Swasti Vinayaka Art Q3 FY26: Volatile Revenue Growth Masks Underlying Concerns

Feb 14 2026 08:53 AM IST
share
Share Via
Swasti Vinayaka Art & Heritage Corporation Ltd., a micro-cap diversified company engaged in gemstone sculptures and real estate, reported net profit of ₹0.83 crores for Q3 FY26 (October-December 2025), marking a sequential increase of 7.79% quarter-on-quarter but a substantial year-on-year surge of 72.92%. Despite the headline profitability growth, the company's erratic revenue trajectory and deteriorating technical position continue to weigh on investor sentiment, with the stock trading at ₹3.53 as of February 13, 2026, down 14.94% over the past year.
Swasti Vinayaka Art Q3 FY26: Volatile Revenue Growth Masks Underlying Concerns
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹0.83 Cr
▲ 72.92% YoY
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹6.33 Cr
▲ 91.82% YoY
PAT Margin
13.11%
▼ 7.87 ppt QoQ
ROE (Latest)
12.72%
Below Industry Avg

With a market capitalisation of just ₹32.00 crores, Swasti Vinayaka operates in a niche segment combining gemstone artifacts with real estate ventures. The December quarter results reveal a company grappling with operational volatility—whilst revenue surged 72.48% sequentially from ₹3.67 crores in Q2 FY26, this followed a dramatic 63.15% contraction in the previous quarter. Such wild swings raise questions about business sustainability and revenue visibility, critical concerns for a micro-cap entity with limited institutional backing and zero promoter pledging.

Quarter Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 6.33 3.67 9.96 3.49 3.30 6.92 5.19
QoQ Growth +72.48% -63.15% +185.39% +5.76% -52.31% +33.33%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) 0.83 0.77 1.45 0.95 0.48 0.77 0.11
PAT Margin (%) 13.11% 20.98% 14.56% 27.22% 14.55% 11.13% 2.12%
Operating Margin (%) 18.80% 29.97% 24.00% 42.69% 23.94% 17.34% 7.13%

Financial Performance: Erratic Revenue Trajectory Clouds Profitability

In Q3 FY26, Swasti Vinayaka reported net sales of ₹6.33 crores, representing a robust 91.82% year-on-year increase from ₹3.30 crores in Q3 FY25. On a sequential basis, the 72.48% quarter-on-quarter surge marked a sharp recovery from the ₹3.67 crores recorded in Q2 FY26. However, this volatility is emblematic of the company's operational challenges—the preceding quarter had witnessed a 63.15% revenue collapse from ₹9.96 crores in Q1 FY26, itself a 185.39% surge from the March quarter.

Net profit for Q3 FY26 stood at ₹0.83 crores, up 7.79% sequentially from ₹0.77 crores and 72.92% higher year-on-year. Whilst the absolute profitability improvement is encouraging, the PAT margin contracted sharply to 13.11% from 20.98% in Q2 FY26, reflecting the impact of higher operational costs relative to the revenue base. Operating margins (excluding other income) also compressed to 18.80% from 29.97% in the previous quarter, though they remained above the 23.94% recorded in Q3 FY25.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹6.33 Cr
▲ 72.48% QoQ | ▲ 91.82% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹0.83 Cr
▲ 7.79% QoQ | ▲ 72.92% YoY
Operating Margin
18.80%
▼ 11.17 ppt QoQ
PAT Margin
13.11%
▼ 7.87 ppt QoQ

For the nine-month period ended December 2025, cumulative net sales reached ₹19.96 crores, with net profit aggregating to ₹3.05 crores. The tax rate for Q3 FY26 stood at 23.15%, broadly in line with the company's historical average of 21.51%. Interest costs moderated to ₹0.32 crores from ₹0.37 crores in Q2 FY26, reflecting improved working capital management or reduced debt servicing obligations. Employee costs remained stable at ₹0.85 crores, up marginally from ₹0.82 crores in the prior quarter.

Operational Challenges: Weak Capital Efficiency and Leverage Concerns

Swasti Vinayaka's return on equity (ROE) of 12.72% for the latest period, whilst marginally improved from the five-year average of 12.28%, remains below par for a company operating in the diversified sector. The return on capital employed (ROCE) of 13.03%, though higher than the average of 11.82%, indicates modest capital efficiency. With sales to capital employed averaging just 0.42 times, the company struggles to generate meaningful revenue from its asset base—a critical weakness for a capital-intensive business spanning gemstone manufacturing and real estate.

The balance sheet reveals rising leverage, with long-term debt standing at ₹13.28 crores as of March 2025, down modestly from ₹14.70 crores a year earlier but still elevated relative to shareholder funds of ₹26.47 crores. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.17 times suggests moderate financial stress, particularly given the company's volatile earnings profile. Net debt to equity averaged 0.52 over the assessment period, indicating manageable but non-negligible leverage. Current assets of ₹27.34 crores provide some liquidity cushion, though the debtors turnover ratio deteriorated to 11.22 times in the half-year period, the lowest in recent quarters.

⚠️ Key Operational Concerns

Capital Efficiency: Sales to capital employed at just 0.42x indicates weak asset utilisation, limiting revenue generation potential.

Leverage: Debt-to-EBITDA of 3.17x combined with volatile earnings raises refinancing risks.

Working Capital: Debtors turnover ratio hit a multi-quarter low at 11.22 times, signalling potential collection challenges.

Industry Context: Niche Positioning in Fragmented Market

Operating in the diversified sector with a focus on gemstone artifacts and real estate, Swasti Vinayaka occupies a niche segment with limited comparability to mainstream industrial or consumer businesses. The company's micro-cap status (₹32.00 crores market capitalisation) and negligible institutional ownership (0.0%) underscore its peripheral position within India's equity markets. The diversified sector itself has underperformed, with the sectoral index declining 17.18% over the past year—Swasti Vinayaka's 14.94% decline represents a marginal 2.24 percentage point outperformance.

The absence of foreign institutional investor (FII) or mutual fund holdings, coupled with zero insurance company participation, reflects limited institutional confidence. Promoter holding remains stable at 51.00% across the past five quarters with no pledging, providing governance stability but offering little signal of operational momentum. The company's below-average quality grade, assigned since November 2025, stems from weak interest coverage (EBIT to interest of 3.26 times) and modest profitability metrics despite healthy long-term sales growth of 21.26%.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Structural Weaknesses

Relative to its diversified sector peers, Swasti Vinayaka trades at a significant valuation discount, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 8.70 times compared to the industry average of 34 times. The price-to-book value of 1.11 times is also below the peer average of approximately 1.60 times, suggesting the market ascribes limited premium to the company's asset base or earnings quality.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield (%)
Swasti Vin. Art 8.70 1.11 12.28% 0.52 NA
Empire Inds. 15.21 1.73 10.79% 0.16 2.66%
Krypton Industri 52.19 1.76 6.08% 0.61 2.74%
Galactico Corpo. 17.28 0.99 13.44% 0.41 NA
Panth Infinity 1.79 0.59 6.66% 0.56 NA
HCKK Ventures 81.87 2.74 0.0% 0.01 NA

Swasti Vinayaka's ROE of 12.28% stands as the second-highest amongst its peer group, trailing only Galactico Corporation's 13.44% but significantly ahead of the 6-7% range for most peers. This relative strength in profitability, however, is offset by higher leverage (debt-to-equity of 0.52 versus Empire Industries' 0.16) and the absence of dividend payouts, which peers like Empire and Krypton offer. The company's market capitalisation of ₹32.00 crores ranks fourth within the peer set, reflecting its limited scale and liquidity constraints.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Fail to Compensate for Risk

At the current price of ₹3.53, Swasti Vinayaka trades at a trailing twelve-month P/E of 9 times and an EV/EBITDA of 8.08 times, both well below industry benchmarks. The price-to-book value of 1.11 times implies the market values the company's net assets at just an 11% premium, a modest figure for a going concern. The PEG ratio of 0.07 suggests the stock is theoretically undervalued relative to its five-year earnings growth rate of 31.35%, though this metric is distorted by the company's erratic quarterly performance.

The company's valuation grade has oscillated between "Attractive" and "Expensive" over recent months, currently sitting at "Very Attractive" as of the latest assessment. However, this designation reflects mechanical valuation metrics rather than fundamental quality or growth visibility. With the stock trading 29.68% below its 52-week high of ₹5.02 and 25.18% above its 52-week low of ₹2.82, the price action suggests investor uncertainty rather than conviction.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
9.0x
vs Industry 34x
Price to Book
1.11x
Modest Premium
EV/EBITDA
8.08x
Below Sector Avg
Dividend Yield
NA
No Payouts

Shareholding: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest

Promoter holding has remained rock-solid at 51.00% across the past five quarters (December 2024 through December 2025), with no sequential changes or pledging activity. The promoter group, led by Rajesh Ramprasad Poddar (22.47%) and Dinesh Ramprasad Poddar (19.20%), maintains majority control through a combination of individual and corporate holdings. The absence of pledging is a positive governance signal, indicating promoters are not leveraging their equity stakes for external financing.

Shareholding Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter 51.00% 51.00% 51.00% 51.00% 0.00%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 49.00% 49.00% 49.00% 49.00% 0.00%

The complete absence of FII, mutual fund, insurance, and other domestic institutional investor (DII) holdings underscores the stock's illiquidity and limited appeal to professional investors. The 49.00% non-institutional shareholding, comprising retail and high-net-worth individuals, has also remained static across quarters. This ownership structure limits price discovery mechanisms and amplifies volatility during periods of concentrated buying or selling.

Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across Timeframes

Swasti Vinayaka's stock has delivered disappointing returns across most timeframes, declining 14.94% over the past year against the Sensex's 8.52% gain—a negative alpha of 23.46 percentage points. The two-year performance is even more dismal, with the stock down 25.68% whilst the Sensex rallied 15.47%, resulting in a 41.15 percentage point underperformance. Over three years, the stock has gained 34.22%, marginally trailing the Sensex's 36.73% return.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +1.44% -1.14% +2.58%
1 Month +2.62% -1.20% +3.82%
3 Months -9.25% -2.19% -7.06%
6 Months -5.87% +2.59% -8.46%
YTD -1.94% -3.04% +1.10%
1 Year -14.94% +8.52% -23.46%
2 Years -25.68% +15.47% -41.15%
3 Years +34.22% +36.73% -2.51%

The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. With a risk-adjusted return of -0.41 over the past year and volatility of 36.04%, the stock falls squarely into the "high risk, low return" category. The technical trend turned bearish on December 1, 2025, at ₹3.85, and has remained under pressure since. All key moving averages—5-day (₹3.53), 20-day (₹3.45), 50-day (₹3.58), 100-day (₹3.77), and 200-day (₹3.89)—are currently above the stock price, signalling persistent downward momentum.

Investment Thesis: Below-Average Quality Meets Attractive Valuation

Swasti Vinayaka's investment case presents a paradox: mechanically attractive valuation metrics juxtaposed against below-average operational quality and bearish technical trends. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 32 out of 100, assigned a "SELL" rating, reflects this dichotomy. The valuation component scores as "Very Attractive," driven by single-digit P/E and P/BV multiples. However, the quality grade remains "Below Average," weighed down by weak capital efficiency, modest profitability, and volatile earnings.

The financial trend component registered as "Positive" in Q3 FY26, supported by the highest half-yearly ROCE of 15.20% and improved nine-month net sales of ₹19.96 crores. Yet this positive momentum is undermined by the "Bearish" technical trend, which has persisted since early December 2025. The absence of institutional ownership, zero dividend payouts, and high volatility (36.04%) further constrain the investment appeal for risk-averse investors.

Valuation Grade
Very Attractive
✓ Low Multiples
Quality Grade
Below Average
✗ Weak Metrics
Financial Trend
Positive
✓ Q3 Improvement
Technical Trend
Bearish
✗ Since Dec'25

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

✅ KEY STRENGTHS

Attractive Valuation: P/E of 9x and P/BV of 1.11x offer significant discount to sector averages, creating potential upside if operational stability improves.
Strong YoY Growth: Q3 FY26 revenue up 91.82% YoY and net profit up 72.92% YoY demonstrate underlying business momentum despite quarterly volatility.
Stable Promoter Holding: 51.00% promoter stake with zero pledging provides governance stability and alignment of interests with minority shareholders.
Improved ROCE: Latest ROCE of 13.03% and half-yearly peak of 15.20% signal improving capital efficiency from historical averages.
Modest Leverage: Net debt-to-equity of 0.52 and absence of aggressive borrowing limit financial distress risks relative to peers.

⚠️ KEY CONCERNS

Revenue Volatility: Wild quarterly swings (Q2 -63.15%, Q3 +72.48%) undermine earnings visibility and investor confidence in business sustainability.
Weak Capital Efficiency: Sales to capital employed of just 0.42x indicates poor asset utilisation, limiting revenue generation from invested capital.
Zero Institutional Ownership: Complete absence of FII, MF, and insurance holdings signals limited professional investor confidence and poor liquidity.
Bearish Technical Trend: Stock below all major moving averages with persistent bearish signals since December 2025, indicating negative momentum.
High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 36.04% expose investors to amplified downside risks relative to broader market movements.
Deteriorating Working Capital: Debtors turnover ratio hit multi-quarter low of 11.22 times, raising concerns about collection efficiency and cash conversion.

Outlook: What to Watch

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

Revenue Stabilisation: Consistent quarterly sales growth without wild swings would rebuild investor confidence in business model sustainability.
Margin Expansion: Sustained operating margins above 20% combined with PAT margins exceeding 15% would signal improved operational efficiency.
Working Capital Improvement: Debtors turnover ratio returning above 15 times would indicate better collection efficiency and cash flow generation.
Institutional Entry: Any mutual fund or insurance company initiating positions would provide liquidity boost and validation of business quality.

RED FLAGS

Further Revenue Collapse: Another quarter of 50%+ sequential revenue decline would confirm structural business challenges rather than temporary volatility.
Margin Compression: Operating margins falling below 15% or PAT margins below 10% would indicate deteriorating pricing power or cost control issues.
Rising Debt Levels: Long-term debt increasing above ₹15 crores or debt-to-EBITDA exceeding 4x would heighten financial stress concerns.
Promoter Pledging: Any pledging of promoter shares would signal financial distress at the promoter level and governance concerns.
"Swasti Vinayaka's attractive valuation multiples cannot compensate for operational volatility, weak capital efficiency, and complete absence of institutional validation—a combination that relegates the stock to speculative territory."

The Verdict: Speculative Micro-Cap with Limited Conviction

SELL

Score: 32/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of extreme revenue volatility, below-average operational quality, zero institutional ownership, and bearish technical momentum creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Whilst valuation multiples appear attractive, they reflect fundamental weaknesses rather than opportunity. The micro-cap status and illiquid trading further amplify downside risks.

For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure on any technical bounce towards ₹3.75-₹3.85 levels. The stock's inability to sustain momentum above key moving averages, coupled with deteriorating working capital metrics and persistent quarterly volatility, warrants defensive positioning. Only investors with high risk tolerance and long-term conviction in the niche gemstone/real estate business model should maintain holdings.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹3.20 (9.35% downside from current levels). The 10% discount reflects concerns about earnings sustainability, weak institutional interest, and technical deterioration that outweigh low valuation multiples.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in micro-cap stocks carry substantial risks including illiquidity, volatility, and potential loss of capital.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News