The September 2025 quarter marks a concerning inflexion point for Shree Tirupati Balajee, with the company recording its lowest quarterly operating profit margin in recent history at 4.33%, down sharply from 10.78% in the year-ago quarter. This margin compression, combined with declining revenues and elevated employee costs, has created a perfect storm that has decimated profitability. The company's return on equity stands at a weak 8.66%, significantly below industry standards, whilst return on capital employed of 10.20% suggests inefficient capital allocation. With the stock now in a confirmed bearish technical trend and trading at multi-month lows, investors are questioning whether this represents a temporary setback or the beginning of a more sustained period of underperformance.
Financial Performance: Margin Collapse Drives Profit Erosion
The Q2 FY26 financial performance reveals a company grappling with severe operational challenges. Net sales declined 8.30% year-on-year to ₹142.65 crores from ₹155.57 crores, whilst sequentially showing a modest 13.75% increase from Q1 FY26's ₹125.41 crores. However, the revenue performance masks a far more troubling deterioration in profitability metrics. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) collapsed to ₹6.17 crores in Q2 FY26, representing the lowest quarterly figure in the company's recent history and marking a staggering 63.21% year-on-year decline from ₹16.77 crores.
The margin compression story becomes even more concerning when examining the sequential trends. Operating margin (excluding other income) plummeted from 8.36% in Q1 FY26 to just 4.33% in Q2 FY26, a 403 basis points sequential decline. PAT margin followed a similar trajectory, collapsing from 5.07% to 1.18% quarter-on-quarter. This dramatic deterioration suggests the company is facing mounting cost pressures that it cannot pass on to customers through pricing power. Employee costs rose 25.71% year-on-year to ₹11.55 crores, representing 8.10% of revenues compared to 5.91% in the year-ago quarter, indicating either wage inflation or operational inefficiencies.
| Quarter | Revenue (₹ Cr) | QoQ Growth | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Growth | Operating Margin | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 142.65 | +13.75% | 2.09 | -59.34% | 4.33% | 1.18% |
| Jun'25 | 125.41 | -8.89% | 5.14 | -9.19% | 8.36% | 5.07% |
| Mar'25 | 137.65 | -3.51% | 5.66 | -7.67% | 6.36% | 5.06% |
| Dec'24 | 142.66 | -8.30% | 6.13 | -13.54% | 11.61% | 5.71% |
| Sep'24 | 155.57 | +8.40% | 7.09 | +9.08% | 10.78% | 5.83% |
| Jun'24 | 143.52 | -21.01% | 6.50 | -30.85% | 10.86% | 5.52% |
| Mar'24 | 181.69 | — | 9.40 | — | 10.90% | 6.05% |
The quality of earnings in Q2 FY26 raises additional red flags. Other income of ₹3.60 crores represented a staggering 125.00% of profit before tax (PBT) of ₹2.88 crores, suggesting that non-operating income is propping up headline profitability. When excluding other income, the company recorded a profit before tax of negative ₹0.72 crores, marking the lowest level on record. This dependence on other income to generate positive earnings is unsustainable and highlights the underlying weakness in core operations. The interest coverage ratio, measured by operating profit to interest, deteriorated to a concerning 1.17 times in Q2 FY26, the lowest on record, indicating mounting financial stress and reduced ability to service debt obligations.
⚠️ Critical Profitability Warning
Other Income Dependency: Other income at ₹3.60 crores represents 125% of profit before tax, indicating core operations are loss-making. When excluding other income, the company posted a loss before tax of ₹0.72 crores – the worst quarterly performance on record. This unsustainable reliance on non-operating income masks severe operational distress.
Interest Coverage Crisis: Operating profit to interest coverage has collapsed to just 1.17 times, the lowest level recorded, raising concerns about the company's ability to service its debt obligations comfortably.
Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Deteriorating Efficiency
Beyond the immediate quarterly setback, Shree Tirupati Balajee's operational metrics paint a picture of a company struggling with fundamental efficiency issues. The company's return on equity of 8.66% places it at the bottom of its peer group and well below acceptable thresholds for value creation. For context, a company must generate returns above its cost of capital to create shareholder value, and an ROE below 10% typically signals capital is being deployed inefficiently. The company's return on capital employed of 10.20% tells a similar story, suggesting that for every ₹100 of capital employed in the business, the company generates merely ₹10.20 of operating profit – a weak showing that fails to justify the capital intensity of the packaging business.
The five-year financial track record reveals a company that has failed to scale profitably despite revenue growth. Whilst net sales have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 7.40% over the past five years, operating profit (EBIT) has actually contracted at a rate of 9.29% annually. This negative operating leverage indicates that the company's cost structure is rising faster than revenues, eroding profitability over time. The average EBIT to interest coverage ratio of 2.53 times over the past five years is below comfortable levels, whilst the debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.50 suggests elevated leverage relative to cash generation capability.
Balance Sheet Health: Moderate Concerns
As of March 2025, Shree Tirupati Balajee's balance sheet shows shareholder funds of ₹293.09 crores against total assets, with long-term debt reduced to ₹8.93 crores from ₹38.33 crores in the previous year. Whilst the deleveraging is positive, current liabilities of ₹236.98 crores against current assets of ₹495.00 crores suggest adequate short-term liquidity. However, the company's net debt to equity ratio of 0.67 remains elevated, and with deteriorating profitability, the ability to further reduce leverage is questionable. Fixed assets have increased to ₹84.66 crores, indicating ongoing capital expenditure, but the return on these investments remains unconvincing given the weak ROCE metrics.
The cash flow statement for FY24 reveals operational challenges that preceded the current quarter's results. The company generated negative operating cash flow of ₹26.00 crores in FY24, driven by a ₹76.00 crores adverse movement in working capital. This suggests the company is tying up increasing amounts of cash in inventory and receivables, a concerning trend that strains liquidity. With closing cash of effectively zero as of March 2024, the company's financial flexibility is severely constrained. The combination of weak profitability, negative operating cash flows, and minimal cash reserves creates a precarious financial position that limits the company's ability to weather further operational setbacks or invest in growth initiatives.
Industry Context: Underperforming the Packaging Sector
The packaging industry in India has been experiencing mixed performance, with demand tied to broader economic activity and end-user industries such as food and beverages, pharmaceuticals, and consumer goods. Whilst the sector has benefited from structural growth drivers including organised retail expansion and rising consumer spending, margin pressures from raw material costs and competitive intensity have challenged profitability for smaller players. Shree Tirupati Balajee's performance must be viewed against this backdrop, where the company has not only failed to capitalise on industry tailwinds but has actively underperformed its peer group.
Over the past year, the packaging sector has delivered a return of negative 8.64%, reflecting broader headwinds. However, Shree Tirupati Balajee has dramatically underperformed even this weak benchmark, posting a one-year return of negative 41.42% – an underperformance of 32.78 percentage points versus the sector. This suggests company-specific issues rather than sector-wide challenges are driving the stock's poor performance. The company's inability to maintain margins in a challenging environment, combined with revenue stagnation, indicates a lack of competitive positioning or operational excellence that would allow it to navigate industry headwinds successfully.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE % | Debt/Equity | Div Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shree Tirupati Balajee | 13.72 | 1.19 | 8.66% | 0.67 | — |
| Pyramid Technoplast | 21.55 | 2.34 | 17.84% | 0.20 | 0.32% |
| TPL Plastech | 21.57 | 3.59 | 13.06% | 0.27 | 1.47% |
| Haldyn Glass | 26.83 | 2.39 | 9.84% | 0.54 | 0.73% |
| Kanpur Plastipack | 16.00 | 2.42 | 9.48% | 0.66 | 0.42% |
| B&B Triplewall | NA (Loss Making) | 3.55 | 10.56% | 2.04 | — |
The peer comparison reveals Shree Tirupati Balajee trading at a significant discount to its packaging sector peers, but this discount appears justified given the company's inferior operational metrics. With an ROE of 8.66%, the company ranks at the bottom of its peer group, well below Pyramid Technoplast's 17.84% and TPL Plastech's 13.06%. The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.19 times compares to a peer average of approximately 2.90 times, whilst its P/E ratio of 13.72 times trades below the peer average of around 21 times. However, this valuation discount reflects the market's recognition of the company's weak return profile and deteriorating fundamentals rather than representing an attractive entry opportunity. The absence of any dividend yield further reduces the stock's appeal compared to peers who return cash to shareholders.
Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Mask Fundamental Weakness
At the current price of ₹41.85, Shree Tirupati Balajee trades at a P/E ratio of 13.72 times trailing twelve-month earnings and a price-to-book value of 1.19 times. On a superficial level, these multiples appear attractive, particularly when compared to the industry P/E of 17 times. The company's enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 9.43 times and EV to sales ratio of 0.94 times also suggest the stock is not expensive relative to its financial metrics. However, valuation must be assessed in the context of business quality, growth prospects, and return on capital – areas where Shree Tirupati Balajee demonstrates significant weakness.
The proprietary valuation assessment grades the stock as "Attractive" at current levels, having been downgraded from "Very Attractive" in early June 2025. Whilst the mathematical valuation appears reasonable, this assessment fails to capture the deteriorating trajectory of the business. A company generating sub-10% returns on equity and experiencing negative operating profit growth deserves to trade at a discount to book value and below market multiples. The absence of dividend payments means investors rely entirely on capital appreciation, which appears unlikely given the current operational trajectory. The 52-week price performance, with the stock down 49.58% from its high of ₹83.00, suggests the market is re-rating the stock downward as the fundamental deterioration becomes apparent.
"Low valuations are not inherently attractive when a company's return on capital falls below its cost of capital and operational trends are deteriorating. Shree Tirupati Balajee's discount to peers reflects fundamental weakness, not opportunity."
Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Exodus Signals Concern
The shareholding pattern over the past five quarters reveals a concerning trend of institutional divestment that validates the fundamental concerns outlined in this analysis. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have systematically reduced their stake from 3.65% in September 2024 to a mere 0.02% in September 2025, representing an almost complete exit from the stock. This 363 basis points reduction in FII holding over four quarters signals a clear loss of confidence from sophisticated international investors who typically conduct rigorous due diligence before investment decisions.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Insurance % | Other DII % | Public % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 65.42% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 33.54% |
| Jun'25 | 65.42% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 33.33% |
| Mar'25 | 65.42% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 32.01% |
| Dec'24 | 65.42% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 1.81% | 30.66% |
| Sep'24 | 65.42% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 3.97% | 26.94% |
Equally concerning is the reduction in other domestic institutional investor (DII) holdings from 3.97% in September 2024 to 1.02% in September 2025, a 295 basis points decline. The absence of any mutual fund holdings throughout this period is particularly telling – domestic mutual funds, which typically identify and invest in promising mid and small-cap opportunities, have shown zero interest in the stock. Insurance companies, which held a negligible 0.02% stake, have also exited completely. The combined institutional holding now stands at a paltry 1.04%, indicating a near-total absence of institutional support. Meanwhile, promoter holding has remained static at 65.42%, showing neither confidence-building stake increases nor concerning pledging activity, but simply a passive stance as the business deteriorates.
Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes
The stock's price performance has been catastrophic across all measured timeframes, with Shree Tirupati Balajee dramatically underperforming both the broader market and its sector. Over the past year, the stock has declined 41.42% whilst the Sensex has gained 5.50%, resulting in a negative alpha of 46.92 percentage points. This underperformance has accelerated in recent months, with the stock down 22.31% over the past month alone compared to the Sensex's 1.66% gain. Year-to-date, the stock has plummeted 40.47% against the Sensex's 7.34% gain, representing a 47.81 percentage points underperformance.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | -5.47% | +0.49% | -5.96% |
| 1 Month | -22.31% | +1.66% | -23.97% |
| 3 Months | -12.56% | +4.05% | -16.61% |
| 6 Months | -3.70% | +5.56% | -9.26% |
| Year-to-Date | -40.47% | +7.34% | -47.81% |
| 1 Year | -41.42% | +5.50% | -46.92% |
From a technical perspective, the stock is in a confirmed bearish trend, having broken below all major moving averages. The current price of ₹41.85 trades below the 5-day moving average of ₹43.37, the 20-day average of ₹45.91, the 50-day average of ₹49.48, the 100-day average of ₹48.49, and the 200-day average of ₹50.45. This alignment of all moving averages above the current price is a classic bearish configuration that typically signals further downside risk. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, meaning it tends to decline more sharply in down markets – a concerning characteristic given the current bearish trend. The risk-adjusted return of negative 0.93 over the past year confirms that investors have been penalised for taking on the stock's high volatility of 44.65%.
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Appeal
The investment case for Shree Tirupati Balajee is severely challenged by the convergence of negative fundamental, technical, and qualitative factors. The company's proprietary Mojo score of just 12 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting the multiple dimensions of weakness. The near-term financial trend is classified as "Negative," with the September 2025 quarter marking the lowest quarterly operating profit, PAT, and operating margin on record. The technical trend is "Bearish," with the stock in a confirmed downtrend and trading at multi-month lows. The quality assessment is "Below Average," reflecting the company's weak return profile and negative five-year operating profit growth.
Whilst the valuation appears "Attractive" at current levels, this assessment is misleading when considered against the company's poor return on capital and deteriorating operational trends. A company generating an 8.66% return on equity trading at 1.19 times book value is not cheap – it is appropriately valued for a business destroying shareholder value. The absence of institutional ownership, systematic FII and DII divestment, and complete lack of mutual fund interest all validate the fundamental concerns. The company's dependence on other income to generate positive earnings, collapsing interest coverage, and negative operating cash flows create a precarious financial position with limited room for error.
✅ KEY STRENGTHS
- Valuation Discount: Trading at 13.72x P/E vs industry 17x, below peers on P/BV
- Deleveraging: Long-term debt reduced from ₹38.33 Cr to ₹8.93 Cr in FY25
- No Pledging: Zero promoter share pledging indicates no immediate financial stress
- Stable Promoter: Promoter holding steady at 65.42% over past five quarters
- Adequate Liquidity: Current assets of ₹495 Cr vs current liabilities of ₹237 Cr
⚠️ KEY CONCERNS
- Collapsing Margins: Operating margin at record low 4.33%, down from 10.78% YoY
- Profit Erosion: Net profit down 70.52% YoY to ₹2.09 Cr in Q2 FY26
- Weak Returns: ROE at 8.66%, ROCE at 10.20% – both below acceptable thresholds
- Other Income Dependency: Other income at 125% of PBT; core operations loss-making
- Interest Coverage Crisis: Operating profit to interest at 1.17x, lowest on record
- Institutional Exodus: FII stake collapsed from 3.65% to 0.02%; zero MF holding
- Negative Cash Flow: Operating cash flow of -₹26 Cr in FY24; working capital stress
- Technical Breakdown: Stock in bearish trend, below all moving averages
- Severe Underperformance: Down 41.42% vs Sensex up 5.50% over past year
Outlook: Limited Visibility on Recovery Path
The outlook for Shree Tirupati Balajee remains challenging with limited near-term catalysts for improvement. The company must demonstrate it can reverse the margin compression, return to positive operating leverage, and generate sustainable cash flows before investors should consider re-engaging with the stock. The packaging industry's modest growth prospects provide some tailwind, but the company's inability to capture this growth whilst maintaining profitability suggests deeper structural issues. Management commentary on the path to margin recovery, cost reduction initiatives, and working capital optimisation will be critical to monitor in coming quarters.
📈 POSITIVE CATALYSTS
- Margin recovery to historical 10%+ levels
- Return to positive operating cash flow generation
- Revenue growth acceleration above 10% YoY
- Improvement in interest coverage above 3x
- Institutional investor re-entry signalling confidence
🚨 RED FLAGS TO MONITOR
- Further margin compression below 4% levels
- Continued dependence on other income for profitability
- Interest coverage falling below 1x
- Additional institutional selling or promoter pledging
- Negative operating cash flow in FY26
- Stock breaking below ₹37.85 (52-week low)
The Verdict: Fundamental Deterioration Warrants Exit
Score: 12/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating any position. The company is experiencing severe operational deterioration with collapsing margins, weak returns on capital, and negative financial trends. The apparent valuation discount is a value trap, not an opportunity. Wait for concrete evidence of margin recovery and return to positive operating leverage before considering entry.
For Existing Holders: Exit positions at current levels or on any technical bounce. The 70.52% year-on-year profit decline, record-low margins, and systematic institutional divestment signal fundamental problems that will take multiple quarters to resolve, if at all. The stock's bearish technical trend suggests further downside risk, whilst the absence of dividend income provides no cushion during the turnaround period.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹35.00 (16.35% downside from current price of ₹41.85). This estimate reflects a 1.0x price-to-book multiple on the current book value of ₹35.93, appropriate for a company with sub-10% ROE and deteriorating fundamentals.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. The analysis presented is based on publicly available information and may not reflect the most current developments. The author and publisher are not liable for any losses or damages arising from investment decisions based on this content.
