Shreeoswal Seeds Q3 FY26: Sharp Profit Decline Amid Revenue Volatility

Feb 13 2026 10:16 AM IST
share
Share Via
ShreeOswal Seeds and Chemicals Ltd., a micro-cap player in the agricultural products sector, reported a concerning third quarter for FY26, with consolidated net profit plummeting 80.82% year-on-year to ₹1.03 crores from ₹5.37 crores in Q3 FY25. The sequential picture was equally troubling, with profit declining 132.19% from a loss of ₹3.20 crores in Q2 FY26. With a market capitalisation of ₹126.05 crores and trading at ₹13.78 per share, the company faces mounting pressure from deteriorating operational metrics and persistent margin compression.
Shreeoswal Seeds Q3 FY26: Sharp Profit Decline Amid Revenue Volatility
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹1.03 Cr
▼ 80.82% YoY
Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹54.75 Cr
▼ 27.41% YoY
PAT Margin
1.88%
From 7.12% YoY
Operating Margin
5.06%
From 10.77% YoY

The quarter's results underscore the company's struggle with revenue volatility and operational efficiency. Net sales declined 27.41% year-on-year to ₹54.75 crores, whilst sequentially showing a 38.82% increase from Q2 FY26's depressed base of ₹39.44 crores. This wild quarterly swing reflects the inherent seasonality and unpredictability in the agricultural products business, but the magnitude of fluctuation raises concerns about business stability and management's ability to smooth operational cycles.

Operating margins contracted sharply to 5.06% in Q3 FY26 from 10.77% in the year-ago quarter, highlighting deteriorating cost structures and pricing power. The PAT margin compressed even more severely to 1.88% from 7.12%, indicating that profitability challenges extend beyond operational inefficiencies to encompass higher interest costs and tax burdens.

Financial Performance: Alarming Profitability Erosion

A detailed examination of the quarterly financials reveals troubling trends across multiple parameters. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) declined to ₹2.77 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹8.12 crores in Q3 FY25, representing a 65.89% year-on-year contraction. This metric has fallen 57.50% compared to the previous four-quarter average, signalling structural weakness rather than temporary headwinds.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change PAT Margin
Dec'25 (Q3 FY26) 54.75 +38.82% 1.03 -132.19% 1.88%
Sep'25 (Q2 FY26) 39.44 -59.73% -3.20 -143.96% -8.11%
Jun'25 (Q1 FY26) 97.95 +278.92% 7.28 +1223.64% 7.43%
Mar'25 (Q4 FY25) 25.85 -65.73% 0.55 -89.76% 2.13%
Dec'24 (Q3 FY25) 75.42 +11.42% 5.37 +1578.12% 7.12%
Sep'24 (Q2 FY25) 67.69 -12.03% 0.32 -111.76% 0.47%
Jun'24 (Q1 FY25) 76.95 -2.72 -3.53%

Interest expenses climbed to ₹1.16 crores in Q3 FY26, the highest quarterly level in the dataset, up from ₹0.75 crores in Q3 FY25. This 54.67% year-on-year increase reflects both higher debt levels and potentially elevated interest rates, squeezing already thin margins. The interest burden consumed 81.12% of operating profit in Q3 FY26, compared to just 9.19% in the year-ago quarter—a dramatic deterioration in financial efficiency.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹54.75 Cr
▼ 27.41% YoY | ▲ 38.82% QoQ
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹1.03 Cr
▼ 80.82% YoY | ▼ 132.19% QoQ
Operating Margin
5.06%
From 10.77% in Q3 FY25
Interest Cost
₹1.16 Cr
▲ 54.67% YoY (Highest)

Tax expenses in Q3 FY26 stood at ₹0.40 crores, translating to an effective tax rate of 27.97%. Whilst this represents a normalised tax burden, it further compressed net profitability in an environment where operating performance was already under severe strain.

Operational Challenges: Weak Return Metrics Signal Quality Concerns

The company's return on equity (ROE) averaged 9.55% over the assessment period, a figure that falls well below the threshold for quality businesses in the agricultural sector. The latest ROE of 20.92% appears inflated by the low equity base and doesn't reflect sustainable profitability given the quarterly volatility. Similarly, the average return on capital employed (ROCE) of 7.31% indicates weak capital efficiency, though the latest ROCE of 18.24% shows some improvement.

Critical Concern: Deteriorating Financial Strength

Negative Financial Trend: Q3 FY26 marked a sharp reversal from the "Very Positive" trend observed in Q1 FY26. Net sales fell 8.20% versus the previous four-quarter average, whilst PAT declined 58.80% against the same benchmark. Operating profit before other income dropped 57.50%, signalling broad-based operational weakness.

Leverage Burden: Average debt to EBITDA stands at an alarming 9.82 times, indicating the company carries excessive debt relative to its earnings generation capacity. With average net debt to equity at 0.97, the balance sheet remains stretched, limiting financial flexibility.

Interest Coverage Weakness: The average EBIT to interest ratio of just 1.75 times reveals inadequate earnings cushion to service debt obligations comfortably. In Q3 FY26, this ratio deteriorated further as interest costs surged.

Balance sheet metrics paint an equally concerning picture. Shareholder funds stood at ₹43.73 crores as of March 2025, up modestly from ₹40.20 crores in March 2024. However, current liabilities declined from ₹83.13 crores to ₹59.13 crores, primarily due to reduced other current liabilities rather than improved operational efficiency. Current assets fell from ₹112.49 crores to ₹92.39 crores, suggesting working capital compression that could constrain future growth.

The company's sales to capital employed ratio averaged 2.91 times, indicating moderate asset turnover efficiency. However, this metric must be viewed in context of the negative sales growth trajectory, which has seen revenue contract at a 4.51% compound annual rate over five years—a deeply troubling long-term trend.

The Debt Trap: Rising Interest Costs Squeeze Thin Margins

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of Shreeoswal Seeds' financial profile is its deteriorating debt servicing capacity. Interest expenses have climbed steadily, reaching ₹1.16 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹0.75 crores in Q3 FY25. On an annualised basis, interest costs have surged from ₹2.00 crores in FY19 to ₹5.00 crores in FY24, even as operating profits remained stagnant or declined.

Debt Dynamics: A Worsening Picture

Long-term debt stood at ₹0.18 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹1.68 crores in March 2023, suggesting the company has been paying down long-term obligations. However, the reduction appears to have been financed through working capital compression rather than improved cash generation, as evidenced by the decline in current assets and the negative cash flow from operations in FY24.

Cash flow from operations turned sharply negative at ₹15.00 crores in FY24 before recovering to a positive ₹24.00 crores in FY25. This volatility reflects the lumpy nature of working capital cycles in the agricultural products business but raises questions about the sustainability of cash generation.

The company's closing cash position stood at zero as of March 2025, down from ₹2.00 crores in March 2024, indicating tight liquidity. With no cash buffer and elevated debt servicing obligations, Shreeoswal Seeds operates with minimal financial flexibility to weather operational challenges or pursue growth opportunities.

Industry Context: Agricultural Headwinds Compound Company-Specific Woes

The broader "Other Agricultural Products" sector has faced its own challenges, with the sector delivering a negative 6.23% return over the past year. Shreeoswal Seeds underperformed even this weak benchmark, posting an 8.26% decline and generating negative alpha of 2.03 percentage points. This underperformance reflects both sector-wide pressures and company-specific execution shortfalls.

The agricultural inputs industry faces structural headwinds from volatile commodity prices, erratic monsoon patterns, and intense competition from both organised and unorganised players. For smaller players like Shreeoswal Seeds, these challenges are amplified by limited pricing power, higher working capital intensity, and restricted access to cost-effective financing.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV Avg ROE Debt/Equity
Shreeoswal Seeds 12.74x 2.67x 9.55% 0.97x
Sheel Biotech 13.58x 1.74x 0.0% 0.00x
Upsurge Seeds 15.71x 2.34x 15.69% 0.71x
Kohinoor Foods NA (Loss Making) -0.59x 0.0% -0.92x
Agri-Tech India NA (Loss Making) 0.79x 0.0% 0.00x
Saptarishi Agro 27.58x N/A N/A N/A

Relative to peers, Shreeoswal Seeds trades at a modest P/E multiple of 12.74 times, below Upsurge Seeds (15.71x) and significantly below Saptarishi Agro (27.58x). However, the company's price-to-book ratio of 2.67 times appears elevated given its below-average ROE of 9.55%, suggesting the market may be overvaluing the equity relative to underlying profitability. Upsurge Seeds, with a superior ROE of 15.69%, trades at a lower P/BV of 2.34 times, highlighting ShreeOswal's valuation disconnect.

Valuation Analysis: "Very Attractive" Rating Masks Fundamental Weakness

Despite the company's operational struggles, its proprietary valuation grade stands at "Very Attractive," having been upgraded from "Attractive" in June 2025. This rating reflects the stock's sharp price decline—down 32.05% from its 52-week high of ₹20.28—rather than any fundamental improvement in business quality or earnings trajectory.

At the current price of ₹13.78, Shreeoswal Seeds trades at a P/E ratio of 13.00 times trailing twelve-month earnings, which appears reasonable in isolation. However, this multiple fails to account for the negative earnings trend, with net profit declining 80.82% year-on-year in Q3 FY26. The price-to-book ratio of 2.67 times book value of ₹4.78 per share suggests the market assigns some premium to the business, though the weak ROE hardly justifies such a valuation.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
13.00x
Peer Avg: ~19x
Price to Book
2.67x
Book Value: ₹4.78
EV/EBITDA
9.78x
EV/Sales: 0.73x
Dividend Yield
NA
No Dividend

The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 9.78 times appears elevated for a business with declining margins and negative financial trends. The EV to sales ratio of 0.73 times reflects the asset-light nature of the business but doesn't compensate for the poor return on those assets. With a PEG ratio of 0.06, the stock theoretically offers value relative to growth, but the negative 4.51% five-year sales CAGR renders this metric meaningless.

The company pays no dividend, maintaining a dividend payout ratio of zero, which is understandable given the weak cash generation and need to service debt. Promoter holdings remain stable at 66.63% with no pledging, providing some governance comfort, though the absence of any institutional holdings (0.0% FII, mutual fund, and insurance participation) signals lack of confidence from sophisticated investors.

Shareholding: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest

Shareholding patterns reveal a concerning lack of institutional validation. Promoters maintain a steady 66.63% stake across the last five quarters with no pledging, indicating commitment but also limited ability or willingness to infuse fresh capital. The remaining 33.37% is held entirely by non-institutional investors, with zero participation from foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, insurance companies, or other domestic institutional investors.

Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24
Promoter 66.63% 66.63% 66.63% 66.63% 66.63%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 33.37% 33.37% 33.37% 33.37% 33.37%

This complete absence of institutional participation is a significant red flag. Sophisticated investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence before committing capital, and their collective avoidance suggests concerns about business quality, governance, growth prospects, or all three. For retail investors, this should serve as a cautionary signal about the investment risks inherent in the stock.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes

The stock's price performance tells a story of sustained value destruction. Over the past year, Shreeoswal Seeds declined 8.26% whilst the Sensex gained 8.82%, generating negative alpha of 17.08 percentage points. The underperformance intensifies over longer periods: two-year returns of negative 68.61% (versus Sensex +15.79%), three-year returns of negative 75.63% (versus Sensex +37.11%), and four-year returns of negative 2.34% (versus Sensex +42.48%).

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -0.14% -0.87% +0.73%
1 Month -7.33% -0.92% -6.41%
3 Month -6.13% -1.92% -4.21%
6 Month +4.63% +2.88% +1.75%
YTD (FY26) -19.37% -2.77% -16.60%
1 Year -8.26% +8.82% -17.08%
2 Years -68.61% +15.79% -84.40%
3 Years -75.63% +37.11% -112.74%
5 Years +186.25% +60.75% +125.50%

The only bright spot emerges in the five-year return of 186.25%, which significantly outperformed the Sensex's 60.75% gain. However, this long-term outperformance appears to reflect an extremely low base from 2021 rather than sustained value creation, as evidenced by the severe underperformance in recent years. The stock currently trades 32.05% below its 52-week high of ₹20.28 and 28.54% above its 52-week low of ₹10.72.

From a risk perspective, the stock exhibits high volatility of 47.31% compared to the Sensex's 11.46%, with a beta of 1.50 indicating it moves more dramatically than the broader market. The combination of high volatility and negative returns places Shreeoswal Seeds firmly in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category—the worst quadrant for investors.

Technical Analysis: Mildly Bullish Trend Offers Little Comfort

Technical indicators present a mixed picture with limited conviction. The overall trend classification stands at "Mildly Bullish" as of February 5, 2026, following a change from "Sideways" at ₹13.26. However, this classification appears tenuous given the stock trades below all key moving averages: 5-day MA (₹13.99), 20-day MA (₹13.72), 50-day MA (₹14.89), 100-day MA (₹14.79), and 200-day MA (₹14.49).

Individual technical indicators offer conflicting signals. The MACD shows bearish on a weekly basis but mildly bullish on monthly charts. The KST indicator remains bullish on weekly timeframes and mildly bullish monthly. However, the on-balance volume (OBV) indicates mildly bearish sentiment on a weekly basis, suggesting distribution rather than accumulation. Bollinger Bands signal bearish on weekly and mildly bearish on monthly timeframes, indicating potential downside pressure.

Key technical levels suggest limited upside and substantial downside risk. Immediate support lies at the 52-week low of ₹10.72, representing 22.20% downside from current levels. Immediate resistance sits at the 20-day moving average of ₹13.72, just 0.44% above current prices. Major resistance at the 100-day MA (₹14.79) and 200-day MA (₹14.49) represents 7.33% and 5.15% upside respectively—modest targets that would still leave the stock well below its 52-week high.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Appeal

The investment case for Shreeoswal Seeds rests primarily on its "Very Attractive" valuation grade and low absolute price. However, this superficial appeal crumbles under scrutiny of the underlying fundamentals. The company's Mojo Score of 38 out of 100 and "SELL" rating reflect the preponderance of negative factors overwhelming the valuation discount.

Valuation Grade
Very Attractive
✓ Positive
Quality Grade
Below Average
✗ Concern
Financial Trend
Negative
✗ Deteriorating
Technical Trend
Mildly Bullish
Neutral

The quality assessment of "Below Average" reflects the company's weak long-term financial performance, with negative 4.51% sales CAGR over five years, weak average ROCE of 7.31%, and poor EBIT to interest coverage of 1.75 times. The current negative financial trend, marked by sharp profit declines and margin compression, suggests conditions are worsening rather than improving.

"A cheap stock can always get cheaper when fundamentals deteriorate—Shreeoswal Seeds exemplifies this value trap, where declining earnings power and mounting leverage overwhelm any valuation appeal."

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Stable Promoter Holding: 66.63% promoter stake with zero pledging indicates commitment and governance stability
  • Attractive Valuation Multiples: P/E of 13x trades below peer average of ~19x, offering theoretical value
  • Improved Latest ROE: Latest ROE of 20.92% shows improvement from average of 9.55%, though sustainability is questionable
  • Positive Nine-Month Performance: Nine-month FY26 PAT of ₹5.11 crores remains positive despite Q3 weakness
  • Long-Term Debt Reduction: Long-term debt declined to ₹0.18 crores from ₹1.68 crores, reducing structural leverage

KEY CONCERNS

  • Severe Profit Decline: Q3 FY26 net profit crashed 80.82% YoY to ₹1.03 crores, signalling structural weakness
  • Revenue Contraction: Net sales declined 27.41% YoY in Q3 FY26; five-year CAGR at negative 4.51%
  • Margin Compression: PAT margin collapsed to 1.88% from 7.12% YoY; operating margin halved to 5.06%
  • Excessive Debt Burden: Debt to EBITDA of 9.82x and weak interest coverage of 1.75x constrain financial flexibility
  • Rising Interest Costs: Interest expense at ₹1.16 crores (highest ever) consumed 81% of operating profit in Q3
  • Zero Institutional Holdings: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance participation signals lack of confidence
  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 47.31% create significant downside risk in adverse markets

Outlook: What to Watch

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Sustained margin improvement above 8-10% operating margin levels
  • Revenue stabilisation with positive QoQ growth for three consecutive quarters
  • Interest cost reduction below ₹0.90 crores quarterly through debt paydown
  • Entry of institutional investors (mutual funds or FIIs) signalling quality validation
  • Improvement in EBIT to interest coverage above 3.0x consistently

RED FLAGS

  • Further margin compression below 5% operating margin in Q4 FY26
  • Revenue decline exceeding 10% in Q4 FY26 on a YoY basis
  • Interest costs rising above ₹1.20 crores quarterly
  • Working capital deterioration with current assets declining below ₹85 crores
  • Any promoter pledging or reduction in promoter stake

The Verdict: Avoid This Value Trap

SELL

Score: 38/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of deteriorating fundamentals, weak return metrics, excessive leverage, and zero institutional validation creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The "Very Attractive" valuation grade reflects price decline rather than value creation opportunity.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce towards ₹14.50-₹15.00 levels to minimise losses. The negative financial trend, margin compression, and rising interest burden suggest further downside risk. Use any strength to reduce exposure rather than averaging down.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹11.50 (16.54% downside risk from current price of ₹13.78)

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News