stock trading below all major moving averages—including the 5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day and 200-day moving averages—technical indicators uniformly point to continued weakness. The bearish technical trend that began in November 2025 remains firmly intact.

What appears cheap on an absolute price basis is actually expensive relative to fundamentals. The company generates no earnings, destroys capital at an alarming rate, and faces existential questions about debt sustainability. Any valuation exercise must start with the question of survival rather than growth multiples. Until the company demonstrates a credible path to profitability and debt reduction, the stock represents a classic value trap—appearing cheap but likely to disappoint.

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Commitment, Limited Institutional Interest

The shareholding pattern reveals a stable promoter base but minimal institutional confidence. Promoter holding has remained constant at 69.52% across the past five quarters, with Dayanand Munjal Investments Pvt Ltd holding the entire promoter stake. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, suggesting the controlling shareholders retain faith in the long-term prospects despite current challenges.

Shareholder Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 QoQ Change
Promoter Holding 69.52% 69.52% 69.52% 0.00%
FII Holding 0.03% 0.04% 0.00% -0.01%
Mutual Fund Holding 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 0.00%
Other DII Holdings 7.06% 7.06% 7.06% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 23.38% 23.37% 23.41% +0.01%

However, institutional participation remains negligible, with just 7.10% combined institutional holding (including both foreign and domestic institutions). Foreign institutional investors hold a mere 0.03%, whilst mutual funds account for just 0.01%—both figures indicating virtually no professional investor interest. The absence of institutional investors is telling, as sophisticated investors have clearly identified the fundamental challenges and chosen to avoid the stock.

The stable shareholding pattern, whilst providing some governance comfort, also means there is limited fresh capital coming into the company. With promoters already holding nearly 70%, their ability to infuse additional equity is constrained, whilst the lack of institutional interest makes raising capital through equity markets extremely difficult. This creates a challenging situation where the company needs capital to reduce debt but has limited avenues to raise it.

Stock Performance: Sustained Underperformance Across All Timeframes

The stock's performance has been uniformly poor across virtually all timeframes, with the sole exception being a modest 11.56% gain over the past week—likely a technical bounce from oversold levels rather than any fundamental improvement. Over meaningful investment horizons, the destruction of shareholder value is stark and consistent.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +11.56% +1.01% +10.55%
1 Month -9.17% -2.38% -6.79%
3 Months -27.01% -0.07% -26.94%
6 Months -26.15% +3.34% -29.49%
Year-to-Date -8.10% -2.13% -5.97%
1 Year -45.38% +6.56% -51.94%
2 Years -50.47% +16.27% -66.74%
3 Years -14.89% +37.08% -51.97%
5 Years +3.53% +64.40% -60.87%

The one-year decline of 45.38% compares to a Sensex gain of 6.56%, resulting in negative alpha of 51.94 percentage points. Over two years, the stock has lost 50.47% whilst the Sensex gained 16.27%, and over three years, the stock is down 14.89% versus the Sensex's 37.08% gain. Even the modest 3.53% gain over five years pales against the Sensex's 64.40% advance, resulting in 60.87 percentage points of underperformance.

The stock exhibits high volatility with a beta of 1.31, meaning it moves 31% more than the broader market—amplifying both gains and losses. However, with negative risk-adjusted returns of negative 0.87 over the past year and a Sharpe ratio in negative territory, investors have been penalised rather than rewarded for taking on this additional risk. The stock falls firmly into the "high risk, low return" category—the worst quadrant for any investment.

"With interest expenses consuming 19.80% of revenues and operating margins at just 5.25%, Shivam Autotech faces a mathematical impossibility—the company cannot generate sufficient cash flow to service its debt, let alone invest in growth or return to profitability."

Investment Thesis: Fundamental Deterioration Across All Parameters

The investment case for Shivam Autotech has deteriorated across all key dimensions. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at just 9 out of 100, firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting the confluence of negative factors. Quality assessment rates the company as "Below Average" based on weak return ratios, high leverage, and persistent losses. The financial trend is classified as "Negative" following the Q3 FY26 results, whilst technical indicators remain uniformly "Bearish."

From a valuation perspective, despite the absolute price decline, the stock is graded as "Expensive" because it offers no earnings, destroys capital, and faces existential debt challenges. The traditional valuation framework breaks down when a company loses money consistently—price-to-sales or EV multiples become irrelevant if the business model is fundamentally broken.

Key Strengths

  • Promoter Commitment: Stable 69.52% promoter holding with zero pledging demonstrates long-term commitment
  • Hero Group Legacy: Historical association with reputable Hero Group provides some credibility
  • Established Operations: Over two decades of manufacturing experience since 1999
  • Positive Operating Cash Flow: Generated ₹77 crores in operating cash flow in FY25 despite losses
  • Working Capital Improvement: ₹27 crores positive change in working capital in FY25

Key Concerns

  • Unsustainable Debt Burden: Debt-to-equity of 190.74x with interest consuming entire operating profit
  • Persistent Losses: Negative PAT margins averaging -10.6% over FY21-25, widening to -25.50% in Q3 FY26
  • Collapsing Margins: Operating margin deteriorated from 11.20% to 5.25% over past year
  • Declining Revenues: Sales down 14.69% YoY in Q3 FY26, negative 5-year CAGR of -0.18%
  • Eroding Equity Base: Shareholder funds declined 77.28% from ₹138.55 Cr (FY22) to ₹31.48 Cr (FY25)
  • No Institutional Support: Just 7.10% institutional holding signals lack of professional investor confidence
  • Weak Capital Returns: ROCE at 0.58%, ROE at negative 3,221.59%

Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points

For investors considering this stock or existing shareholders evaluating their positions, several critical factors warrant close monitoring in coming quarters. The trajectory of these metrics will determine whether the company can stabilise or faces further deterioration.

Positive Catalysts to Watch

  • Debt Restructuring: Any announcement of debt refinancing or equity infusion to reduce leverage
  • Margin Recovery: Return of operating margins to double-digit levels sustainably
  • Revenue Stabilisation: Halt in revenue decline and return to growth trajectory
  • New Customer Wins: Orders from additional OEMs to diversify revenue base
  • Cost Reduction Programme: Concrete steps to reduce fixed costs and improve efficiency

Red Flags to Monitor

  • Further Margin Compression: Operating margins falling below 5% would signal crisis
  • Revenue Decline Acceleration: QoQ declines exceeding 15-20% indicate market share loss
  • Rising Interest Costs: Further increases in interest burden beyond ₹19 crores quarterly
  • Working Capital Stress: Increase in trade payables or creditor days indicating payment delays
  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Any decline in 69.52% promoter holding would be highly negative
  • Credit Rating Downgrade: Any adverse rating action by credit agencies

The path forward for Shivam Autotech requires urgent and decisive action on multiple fronts. The company needs to simultaneously arrest revenue decline, restore operating margins, reduce debt burden, and rebuild investor confidence—a challenging combination that will test management's capability. Without significant operational improvement and financial restructuring, the current trajectory points towards continued value destruction.

The Verdict: Avoid This Debt-Laden Value Trap

STRONG SELL

Score: 9/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid completely. The combination of unsustainable debt (190.74x debt-to-equity), widening losses (₹24.53 crores in Q3 FY26), collapsing margins (5.25% operating margin), and declining revenues (down 14.69% YoY) creates a perfect storm of negative factors. With interest expenses exceeding operating profits and no clear path to profitability, this represents capital at high risk of permanent loss rather than a recovery opportunity.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce. The Q3 FY26 results represent a significant deterioration from already weak levels, with losses doubling quarter-on-quarter and operating margins collapsing. The stock has underperformed peers by 70 percentage points over the past year and shows no signs of fundamental improvement. The 69.52% promoter holding provides some governance comfort, but without capital infusion or operational turnaround, continued erosion of shareholder value appears inevitable.

Fair Value Estimate: Not applicable given loss-making status and debt sustainability concerns. Current price of ₹22.00 may find support at ₹18.42 (52-week low), but fundamental value remains impaired until profitability returns.

Key Rationale: Shivam Autotech exemplifies a value trap—superficially cheap but fundamentally broken. The debt burden is mathematically unsustainable with interest consuming 380% of operating profit in Q3 FY26. The company operates in a growing sector yet loses market share, suggesting structural competitive disadvantages. With minimal institutional interest (7.10%), negative technical trends across all timeframes, and deteriorating financial metrics across every parameter, the risk-reward equation is decidedly unfavourable. This is not a turnaround candidate but a distressed situation requiring comprehensive restructuring that may significantly dilute existing shareholders.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in equities are subject to market risks, and investors may lose their entire capital.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News