The Mumbai-based NBFC, which commenced operations in February 1990, has witnessed its stock surge 101.05% over the past year, significantly outperforming the Sensex's 9.81% gain during the same period. Trading at ₹268.40 as of November 19, 2025, the stock has delivered exceptional returns to shareholders, with a three-year gain of 408.33% and a five-year return of 1,181.15%. However, these stellar returns have pushed valuation metrics to levels that suggest limited room for further appreciation without corresponding improvements in fundamental performance.
The company's Q2 FY26 results revealed net sales of ₹1.37 crores, up 8.73% sequentially and 59.30% year-on-year, indicating accelerating revenue momentum. Operating profit excluding other income stood at ₹0.80 crores, marking the highest level in recent quarters and translating to an operating margin of 58.39%. The profit after tax margin of 48.91% reflects the company's ability to convert revenues into bottom-line profits efficiently, though this must be viewed in the context of the company's relatively small scale of operations.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Growth | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Growth | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 1.37 | +8.73% | 0.67 | +19.64% | 48.91% |
| Jun'25 | 1.26 | +28.57% | 0.56 | -22.22% | 44.44% |
| Mar'25 | 0.98 | +15.29% | 0.72 | +24.14% | 73.47% |
| Dec'24 | 0.85 | -1.16% | 0.58 | +16.00% | 68.24% |
| Sep'24 | 0.86 | +1.18% | 0.50 | -10.71% | 58.14% |
| Jun'24 | 0.85 | +2.41% | 0.56 | +43.59% | 65.88% |
| Mar'24 | 0.83 | — | 0.39 | — | 46.99% |
Financial Performance: Consistent Profitability Amidst Scale Challenges
Team India Guaranty's Q2 FY26 financial performance demonstrates steady sequential improvement, with net sales advancing to ₹1.37 crores from ₹1.26 crores in Q1 FY26, representing a QoQ growth of 8.73%. On a year-on-year basis, the revenue expansion of 59.30% reflects the company's ability to scale its operations from a low base, though the absolute quantum of revenues remains modest for an NBFC with a market capitalisation exceeding ₹240 crores.
The company's operating profit excluding other income reached ₹0.80 crores in Q2 FY26, marking the highest level recorded in recent quarters and maintaining a robust operating margin of 58.39%. This margin, whilst lower than the 61.90% achieved in Q1 FY26, remains significantly above industry norms and reflects the company's lean cost structure. Employee costs remained minimal at ₹0.08 crores, consistent with the previous quarter, indicating stable overhead management.
Profit before tax stood at ₹0.80 crores in Q2 FY26, up from ₹0.79 crores in Q1 FY26, translating to a modest sequential increase of 1.27%. The effective tax rate of 16.25% in Q2 FY26 represents a substantial improvement from the 29.11% rate applied in Q1 FY26, contributing significantly to the 19.64% sequential growth in net profit. This tax rate volatility, which has ranged from 16.25% to 29.63% over the past seven quarters, introduces an element of unpredictability into earnings projections.
On a half-yearly basis for H1 FY26, the company reported cumulative net sales of ₹2.63 crores and a net profit of ₹1.23 crores, representing a PAT margin of 46.77%. Compared to H1 FY25, which saw net sales of ₹1.71 crores and net profit of ₹1.06 crores, the company has achieved revenue growth of 53.80% and profit growth of 16.04% on a half-yearly comparison basis. This growth trajectory, whilst positive, must be assessed against the company's negative five-year sales growth rate of -4.61%, highlighting the recent nature of this turnaround.
Operational Quality: Weak Fundamentals Despite Recent Momentum
The company's operational quality presents a concerning picture when evaluated through the lens of long-term fundamental strength. Team India Guaranty's average return on equity of 6.13% over the past five years falls substantially below acceptable standards for a financial services company, where ROE levels of 15-20% are typically considered healthy. The latest ROE of 5.30% as of March 2025 indicates that the company generates returns barely above risk-free rates, raising questions about its ability to create meaningful shareholder value over time.
The company's ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) stands at 8.66%, which, whilst marginally better than its ROE, still reflects suboptimal capital efficiency. For context, well-managed NBFCs typically deliver ROCE levels in the mid-teens or higher, suggesting that Team India Guaranty struggles to deploy capital productively. This weak return profile becomes particularly problematic when considered alongside the stock's premium valuation multiples.
From a balance sheet perspective, the company maintains a debt-free capital structure with zero long-term borrowings, which eliminates financial risk but also raises questions about growth ambitions. Shareholder funds stood at ₹47.77 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹45.43 crores in March 2024, reflecting steady capital accumulation through retained earnings. Current assets of ₹47.41 crores significantly exceed current liabilities of ₹0.18 crores, providing ample liquidity cushion, though the absence of meaningful fixed assets or investments suggests limited business infrastructure.
Critical Concern: Fundamental Weakness
Weak Long-Term Performance: The company's average ROE of 6.13% over five years and latest ROE of 5.30% indicate poor capital efficiency and limited value creation capability. The five-year sales growth rate of -4.61% and EBIT growth of -2.93% reflect structural challenges in scaling the business profitably. These fundamental weaknesses stand in stark contrast to the stock's premium valuation, creating a significant risk-reward imbalance for investors.
The Valuation Paradox: Expensive Multiples for Modest Returns
Team India Guaranty trades at a P/E ratio of 95.41x, representing a valuation premium of over 315% compared to the industry average P/E of 23x. This extreme valuation multiple implies market expectations of extraordinary growth and profitability improvements, which appear disconnected from the company's historical track record and current scale of operations. The Price-to-Book ratio of 5.05x further underscores the expensive valuation, particularly when juxtaposed against the company's 5.30% ROE, which fails to justify such a premium to book value.
The company's PEG ratio of 3.14 indicates that investors are paying ₹3.14 for every unit of earnings growth, well above the threshold of 1.0 that typically signals fair value. This elevated PEG ratio suggests that the stock has run ahead of its fundamental earnings power, with recent price appreciation driven more by momentum and technical factors than by improvements in underlying business quality. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 75.74x and EV/Sales ratio of 50.27x further confirm the stretched nature of current valuations.
| Valuation Metric | Current Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 95.41x | Very Expensive |
| Price to Book | 5.05x | Premium to peers |
| EV/EBITDA | 75.74x | Stretched |
| PEG Ratio | 3.14x | Expensive vs growth |
| EV/Sales | 50.27x | Extremely high |
The company's overall valuation grade of "Very Expensive" reflects these stretched metrics, with the classification remaining unchanged since April 2023. Historical valuation patterns show frequent oscillations between "Very Expensive" and "Does Not Qualify" categories, suggesting that the stock has consistently traded at levels disconnected from fundamental value. The absence of dividend payments (dividend yield: NA) further reduces the investment appeal for value-oriented investors seeking income generation alongside capital appreciation.
Peer Comparison: Underperformance on Key Metrics
When benchmarked against peer NBFCs, Team India Guaranty's fundamental underperformance becomes starkly apparent. The company's ROE of 6.13% lags significantly behind peers such as Keynote Financial Services (11.97% ROE) and Gamco Ltd (18.28% ROE), indicating inferior capital efficiency. Despite this weaker return profile, Team India Guaranty commands a P/E multiple of 95.41x, substantially higher than Keynote Financial's 22.96x and Alfred Herbert's 10.05x, creating a valuation disconnect that defies rational investment logic.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | ROE | Price to Book | Debt to Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team India Guaranty | 95.41x | 6.13% | 5.05x | 0.00 |
| Keynote Financial | 22.96x | 11.97% | 1.47x | 0.01 |
| Gamco Ltd | NA (Loss Making) | 18.28% | 2.12x | 2.00 |
| Alfred Herbert | 10.05x | 1.59% | 0.43x | -0.11 |
| Purple Finance | NA (Loss Making) | 0.00% | 2.21x | 0.78 |
| Innovassynth Investments | NA (Loss Making) | 0.00% | 5.21x | 0.10 |
The Price-to-Book ratio comparison reveals similar concerns. Team India Guaranty's P/BV of 5.05x ranks among the highest in its peer group, exceeded only by Innovassynth Investments at 5.21x. However, Keynote Financial, which delivers nearly double the ROE at 11.97%, trades at a P/BV of just 1.47x, highlighting the valuation premium that Team India Guaranty commands despite inferior fundamentals. The company's debt-free balance sheet, whilst reducing financial risk, also limits its ability to leverage capital for growth, potentially constraining future expansion opportunities.
From a market capitalisation perspective, Team India Guaranty's ₹241.00 crores positions it as the third-largest entity within its immediate peer group, though this ranking reflects stock price appreciation rather than business scale or profitability. The company's institutional holding of just 1.74% suggests limited interest from sophisticated investors, who typically conduct rigorous fundamental analysis before committing capital. This low institutional participation may indicate that professional fund managers view the current valuation as unjustified by underlying business quality.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Minimal Institutional Interest
The shareholding structure of Team India Guaranty reveals a stable promoter holding of 74.92% that has remained unchanged across the past five quarters, indicating strong promoter commitment and alignment with minority shareholders. The absence of pledged shares further reinforces confidence in the promoter group's financial stability and long-term vision for the company. Key promoters include Team India Managers Ltd (45.31%), Surajkumar Saraogi (14.91%), Sharda Omprakash Saraogi (9.97%), and Karan Surajkumar Saraogi (4.73%).
| Quarter | Promoter | FII | Mutual Funds | Insurance | DII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 74.92% | 1.69% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Jun'25 | 74.92% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Mar'25 | 74.92% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Dec'24 | 74.92% | 0.55% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Sep'24 | 74.92% | 0.18% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Foreign institutional investor (FII) holding declined marginally to 1.69% in Q2 FY26 from 1.92% in Q1 FY26, representing a sequential decrease of 0.23 percentage points. Whilst FII participation has increased from 0.18% in September 2024, the absolute level remains negligible, with just two FII entities holding stakes in the company. This minimal foreign interest likely reflects concerns about liquidity, scale, and valuation, factors that typically deter large institutional investors from micro-cap stocks.
Mutual fund holding has remained static at 0.01% across all five quarters, with three mutual fund schemes maintaining token positions. The absence of insurance company holdings and minimal DII participation of 0.05% underscore the lack of institutional conviction in the stock. The non-institutional category, comprising primarily retail investors, holds 23.34% as of September 2025, up from 23.11% in the previous quarter, suggesting that recent price appreciation has been driven predominantly by retail enthusiasm rather than institutional accumulation.
Stock Performance: Momentum-Driven Rally Defies Fundamentals
Team India Guaranty's stock has delivered extraordinary returns across multiple timeframes, significantly outperforming both the broader market and its sector peers. The stock's one-year return of 101.05% dwarfs the Sensex's 9.81% gain, generating alpha of 91.24 percentage points. This outperformance extends across longer periods, with three-year returns of 408.33% (alpha: 370.18%) and five-year returns of 1,181.15% (alpha: 1,085.77%) highlighting the stock's momentum-driven character.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | 7.79% | 0.85% | +6.94% |
| 1 Month | 5.88% | 1.47% | +4.41% |
| 3 Months | -6.19% | 4.34% | -10.53% |
| 6 Months | 52.98% | 3.81% | +49.17% |
| YTD | 64.66% | 9.02% | +55.64% |
| 1 Year | 101.05% | 9.81% | +91.24% |
| 3 Years | 408.33% | 38.15% | +370.18% |
| 5 Years | 1181.15% | 95.38% | +1085.77% |
However, the three-month return of -6.19% against the Sensex's 4.34% gain (alpha: -10.53%) signals recent loss of momentum, with the stock trading 15.26% below its 52-week high of ₹316.75. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility relative to the broader market, with annualised volatility of 60.41% placing it firmly in the "high risk, high return" category. This elevated volatility, combined with weak fundamentals, creates a challenging risk-reward profile for investors seeking stable, long-term wealth creation.
Technical indicators present a mixed picture, with the overall trend classified as "Mildly Bullish" as of November 19, 2025. The stock trades above all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), suggesting positive near-term momentum. However, weekly technical indicators show mildly bearish signals from MACD, KST, and Dow Theory, whilst monthly indicators remain predominantly bullish. This divergence between short-term weakness and longer-term strength reflects the stock's recent consolidation following its spectacular rally.
"A 95x P/E multiple on 6% ROE represents one of the market's most extreme valuation disconnects – investors are paying premium prices for distinctly average business quality."
Investment Thesis: Momentum Play Without Fundamental Support
The investment case for Team India Guaranty rests almost entirely on technical momentum and recent operational improvements, with fundamental analysis revealing significant weaknesses that undermine long-term value creation potential. The company's Mojo Score of 37/100 places it firmly in "SELL" territory, reflecting concerns across multiple parameters including valuation, quality, and long-term growth trajectory.
From a quality perspective, the company's "Below Average" grade stems from its weak five-year sales growth of -4.61%, EBIT contraction of -2.93%, and average ROE of just 6.13%. These metrics indicate a business that has struggled to grow profitably over the medium term, with recent quarterly improvements insufficient to offset years of stagnation. The company's minimal institutional holdings of 1.74% further validate concerns about fundamental quality, as sophisticated investors typically avoid businesses with such weak return profiles.
The valuation assessment of "Very Expensive" reflects P/E, P/BV, and EV multiples that appear unjustifiable given the company's scale, growth rate, and return on capital. The PEG ratio of 3.14 suggests that investors are paying more than three times the appropriate price for the company's earnings growth, creating significant downside risk should sentiment shift or quarterly results disappoint. The technical trend of "Mildly Bullish" provides some near-term support, but this momentum-driven strength cannot compensate for fundamental overvaluation.
KEY STRENGTHS
- Debt-free balance sheet eliminates financial risk and interest burden
- Strong liquidity position with current assets significantly exceeding liabilities
- Consistent profitability with PAT margins above 45% in recent quarters
- Accelerating revenue growth with 59.30% YoY increase in Q2 FY26
- Stable promoter holding of 74.92% with zero pledging
- Impressive stock returns across 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year periods
- Trading above all major moving averages indicating technical strength
KEY CONCERNS
- Extremely weak ROE of 6.13% indicates poor capital efficiency
- Negative five-year sales growth of -4.61% reflects structural challenges
- P/E ratio of 95.41x represents severe overvaluation versus fundamentals
- PEG ratio of 3.14 suggests investors paying excessive premium for growth
- Minimal institutional participation at 1.74% signals lack of sophisticated investor interest
- Very small scale with quarterly revenues below ₹1.50 crores
- High volatility (60.41%) and beta (1.50) create significant downside risk
Outlook: Limited Upside, Significant Downside Risk
Looking ahead, Team India Guaranty faces the challenge of justifying its premium valuation through sustained improvements in both revenue growth and return on capital. Whilst recent quarterly results show positive momentum, the company must demonstrate its ability to scale operations significantly whilst maintaining or improving profitability margins. The absence of leverage in the capital structure, whilst reducing risk, also limits growth potential unless the company can generate substantially higher returns on equity to fund organic expansion.
Key monitoring points for investors include the sustainability of revenue growth beyond the current low base, improvement in ROE towards industry-standard levels of 15-20%, and any changes in institutional shareholding that might signal growing conviction from professional investors. The company's ability to deploy capital into higher-yielding opportunities will determine whether it can bridge the gap between current valuation multiples and fundamental performance.
POSITIVE CATALYSTS
- Sustained quarterly revenue growth above 50% YoY
- ROE improvement towards 12-15% range
- Meaningful increase in institutional shareholding
- Expansion of asset base through strategic investments
- Maintenance of debt-free status whilst scaling operations
RED FLAGS TO WATCH
- Any decline in quarterly revenue or profit momentum
- Further reduction in already-minimal institutional holdings
- Inability to improve ROE beyond current 5-6% levels
- Loss of technical support at key moving averages
- Valuation multiples remaining elevated despite fundamental weakness
The stock's recent three-month underperformance (-6.19% vs Sensex +4.34%) may signal the beginning of a valuation correction, as momentum-driven gains give way to fundamental reality. With the stock trading at 95x earnings on 6% returns on equity, the margin of safety appears non-existent for fresh investors. Existing shareholders who have benefited from the multi-year rally should consider booking profits, as the risk-reward equation has shifted decisively unfavourable at current price levels.
Investment Verdict: Sell on Valuation Concerns
Score: 37/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current valuations. The stock trades at 95x P/E on 6% ROE, representing one of the market's most extreme valuation disconnects. Wait for substantial correction (40-50%) or material improvement in ROE before considering entry.
For Existing Holders: Book profits and exit positions. The 101% one-year gain and 408% three-year return have pushed valuations to unsustainable levels. Recent momentum loss (-6.19% over three months) may signal the start of a correction. Preserve capital by realising gains now.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹140-160 (45-50% downside from current levels based on normalised P/E of 50x on trailing earnings)
Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.
