The company's quarterly revenue trajectory reveals a volatile growth pattern. Net sales for Q3 FY26 stood at ₹3.64 crores, declining 13.74% sequentially from Q2 FY26's ₹4.22 crores but surging 182.17% year-on-year from the meagre ₹1.29 crores recorded in Q3 FY25. This dramatic year-on-year expansion, whilst impressive on paper, comes off an exceptionally low base and reflects the company's struggle to establish consistent operational momentum.
The sequential revenue decline from Q2 to Q3 FY26 raises immediate concerns about demand sustainability and the company's ability to maintain the growth trajectory witnessed in the first half of the fiscal year. With four quarters now elapsed in FY26, the company's cumulative nine-month performance reveals revenues of ₹10.55 crores, substantially ahead of the full-year FY25 figure of ₹4.00 crores, yet the path forward remains uncertain.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Growth | YoY Growth | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | Operating Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3) | 3.64 | -13.74% | +182.17% | 0.02 | 5.22% |
| Sep'25 (Q2) | 4.22 | +56.88% | +1658.33% | -0.03 | 3.79% |
| Jun'25 (Q1) | 2.69 | +57.31% | +205.68% | -0.47 | 1.12% |
| Mar'25 (Q4) | 1.71 | +32.56% | — | -0.42 | -32.75% |
| Dec'24 (Q3) | 1.29 | +437.50% | — | -0.13 | -10.08% |
| Sep'24 (Q2) | 0.24 | -72.73% | — | -0.12 | -45.83% |
| Jun'24 (Q1) | 0.88 | — | — | -0.06 | -6.82% |
Financial Performance: Margin Expansion Masks Underlying Fragility
Shivamshree Businesses' operating performance in Q3 FY26 demonstrates a notable improvement in margin structure, though the absolute profitability remains precariously thin. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) stood at ₹0.19 crores, translating to an operating margin of 5.22%, a marked improvement from the negative 10.08% margin in Q3 FY25 and sequential expansion from Q2 FY26's 3.79%.
However, the margin expansion story becomes considerably less impressive when examined through the lens of absolute profitability. After accounting for depreciation of ₹0.23 crores—a significant charge that has remained elevated across recent quarters—and minimal interest costs, the company's profit before tax for Q3 FY26 stood at a meagre ₹0.02 crores. Tax expenses of ₹0.01 crores resulted in net profit of ₹0.02 crores, yielding a profit after tax margin of just 0.55%.
The depreciation burden warrants particular attention. At ₹0.23 crores in Q3 FY26, depreciation consumed 6.32% of revenues, suggesting substantial recent capital investments that have yet to translate into commensurate revenue generation. This elevated depreciation charge has been consistent across Q2 and Q3 FY26, indicating the company is absorbing costs from asset additions made to support its expansion efforts.
Employee costs have escalated significantly as the company scales operations, rising to ₹0.87 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹0.10 crores in Q3 FY25, though showing sequential moderation from Q2 FY26's ₹0.95 crores. This represents 23.90% of Q3 revenues, a substantial proportion that limits operating leverage and suggests the business model remains labour-intensive without clear productivity gains.
Operational Challenges: Weak Return Metrics Signal Structural Concerns
The most troubling aspect of Shivamshree Businesses' financial profile lies in its abysmal return metrics, which paint a picture of a company struggling to generate meaningful returns on invested capital. The average return on equity (ROE) stands at a negligible 0.05%, whilst the latest ROE figure deteriorates further to negative 9.79%, indicating the company is actively destroying shareholder value.
Return on capital employed (ROCE) presents an equally dismal picture, with the average ROCE at negative 2.61% and the latest figure plummeting to negative 10.73%. These metrics unequivocally demonstrate that the company's capital deployment has been inefficient, with invested funds failing to generate adequate returns to justify their cost.
Critical Capital Efficiency Concerns
With ROE of just 0.05% (average) and ROCE at negative 2.61%, Shivamshree Businesses ranks amongst the weakest performers in capital efficiency. The latest quarterly metrics show further deterioration, with ROE at negative 9.79% and ROCE at negative 10.73%, indicating ongoing value destruction. For context, healthy FMCG companies typically deliver ROE above 15% and ROCE above 20%, highlighting the massive performance gap.
The company's five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in operating profits stands at negative 168.43%, reflecting consistent operational losses over an extended period. Sales growth over the same period shows a negative 10.40% CAGR, indicating the company has experienced revenue contraction rather than expansion when viewed through a longer-term lens.
On the balance sheet front, the company maintains relatively low leverage with an average net debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18 and negative net debt-to-EBITDA, suggesting it operates with minimal borrowings. Whilst this limits financial risk, it also indicates that the company's operational challenges are not primarily debt-driven but rather stem from fundamental business model weaknesses.
Asset Quality and Capital Structure: No Promoter Holdings Raise Governance Questions
Shivamshree Businesses presents an unusual shareholding structure that merits careful consideration. The company has zero promoter holdings across all reported quarters, with 100% of shares held by non-institutional investors. This complete absence of promoter stake is highly atypical for Indian listed companies and raises questions about management alignment with shareholder interests and long-term strategic commitment.
Furthermore, institutional participation remains entirely absent, with no holdings from foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, or other domestic institutional investors (DIIs). This institutional vacuum suggests that professional investors have not found the company's fundamentals compelling enough to warrant investment, leaving the shareholder base entirely in the hands of retail and non-institutional participants.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | Mutual Funds % | Insurance % | Non-Institutional % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
| Sep'25 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
| Jun'25 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
| Sep'24 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
The company's equity capital stands at ₹4.56 crores, with 4.57 crore shares outstanding. The absence of promoter pledging is a positive, though this benefit is entirely negated by the fact that there are no promoter holdings to pledge in the first place.
Peer Comparison: Lagging Across All Key Metrics
When benchmarked against FMCG sector peers of similar size, Shivamshree Businesses' underperformance becomes starkly evident. The company's ROE of 0.05% compares unfavourably to peers such as Jetmall Spices (2.98%), Paramount Cosmetics (3.63%), and Chothani Foods (1.37%). Even amongst a peer group characterised by modest returns, Shivamshree ranks at the bottom.
The company's price-to-book value ratio of 2.24x appears elevated relative to its return profile, trading at a premium to peers like Paramount Cosmetics (0.88x) and Chothani Foods (1.08x) despite delivering inferior returns on equity. This valuation disconnect suggests the market may be pricing in optimistic expectations for future improvement that have yet to materialise in reported financials.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | ROE % | Debt/Equity | Price/Book | Market Cap (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shivamshree Busi | NA (Loss Making) | 0.05% | 0.18 | 2.24 | 16.00 |
| Jetmall Spices | NA (Loss Making) | 2.98% | -0.04 | 2.49 | — |
| Novateor Research | 236.11 | 1.02% | 0.08 | 2.36 | — |
| Hipolin | NA (Loss Making) | 0.00% | 0.13 | 2.28 | — |
| Paramount Cosmetics | 300.36 | 3.63% | 0.44 | 0.88 | — |
| Chothani Foods | 120.55 | 1.37% | 0.08 | 1.08 | — |
Debt levels remain conservative across the peer group, with Shivamshree's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18 comparable to sector standards. However, this financial conservatism has not translated into superior operational performance, highlighting that the company's challenges are fundamentally operational rather than financial structure-related.
Valuation Analysis: Risky Grade Reflects Fundamental Weaknesses
Shivamshree Businesses carries a "Risky" valuation grade, appropriately reflecting the company's precarious financial position and uncertain earnings trajectory. With the company generating minimal profits and demonstrating negative return metrics, traditional valuation multiples offer limited analytical value.
The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple stands at negative 18.55x, a mathematically meaningless figure given the company's negligible EBITDA generation. Similarly, the EV-to-EBIT ratio mirrors this at negative 18.55x. The EV-to-sales ratio of 4.49x suggests the market is valuing the company at approximately 4.5 times its revenue run rate, a premium that appears unjustified given the weak profitability profile.
The price-to-book ratio of 2.24x implies the market values the company's net assets at more than double their book value, despite the company's demonstrated inability to generate adequate returns on those assets. This premium appears difficult to justify and suggests significant downside risk should operational performance fail to improve materially.
The stock trades at ₹2.27, approximately 14.66% below its 52-week high of ₹2.66 but 42.77% above its 52-week low of ₹1.59. This positioning suggests the market remains uncertain about the company's trajectory, with the stock range-bound as investors assess whether the recent operational improvements represent a sustainable turnaround or merely temporary respite.
Stock Performance: Short-Term Gains Mask Long-Term Underperformance
Shivamshree Businesses' stock has delivered mixed returns across different timeframes, with recent performance showing improvement whilst longer-term results remain deeply negative. Year-to-date, the stock has gained 5.09%, outperforming the Sensex's 1.65% decline by 6.74 percentage points. Over the past six months, the stock has returned 10.73% compared to the Sensex's 3.45% gain, generating positive alpha of 7.28 percentage points.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Day | +0.89% | +0.09% | +0.80% |
| 1 Week | +2.71% | +1.79% | +0.92% |
| 1 Month | -1.73% | -2.27% | +0.54% |
| 6 Months | +10.73% | +3.45% | +7.28% |
| YTD | +5.09% | -1.65% | +6.74% |
| 10 Years | -75.00% | +244.38% | -319.38% |
However, the longer-term picture remains catastrophic. Over a ten-year period, the stock has declined 75.00% whilst the Sensex has surged 244.38%, resulting in massive underperformance of 319.38 percentage points. This stark divergence underscores the company's chronic inability to create shareholder value over extended periods.
Technical indicators show a "Mildly Bullish" trend, with the stock trading above its 5-day (₹2.26), 20-day (₹2.19), 50-day (₹2.15), and 100-day (₹2.16) moving averages. This technical positioning suggests near-term momentum remains positive, though technical strength alone cannot compensate for fundamental weaknesses.
Investment Thesis: Speculative Turnaround Play With High Risk
Shivamshree Businesses presents as a highly speculative investment proposition characterised by nascent operational improvements set against a backdrop of chronic underperformance and structural weaknesses. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of 39 out of 100 places it firmly in "Sell" territory, reflecting the significant risks that outweigh potential rewards.
The investment case rests primarily on the company's recent revenue acceleration and margin improvement, which demonstrate management's ability to drive top-line growth and achieve positive operating leverage. The sequential revenue growth from ₹0.88 crores in Q1 FY24 to ₹4.22 crores in Q2 FY26 represents a dramatic scaling effort that, if sustained, could eventually translate into meaningful profitability.
However, this optimistic scenario faces formidable headwinds. The company's return metrics remain amongst the weakest in the sector, indicating fundamental inefficiencies in capital deployment. The absence of promoter holdings and complete lack of institutional participation raise governance concerns and suggest sophisticated investors have evaluated and rejected the opportunity.
Furthermore, the sequential revenue decline in Q3 FY26 breaks the growth momentum established in the first half, raising questions about demand sustainability. With operating margins still in low single digits and significant depreciation charges eroding profitability, the path to sustainable, meaningful earnings generation remains unclear.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
KEY STRENGTHS ✓
- Revenue Acceleration: 182.17% YoY growth in Q3 FY26 demonstrates scaling capability
- Margin Improvement: Operating margin expanded to 5.22% from negative territory year ago
- Return to Profitability: Achieved positive net profit after several quarters of losses
- Low Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18 limits financial risk
- No Pledging: Zero promoter pledging eliminates that specific governance concern
- Technical Momentum: Stock trading above key moving averages with mildly bullish trend
- YTD Outperformance: Stock up 5.09% vs Sensex decline of 1.65%
KEY CONCERNS ⚠
- Abysmal ROE: Return on equity of just 0.05% indicates severe capital inefficiency
- Negative ROCE: Return on capital employed at -2.61% demonstrates value destruction
- No Promoter Holdings: Zero promoter stake raises alignment and commitment questions
- Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, MF, or insurance holdings
- Sequential Revenue Decline: Q3 sales down 13.74% QoQ breaks growth momentum
- Fragile Profitability: PAT margin of just 0.55% provides minimal buffer
- High Depreciation: Depreciation consuming 6.32% of revenues limits profit conversion
- Long-term Underperformance: Stock down 75% over 10 years vs Sensex up 244%
- Risky Valuation: Price-to-book of 2.24x unjustified given return profile
Outlook: Critical Juncture With Sustainability Questions
Shivamshree Businesses stands at a critical juncture where the sustainability of its recent operational improvements will determine whether the company represents a genuine turnaround or merely a temporary bounce in a chronic underperformer. The Q3 FY26 results, whilst showing continued year-on-year improvement, introduced concerning sequential weakness that demands careful monitoring.
POSITIVE CATALYSTS ↑
- Sustained Revenue Growth: Maintaining quarterly revenues above ₹3.50 crores
- Margin Expansion: Operating margins crossing 8-10% threshold sustainably
- Profit Scaling: PAT margins expanding to 3-5% range
- Institutional Entry: Mutual funds or other institutions taking positions
- Promoter Acquisition: Credible promoter group acquiring stake and providing strategic direction
RED FLAGS ↓
- Further Sequential Decline: Q4 FY26 revenues falling below Q3 levels
- Return to Losses: Any quarter showing negative net profit
- Margin Compression: Operating margins slipping back below 3%
- Continued Institutional Absence: No professional investor interest materialising
- Deteriorating Returns: ROE/ROCE metrics worsening further from current levels
For the company to merit a more constructive investment stance, it must demonstrate several consecutive quarters of revenue growth accompanied by meaningful margin expansion. Operating margins need to sustainably cross the 10% threshold, whilst PAT margins should reach at least 3-5% to provide adequate returns on invested capital. Most critically, the company requires credible promoter involvement and institutional validation to address governance concerns and provide strategic direction.
The absence of these catalysts, combined with the company's historical track record of value destruction, suggests investors should approach this opportunity with extreme caution. The micro-cap nature of the stock further amplifies risks related to liquidity and price volatility.
The Verdict: Avoid This High-Risk Speculative Play
Score: 39/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation. The company's abysmal return metrics (ROE of 0.05%, ROCE of -2.61%), complete absence of promoter holdings and institutional participation, and fragile profitability profile present unacceptable risks. Recent operational improvements remain unproven and insufficient to offset structural weaknesses. The sequential revenue decline in Q3 FY26 raises immediate concerns about sustainability. Numerous better-quality opportunities exist in the FMCG space with established track records and credible management.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical strength. Whilst the stock has generated positive returns over the past six months, the fundamental picture remains deeply concerning. The lack of institutional interest and promoter involvement, combined with weak return metrics, suggests limited upside potential. Use any rallies towards the 52-week high of ₹2.66 as exit opportunities. The risk-reward profile heavily favours downside, particularly if Q4 FY26 results disappoint.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹1.60-1.80 (approximately 25-30% downside risk from current levels of ₹2.27, based on normalised P/BV multiple of 0.8-1.0x for a company with sub-1% ROE)
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in micro-cap stocks carry heightened risks including liquidity constraints, volatility, and potential for total capital loss.
