Symphony Q4 FY26: Exceptional Loss Triggers Sharp Derating Despite Seasonal Revenue Recovery

2 hours ago
share
Share Via
Symphony Limited, India's leading air cooler manufacturer, reported a shocking consolidated net loss of ₹218.00 crores for Q4 FY26, marking its worst quarterly performance in recent history and triggering a sharp market derating. Despite seasonal revenue recovery to ₹338.00 crores—up 45.06% quarter-on-quarter—the company's profitability collapsed due to an exceptional charge that wiped out operating gains. The stock, currently trading at ₹784.55 with a market capitalisation of ₹5,261 crores, has plunged 39.87% over the past year, significantly underperforming both the Sensex (-8.84%) and the Electronics & Appliances sector (-26.75%).
Symphony Q4 FY26: Exceptional Loss Triggers Sharp Derating Despite Seasonal Revenue Recovery
Q4 FY26 Net Profit
-₹218.00 Cr
▼ 1247.37% QoQ | ▼ 375.95% YoY
Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹338.00 Cr
▲ 45.06% QoQ | ▼ 30.74% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
14.79%
▲ 4.49% pts QoQ | ▼ 7.14% pts YoY
PAT Margin
-64.50%
▼ 72.65% pts QoQ | ▼ 80.69% pts YoY

The March 2026 quarter results reveal a company grappling with an extraordinary financial setback that has overshadowed otherwise improving operational metrics. While net sales recovered seasonally from the December quarter's ₹233.00 crores, the year-on-year comparison remains deeply concerning, with revenues declining 30.74% from ₹488.00 crores in March 2025. More alarmingly, the profit before tax of negative ₹157.00 crores—despite operating profit of ₹50.00 crores—suggests exceptional items or write-offs that management has not publicly detailed in the available financial data.

For the full fiscal year FY26, Symphony's consolidated net sales reached ₹985.00 crores across the first three reported quarters (June to December 2025), representing a significant operational challenge compared to the prior year's annual performance of ₹1,575.00 crores. The company's earnings per share for Q4 FY26 plummeted to negative ₹31.14, marking the lowest quarterly EPS in the company's recent history and raising serious questions about the sustainability of its business model in the current market environment.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth PAT Margin
Mar'26 338.00 +45.06% -218.00 -1247.37% -64.50%
Dec'25 233.00 +42.94% 19.00 0.00% 8.15%
Sep'25 163.00 -35.06% 19.00 -54.76% 15.34%
Jun'25 251.00 -48.57% 42.00 -46.84% 15.54%
Mar'25 488.00 +101.65% 79.00 -890.00% 16.19%
Dec'24 242.00 -16.26% -10.00 -117.86% -4.13%
Sep'24 289.00 56.00 24.22%

Financial Performance: Exceptional Charge Devastates Bottom Line

Symphony's Q4 FY26 financial performance presents a stark dichotomy between operational improvement and catastrophic profitability collapse. Net sales of ₹338.00 crores marked a healthy 45.06% sequential recovery from the seasonally weak December quarter, though the 30.74% year-on-year decline remains concerning. The company generated operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) of ₹50.00 crores, translating to an operating margin of 14.79%—a sequential improvement of 4.49 percentage points from 10.30% in December 2025, but still significantly below the 21.93% achieved in March 2025.

The real shock emerged below the operating line, where profit before tax plummeted to negative ₹157.00 crores despite operating profit of ₹50.00 crores and other income of ₹13.00 crores. This ₹220.00 crore swing suggests extraordinary write-offs, impairments, or exceptional charges that have not been explicitly detailed in the available quarterly data. The tax credit of ₹61.00 crores—representing an effective tax rate of negative 38.85%—partially cushioned the blow, but the final consolidated net loss of ₹218.00 crores represents the company's worst quarterly performance in recent history.

Net Sales (Q4 FY26)
₹338.00 Cr
▲ 45.06% QoQ | ▼ 30.74% YoY
Operating Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹50.00 Cr
▲ 108.33% QoQ | ▼ 53.27% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
14.79%
▲ 4.49% pts QoQ | ▼ 7.14% pts YoY
Interest Cost
₹5.00 Cr
▲ 25.00% QoQ | ▲ 66.67% YoY

Employee costs in Q4 FY26 declined to ₹33.00 crores from ₹34.00 crores in the previous quarter, suggesting modest headcount optimisation or reduced variable compensation. Interest expenses rose to ₹5.00 crores from ₹4.00 crores sequentially, indicating increased working capital borrowings despite the company's historically low debt profile. Depreciation remained stable at ₹6.00 crores, consistent with the company's capital-light business model focused on outsourced manufacturing and brand management.

Critical Concern: Unexplained Exceptional Charge

The ₹220.00 crore gap between operating profit plus other income (₹63.00 crores) and profit before tax (negative ₹157.00 crores) suggests massive exceptional items or write-offs that have not been transparently disclosed in the quarterly financial statements. This represents approximately 65% of Q4 revenue and raises serious governance and transparency questions. Investors should demand detailed explanations from management regarding the nature, quantum, and one-time versus recurring character of these charges before making any investment decisions.

Profitability Erosion: Quality of Earnings Under Severe Pressure

The quality of Symphony's earnings has deteriorated dramatically over the past year, with return on equity collapsing to 10.49% in the latest reported period from the historical average of 18.98%. This sharp decline reflects not only the Q4 loss but also sustained margin pressure throughout FY26. The company's return on capital employed, whilst still respectable at 32.93% on a trailing basis, masks the underlying operational challenges evident in quarterly performance.

Symphony's balance sheet as of March 2025 showed shareholder funds of ₹760.54 crores, supported by reserves of ₹746.81 crores and minimal share capital of ₹13.73 crores. The company maintained a net cash position with zero long-term debt and current liabilities of ₹544.03 crores, primarily comprising trade payables of ₹179.09 crores. However, the Q4 FY26 loss of ₹218.00 crores—if sustained—would significantly erode book value, potentially reducing net worth to approximately ₹542 crores and pushing the price-to-book ratio from 6.88x to over 9.7x based on current market capitalisation.

Working capital management showed signs of stress, with current assets of ₹675.09 crores as of March 2025 barely covering current liabilities of ₹544.03 crores, resulting in a current ratio of 1.24x. This represents a tightening from historical norms, suggesting potential cash flow pressures that may have contributed to the increased interest costs observed in Q4 FY26. The company's cash and cash equivalents stood at ₹35.00 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹41.00 crores a year earlier, reflecting negative free cash flow generation despite historically strong operating cash flows.

Five-Year Performance Snapshot: Growth Deceleration

Symphony's five-year compound annual growth rate reveals a company struggling to maintain momentum. Net sales have grown at a meagre 3.76% CAGR over the past five years, whilst operating profit (EBIT) has expanded at 17.33%—a divergence that suggests improved operational efficiency but stagnant top-line growth. The company's average ROCE of 28.58% and average ROE of 18.98% over this period demonstrate historically strong capital efficiency, but recent quarterly performance suggests this foundation is eroding rapidly.

Industry Context: Premiumisation Challenges in Cooling Solutions

Symphony operates in India's fragmented air cooling market, positioned between traditional ceiling fans and premium air conditioning systems. The company's business model relies heavily on seasonal demand patterns, with March quarter historically representing peak revenue contribution as summer approaches. The 30.74% year-on-year revenue decline in Q4 FY26 suggests either market share losses to competing cooling solutions, delayed summer onset affecting retail demand, or strategic inventory destocking by distributors.

The broader Electronics & Appliances sector has faced headwinds over the past year, with the sectoral index declining 26.75%. Symphony's 39.87% decline significantly underperforms this already weak sector benchmark, indicating company-specific challenges beyond macro industry trends. Rising competition from Chinese manufacturers, increasing penetration of affordable air conditioners, and changing consumer preferences towards year-round cooling solutions may be structurally challenging Symphony's traditional summer-cooler business model.

The company's international operations, which have historically contributed approximately 15-20% of revenues, face currency headwinds and competitive pressures in key markets. Symphony's strategy of targeting emerging markets with affordable cooling solutions has delivered mixed results, with geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions potentially impacting export performance. The lack of detailed segment reporting in the available quarterly data prevents precise assessment of domestic versus international performance divergence.

Metric FY25 FY24 FY23 FY22 5Y Trend
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 1,575.00 1,156.00 1,187.00 1,039.00 +3.76% CAGR
Operating Profit (₹ Cr) 312.00 170.00 139.00 162.00 +17.33% CAGR
PAT (₹ Cr) 212.00 148.00 115.00 120.00 +15.27% CAGR
Operating Margin % 19.80% 14.70% 11.70% 15.60% Improving
PAT Margin % 13.50% 12.80% 9.70% 11.50% Improving

Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Despite Deteriorating Fundamentals

Symphony's relative positioning within the Electronics & Appliances peer group reveals a company trading at premium valuations despite weakening fundamentals. With a price-to-earnings ratio of 33.29x, Symphony trades at a discount to peers like PG Electroplast (50.24x) and Eureka Forbes (52.21x), but commands a significant premium on price-to-book value at 6.88x versus the peer average of approximately 3.50x. This valuation disparity reflects the market's historical recognition of Symphony's superior return on equity of 18.98%, which substantially exceeds most peers.

However, the sustainability of this valuation premium appears increasingly questionable given recent performance trends. Symphony's net debt-to-equity ratio of negative 0.36 indicates a net cash position that provides financial flexibility, but the company's inability to convert this balance sheet strength into consistent earnings growth raises concerns about capital allocation efficiency. The dividend yield of 1.53% exceeds most peers and reflects the company's commitment to shareholder returns, though the payout ratio of 42.00% may come under pressure if profitability challenges persist.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Div Yield % Debt/Equity
Symphony 33.29 6.88 18.98 1.53 -0.36
PG Electroplast 50.24 4.79 12.18 0.05 -0.01
Whirlpool India 30.88 2.67 8.02 0.58 -0.62
Eureka Forbes 52.21 2.19 3.17 -0.05
Cello World 27.91 3.84 15.74 -0.29
TTK Prestige 40.83 3.76 13.62 1.15 -0.30

Symphony's market capitalisation of ₹5,261 crores positions it as a mid-sized player within the sector, ranking sixth among the peer group. The company's superior ROE historically justified its valuation premium, but the recent collapse in profitability threatens this fundamental support. If the Q4 FY26 loss reflects structural rather than one-time challenges, Symphony's P/E ratio would need significant downward adjustment, potentially triggering further derating towards peer averages.

Valuation Analysis: Expensive Relative to Deteriorating Growth Trajectory

Symphony's current valuation metrics suggest the stock remains expensive despite the recent 39.87% price correction over the past year. The price-to-earnings ratio of 33.29x appears elevated given the company's five-year sales growth of just 3.76% and the recent profitability collapse. The PEG ratio of 3.06 significantly exceeds the ideal threshold of 1.0, indicating investors are paying a substantial premium for each unit of earnings growth—a premium that appears increasingly unjustified given deteriorating fundamentals.

The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 28.68x and EV-to-EBIT of 30.21x both trade at significant premiums to historical norms for consumer durables companies, particularly those experiencing growth challenges. Symphony's EV-to-sales ratio of 5.24x reflects the market's historical willingness to pay for the company's brand equity and market leadership, but this multiple appears vulnerable to compression if revenue growth remains anaemic and margins continue contracting.

The stock's price-to-book ratio of 6.88x represents perhaps the most concerning valuation metric, trading at nearly double the peer group average despite recent ROE deterioration to 10.49%. Assuming the Q4 FY26 loss of ₹218.00 crores reduces book value proportionally, the adjusted P/BV could exceed 9.0x—a level that appears fundamentally unsustainable for a company with single-digit ROE and negative earnings momentum. The valuation grade of "Fair" assigned by research platforms appears optimistic given these deteriorating fundamentals.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
33.29x
vs Industry 43x
Price to Book Value
6.88x
vs Peers ~3.5x
EV/EBITDA
28.68x
Premium valuation
Dividend Yield
1.53%
₹2.00 per share
"With a PEG ratio exceeding 3.0 and price-to-book value nearly double the peer average, Symphony's valuation appears disconnected from its deteriorating growth trajectory and collapsing profitability."

Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Exodus Signals Waning Confidence

Symphony's shareholding pattern reveals a concerning trend of institutional divestment that accelerated through the quarters ending March 2026. Foreign institutional investor holdings declined sharply from 6.18% in March 2025 to just 3.27% in March 2026—a reduction of 2.91 percentage points representing approximately ₹153 crores of selling at current market prices. This exodus accelerated in the March quarter, with FII holdings dropping 2.03 percentage points sequentially, suggesting sophisticated investors were reducing exposure ahead of the disappointing Q4 results.

Mutual fund holdings remained relatively stable at 8.57% as of March 2026, down marginally from 8.64% in December 2025, indicating domestic institutional investors maintained positions despite the deteriorating fundamentals. Insurance company holdings collapsed from 0.44% in March 2025 to just 0.07% by March 2026, representing near-complete exit by this investor category. Other domestic institutional investors maintained minimal exposure at 0.08%, suggesting limited conviction among professional money managers.

Investor Category Mar'26 Dec'25 Sep'25 QoQ Change YoY Change
Promoter 73.43% 73.43% 73.43% 0.00% 0.00%
FII 3.27% 5.30% 5.98% -2.03% -2.91%
Mutual Funds 8.57% 8.64% 8.72% -0.07% +0.38%
Insurance 0.07% 0.07% 0.07% 0.00% -0.37%
Other DII 0.08% 0.03% 0.05% +0.05% +0.03%
Non-Institutional 14.58% 12.52% 11.76% +2.06% +2.86%

Promoter holdings remained rock-solid at 73.43% throughout the period, with no pledging of shares—a positive signal of promoter confidence despite operational challenges. The promoter group, led by Achal Anil Bakeri with 41.93% personal holding and family entities controlling the balance, has maintained consistent ownership through market cycles. However, the inability or unwillingness of promoters to support the stock price through open market purchases during the recent correction raises questions about their assessment of near-term recovery prospects.

Non-institutional holdings surged from 11.72% in March 2025 to 14.58% by March 2026, with a sharp 2.06 percentage point increase in the March quarter alone. This suggests retail investors accumulated shares during the price decline, potentially attracted by the historical brand strength and dividend yield. However, retail accumulation against institutional selling typically represents a bearish contrarian indicator, as sophisticated investors exit whilst less-informed participants enter.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes

Symphony's stock price performance over the past year represents one of the most severe deratings in the Electronics & Appliances sector, with the shares declining 39.87% whilst the Sensex fell just 8.84%—generating negative alpha of 31.03 percentage points. The stock currently trades at ₹784.55, having touched a 52-week low of ₹684.05 and sitting 41.37% below its 52-week high of ₹1,338.20 reached in mid-2025. The recent 1.67% single-day gain on May 15, 2026, appears to be a minor technical bounce rather than any fundamental reversal.

The medium-term picture appears equally concerning, with Symphony declining 21.22% over two years and 11.57% over three years, whilst the Sensex gained 3.08% and 20.68% respectively over the same periods. This persistent underperformance across multiple timeframes suggests structural rather than cyclical challenges. The stock's five-year return of negative 26.02% versus the Sensex's positive 54.39% return represents an alpha of negative 80.41 percentage points—amongst the worst in the sector.

Period Symphony Return Sensex Return Alpha Sector Return
1 Day +1.67% -0.21% +1.88%
1 Week -1.21% -2.70% +1.49%
1 Month -0.72% -3.68% +2.96%
3 Months -10.48% -8.94% -1.54%
6 Months -11.61% -11.03% -0.58%
1 Year -39.87% -8.84% -31.03% -26.75%
2 Years -21.22% +3.08% -24.30%
3 Years -11.57% +20.68% -32.25%
5 Years -26.02% +54.39% -80.41%

Technical indicators paint a uniformly bearish picture, with the stock trading below all major moving averages—5-day (₹776.08), 20-day (₹809.69), 50-day (₹782.16), 100-day (₹833.35), and 200-day (₹883.43). The overall technical trend classification of "Mildly Bearish" represents a marginal improvement from the previous "Bearish" designation, but provides little comfort given the stock's proximity to 52-week lows. Weekly MACD shows "Mildly Bullish" signals, but monthly indicators remain firmly "Bearish," suggesting any near-term bounce would likely encounter heavy resistance.

Risk-adjusted returns reveal Symphony as a "Medium Risk Low Return" investment over the past year, with a negative risk-adjusted return of -1.36 and volatility of 29.25%—more than double the Sensex's 13.02% volatility. The stock's beta of 1.05 indicates it generally moves in line with the broader market, but the negative alpha demonstrates consistent value destruction relative to the benchmark. Delivery volumes have shown mixed trends, with the one-month delivery percentage declining 2.24 percentage points, suggesting reduced institutional conviction.

Investment Thesis: Quality Erosion Undermines Historical Strengths

Symphony's investment thesis historically rested on four pillars: market leadership in air coolers, superior return on equity, minimal debt, and consistent dividend payments. However, recent performance has severely undermined three of these four pillars. Whilst the company maintains its net cash position and continues paying dividends, the collapse in profitability and erosion of competitive positioning raise fundamental questions about the sustainability of these attributes.

The company's quality grade of "Good" reflects its long-term financial performance, characterised by average ROCE of 28.58%, average ROE of 18.98%, and strong interest coverage of 54.07x. However, these historical averages increasingly appear disconnected from current reality, with the latest ROE of just 10.49% and the Q4 FY26 loss suggesting structural deterioration. The five-year sales growth of 3.76% barely exceeds inflation, indicating the company has struggled to grow in real terms despite India's robust economic expansion.

Overall Quality Grade
Good
Declining trend
Financial Trend
Negative
Since Jun'25
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish
Multiple indicators bearish
Valuation Grade
Fair
Expensive on growth

The financial trend classification of "Negative" since June 2025 reflects deteriorating fundamentals across multiple metrics, including the lowest quarterly PAT in recent history and negative six-month sales growth of 21.78%. The technical trend of "Mildly Bearish" provides no support for contrarian accumulation, whilst the valuation grade of "Fair" appears generous given the PEG ratio of 3.06 and premium P/BV multiple. The overall Mojo Score of 34/100 places Symphony firmly in "SELL" territory, with the recommendation to "Consider selling" and "Look for exit opportunities."

✓ KEY STRENGTHS

  • Net Cash Position: Zero long-term debt with net debt-to-equity of -0.36 provides financial flexibility
  • Market Leadership: Dominant brand in Indian air cooler segment with established distribution network
  • Promoter Commitment: 73.43% promoter holding with zero pledging demonstrates long-term commitment
  • Dividend Track Record: Consistent dividend payer with 1.53% yield and 42% payout ratio
  • Historical Profitability: Five-year average ROE of 18.98% and ROCE of 28.58% demonstrate past efficiency
  • Capital-Light Model: Outsourced manufacturing reduces fixed cost burden and capital intensity
  • Export Presence: Operations across 60 countries provide geographic diversification

⚠ KEY CONCERNS

  • Exceptional Loss: Q4 FY26 loss of ₹218 crores with unexplained exceptional charges raises transparency concerns
  • Revenue Decline: 30.74% YoY sales drop in Q4 and 21.78% decline over six months signals market share loss
  • ROE Collapse: Latest ROE of 10.49% down from 18.98% average indicates deteriorating capital efficiency
  • Institutional Exodus: FII holdings crashed from 6.18% to 3.27%, insurance from 0.44% to 0.07%
  • Margin Pressure: Operating margin of 14.79% significantly below prior year's 21.93%
  • Anaemic Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 3.76% barely exceeds inflation
  • Expensive Valuation: PEG ratio of 3.06 and P/BV of 6.88x unjustified by deteriorating fundamentals
  • Technical Weakness: Trading below all moving averages with bearish trend across timeframes

Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points for Potential Stabilisation

Symphony's forward outlook hinges critically on management's ability to explain and recover from the Q4 FY26 exceptional loss. Investors should demand detailed disclosure regarding the nature of the ₹220 crore charge that transformed operating profit into massive losses. If this represents one-time write-offs related to inventory obsolescence, goodwill impairment, or restructuring costs, the company may stabilise in coming quarters. However, if the charges reflect recurring operational issues or structural business model challenges, further deterioration appears likely.

The upcoming Q1 FY27 results (June 2026 quarter) will prove crucial in determining whether Symphony can return to profitability. Historically, the June quarter represents peak season for air cooler sales as summer temperatures rise across India. A return to historical June quarter profitability margins of 15-20% would signal the Q4 loss was indeed exceptional. Conversely, continued losses or sub-10% margins would confirm structural deterioration requiring significant business model reassessment.

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Management Clarity: Detailed explanation of Q4 exceptional items could restore confidence if genuinely one-time
  • Seasonal Recovery: Strong Q1 FY27 performance would demonstrate underlying business health
  • Cost Rationalisation: Margin improvement through operational efficiency and cost controls
  • Product Innovation: Launch of premium products or smart coolers to combat air conditioner competition
  • Market Share Gains: Evidence of winning back distribution or retail shelf space

RED FLAGS TO WATCH

  • Continued Losses: Q1 FY27 profitability failure would confirm structural problems
  • Further Institutional Selling: Additional FII or mutual fund exits would pressure valuations
  • Dividend Cut: Reduction or suspension of dividend would signal cash flow stress
  • Market Share Data: Industry reports showing accelerating cooler-to-AC substitution
  • Working Capital Stress: Rising payables or declining cash could force debt raising

Competitive dynamics in the cooling solutions market bear close monitoring, particularly the accelerating shift from air coolers to affordable air conditioners. If consumer preferences permanently shift towards year-round cooling comfort, Symphony's seasonal business model faces existential challenges. The company's response—whether through product diversification, premiumisation, or strategic partnerships—will determine long-term viability. Management commentary on these strategic initiatives in upcoming earnings calls will prove crucial for investor assessment.

The Verdict: Avoid Until Clarity Emerges on Exceptional Loss

SELL

Score: 34/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions until management provides detailed explanation of the Q4 FY26 exceptional loss and demonstrates return to profitability in Q1 FY27. The combination of unexplained charges, deteriorating fundamentals, institutional exodus, and expensive valuation creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of normalised profitability before considering entry.

For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions on any technical bounce towards the ₹809-833 resistance zone (20-day and 100-day moving averages). The 39.87% decline over the past year reflects fundamental deterioration rather than temporary sentiment, and further downside appears likely if Q1 FY27 fails to show recovery. Maintain positions only if prepared for extended holding period and potential further losses. Demand detailed management explanation of exceptional items before making hold/sell decisions.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹650-700 (17-21% downside from current levels), based on normalised earnings of ₹150-175 crores annually and target P/E of 25-28x, assuming Q4 loss was truly exceptional and profitability normalises.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The analysis presented is based on publicly available financial data as of May 16, 2026, and market conditions may change materially. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News