Supertex Industries Q2 FY26: Sharp Recovery Masks Deeper Structural Challenges

Nov 15 2025 10:40 AM IST
share
Share Via
Supertex Industries Ltd., a micro-cap textile processor specialising in polyester filament yarn, reported a dramatic quarterly turnaround in Q2 FY26 with net profit surging to ₹0.62 crores from a loss of ₹0.37 crores in the previous quarter. However, this recovery comes against a backdrop of persistent structural challenges, with the stock down 30.11% over the past year and trading at ₹7.59, commanding a market capitalisation of just ₹8.00 crores.



The Silvassa-based company, founded in 1986, posted quarterly revenue of ₹20.66 crores in Q2 FY26, representing a remarkable 152.57% quarter-on-quarter jump and 66.34% year-on-year growth. Yet, beneath this headline recovery lies a troubling reality: half-yearly sales for H1 FY26 declined 30.87% to ₹28.84 crores, whilst the company remains loss-making on a trailing twelve-month basis with an extremely low promoter holding of just 13.29%.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.62 Cr

▲ 267% QoQ | ▲ 10.71% YoY



Revenue Growth (Q2 FY26)

+66.34%

YoY Growth



Operating Margin (Q2 FY26)

8.13%

Highest in 7 Quarters



PAT Margin (Q2 FY26)

3.00%

vs -4.52% in Q1 FY26




The textile processing industry has witnessed volatile demand patterns in recent quarters, and Supertex's performance epitomises this turbulence. Whilst the company managed to swing back to profitability in Q2 FY26, the broader financial picture remains deeply concerning for investors seeking sustainable growth and quality.



Financial Performance: Volatile Recovery Amid Persistent Weakness



Supertex Industries' Q2 FY26 results reveal a company grappling with extreme operational volatility. Net sales of ₹20.66 crores represented a substantial 152.57% sequential increase from Q1 FY26's ₹8.18 crores, yet this dramatic recovery merely brought revenues back to levels comparable with Q2 FY25 (₹12.42 crores). The year-on-year growth of 66.34% appears impressive in isolation but must be contextualised against the company's erratic quarterly performance over the past two years.



Operating profit excluding other income reached ₹1.68 crores in Q2 FY26, yielding an operating margin of 8.13%—the highest recorded in the past seven quarters. This represents a marked improvement from Q1 FY26's anaemic 3.55% margin and compares favourably with the 7.00% achieved in Q2 FY25. However, the company's inability to maintain consistent margins across quarters raises serious questions about operational stability and pricing power.



The bottom line showed even more dramatic swings. After posting a net loss of ₹0.37 crores in Q1 FY26, the company rebounded to a profit of ₹0.62 crores in Q2 FY26, translating to a PAT margin of 3.00%. Whilst this marks a significant improvement, the company's profitability remains fragile, with FY25 ending in a net loss of ₹0.75 crores for the full year.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹20.66 Cr

▲ 152.57% QoQ | ▲ 66.34% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.62 Cr

vs Loss of ₹0.37 Cr in Q1



Operating Margin (Q2 FY26)

8.13%

vs 3.55% in Q1 FY26



PAT Margin (Q2 FY26)

3.00%

vs -4.52% in Q1 FY26










































































Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin PAT Margin
Sep'25 20.66 +152.57% 0.62 8.13% 3.00%
Jun'25 8.18 -23.69% -0.37 3.55% -4.52%
Mar'25 10.72 -48.83% -0.75 5.32% -7.00%
Dec'24 20.95 +68.68% 0.16 5.78% 0.76%
Sep'24 12.42 -57.61% 0.56 7.00% 4.51%
Jun'24 29.30 -27.42% -0.04 3.14% -0.14%
Mar'24 40.37 0.06 2.58% 0.15%



Perhaps most concerning is the half-yearly perspective. Despite the Q2 recovery, H1 FY26 revenue of ₹28.84 crores represents a 30.87% decline compared to the corresponding period last year. This suggests that the Q2 surge may be more of a temporary reprieve than the beginning of a sustained turnaround, particularly given the company's history of erratic quarterly performance.



Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and High Leverage



Beyond the quarterly volatility, Supertex Industries faces fundamental operational challenges that severely constrain its investment appeal. The company's return on equity stands at a meagre 0.55% on average, with the latest half-year figure showing a negative ROE of -1.13%. For context, this means the company is barely generating any returns on shareholder capital—a critical red flag for equity investors seeking growth and value creation.



Return on capital employed (ROCE) paints an equally troubling picture at just 5.69% on average, with H1 FY26 recording the lowest ROCE in recent periods at 4.19%. These anaemic returns fall well below the cost of capital, indicating that the company is destroying rather than creating value. The EBIT to interest coverage ratio of merely 1.06 times reveals razor-thin cushion for debt servicing, leaving the company vulnerable to any operational setback.




Critical Concern: Debt Burden and Financial Fragility


Supertex Industries carries a substantial debt burden relative to its size and profitability. With a debt-to-EBITDA ratio averaging 7.05 times and net debt-to-equity of 1.24, the company's leverage profile is concerning. Long-term debt stood at ₹3.81 crores as of March 2025, whilst current liabilities ballooned to ₹38.92 crores, including trade payables of ₹16.92 crores. This heavy reliance on debt, combined with weak cash generation, creates significant financial risk.




The company's working capital management also raises concerns. The debtor turnover ratio hit its lowest point in H1 FY26 at just 1.28 times, suggesting lengthening payment cycles and potential liquidity pressures. Current assets of ₹60.43 crores are barely sufficient to cover current liabilities, leaving minimal buffer for operational flexibility.



Employee costs have remained relatively stable at ₹0.63 crores in Q2 FY26, down marginally from ₹0.65 crores in the previous quarter. However, interest expenses continue to consume a significant portion of operating profits, with ₹0.66 crores paid in Q2 FY26 alone—representing nearly 40% of operating profit. This heavy interest burden severely limits the company's ability to reinvest in growth or reward shareholders.



Industry Context: Textile Sector Headwinds Persist



The broader garments and apparels sector has experienced mixed performance over the past year, with the industry posting a modest 3.24% return. Supertex Industries has dramatically underperformed this benchmark, delivering a negative 30.11% return over the same period—a staggering underperformance of 33.35 percentage points. This persistent weakness reflects both company-specific challenges and broader structural headwinds facing textile processors.



The polyester filament yarn processing business operates in a highly competitive, commoditised environment with limited pricing power. Companies in this space face pressure from fluctuating raw material costs, intense competition from larger integrated players, and cyclical demand patterns tied to the broader textile and garment manufacturing cycle. Supertex's micro-cap status and limited scale place it at a significant disadvantage relative to larger, better-capitalised competitors.



The company's sales-to-capital-employed ratio of 1.66 times suggests moderate asset utilisation efficiency, but this metric has failed to translate into meaningful profitability or returns. The five-year sales CAGR of -5.93% underscores the company's inability to achieve sustained revenue growth, whilst EBIT growth of 11.51% over the same period has been insufficient to offset the top-line decline and improve overall financial health.




Market Positioning: Micro-Cap with Minimal Institutional Interest


Supertex Industries' market capitalisation of just ₹8.00 crores places it firmly in micro-cap territory, limiting liquidity and institutional participation. With institutional holdings at a negligible 0.01% and promoter holding at an unusually low 13.29%, the company lacks the ownership structure typically associated with stable, well-governed businesses. The absence of mutual fund or FII interest speaks volumes about the investment community's assessment of the company's prospects.




Peer Comparison: Struggling Amongst Struggling Peers



Within the garments and apparels sector, Supertex Industries occupies an unenviable position. Whilst the company is loss-making on a trailing twelve-month basis, preventing meaningful P/E ratio comparison, its price-to-book value of 0.29x suggests the market ascribes minimal value to its net assets. This deep discount to book value reflects investor scepticism about the company's ability to generate adequate returns on its asset base.

















































Company P/E Ratio P/BV Ratio Avg ROE Debt/Equity Market Cap
Supertex Inds. NA (Loss Making) 0.29x 0.55% 1.24 ₹8 Cr
Amit International 49.86x 0.40x 0.00% -0.02
Nutech Global 277.76x 1.44x 0.59% 1.64
Alps Industries NA (Loss Making) -0.01x 0.00% -0.99



Compared to peers, Supertex shows marginally higher ROE at 0.55% versus near-zero returns for most comparable companies. However, this distinction provides little comfort given the absolute weakness of returns across the peer group. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.24 places it in the middle of the pack, though the high leverage combined with weak profitability creates a precarious financial position.



The sector as a whole appears to be struggling with structural profitability challenges, as evidenced by the multiple loss-making companies and extremely low returns on equity. Supertex's position as the third-largest by market capitalisation within this troubled peer group offers little strategic advantage, particularly given the company's limited scale and resources to weather extended periods of industry weakness.



Valuation Analysis: Cheap for a Reason



At the current price of ₹7.59, Supertex Industries trades at a price-to-book value of just 0.29x, representing a substantial 71% discount to book value of ₹26.62 per share. Whilst this appears optically attractive, the deep discount reflects fundamental concerns about the company's ability to generate adequate returns on its asset base. The company's loss-making status on a trailing twelve-month basis prevents meaningful P/E ratio analysis.



The enterprise value metrics provide additional context. With an EV/EBITDA multiple of 12.31x and EV/EBIT of 15.38x, the company trades at moderate multiples relative to its operating profits. However, these ratios must be interpreted cautiously given the extreme volatility in quarterly earnings and the company's history of losses. The EV-to-sales ratio of 0.76x suggests the market values the entire business at less than one year's revenue—a clear sign of distress.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

NA

Loss Making



Price to Book

0.29x

71% discount to book



EV/EBITDA

12.31x

Moderate multiple



Dividend Yield

NA

No dividends paid




The stock's 52-week range of ₹5.68 to ₹13.81 illustrates extreme price volatility, with the current price sitting 45.04% below the 52-week high and 33.63% above the 52-week low. This wide trading range reflects both the company's operational volatility and market uncertainty about its prospects. The valuation grade has fluctuated between "Very Attractive" and "Fair" over the past year, currently standing at "Fair"—though this assessment appears generous given the fundamental challenges.



The absence of dividend payments further diminishes the investment case for income-oriented investors. With no dividend history and a zero payout ratio, shareholders have no near-term prospect of cash returns, leaving capital appreciation as the sole potential source of returns—a challenging proposition given the company's track record.



Shareholding Pattern: Minimal Promoter Skin in the Game



Perhaps the most striking aspect of Supertex Industries' ownership structure is the exceptionally low promoter holding of just 13.29%, which has remained unchanged over the past five quarters. This minimal promoter stake is highly unusual for an Indian listed company and raises serious governance and alignment concerns. With promoters holding less than 15% of equity, their financial interests are not strongly aligned with minority shareholders.































































Quarter Promoter FII Mutual Funds Insurance Other DII Public
Sep'25 13.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 86.70%
Jun'25 13.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 86.70%
Mar'25 13.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 86.70%
Dec'24 13.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 86.70%
Sep'24 13.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 86.70%



The shareholding pattern reveals complete absence of institutional investor interest, with zero holdings from foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, and insurance companies. The negligible 0.01% stake held by other domestic institutional investors underscores the investment community's lack of confidence in the company's prospects. This institutional void leaves the stock in the hands of retail and non-institutional investors, contributing to poor liquidity and high volatility.



The public and non-institutional shareholding of 86.70% is extraordinarily high, suggesting a highly fragmented shareholder base with limited ability to influence corporate governance or strategic direction. The static nature of the shareholding pattern over multiple quarters indicates neither institutional accumulation nor promoter buying—both negative signals for investor confidence.



Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across Timeframes



Supertex Industries' stock price performance has been dismal across virtually all meaningful timeframes, with particularly acute underperformance relative to the benchmark Sensex. Over the past year, the stock has declined 30.11% whilst the Sensex advanced 9.00%, resulting in a negative alpha of 39.11 percentage points. This stark underperformance extends across multiple periods, reflecting sustained investor disappointment.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +5.71% +1.62% +4.09%
1 Month -0.13% +3.09% -3.22%
3 Months -3.92% +4.92% -8.84%
6 Months -5.24% +3.97% -9.21%
YTD -30.75% +8.22% -38.97%
1 Year -30.11% +9.00% -39.11%
2 Years -19.08% +30.23% -49.31%
3 Years -20.94% +37.22% -58.16%



The year-to-date decline of 30.75% has been particularly painful for shareholders, with the stock significantly underperforming both the Sensex and its own sector. The three-year and two-year returns paint an even grimmer picture, with cumulative losses of 20.94% and 19.08% respectively, whilst the broader market delivered strong positive returns.



From a risk-adjusted perspective, the stock's performance is deeply concerning. With a beta of 1.50, Supertex exhibits significantly higher volatility than the market, yet has failed to deliver commensurate returns. The stock's volatility of 53.48% over the past year—more than four times the Sensex's 12.26%—combined with negative returns produces a sharply negative risk-adjusted return of -0.56. This high-risk, low-return profile makes the stock unsuitable for risk-averse investors.




"With negative alpha across all major timeframes and volatility exceeding 50%, Supertex Industries exemplifies a high-risk, low-return investment proposition that has consistently destroyed shareholder value."


Technical Analysis: Mildly Bearish with Limited Support



From a technical perspective, Supertex Industries currently exhibits a "Mildly Bearish" trend as of November 14, 2025, having recently shifted from a "Bearish" classification. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹7.23), 20-day (₹7.10), 50-day (₹7.25), 100-day (₹7.62), and 200-day (₹7.99)—indicating persistent downward pressure and lack of technical support.



The technical indicator summary presents a mixed but predominantly negative picture. The MACD shows mildly bullish signals on a weekly basis but remains bearish on monthly charts. The KST indicator is bearish across both weekly and monthly timeframes, whilst Dow Theory suggests a mildly bearish trend. Bollinger Bands indicate sideways movement with a mildly bearish bias, reflecting the stock's recent consolidation near multi-month lows.



Key technical levels reveal limited near-term upside potential. Immediate resistance sits at ₹7.10 (around the 20-day moving average), with more substantial resistance at ₹7.62 (100-day MA) and ₹7.99 (200-day MA). The 52-week high of ₹13.81 represents a distant target, requiring an 82% rally from current levels—a highly improbable scenario given fundamental headwinds. On the downside, immediate support rests at the 52-week low of ₹5.68, just 25% below current levels.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Override Valuation Appeal



The investment thesis for Supertex Industries is severely compromised by multiple structural weaknesses that far outweigh any apparent valuation appeal. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of just 28 out of 100 places it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, reflecting the convergence of poor fundamentals, weak technicals, and deteriorating financial trends.





Valuation Grade

Fair

Cheap but troubled



Quality Grade

Below Average

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

Flat

No momentum



Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish

Weak momentum




The quality assessment reveals a company with "Below Average" fundamentals, characterised by negative five-year sales growth of -5.93%, anaemic returns on capital (ROCE of 5.69%), and extremely weak return on equity (0.55%). The debt burden remains elevated with debt-to-EBITDA of 7.05 times and EBIT-to-interest coverage of barely 1.06 times, leaving minimal cushion for any operational setback.



The financial trend classification of "Flat" in Q2 FY26 offers little comfort, particularly when viewed against the backdrop of a 30.87% decline in half-yearly sales and persistent losses in recent quarters. The company's inability to demonstrate sustained improvement in key metrics suggests that the Q2 recovery may prove ephemeral rather than the start of a genuine turnaround.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Q2 Recovery: Sharp sequential improvement in revenue (+152.57% QoQ) and return to profitability (₹0.62 crores)

  • Margin Expansion: Operating margin of 8.13% in Q2 FY26 represents highest level in seven quarters

  • Valuation Discount: Trading at 0.29x book value, representing 71% discount to stated book value

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares removes one potential governance concern

  • Established Operations: Company founded in 1986 with four operational divisions providing diversification




KEY CONCERNS



  • Extreme Volatility: Wild swings in quarterly revenue and profitability indicate unstable business model

  • Weak Returns: ROE of 0.55% and ROCE of 5.69% demonstrate inability to generate adequate returns on capital

  • High Leverage: Debt-to-EBITDA of 7.05x and net debt-to-equity of 1.24 create significant financial risk

  • Minimal Promoter Holding: Just 13.29% promoter stake raises alignment and governance concerns

  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, or insurance holdings signals lack of confidence

  • Persistent Underperformance: Stock down 30.11% over past year with negative alpha of 39.11 percentage points

  • Negative Long-Term Trends: Five-year sales CAGR of -5.93% indicates structural decline





Outlook: What Lies Ahead





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Sustained improvement in quarterly revenue and margins beyond Q2 FY26

  • Meaningful reduction in debt levels and improvement in interest coverage

  • Increase in promoter holding demonstrating management confidence

  • Entry of institutional investors providing validation and governance improvement

  • Consistent profitability across multiple quarters establishing sustainable earnings trajectory




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Return to quarterly losses or further revenue volatility in coming quarters

  • Inability to maintain operating margins above 5% on sustained basis

  • Further deterioration in working capital metrics or debtor turnover ratios

  • Any increase in debt levels or breach of debt covenants

  • Continued absence of institutional buying or reduction in promoter stake

  • Failure to achieve positive full-year profitability for FY26





The path forward for Supertex Industries requires addressing multiple structural challenges simultaneously—a daunting task for a micro-cap company with limited resources and minimal promoter commitment. Whilst the Q2 FY26 results provide a temporary reprieve, the company must demonstrate sustained operational improvement, deleveraging, and margin stability before investors can gain confidence in a genuine turnaround.



The textile processing industry's competitive dynamics and commoditised nature make it inherently difficult for small players to achieve sustainable profitability and returns. Without significant scale advantages, technological differentiation, or strong customer relationships, companies like Supertex face an uphill battle to create shareholder value. The complete absence of institutional interest speaks volumes about professional investors' assessment of the company's prospects.




The Verdict: Avoid This Value Trap


STRONG SELL

Score: 28/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating any position. The apparent valuation discount is a classic value trap, with fundamental weaknesses far outweighing the low price-to-book multiple. The combination of extreme operational volatility, weak returns on capital, high leverage, minimal promoter holding, and zero institutional interest creates an unacceptable risk-reward profile.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any near-term strength. The Q2 FY26 recovery does not alter the structural challenges facing the business. With the stock down 30% over the past year and displaying persistent negative alpha across all timeframes, opportunity cost considerations strongly favour redeploying capital to higher-quality opportunities.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹5.50 (27.5% downside risk from current price of ₹7.59)




Supertex Industries exemplifies the dangers of chasing apparent valuation bargains without adequate consideration of fundamental quality and business sustainability. The stock's deep discount to book value reflects genuine concerns about the company's ability to generate returns, rather than representing a mispricing opportunity. With a Mojo Score of just 28, below-average quality grade, flat financial trends, and mildly bearish technicals, the investment case is overwhelmingly negative.



The company's minimal promoter holding of 13.29% and complete absence of institutional investors should serve as clear warning signals to retail investors. Professional money managers have evidently assessed the opportunity and chosen to stay away—a judgement that individual investors would be wise to heed. The textile processing sector's structural challenges, combined with Supertex's specific operational weaknesses, create a high-risk, low-return proposition unsuitable for prudent portfolios.




Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in micro-cap stocks carry significant risks including liquidity constraints, heightened volatility, and potential for total capital loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News
Why is Supertex Inds. falling/rising?
Nov 27 2025 12:40 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Supertex Inds. overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 17 2025 08:10 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Supertex Inds. overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 16 2025 08:10 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Supertex Inds. overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 15 2025 08:10 AM IST
share
Share Via
How has been the historical performance of Supertex Inds.?
Nov 14 2025 11:59 PM IST
share
Share Via
Why is Supertex Inds. falling/rising?
Nov 14 2025 10:48 PM IST
share
Share Via
How has been the historical performance of Supertex Inds.?
Nov 13 2025 11:31 PM IST
share
Share Via