Teamo Productions HQ Ltd: Micro-Cap Construction Stock Faces Severe Headwinds Despite Recent Quarterly Profit

4 hours ago
share
Share Via
Teamo Productions HQ Ltd. (NSE: TPHQ), a micro-cap construction company with a market capitalisation of ₹70.00 crores, continues to struggle under the weight of deteriorating fundamentals and collapsing investor confidence. Trading at ₹0.62 as of January 14, 2026, the stock has plunged 72.32% over the past year, vastly underperforming both the Sensex's 9.00% gain and the construction sector's 22.87% decline. With a proprietary Mojo Score of just 23 out of 100 and a "STRONG SELL" rating, the company presents a cautionary tale of operational challenges, weak profitability metrics, and alarming technical deterioration that warrant immediate attention from existing shareholders.
Teamo Productions HQ Ltd: Micro-Cap Construction Stock Faces Severe Headwinds Despite Recent Quarterly Profit





Latest Quarterly PAT

₹5.12 Cr

Highest on Record



1-Year Stock Return

-72.32%

vs Sensex +9.00%



Average ROE

2.64%

Weak Capital Efficiency



P/E Ratio (TTM)

37.34x

vs Industry 35x




The company, formerly known as GI Engineering Solutions Limited until its rebranding in August 2023, specialises in civil engineering activities and ancillary services. Despite posting its highest-ever quarterly profit of ₹5.12 crores in Q3 FY26 (October-December 2025), the stock has failed to gain traction, declining 3.13% on January 14, 2026, and now trading 72.81% below its 52-week high of ₹2.28. The disconnect between operational performance and market valuation reflects deeper structural concerns that have eroded investor confidence systematically over the past year.



Financial Performance: Quarterly Strength Masks Long-Term Weakness



In Q3 FY26, Teamo Productions reported net sales of ₹17.85 crores, representing a sharp 37.80% decline compared to the previous four-quarter average. However, the company achieved its highest quarterly profit after tax of ₹5.12 crores, with earnings per share reaching ₹0.05. The operating profit margin (excluding other income) stood at 14.40%, marking the highest level on record, whilst the PAT margin compressed significantly due to the lower revenue base.





Q3 FY26 Net Sales

₹17.85 Cr

▼ 37.8% vs 4Q Avg



Q3 FY26 Net Profit

₹5.12 Cr

Record High



Operating Margin

14.40%

Highest Ever



Operating Profit (Q3)

₹2.57 Cr

Record PBDIT




The quarterly performance, whilst superficially impressive, raises critical questions about sustainability. The operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) of ₹2.57 crores was the highest on record, yet this came against a backdrop of significantly reduced sales volume. More concerning is the composition of profitability: non-operating income constituted a staggering 63.79% of profit before tax, suggesting the company's core engineering operations are generating minimal earnings.




⚠️ Earnings Quality Concern


Critical Finding: Non-operating income represents 63.79% of Q3 FY26 profit before tax, indicating the company's core construction operations are not driving profitability. This dependency on other income sources raises serious questions about the sustainability of earnings and the health of the underlying business model.




Operational Challenges: Weak Capital Efficiency and Deteriorating Returns



Teamo Productions' operational metrics paint a troubling picture of capital inefficiency and declining returns. The company's average return on equity (ROE) of just 2.64% over the past five years ranks amongst the weakest in the construction sector, indicating poor utilisation of shareholder capital. This figure is particularly concerning when compared to industry peers, who typically generate ROE in the 8-15% range. Higher ROE values indicate better capital efficiency and profitability—Teamo's performance falls dramatically short of this benchmark.



The latest half-yearly return on capital employed (ROCE) stood at a mere 1.90%, the lowest level recorded, down from an average of 11.93%. This sharp deterioration signals that the company is generating minimal returns from its total capital base, raising questions about management's ability to deploy resources effectively. The debtors turnover ratio for H1 FY26 also hit its lowest point at 1.29 times, suggesting the company is taking longer to collect payments from customers—a red flag for cash flow management in the construction industry.




Return on Equity: A Critical Weakness


With an average ROE of 2.64% over five years and latest ROE of 1.33%, Teamo Productions demonstrates extremely poor capital efficiency. This means for every ₹100 of shareholder equity, the company generates less than ₹3 in annual profit—far below the double-digit returns expected from healthy construction companies. This weak performance reflects fundamental challenges in project execution, pricing power, and operational management.




On a positive note, the company maintains a debt-free balance sheet with negative net debt to equity of -0.01, indicating it holds more cash than debt. The average EBIT to interest coverage ratio of 25.62 times demonstrates strong interest servicing capability, though this metric holds limited relevance given the minimal debt levels. Zero promoter pledging provides some comfort regarding ownership commitment, yet this alone cannot offset the fundamental operational weaknesses.



Balance Sheet Analysis: Shareholder Erosion and Asset Concerns



The balance sheet reveals systematic erosion of shareholder value over recent years. As of March 2019, shareholder funds stood at ₹6.93 crores, down from ₹45.69 crores in March 2016—a decline of 84.83% over three years. Reserves and surplus turned negative at ₹1.68 crores in March 2019, compared to positive ₹30.08 crores in March 2016, reflecting cumulative losses that have wiped out retained earnings.
















































Balance Sheet Item Mar'19 Mar'18 Mar'17 Mar'16
Share Capital ₹8.61 Cr ₹8.61 Cr ₹8.61 Cr ₹15.61 Cr
Reserves & Surplus ₹-1.68 Cr ₹-0.64 Cr ₹-0.56 Cr ₹30.08 Cr
Shareholder Funds ₹6.93 Cr ₹7.97 Cr ₹8.06 Cr ₹45.69 Cr
Current Assets ₹8.29 Cr ₹14.26 Cr ₹15.37 Cr ₹28.02 Cr
Book Value/Share ₹8.04 (Current)



Current assets declined from ₹28.02 crores in March 2016 to ₹8.29 crores in March 2019, a 70.41% reduction that suggests either significant working capital consumption or business contraction. With a current book value per share of ₹8.04 and the stock trading at ₹0.62, the price-to-book ratio of 0.50 indicates the market values the company at half its stated net asset value—a clear signal of scepticism about asset quality and future earning power.



Peer Comparison: Lagging Industry Standards Across Key Metrics



When benchmarked against construction sector peers, Teamo Productions' underperformance becomes starkly evident. The company's ROE of 2.64% trails significantly behind competitors such as Jayant Infratech (15.03%), H.M. Electro (12.76%), and Popular Foundations (8.92%). This gap underscores fundamental weaknesses in project profitability and capital allocation that management has failed to address.



















































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE Debt/Equity
Teamo Productions 37.34x 0.50x 2.64% -0.01
VSF Projects 449.59x 0.73x 0.00% 0.73
Jayant Infratech 8.80x 1.33x 15.03% 0.01
H.M. Electro 8.37x 1.03x 12.76% 0.08
Popular Found. 17.76x 1.55x 8.92% 0.24



Whilst Teamo's P/E ratio of 37.34 times appears moderate compared to VSF Projects' elevated 449.59 times, it remains unjustifiably high given the company's weak ROE and deteriorating operational metrics. More profitable peers like Jayant Infratech and H.M. Electro trade at significantly lower P/E multiples (8.80x and 8.37x respectively) despite delivering far superior returns on equity. The market's valuation disconnect suggests investors have not yet fully priced in the company's fundamental challenges.



Valuation Analysis: Risky Territory with Limited Upside



Teamo Productions currently carries a "RISKY" valuation grade, having deteriorated from "Attractive" in July 2025 through successive downgrades to "Fair," "Very Expensive," "Expensive," and finally "Risky" by October 2025. This rapid deterioration in valuation assessment reflects the market's growing recognition of fundamental weaknesses and deteriorating business prospects.



At the current price of ₹0.62, the stock trades at a P/E ratio of 37.34 times trailing twelve-month earnings and 0.50 times book value. The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of -66.58 times appears distorted due to the company's minimal debt and cash holdings, rendering this metric less meaningful for valuation purposes. The EV to sales ratio of 0.58 times suggests the market values the entire business at roughly half of annual revenues—a level typically associated with distressed or structurally challenged companies.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

37.34x

vs Industry 35x



Price to Book

0.50x

50% Discount to BV



EV/Sales

0.58x

Distressed Level



52-Week Range

₹0.52-₹2.28

-72.8% from High




The stock's 52-week price range of ₹0.52 to ₹2.28 illustrates extraordinary volatility, with the current price sitting just 19.23% above the year's low. This proximity to multi-year lows, combined with the absence of institutional investor interest (0.00% institutional holdings), suggests limited buying support exists at current levels. The lack of dividend yield provides no income cushion for investors enduring the capital erosion.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest



The shareholding structure reveals a stable but concerning pattern. Promoter holding has remained virtually unchanged at 26.48% over the past five quarters, with only a marginal 0.01% decline in December 2024. The two key promoters—Vrindaa Advanced Materials Limited (21.28%) and Vishesh Gupta (5.20%)—have maintained their stakes without additional investments, suggesting neither conviction to increase holdings nor urgency to exit.

































































Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 QoQ Change
Promoter 26.48% 26.48% 26.48% 26.48% 0.00%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 73.52% 73.52% 73.52% 73.52% 0.00%



Most alarming is the complete absence of institutional investors. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors collectively hold 0.00% of the company's equity. This institutional void signals that professional fund managers, who conduct rigorous due diligence, have found no compelling investment case in Teamo Productions. The 73.52% non-institutional holding consists primarily of retail investors who may lack the resources or expertise to properly assess the company's deteriorating fundamentals.



Stock Performance: Catastrophic Wealth Destruction Across Timeframes



Teamo Productions' stock performance represents one of the most severe wealth destruction stories in the construction sector over the past year. The stock has declined 72.32% over twelve months, underperforming the Sensex by a staggering 81.32 percentage points and the construction sector by 49.45 percentage points. This magnitude of underperformance reflects not merely sector headwinds but company-specific challenges that have decimated shareholder value.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -8.82% -1.86% -6.96%
1 Month +10.71% -2.21% +12.92%
3 Months -10.14% +1.65% -11.79%
6 Months -32.61% +1.37% -33.98%
YTD (FY26) -1.59% -2.16% +0.57%
1 Year -72.32% +9.00% -81.32%
2 Years -47.01% +14.90% -61.91%
3 Years +23.74% +38.37% -14.63%



The stock's risk profile categorises it as "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" with a negative risk-adjusted return of -1.36 over the past year. Volatility stands at an extreme 53.36%—nearly five times the Sensex's 11.29% volatility—indicating wild price swings that expose investors to substantial downside risk without commensurate upside potential. The beta of 1.50 confirms the stock amplifies market movements, falling harder during downturns whilst participating less enthusiastically in rallies.



Recent price action shows the stock trading below all key moving averages: 5-day (₹0.65), 20-day (₹0.65), 50-day (₹0.61), 100-day (₹0.66), and 200-day (₹0.77). This technical configuration signals sustained selling pressure and absence of meaningful support levels. The one-month return of +10.71% represents a brief technical bounce rather than fundamental improvement, as the three-month and six-month returns remain deeply negative at -10.14% and -32.61% respectively.



Technical Analysis: Mildly Bearish with No Catalyst for Reversal



From a technical perspective, Teamo Productions remains trapped in a "MILDLY BEARISH" trend that began on December 22, 2025. The stock has oscillated between bearish and mildly bearish classifications throughout the past quarter, with no sustained bullish breakout materialising. Key technical indicators present a mixed but predominantly negative picture: the MACD shows mildly bullish signals on a weekly basis but bearish on monthly timeframes, whilst the RSI, Bollinger Bands, and moving averages all flash bearish signals.



The stock finds immediate support at ₹0.52 (the 52-week low), with resistance clustering at ₹0.65 (20-day moving average), ₹0.66 (100-day moving average), and ₹0.77 (200-day moving average). The distance of 72.81% from the 52-week high of ₹2.28 illustrates the magnitude of value destruction and suggests any meaningful recovery would require multiple quarters of fundamental improvement—a scenario that appears unlikely given current operational trends.




"With the stock trading 72.81% below its 52-week high, exhibiting extreme volatility of 53.36%, and generating negative risk-adjusted returns, technical indicators offer no compelling case for a near-term reversal."


Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Limited Positives



The investment case for Teamo Productions is severely compromised by a confluence of fundamental, operational, and market-related weaknesses. The company's Mojo Score of 23 out of 100 places it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, with the proprietary assessment highlighting "weak long-term fundamental strength with an average return on equity of 2.64%" as a primary concern. The quality grade of "BELOW AVERAGE" reflects poor capital efficiency, deteriorating returns, and operational challenges that management has failed to address.





Mojo Score

23/100

Strong Sell Zone



Quality Grade

Below Avg

Weak Fundamentals



Financial Trend

Positive

Q3 Improvement



Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish

No Reversal Signal




The financial trend classification of "POSITIVE" based on Q3 FY26 results provides limited comfort, as this improvement appears driven by non-operating income rather than core business strength. The technical trend remains "MILDLY BEARISH," offering no near-term catalyst for price recovery. Valuation metrics classified as "RISKY" suggest the market has not yet fully priced in the company's deteriorating fundamentals, implying potential for further downside.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





Key Strengths



  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Zero long-term debt with negative net debt to equity of -0.01, providing financial flexibility without interest burden.

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares indicate promoters have not leveraged their holdings, suggesting some level of financial stability.

  • Record Quarterly Profitability: Q3 FY26 PAT of ₹5.12 crores represents the highest quarterly profit in company history.

  • Improved Operating Margins: Operating profit margin (excluding other income) reached 14.40% in Q3 FY26, the highest level recorded.

  • Long-Term Sales Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 158.65% demonstrates historical revenue expansion capability.




Key Risk Factors



  • Catastrophic Stock Performance: 72.32% decline over one year with 81.32 percentage points of underperformance versus Sensex.

  • Extremely Weak ROE: Average ROE of 2.64% and latest ROE of 1.33% indicate severe capital inefficiency and poor profitability.

  • Deteriorating ROCE: Half-yearly ROCE collapsed to 1.90%, the lowest level on record, signalling declining returns on total capital.

  • Earnings Quality Concerns: Non-operating income represents 63.79% of Q3 FY26 PBT, indicating core operations generate minimal profit.

  • Revenue Contraction: Q3 FY26 sales of ₹17.85 crores declined 37.80% versus previous four-quarter average.

  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, insurance, and DII holdings signals professional investors have avoided the stock.

  • High Volatility: 53.36% volatility (versus Sensex 11.29%) with beta of 1.50 exposes investors to extreme price swings.





Outlook: What to Watch





Positive Catalysts



  • Sustained revenue growth returning to ₹25+ crores quarterly levels with improved visibility

  • ROE improvement above 10% threshold demonstrating better capital deployment

  • ROCE stabilisation above 8-10% indicating improved returns on total capital employed

  • Reduction in non-operating income dependency below 30% of PBT showing core business strength

  • Entry of institutional investors (FII/MF) signalling professional validation of turnaround story




Red Flags to Monitor



  • Further revenue decline below ₹15 crores quarterly indicating business contraction

  • ROE falling below 1% suggesting complete capital inefficiency

  • Continued absence of institutional buying indicating lack of professional confidence

  • Breach of ₹0.52 support level (52-week low) triggering technical breakdown

  • Increasing dependency on non-operating income above 70% of PBT






The Verdict: Exit Recommended for Risk-Averse Investors


STRONG SELL

Score: 23/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation entirely. The combination of weak ROE (2.64%), deteriorating ROCE (1.90%), extreme volatility (53.36%), zero institutional interest, and 72.32% one-year decline presents an unacceptable risk-reward profile. The stock trades in "RISKY" valuation territory with no compelling catalysts for reversal. Better opportunities exist within the construction sector amongst peers delivering double-digit ROE with institutional backing.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any technical bounce towards ₹0.70-₹0.75 levels. The fundamental deterioration—evidenced by collapsing ROCE, revenue contraction, and earnings quality concerns—suggests the recent quarterly profit represents a temporary aberration rather than sustainable improvement. The complete absence of institutional investors and persistent bearish technical trends indicate limited near-term upside whilst downside risk to ₹0.52 (52-week low) remains material.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹0.45-₹0.50 (27.4% downside from current levels), based on 0.40x price-to-book ratio applied to ₹8.04 book value, reflecting structural challenges, weak profitability metrics, and absence of institutional validation.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investments carry inherent risks including potential loss of principal.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News