Sonal Mercantile Q2 FY26: Profit Momentum Falters Amid Rising Interest Costs

The micro-cap NBFC, with a market capitalisation of ₹139.00 crores, witnessed its stock price surge 14.17% to ₹103.00 on November 18, 2025, following the quarterly results announcement. However, this short-term rally masks deeper concerns about the company's deteriorating profitability metrics and weak fundamental performance over the medium term. With a proprietary Mojo Score of just 23 out of 100 and a "Strong Sell" rating, the company faces significant headwinds that warrant careful investor scrutiny.

Financial Performance: Revenue Growth Fails to Translate into Profit Expansion

In Q2 FY26, Sonal Mercantile's net sales (interest income) reached ₹9.79 crores, representing a modest sequential improvement of 4.82% from ₹9.34 crores in Q1 FY26 and a year-on-year increase of 7.94% from ₹9.07 crores in Q2 FY25. However, this revenue growth proved insufficient to offset the sharp rise in interest expenses, which climbed to ₹6.32 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹6.05 crores in the previous quarter—a 4.46% quarter-on-quarter increase. On a year-on-year basis, interest costs surged 15.33% from ₹5.48 crores, significantly outpacing revenue growth and compressing net interest margins.

The company's standalone net profit declined to ₹2.31 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹2.29 crores in Q1 FY26, whilst consolidated net profit fell 9.60% sequentially to ₹7.63 crores. The PAT margin contracted to 23.60% in Q2 FY26 from 24.52% in Q1 FY26, reflecting deteriorating profitability. More concerning is the year-on-year margin compression of 562 basis points from 29.22% in Q2 FY25, indicating sustained pressure on the company's earnings quality.

Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) stood at ₹9.47 crores in Q2 FY26, up from ₹9.12 crores in the previous quarter, maintaining a robust operating margin of 96.73%. However, the elevated interest burden—which now consumes 64.56% of operating profit—leaves limited cushion for bottom-line growth. Tax expenses remained relatively stable at ₹0.83 crores with an effective tax rate of 26.43%, marginally higher than the previous quarter's 25.16%.

Asset Quality Concerns: Deteriorating Return Metrics Signal Operational Stress

The company's fundamental quality metrics paint a concerning picture. Sonal Mercantile's average return on equity (ROE) stands at just 7.29%, significantly below the threshold for quality NBFCs. This weak ROE reflects inefficient capital deployment and limited ability to generate shareholder value. The latest ROE of 8.71%, whilst marginally better than the average, remains substantially below industry standards for well-managed financial services companies.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) stood at 5.21%, indicating the company generates only ₹5.21 of operating profit for every ₹100 of capital employed—a level that barely exceeds the cost of capital in the current interest rate environment. This anaemic ROCE suggests the company struggles to earn adequate returns on its loan book, raising questions about asset quality, pricing discipline, and competitive positioning.

The balance sheet reveals total shareholder funds of ₹357.93 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹313.86 crores in the previous year. Current liabilities stood at ₹289.57 crores, down from ₹322.39 crores, indicating some deleveraging. However, the company's investments of ₹299.75 crores represent 83.74% of shareholder funds, suggesting a significant portion of capital is deployed in financial instruments rather than core lending activities. This asset allocation raises questions about the company's growth strategy and ability to scale its lending operations profitably.

Interest Rate Squeeze: Rising Funding Costs Compress Margins

The most pressing challenge facing Sonal Mercantile is the rapid escalation of interest expenses, which have grown disproportionately faster than revenue. In Q2 FY26, interest costs of ₹6.32 crores represented 64.56% of net sales, up from 64.78% in Q1 FY26 and 60.42% in Q2 FY25. This deteriorating interest coverage indicates the company faces mounting pressure on its net interest margins (NIMs), a critical profitability metric for NBFCs.

On an annual basis, interest expenses reached ₹20.00 crores in FY25, consuming 57.14% of net sales of ₹35.00 crores. Whilst this is an improvement from ₹23.00 crores (58.97% of sales) in FY24, the quarterly trend shows a reversal of this favourable trajectory. The company's ability to maintain profitability hinges on either growing its loan book at significantly higher yields or reducing its cost of funds—both challenging propositions in the current competitive and regulatory environment.

The cash flow statement reveals operational cash flow of just ₹1.00 crore for FY25, down from ₹0.00 crores in FY24. This minimal cash generation despite reporting net profit of ₹10.00 crores highlights significant working capital absorption, with changes in working capital consuming ₹9.00 crores during the year. Such divergence between reported profits and cash generation warrants close monitoring, as it may indicate aggressive accounting practices or challenges in collecting receivables.

Industry Leadership: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness

Within the NBFC peer group, Sonal Mercantile trades at a significant valuation discount, reflecting market scepticism about its growth prospects and earnings quality. The company's price-to-earnings ratio of 4.62x compares favourably to peers like Corporate Merch (55.11x) and Optimus Finance (18.77x), but this apparent cheapness masks underlying concerns about profitability sustainability and return metrics.

Sonal Mercantile's price-to-book value of 0.40x—the lowest in its peer group—suggests the market assigns minimal value to the company's net assets. Whilst this could theoretically represent a value opportunity, the sub-par ROE of 7.29% justifies this discount. In contrast, better-performing peers like Ramsons Projects and Optimus Finance command higher P/BV multiples of 6.53x and 1.87x respectively, supported by superior ROEs of 12.28% and 12.32%.

The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.72 indicates moderate leverage, lower than some peers but higher than unleveraged competitors. With zero institutional holdings—no foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, or insurance companies hold stakes—the stock lacks the support and scrutiny that typically accompanies institutional participation. This absence of institutional interest further underscores concerns about the company's investment appeal and governance standards.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Cannot Offset Fundamental Concerns

At the current market price of ₹103.00, Sonal Mercantile trades at a trailing P/E ratio of 5.00x, significantly below the industry average P/E of 24.00x. The company's enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 12.71x and EV-to-sales ratio of 12.40x appear reasonable on the surface. However, these valuation metrics must be viewed in the context of deteriorating earnings quality, weak return ratios, and uncertain growth prospects.

The company's PEG ratio of 0.40x suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate, with five-year sales CAGR of 17.63% and EBIT CAGR of 18.53%. However, this historical growth has not translated into value creation for shareholders, as evidenced by the stock's negative one-year return of 11.21% and three-year decline of 22.21%. The valuation grade of "Attractive" assigned by the proprietary system reflects only the low absolute multiples, not the quality of the underlying business.

Book value per share stands at ₹37.30, meaning the stock trades at 2.76x book value—a premium that appears unjustified given the company's inability to generate adequate returns on that book value. The 52-week trading range of ₹78.00 to ₹121.30 shows significant volatility, with the current price 15.09% below the 52-week high and 32.05% above the 52-week low.

Shareholding: Stable but Uninspiring Pattern

The shareholding pattern has remained completely static over the past five quarters, with promoter holding fixed at 24.92% and non-institutional shareholders controlling 75.08%. This stability, whilst providing some certainty, also indicates a lack of investor interest and limited liquidity in the stock.

The promoter entity, Ram Gopal Goyal & Sons LLP, holds the entire 24.92% promoter stake with no pledging of shares—a positive indicator of promoter confidence. However, the complete absence of institutional investors raises concerns about corporate governance standards, disclosure quality, and business transparency. Quality NBFCs typically attract institutional capital as they scale and demonstrate consistent performance; Sonal Mercantile's inability to do so over multiple quarters is telling.

Stock Performance: Short-Term Bounce Masks Long-Term Underperformance

Despite the recent 14.17% single-day surge following Q2 results, Sonal Mercantile's stock performance over meaningful timeframes remains deeply concerning. The one-week return of 9.31% and one-month gain of 5.42% represent short-term volatility rather than sustainable value creation.

Over the past year, the stock has declined 11.21% whilst the Sensex gained 9.48%, resulting in negative alpha of 20.69 percentage points. The three-year underperformance is even more pronounced, with the stock down 22.21% compared to the Sensex's 37.31% gain—a staggering 59.52 percentage point underperformance. The stock has also lagged its NBFC sector peer group by 35.61 percentage points over the past year, with the sector delivering 24.40% returns.

The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, yet this higher risk has not been compensated with higher returns. The risk-adjusted return of -0.21 over the past year, combined with volatility of 53.96%, places the stock firmly in the "High Risk Low Return" category—the worst possible quadrant for investors. The negative Sharpe ratio confirms that investors are not being adequately compensated for the risks undertaken.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Override Valuation Appeal

The proprietary Mojo Score of 23 out of 100 reflects a comprehensive assessment across four critical parameters: valuation, quality, financial trend, and technical trend. Whilst the valuation grade of "Attractive" acknowledges the low absolute multiples, this single positive is overwhelmed by weaknesses across other dimensions.

The quality grade of "Below Average" reflects the company's fundamental weakness, with an average ROE of 7.29% that falls well short of acceptable standards for financial services companies. The financial trend designation of "Flat" for Q2 FY26 indicates stagnating business momentum despite modest revenue growth. The technical trend of "Mildly Bearish" suggests limited near-term upside potential, with the stock trading below multiple moving averages and facing resistance at the ₹95.00 to ₹101.15 zone.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch