The company's stock closed at ₹147.40 on November 6, 2025, registering a 3.47% single-day gain, though it remains 22.99% below its 52-week high of ₹191.40. Trading at 9.82 times book value and commanding a price-to-earnings ratio that far exceeds the industry average of 24 times, Trishakti Industries presents a complex investment narrative where operational momentum clashes with stretched valuations and concerning medium-term trends.
Financial Performance: Revenue Acceleration Drives Margin Expansion
In Q2 FY26, Trishakti Industries reported net sales of ₹6.65 crores, marking a robust 62.99% sequential increase from ₹4.08 crores in Q1 FY26. The year-on-year comparison reveals an even more dramatic transformation, with revenues surging 133.33% from ₹2.85 crores in Q2 FY25. This represents the company's highest quarterly revenue figure in the available dataset, signalling a potential inflection point in business momentum.
Operating profitability remained exceptionally strong, with PBDIT (excluding other income) reaching ₹3.90 crores and translating to an operating margin of 58.65%. Whilst this represents a marginal 7.04 percentage point sequential decline from Q1 FY26's extraordinary 65.69%, it remains substantially elevated compared to historical levels and reflects the company's ability to maintain pricing power and operational efficiency.
| Quarter | Revenue (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Operating Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 6.65 | +62.99% | 1.59 | +78.65% | 58.65% |
| Jun'25 | 4.08 | +99.02% | 0.89 | -31.54% | 65.69% |
| Mar'25 | 2.05 | +115.79% | 1.29 | +6400.00% | 48.29% |
| Dec'24 | 0.95 | -66.67% | 0.01 | -97.62% | 38.95% |
| Sep'24 | 2.85 | -75.02% | 0.87 | -40.00% | 52.63% |
| Jun'24 | 11.41 | -78.81% | 1.41 | +566.67% | 20.16% |
| Mar'24 | 53.84 | — | 0.22 | — | 0.87% |
The profit after tax margin improved to 23.91% in Q2 FY26 from 21.81% in the preceding quarter, demonstrating effective cost management despite the lower operating margin. Interest costs remained relatively stable at ₹0.76 crores, whilst depreciation increased to ₹1.04 crores from ₹0.74 crores, reflecting ongoing capital investments. The tax rate normalised to 25.70% after an unusual negative tax charge in Mar'25, bringing greater predictability to earnings quality.
Earnings Quality Concern: Revenue Volatility
Whilst Q2 FY26 results appear strong, the quarterly revenue trajectory reveals extreme volatility. The company's sales plummeted from ₹53.84 crores in Mar'24 to just ₹0.95 crores in Dec'24 before recovering. On a half-yearly basis, H1 FY26 revenue of ₹10.73 crores represents a 24.75% decline compared to the corresponding period. This lumpy revenue pattern, typical of project-based businesses, raises questions about earnings sustainability and visibility.
Balance Sheet Transformation: Capital Infusion Fuels Growth
Trishakti Industries underwent a significant balance sheet restructuring during FY25, with shareholder funds expanding dramatically to ₹26.12 crores from ₹10.72 crores in the previous year. This 143.66% increase stemmed from both a modest share capital increase to ₹3.28 crores and a substantial reserves build-up to ₹22.83 crores, reflecting retained earnings and potential revaluation gains.
The company's fixed assets base expanded exponentially to ₹36.11 crores in Mar'25 from just ₹1.07 crores in Mar'24, suggesting major capital deployment into infrastructure or equipment. This 3,273% surge in fixed assets was financed through a combination of equity infusion and a sharp rise in current liabilities to ₹42.21 crores from ₹7.57 crores. The absence of long-term debt indicates the company relies on working capital financing and internal accruals, though the elevated current liabilities relative to current assets of ₹20.18 crores warrants careful monitoring of liquidity metrics.
Return on equity stood at 13.57% on average, a moderate figure that reflects acceptable capital efficiency but falls short of the 15-20% threshold typically associated with high-quality compounders. The ROCE of 7.79% suggests that whilst the company generates positive returns on deployed capital, the efficiency remains below industry leaders. For an NBFC operating in infrastructure services, these metrics indicate room for improvement in asset utilisation and project selection.
Cash Flow Dynamics: Investment Phase Evident
The FY25 cash flow statement reveals a company in active investment mode. Operating cash flow turned positive at ₹3.00 crores after a negative ₹1.00 crore outflow in FY24, demonstrating improved working capital management and earnings conversion. However, this was more than offset by a substantial ₹43.00 crores outflow in investing activities, predominantly reflecting the massive fixed asset additions discussed earlier.
To bridge this funding gap, Trishakti Industries generated ₹41.00 crores through financing activities, comprising equity raising and working capital facilities. The net cash position improved modestly to ₹1.00 crore from negligible levels in prior years. This cash flow profile is characteristic of a growth company making lumpy capital investments, though investors should monitor whether these investments translate into sustained revenue generation and improved returns over the coming quarters.
Key Insight: Project-Based Business Model
Trishakti Industries' financial profile reflects a project-based business model serving PSUs and oil & gas clients. The extreme quarterly revenue fluctuations, lumpy capital expenditure, and volatile profitability are inherent characteristics of infrastructure service providers. Whilst Q2 FY26 shows strong execution, investors must recognise that future quarters could witness sharp revenue deceleration depending on project completion cycles and new order inflows.
Valuation Analysis: Premium Pricing Without Fundamental Support
At the current market price of ₹147.40, Trishakti Industries commands a price-to-earnings ratio of 85 times trailing twelve-month earnings, a staggering 254% premium to the NBFC sector average of 24 times. This valuation multiple appears disconnected from fundamental performance, particularly given the company's below-average quality grade and flat financial trend classification.
| Valuation Metric | Trishakti Industries | Industry Average | Premium/(Discount) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 85.0x | 24.0x | +254% |
| Price to Book Value | 9.82x | ~3.0x | +227% |
| EV/EBITDA | 42.47x | — | — |
| EV/Sales | 29.04x | — | — |
The price-to-book value ratio of 9.82 times significantly exceeds peer averages around 3.0 times, suggesting the market has priced in substantial future growth that may prove challenging to deliver given the company's historical volatility. The PEG ratio of 2.98 indicates the stock trades at nearly three times its growth rate, well above the 1.0 threshold typically considered fair value. Enterprise value multiples paint a similar picture, with EV/EBITDA at 42.47 times and EV/Sales at 29.04 times reflecting "very expensive" territory according to the company's own valuation grade history.
The stock's classification as "Very Expensive" since January 2024 (with a brief interruption) suggests persistent overvaluation that has yet to correct despite the broader market environment. At current levels, the stock offers minimal margin of safety and leaves little room for execution disappointments or sector-wide derating.
"At 85 times earnings and 9.82 times book value, Trishakti Industries' valuation implies near-perfect execution in a business model characterised by extreme quarterly volatility—a combination that rarely ends well for late-stage investors."
Peer Comparison: Valuation Outlier in NBFC Space
When benchmarked against NBFC sector peers, Trishakti Industries emerges as a clear valuation outlier with limited fundamental justification for its premium pricing. Whilst the company's 13.57% return on equity exceeds the peer average of approximately 9%, this modest superiority hardly warrants the extreme valuation differential observed across multiple metrics.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE % | Debt/Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trishakti Industries | 84.51x | 9.82x | 13.57% | 1.26x |
| Leading Leasing Finance | 39.80x | 2.42x | 10.68% | 3.99x |
| Sakthi Finance | 16.71x | 1.23x | 6.03% | 4.83x |
| R R Financial Consultants | 57.64x | 5.51x | 1.47% | 0.25x |
| Alacrity Securities | 22.65x | 2.69x | 16.98% | 0.00x |
Alacrity Securities, with a superior ROE of 16.98% and zero debt, trades at just 22.65 times earnings and 2.69 times book value—dramatically cheaper than Trishakti despite better fundamental metrics. Even R R Financial Consultants, trading at 57.64 times earnings, appears relatively attractive given its minimal leverage of 0.25 times debt-to-equity compared to Trishakti's 1.26 times.
The peer comparison underscores a critical investment reality: Trishakti Industries trades at a substantial premium without commensurate superiority in profitability, growth visibility, or balance sheet strength. With a micro-cap market capitalisation of ₹268.00 crores ranking sixth amongst its peer group, the company lacks the scale advantages or institutional following that might justify premium valuations.
Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Stability Amidst Low Institutional Interest
The shareholding structure reveals a promoter-dominated company with minimal institutional participation. Promoter holding stood at 69.11% as of September 2025, unchanged from the previous two quarters but representing a significant increase from 33.24% in October 2024. This dramatic 35.87 percentage point surge in promoter stake during December 2024 suggests either open market purchases or preferential allotment, demonstrating strong insider confidence.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Other DII % | Non-Institutional % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 69.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 28.21% |
| Jun'25 | 69.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 30.89% |
| Mar'25 | 69.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 30.89% |
| Dec'24 | 68.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 31.33% |
| Oct'24 | 33.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 66.76% |
A notable development in September 2025 was the entry of other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) with a 2.69% stake, marking the first institutional presence in recent quarters. However, the complete absence of foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and mutual funds signals limited professional investor interest, likely reflecting concerns about the company's size, liquidity, and earnings volatility. With institutional holdings at just 2.69%, the stock remains predominantly retail-driven, contributing to price volatility and limited research coverage.
The promoter group, led by Suresh Jhanwar (25.03%), Sagarmal Ramesh Kumar Private Limited (12.93%), and family members Pranav Jhanwar and Dhruv Jhanwar (11.09% each), maintains control without any pledged shares—a positive indicator of financial stability. The non-institutional holding of 28.21% provides some free float, though liquidity remains constrained for larger investors seeking meaningful positions.
Stock Performance: Spectacular Long-Term Gains Mask Recent Weakness
Trishakti Industries' stock performance presents a tale of two distinct periods: extraordinary multi-year returns followed by concerning recent deterioration. Over the past five years, the stock has delivered a staggering 8,070.73% return, vastly outperforming the Sensex's 98.87% gain and generating alpha of 7,971.86 percentage points. The three-year return of 1,180.63% and two-year gain of 726.60% similarly dwarf benchmark performance, reflecting the company's transformation from a struggling entity to an operationally viable business.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +2.43% | -1.30% | +3.73% |
| 1 Month | -5.42% | +1.86% | -7.28% |
| 3 Month | -15.31% | +3.44% | -18.75% |
| 6 Month | +4.54% | +3.31% | +1.23% |
| YTD | -15.36% | +6.62% | -21.98% |
| 1 Year | -5.51% | +3.65% | -9.16% |
| 2 Years | +726.60% | +28.25% | +698.35% |
| 3 Years | +1180.63% | +36.69% | +1143.94% |
However, the momentum has decisively reversed in recent months. Year-to-date, the stock has declined 15.36% whilst the Sensex gained 6.62%, resulting in negative alpha of 21.98 percentage points. The three-month return of -15.31% and one-month decline of 5.42% indicate accelerating downward pressure. The one-year return of -5.51% underperforms the Sensex by 9.16 percentage points and trails the NBFC sector return of 16.85% by a substantial 22.36 percentage points.
At ₹147.40, the stock trades 22.99% below its 52-week high of ₹191.40 reached earlier in the year, though it remains 25.61% above the 52-week low of ₹117.35. The technical picture has deteriorated, with the stock trading below all key moving averages—5-day (₹143.19), 20-day (₹148.55), 50-day (₹153.56), 100-day (₹157.65), and 200-day (₹153.18)—suggesting sustained selling pressure across multiple timeframes.
Technical Analysis: Multiple Warning Signals Flash Red
The technical landscape for Trishakti Industries has turned decidedly negative, with the stock classified as "Mildly Bearish" since November 4, 2025. This follows a period of sideways consolidation and multiple trend reversals, indicating indecision amongst market participants. Both weekly and monthly MACD indicators flash bearish signals, whilst the KST oscillator similarly points to downward momentum across timeframes.
The Dow Theory indicator shows "Mildly Bearish" readings on both weekly and monthly charts, suggesting the prevailing downtrend could persist unless a significant catalyst emerges. Bollinger Bands present mixed signals, with a "Mildly Bearish" reading on the weekly timeframe contrasted by a "Bullish" signal on the monthly chart, indicating potential volatility ahead.
Technical Red Flag: High Beta, High Volatility
With an adjusted beta of 1.50, Trishakti Industries exhibits 50% more volatility than the broader market. The stock's one-year volatility of 52.65%—more than four times the Sensex's 12.45%—places it in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category. The negative risk-adjusted return of -0.10 over the past year, combined with a negative Sharpe ratio, indicates investors have been penalised rather than rewarded for assuming this elevated risk. This volatility profile makes the stock unsuitable for risk-averse investors and requires strong conviction from those willing to endure sharp price swings.
Delivery volumes show mixed trends, with the one-month average delivery percentage declining to 79.16% from 77.23% in the previous month. The recent session on November 4, 2025, witnessed delivery of 14,740 shares representing 84.51% of total volume, significantly above the five-day average of 87.36%, suggesting some degree of genuine buying interest rather than purely speculative activity.
Investment Thesis: Operational Progress Cannot Justify Valuation
Trishakti Industries' investment thesis rests on several pillars, each requiring careful evaluation. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 21 out of 100, classified as "STRONG SELL," synthesises multiple analytical dimensions into an overall assessment that raises significant red flags for potential investors.
The "Very Expensive" valuation grade reflects the disconnect between current market pricing and fundamental value. Trading at 85 times earnings with a PEG ratio of 2.98, the stock offers no margin of safety and leaves investors vulnerable to any execution missteps or sector-wide derating. The "Below Average" quality classification, driven by weak five-year sales growth of -36.91%, high leverage of 1.26 times debt-to-equity, and modest ROE of 13.57%, suggests the company lacks the fundamental characteristics of compounding machines.
The "Flat" financial trend designation for Q2 FY26, despite strong absolute numbers, reflects the proprietary algorithm's assessment that recent performance does not constitute a sustained improvement given historical volatility. Combined with "Mildly Bearish" technical indicators, three of the four key assessment dimensions flash warning signals that collectively justify the "STRONG SELL" rating.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
Key Strengths ✓
- Strong Q2 Execution: Net profit of ₹1.59 crores represents 78.65% QoQ and 89.29% YoY growth, demonstrating operational momentum.
- Exceptional Margins: Operating margin of 58.65% and PAT margin of 23.91% significantly exceed industry norms, reflecting pricing power.
- Promoter Commitment: Promoter holding increased to 69.11% from 33.24%, with zero pledging indicating strong insider confidence.
- Asset-Light Model: Zero long-term debt provides financial flexibility and reduces refinancing risks.
- Multi-Year Track Record: Five-year return of 8,070.73% demonstrates the company's transformation from distressed to operationally viable.
- Niche Market Position: Serving PSUs and oil & gas majors provides a degree of client quality and payment certainty.
- Positive Operating Cash Flow: FY25 operating cash flow of ₹3.00 crores indicates improving earnings quality and working capital management.
Key Concerns ⚠
- Extreme Valuation: P/E of 85x and P/BV of 9.82x represent 254% and 227% premiums to industry averages without fundamental justification.
- Revenue Volatility: Quarterly sales ranged from ₹0.95 crores to ₹53.84 crores, indicating lumpy project-based revenue with limited visibility.
- Deteriorating Medium-Term Performance: YTD return of -15.36% and three-month decline of 15.31% signal momentum reversal.
- Minimal Institutional Interest: Just 2.69% institutional holding and zero FII/MF presence limit liquidity and research coverage.
- Below-Average Quality Grade: Five-year sales decline of 36.91%, modest ROE of 13.57%, and high leverage constrain quality assessment.
- Technical Weakness: Stock trades below all moving averages with bearish MACD and KST signals across timeframes.
- High Volatility Profile: Beta of 1.50 and annual volatility of 52.65% create "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" classification unsuitable for conservative investors.
Outlook: Monitoring Points for Investors
Positive Catalysts
- Sustained quarterly revenue above ₹5 crores demonstrating business stability
- Operating margins consistently maintained above 50% across quarters
- New project wins or order book disclosure providing revenue visibility
- Entry of institutional investors (FIIs/MFs) improving liquidity and credibility
- Reduction in current liabilities improving balance sheet quality
Red Flags
- Quarterly revenue falling below ₹3 crores indicating project completion without replacement
- Operating margins compressing below 40% suggesting pricing pressure or cost inflation
- Further promoter stake dilution or any pledging of shares
- Working capital deterioration with current liabilities exceeding current assets by wider margins
- Stock breaking below ₹117.35 (52-week low) on high volumes
The forward outlook for Trishakti Industries hinges critically on the company's ability to demonstrate revenue sustainability beyond Q2 FY26's strong showing. Given the project-based nature of the business, investors should closely monitor order book announcements, client concentration, and project execution timelines. The absence of quarterly guidance or management commentary limits visibility, making each quarterly result a potential volatility trigger.
From a sector perspective, the infrastructure and oil & gas exploration services industry faces headwinds from fluctuating crude prices, government capex cycles, and increasing competition. Trishakti's ability to maintain its exceptional operating margins amidst these pressures will determine whether current profitability represents a sustainable competitive advantage or a temporary windfall from favourable project mix.
The Verdict: Avoid Despite Operational Progress
Score: 21/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. The stock trades at 85 times earnings with a PEG ratio of 2.98, offering no margin of safety despite Q2 FY26's strong operational performance. The combination of extreme valuation, below-average quality grade, high volatility (52.65% annually), and deteriorating technical indicators creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Investors should wait for a meaningful valuation correction of at least 40-50% before considering entry, which would bring the P/E multiple closer to industry averages and provide adequate compensation for the inherent business volatility.
For Existing Holders: Consider booking profits and exiting positions, particularly for those who participated in the multi-year rally. Whilst Q2 results demonstrate operational capability, the sustainability of lumpy project-based revenues remains unproven. The stock's classification as "Very Expensive" since January 2024, combined with recent underperformance of 22.36 percentage points versus the NBFC sector, suggests the valuation premium is eroding. Existing holders have benefited from extraordinary gains; protecting capital by exiting at current levels appears prudent given the unfavourable risk-reward dynamics.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹65-75 per share (55-60% downside from current levels), implying a more reasonable P/E multiple of 35-40 times and P/BV of 4.0-4.5 times, still representing a premium to sector averages but justified by superior margins if sustained.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry inherent risks including the potential loss of principal.
