Sigma Solve Q4 FY26: Profit Slump Overshadows Revenue Stability

May 19 2026 10:17 PM IST
share
Share Via
Sigma Solve Ltd., a micro-cap IT services company listed on both NSE and BSE, reported a disappointing fourth quarter for FY26, with consolidated net profit declining 19.73% quarter-on-quarter to ₹5.37 crores despite relatively flat revenues. The Ahmedabad-based software consulting firm, with a market capitalisation of ₹429.00 crores, saw its stock trading at ₹40.82 on May 19, 2026, reflecting a modest 0.49% single-day gain but masking deeper concerns about profitability momentum and margin compression that emerged during the March quarter.
Sigma Solve Q4 FY26: Profit Slump Overshadows Revenue Stability
Net Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹5.37 Cr
▼ 19.73% QoQ | ▼ 21.26% YoY
Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹24.64 Cr
▼ 0.36% QoQ | ▲ 4.67% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
31.62%
▼ 8 bps QoQ | ▼ 971 bps YoY
Return on Equity
36.89%
Latest Quarter

The results paint a picture of a company struggling to maintain profitability momentum despite stable top-line performance. While net sales remained virtually flat at ₹24.64 crores in Q4 FY26 compared to ₹24.73 crores in Q3 FY26, the consolidated net profit witnessed a sharp contraction of 19.73% sequentially. More concerning is the year-on-year comparison, where profit declined 21.26% from ₹6.82 crores in Q4 FY25, even as revenues grew a modest 4.67%. This divergence between revenue and profit growth signals underlying operational challenges that warrant closer examination.

The company's performance over the past year has been characterised by volatility and inconsistency. For the full fiscal year FY26, Sigma Solve posted net sales of ₹95.62 crores and consolidated net profit of ₹24.00 crores, representing year-on-year growth of 25.82% and 26.32% respectively when compared to FY25 figures of ₹76.00 crores in revenue and ₹19.00 crores in profit. However, this annual growth masks significant quarterly fluctuations, with the March quarter proving to be a particularly weak ending to an otherwise promising year.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change PAT Margin
Mar'26 24.64 -0.36% 5.37 -19.73% 21.75%
Dec'25 24.73 -3.36% 6.69 +0.60% 27.09%
Sep'25 25.59 +23.86% 6.65 +28.38% 25.99%
Jun'25 20.66 -12.23% 5.18 -24.05% 25.07%
Mar'25 23.54 +20.22% 6.82 +61.23% 28.97%
Dec'24 19.58 +14.84% 4.23 +2.92% 21.60%
Sep'24 17.05 4.11 24.11%

Financial Performance: Margin Compression Drives Profit Decline

A detailed analysis of Sigma Solve's Q4 FY26 financials reveals that margin compression, rather than revenue weakness, drove the profit decline. Net sales of ₹24.64 crores in Q4 FY26 declined marginally by 0.36% from the previous quarter's ₹24.73 crores, representing essentially flat sequential performance. However, year-on-year revenue growth of 4.67% from ₹23.54 crores in Q4 FY25 demonstrates that the company is still managing to expand its top line, albeit at a modest pace.

The real concern emerges when examining profitability metrics. Operating profit excluding other income stood at ₹7.79 crores in Q4 FY26, yielding an operating margin of 31.62%. While this appears healthy in absolute terms, it represents a sequential decline of 8 basis points from 31.70% in Q3 FY26 and a much more significant year-on-year contraction of 971 basis points from the exceptional 41.33% margin recorded in Q4 FY25. This dramatic year-on-year margin erosion of nearly 10 percentage points is the primary driver behind the profit decline.

Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹24.64 Cr
▼ 0.36% QoQ | ▲ 4.67% YoY
Net Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹5.37 Cr
▼ 19.73% QoQ | ▼ 21.26% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
31.62%
▼ 8 bps QoQ | ▼ 971 bps YoY
PAT Margin
21.75%
▼ 534 bps QoQ | ▼ 722 bps YoY

Employee costs, typically the largest expense category for IT services firms, rose to ₹8.89 crores in Q4 FY26 from ₹8.77 crores in Q3 FY26, representing a 1.37% sequential increase. More tellingly, employee costs as a percentage of revenue climbed to 36.07% in Q4 FY26 from 35.46% in Q3 FY26, indicating deteriorating operational efficiency. Year-on-year, employee costs surged 5.33% from ₹8.44 crores in Q4 FY25, outpacing the 4.67% revenue growth and contributing to margin pressure.

The company's profit after tax margin contracted sharply to 21.75% in Q4 FY26 from 27.09% in Q3 FY26, a sequential decline of 534 basis points. Year-on-year, the PAT margin compression was even more pronounced, falling 722 basis points from 28.97% in Q4 FY25. This margin deterioration translated directly into the 19.73% sequential and 21.26% year-on-year decline in absolute profit, despite relatively stable revenue performance.

Quality of Earnings Concern

Other income turned negative at ₹-0.79 crores in Q4 FY26, a significant reversal from the positive ₹1.67 crores recorded in Q3 FY26. This ₹2.46 crores swing in other income contributed substantially to the profit decline. Year-on-year, the comparison is similarly unfavourable, with Q4 FY25 recording other income of ₹-0.13 crores. The volatility in other income raises questions about the sustainability and predictability of the company's overall earnings profile.

Operational Challenges: Efficiency Metrics Deteriorate

Beyond the headline numbers, several operational metrics point to underlying challenges at Sigma Solve. The company's return on equity, whilst still robust at 36.89% for the latest quarter, has shown signs of moderation from the exceptional levels witnessed earlier. The average ROE over recent periods stands at 42.16%, which remains strong in absolute terms and significantly above industry averages, demonstrating that the company continues to generate substantial returns on shareholder capital. However, the trajectory appears to be one of gradual normalisation rather than sustained expansion.

The balance sheet reveals a company with modest leverage and improving financial flexibility. Shareholder funds stood at ₹49.43 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹30.22 crores a year earlier, reflecting the company's ability to retain and compound earnings. Long-term debt declined to ₹1.88 crores from ₹2.87 crores, resulting in a negligible debt-to-equity ratio and positioning Sigma Solve as essentially a net cash company. This conservative capital structure provides financial resilience but also raises questions about whether the company is optimally deploying capital for growth.

Fixed assets increased to ₹6.97 crores as of March 2025 from ₹7.82 crores the previous year, whilst investments surged to ₹15.21 crores from ₹6.02 crores, suggesting the company is allocating capital to financial assets rather than operational expansion. Current assets stood at ₹34.57 crores, up from ₹23.12 crores, indicating improved liquidity but also potential underutilisation of resources. The company's sales to capital employed ratio of 1.48 times suggests moderate asset efficiency, leaving room for improvement in capital productivity.

Cash Flow Analysis: Strong Operations Offset by Investment Outflows

For FY25, Sigma Solve generated operating cash flow of ₹18.00 crores, a significant improvement from ₹7.00 crores in FY24, demonstrating strong cash generation from core operations. However, investing activities consumed ₹20.00 crores, primarily reflecting the increase in investments visible on the balance sheet. Financing activities resulted in an outflow of ₹2.00 crores, leading to a net cash decrease of ₹4.00 crores during the year. The company's closing cash balance stood at ₹2.00 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹7.00 crores a year earlier, highlighting the impact of investment deployment on liquidity.

Industry Context: Outperformance Amid Sector Weakness

Sigma Solve operates in the highly competitive Computers - Software & Consulting sector, which has faced significant headwinds over the past year. The broader sector delivered a negative return of 25.32% over the one-year period, reflecting challenges including demand uncertainty, pricing pressures, and margin compression across the industry. Against this backdrop, Sigma Solve's stock performance of 29.32% over the same period represents a remarkable 54.64 percentage point outperformance versus its sector, suggesting that investors have recognised the company's relative resilience.

However, this outperformance must be contextualised against the stock's recent volatility and technical weakness. Over the past six months, Sigma Solve shares have declined 17.95%, underperforming the Sensex's 11.72% decline by 623 basis points. Year-to-date, the stock is down 29.05% compared to the Sensex's 11.76% decline, indicating that the recent momentum has been decisively negative. The stock currently trades 37.48% below its 52-week high of ₹65.29, suggesting significant value destruction from peak levels.

The company's current market capitalisation of ₹429.00 crores positions it firmly in micro-cap territory, with the associated liquidity constraints and volatility. Trading volumes remain thin, with only 4,151 shares changing hands on May 19, 2026, limiting institutional participation and contributing to price volatility. The stock trades below all its key moving averages—5-day (₹41.73), 20-day (₹44.13), 50-day (₹42.35), 100-day (₹46.79), and 200-day (₹47.52)—indicating sustained technical weakness and lack of buying support at current levels.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield (%)
Sigma Solve 16.63 6.79 42.16 -0.04 0.12
Softtech Engineers 144.16 3.30 2.94 0.08 NA
Onward Technologies 12.48 2.30 13.60 -0.28 1.95
Inspirisys Solutions 11.23 4.78 24.10 -0.18 NA
DigiSpice Technologies 18.95 1.91 4.42 -1.09 NA
Cybertech Systems 14.42 2.07 13.76 -0.74 17.02

Peer Comparison: Premium Valuation Justified by Superior Returns

When compared to its peer group in the software and consulting space, Sigma Solve presents a mixed valuation picture. The company's price-to-earnings ratio of 16.63 times trailing twelve-month earnings appears reasonable and sits below the industry average P/E of 20 times, suggesting relative undervaluation on this metric. However, this must be weighed against the company's deteriorating earnings trajectory and margin pressures evident in the latest quarter.

Where Sigma Solve truly stands out is in its return on equity profile. The company's average ROE of 42.16% significantly exceeds that of all its peers, with the closest competitor being Inspirisys Solutions at 24.10%. This exceptional capital efficiency justifies the company's elevated price-to-book ratio of 6.79 times, which is the highest in the peer group but mathematically consistent with its superior return profile. In contrast, peers with much lower ROEs trade at substantially lower P/BV multiples, ranging from 1.91 times for DigiSpice Technologies to 4.78 times for Inspirisys Solutions.

The company's debt-free status, reflected in its negative debt-to-equity ratio of -0.04, positions it favourably compared to peers, most of whom also maintain conservative balance sheets. However, Sigma Solve's dividend yield of just 0.12% is amongst the lowest in the group, with only Cybertech Systems offering a substantially higher yield of 17.02%. The minimal dividend payout ratio of 2.69% suggests management is prioritising capital retention for growth, though the deployment of this capital into investments rather than operational expansion raises questions about growth strategy.

Valuation Analysis: Expensive Despite Recent Correction

At the current market price of ₹40.82, Sigma Solve trades at a P/E ratio of 16.63 times trailing earnings, which appears reasonable in isolation but must be evaluated in the context of deteriorating profitability trends. The company's valuation grade has been classified as "Expensive" as of May 19, 2026, having oscillated between "Expensive" and "Very Expensive" over recent months. This classification reflects concerns that the current valuation multiple does not adequately discount the risks associated with margin compression and earnings volatility.

The stock's price-to-book value of 6.79 times is elevated in absolute terms but finds justification in the company's exceptional ROE of 36.89% in the latest quarter and 42.16% on average. The fundamental principle that high ROE companies merit premium P/BV multiples holds true, as the company generates returns well above its cost of equity. However, if the recent margin deterioration persists and ROE begins to normalise downwards, the current P/BV multiple may prove difficult to sustain.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
16.63x
vs Industry 20x
Price to Book Value
6.79x
Premium Justified by ROE
Dividend Yield
0.12%
Minimal Payout
Mojo Score
26/100
Strong Sell Territory

The enterprise value metrics paint a similarly expensive picture. At an EV/EBITDA multiple of 13.87 times and EV/EBIT of 14.32 times, Sigma Solve trades at a premium to many larger, more established IT services companies. The EV/Sales ratio of 4.43 times is particularly elevated for a company experiencing margin contraction, as it implies investors are paying a substantial premium for each rupee of revenue despite deteriorating conversion to profit.

The PEG ratio of 0.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to growth, as values below 1.0 typically indicate attractive valuations. However, this metric is based on historical five-year EBIT growth of 13.57%, which may not reflect the current challenging operating environment and recent profit decline. The minimal dividend yield of 0.12% offers little income support for investors, making total returns heavily dependent on capital appreciation driven by earnings growth—a prospect that appears increasingly uncertain given recent performance trends.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Minimal Institutional Interest

Sigma Solve's shareholding structure reveals a company with strong promoter commitment but limited institutional participation. Promoter holdings have remained rock-solid at 73.22% across the last five quarters, with no change in stake, indicating unwavering confidence from the founding team. The key promoters include Prakash Ratilal Parikh (20.80%), Kalpana Prakashbhai Parikh (20.78%), Pujan Biren Zaverchand (15.81%), and Biren Harshad Zaverchand (15.81%), collectively controlling nearly three-quarters of the company.

Category Mar'26 Dec'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter 73.22% 73.22% 73.22% 73.22% 0.00%
FII 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% -0.03%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 26.78% 26.75% 26.78% 26.78% +0.03%

The concerning aspect of the shareholding pattern is the near-total absence of institutional investors. Foreign institutional investors held a negligible 0.03% stake in December 2025, which they completely exited by March 2026. Mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors maintain zero holdings in the company. This institutional void is a significant red flag, as sophisticated investors with extensive research capabilities have chosen to avoid or exit the stock despite its apparently attractive ROE profile.

The non-institutional shareholding of 26.78% comprises primarily retail investors, whose presence increased marginally by 0.03% in the March quarter. The complete lack of institutional validation raises questions about liquidity, corporate governance, disclosure quality, and growth visibility. For a company with strong financial metrics on paper, the absence of any institutional interest is puzzling and suggests that professional investors may have identified concerns not immediately apparent from public financial statements.

Positively, there is no promoter pledging of shares, eliminating concerns about financial distress or forced selling in adverse market conditions. However, the combination of concentrated promoter holdings, zero institutional participation, and thin retail float creates a challenging environment for price discovery and limits the stock's appeal to a broader investor base.

Stock Performance: Volatility Overshadows Long-Term Gains

Sigma Solve's stock price performance over various time horizons reveals a pattern of extreme volatility with diminishing positive momentum. Over the one-year period ending May 19, 2026, the stock delivered a return of 29.32%, substantially outperforming the Sensex's negative return of 8.36% by an impressive 37.68 percentage points. This one-year alpha generation represents the stock's strongest performance metric and explains why longer-term holders have maintained faith despite recent turbulence.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -6.57% +0.86% -7.43%
1 Month -12.55% -4.19% -8.36%
3 Months +0.29% -8.85% +9.14%
6 Months -17.95% -11.72% -6.23%
YTD -29.05% -11.76% -17.29%
1 Year +29.32% -8.36% +37.68%
2 Years +2.15% +1.61% +0.54%

However, the recent performance paints a dramatically different picture. Year-to-date through May 19, 2026, the stock has plummeted 29.05%, underperforming the Sensex's 11.76% decline by 17.29 percentage points. Over the past six months, Sigma Solve shares have fallen 17.95%, underperforming the market by 6.23 percentage points. The one-month return of negative 12.55% and one-week decline of 6.57% indicate accelerating downward momentum, with the stock underperforming the Sensex by 8.36 and 7.43 percentage points respectively over these shorter timeframes.

The stock's technical positioning confirms this bearish trend. Trading at ₹40.82, Sigma Solve sits 37.48% below its 52-week high of ₹65.29 but 33.53% above its 52-week low of ₹30.57. The current price remains below all key moving averages, a classic sign of technical weakness. The stock is 3.36% below its 5-day moving average, 7.50% below its 20-day average, 3.61% below its 50-day average, 12.77% below its 100-day average, and 14.10% below its 200-day average. This alignment of moving averages in descending order creates a bearish technical structure that typically requires significant positive catalysts to reverse.

The risk-adjusted return profile reveals high volatility as a defining characteristic. With an annualised volatility of 59.25% over the one-year period, Sigma Solve exhibits risk levels more than four times higher than the Sensex's 13.01% volatility. The beta of 1.17 confirms that the stock amplifies market movements, making it unsuitable for risk-averse investors. The positive Sharpe ratio of 0.49 suggests that the one-year returns have adequately compensated investors for the elevated risk, but the deteriorating recent performance raises questions about whether this relationship will persist.

"With profit declining 21% year-on-year despite revenue growth, and margins compressing nearly 1000 basis points, Sigma Solve faces a critical test of whether it can restore operational efficiency or whether the Q4 weakness signals a structural shift in its business model."

Investment Thesis: High Returns Cannot Offset Deteriorating Fundamentals

Sigma Solve's investment case rests on a foundation of strong historical returns on equity, minimal leverage, and consistent profitability over the past several years. The company's average ROE of 42.16% and latest quarter ROE of 36.89% demonstrate exceptional capital efficiency that few peers can match. The debt-free balance sheet and positive operating cash generation provide financial resilience and flexibility. For the full fiscal year FY26, the company delivered respectable growth of 25.82% in revenue and 26.32% in profit, suggesting the Q4 weakness may be an aberration rather than a trend.

However, these positives are increasingly overshadowed by mounting concerns. The proprietary Mojo score of just 26 out of 100 places the stock firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting a comprehensive assessment that weighs quality, valuation, financial trends, and technical factors. The score has declined from 72 in November 2025, when the stock carried a "Buy" rating, highlighting the dramatic deterioration in the investment case over the past six months.

Valuation Grade
Expensive
Despite Correction
Quality Grade
Good
Strong Fundamentals
Financial Trend
Flat
Recent Weakness
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish
Below All MAs

The financial trend assessment of "Flat" for the March 2026 quarter, down from "Positive" in September 2025, captures the deterioration in operating performance. The technical trend classification of "Mildly Bearish" reflects sustained selling pressure and lack of buying interest. The valuation grade of "Expensive" suggests limited margin of safety at current prices, whilst the quality grade of "Good" acknowledges the company's solid long-term financial track record.

The combination of deteriorating quarterly performance, expensive valuation, bearish technical structure, and complete absence of institutional validation creates a challenging risk-reward profile. The stock's extreme volatility with a beta of 1.17 and annualised volatility exceeding 59% makes it unsuitable for conservative portfolios. The minimal dividend yield of 0.12% offers no income cushion during periods of price weakness.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

✓ Key Strengths

  • Exceptional ROE Profile: Average ROE of 42.16% and latest quarter ROE of 36.89% significantly exceed industry averages and justify premium valuation multiples
  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Net debt-to-equity of -0.04 indicates a net cash position, providing financial flexibility and eliminating refinancing risks
  • Strong Cash Generation: Operating cash flow of ₹18.00 crores in FY25 demonstrates healthy conversion of profits to cash
  • Consistent Long-Term Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 23.01% reflects sustained business expansion over the medium term
  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares eliminate concerns about financial distress or forced selling
  • Stable Promoter Holdings: Consistent 73.22% promoter stake over five quarters signals unwavering management commitment
  • One-Year Outperformance: Stock return of 29.32% versus Sensex's -8.36% demonstrates strong historical momentum

⚠ Key Concerns

  • Severe Profit Decline: Q4 FY26 net profit fell 19.73% QoQ and 21.26% YoY despite stable revenues, indicating operational stress
  • Margin Compression: Operating margin contracted 971 basis points YoY from 41.33% to 31.62%, eroding profitability
  • Rising Employee Costs: Employee expenses growing faster than revenue, with cost-to-revenue ratio climbing to 36.07%
  • Zero Institutional Holdings: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance participation raises governance and visibility concerns
  • Expensive Valuation: P/BV of 6.79x and EV/Sales of 4.43x leave limited margin of safety, especially with deteriorating margins
  • Bearish Technical Structure: Trading below all moving averages with year-to-date decline of 29.05% and accelerating downward momentum
  • Extreme Volatility: Annualised volatility of 59.25% and beta of 1.17 create unsuitable risk profile for conservative investors
  • Weak Mojo Score: Score of 26/100 in "Strong Sell" territory reflects comprehensive negative assessment across multiple parameters

Outlook: Critical Juncture Requires Operational Turnaround

Sigma Solve stands at a critical juncture where the company must demonstrate that the Q4 FY26 weakness represents a temporary setback rather than the beginning of a sustained deterioration. The company's strong historical track record and exceptional ROE provide a foundation for recovery, but the path forward requires addressing the margin compression and restoring profitability momentum. The management's ability to control employee costs, improve operational efficiency, and sustain revenue growth will determine whether the company can justify its premium valuation multiples.

Positive Catalysts to Monitor

  • Margin Recovery: Evidence of operating margin expansion back towards 35-40% levels would restore confidence in operational efficiency
  • Consistent Quarterly Performance: Stable or growing profits in Q1 and Q2 FY27 would suggest Q4 FY26 was an aberration
  • Revenue Acceleration: Quarterly revenue growth above 10% QoQ would indicate strengthening demand environment
  • Institutional Interest: Entry of mutual funds or FIIs would validate investment case and improve liquidity
  • Technical Reversal: Stock reclaiming 20-day and 50-day moving averages would signal trend change

Red Flags to Watch

  • Further Margin Decline: Operating margins falling below 30% would indicate structural profitability challenges
  • Sequential Profit Contraction: Another quarter of declining profits would confirm a negative trend
  • Employee Cost Escalation: Employee costs exceeding 40% of revenue would severely pressure profitability
  • Institutional Exits: Any reduction in non-institutional holdings would signal retail investor loss of confidence
  • Technical Breakdown: Stock falling below ₹35 (near 52-week low) would trigger further selling pressure

The near-term outlook hinges critically on the Q1 FY27 results, which will reveal whether the Q4 weakness was an isolated event or the start of a troubling pattern. Investors should monitor employee cost trends, operating margin trajectory, and sequential profit growth as key indicators of operational health. The company's ability to deploy its cash reserves productively, either through business expansion or shareholder returns, will also influence the investment case.

From a technical perspective, the stock needs to reclaim its key moving averages and demonstrate sustained buying interest to reverse the current bearish trend. The lack of institutional participation means that any recovery will likely be gradual and driven by retail investors, limiting the potential for sharp upward moves. The high volatility profile suggests that investors should be prepared for continued price swings in both directions.

The Verdict: Operational Deterioration Outweighs Historical Strengths

STRONG SELL

Score: 26/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. The combination of deteriorating quarterly performance, expensive valuation, bearish technical structure, and zero institutional validation creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Wait for clear evidence of operational turnaround, margin recovery, and technical stabilisation before considering entry. The stock's extreme volatility and micro-cap liquidity constraints make it unsuitable for risk-averse portfolios.

For Existing Holders: Strongly consider exiting positions on any technical bounce towards the ₹44-46 range (20-day and 100-day moving averages). The 19.73% sequential and 21.26% year-on-year profit decline in Q4 FY26, coupled with 971 basis points of margin compression, signals serious operational challenges that may persist. The complete absence of institutional holders despite attractive ROE metrics raises concerns about aspects not visible in public financials. Book profits from the strong one-year gains before further deterioration.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹35-38 (14-17% downside from current levels), based on normalised earnings of ₹2.30-2.50 per share and a target P/E of 14-15x, reflecting increased risk premium for operational uncertainty and margin pressure.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News