TVS Electronics Q3 FY26: Marginal Profit Amid Volatile Revenue Trajectory

Feb 13 2026 09:34 AM IST
share
Share Via
TVS Electronics Ltd., a micro-cap player in the IT hardware space with a market capitalisation of ₹742.84 crores, reported a marginal net profit of ₹0.41 crores for Q3 FY26 (December 2025 quarter), marking a sharp decline of 73.55% quarter-on-quarter from ₹1.55 crores in Q2 FY26. Year-on-year, the company swung to profitability from a loss of ₹0.65 crores in Q3 FY25, though the absolute profit remains negligible relative to revenue scale.
TVS Electronics Q3 FY26: Marginal Profit Amid Volatile Revenue Trajectory

The stock, trading at ₹398.30 as of February 13, 2026, has declined 3.13% in the latest session and remains significantly below its 52-week high of ₹740.85, reflecting investor concerns about the company's inconsistent operational performance and deteriorating technical momentum. The company continues to grapple with razor-thin margins and volatile quarterly results despite modest top-line growth.

Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹0.41 Cr
▼ 73.55% QoQ
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹113.52 Cr
▲ 13.67% YoY
Operating Margin
5.75%
Highest in 7 quarters
PAT Margin
0.36%
Razor-thin profitability

The December 2025 quarter results reveal a company struggling with operational consistency despite achieving its highest operating margin in recent quarters. The sequential revenue decline of 10.90% from ₹127.41 crores in Q2 FY26 to ₹113.52 crores in Q3 FY26 underscores the volatile nature of TVS Electronics' business model, which appears heavily dependent on quarterly order flows and customer concentration in the IT hardware and services segments.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin PAT Margin
Dec'25 113.52 -10.90% 0.41 5.75% 0.36%
Sep'25 127.41 +31.81% 1.55 3.74% 1.22%
Jun'25 96.66 -15.59% -3.55 1.30% -3.67%
Mar'25 114.51 +14.66% -0.57 2.31% -0.50%
Dec'24 99.87 -4.50% -0.65 3.04% -0.65%
Sep'24 104.58 -6.04% -1.32 2.51% -1.26%
Jun'24 111.30 -1.26 2.84% -1.13%

Financial Performance: Marginal Gains Mask Underlying Weakness

TVS Electronics' Q3 FY26 financial performance presents a mixed picture. Net sales of ₹113.52 crores represent a 13.67% year-on-year improvement from ₹99.87 crores in Q3 FY25, demonstrating some demand resilience in the company's product and services portfolio. However, the sharp 10.90% sequential decline from the preceding quarter's ₹127.41 crores highlights the lumpy nature of revenue recognition, likely driven by project-based income streams and seasonal variations in customer ordering patterns.

Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excl OI) reached ₹6.53 crores, yielding the highest operating margin of 5.75% in the last seven quarters. This improvement from 3.74% in Q2 FY26 suggests better cost absorption or favourable product mix, though the absolute operating profit remains modest. Employee costs of ₹19.45 crores in Q3 FY26 stayed relatively stable compared to ₹21.43 crores in Q2 FY26, indicating some workforce rationalisation or lower variable compensation.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹113.52 Cr
▼ 10.90% QoQ | ▲ 13.67% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹0.41 Cr
▼ 73.55% QoQ | YoY: Profit vs Loss
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
5.75%
▲ 201 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
0.36%
▼ 86 bps QoQ

The collapse in net profit from ₹1.55 crores in Q2 FY26 to ₹0.41 crores in Q3 FY26, despite improved operating margins, stems from significantly lower other income (₹0.22 crores vs ₹1.83 crores in Q2 FY26) and higher depreciation charges (₹4.09 crores vs ₹3.74 crores). Interest costs remained elevated at ₹1.54 crores, reflecting the company's continued reliance on debt financing. The profit before tax of ₹0.38 crores barely crossed into positive territory, with a minimal tax credit of ₹0.03 crores pushing net profit to ₹0.41 crores—a figure that translates to a PAT margin of merely 0.36%.

The nine-month performance for FY26 (April-December 2025) shows accumulated losses, with the company reporting cumulative losses in H1 FY26 before turning marginally profitable in Q3. This pattern of inconsistent profitability—oscillating between losses and marginal gains—raises serious questions about the sustainability of TVS Electronics' business model and its ability to generate meaningful shareholder value.

Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Balance Sheet Concerns

TVS Electronics continues to grapple with fundamental operational weaknesses that severely limit its investment appeal. The company's return on equity (ROE) stands at a dismal 8.08% on average, with the latest quarter showing negative ROE of -3.53%. This weak capital efficiency indicates that the company struggles to generate adequate returns for its shareholders, falling well short of the cost of equity capital for a business of this risk profile.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) paints an even grimmer picture at 2.79% on average, with the latest reading at -3.38%. These abysmal returns—significantly below even risk-free government bond yields—suggest that TVS Electronics destroys value rather than creates it. The company's capital-intensive nature, combined with razor-thin margins and volatile earnings, results in inadequate compensation for the capital deployed in the business.

Critical Concern: Value-Destructive Returns

ROE: 8.08% average (Latest: -3.53%)

ROCE: 2.79% average (Latest: -3.38%)

Interpretation: Returns fall dramatically short of investor expectations and cost of capital, indicating systematic value destruction. The negative latest quarter returns highlight the company's inability to generate positive economic profit even during periods of top-line growth.

The balance sheet reveals mounting leverage concerns. The debt-to-equity ratio increased to 0.69 times in H1 FY26, the highest in recent periods, whilst cash and cash equivalents declined to ₹3.35 crores—the lowest level observed. This deteriorating liquidity position, combined with rising debt levels, constrains the company's financial flexibility and increases refinancing risks. Interest coverage, measured by EBIT to interest, averaged 6.87 times, which appears adequate on the surface but masks the volatility in operating profits that frequently push the company into loss-making territory.

Working capital management also shows signs of stress. The debtors turnover ratio fell to 5.53 times in H1 FY26, the lowest in recent periods, indicating either slower collections or extended credit terms to customers—both of which tie up valuable working capital and increase the risk of bad debts. With interest costs rising 20.34% in the nine-month period to ₹4.91 crores, the company faces a vicious cycle of higher borrowing costs eroding already thin margins.

Industry Context: Struggling in a Challenging IT Hardware Landscape

The IT hardware sector in India faces structural headwinds, including intense competition from global brands, commoditisation of products, and rapid technological obsolescence. TVS Electronics operates in this challenging environment with limited scale advantages and weak pricing power, evidenced by its persistent margin pressures and inability to sustain profitability across quarters.

The company's five-year sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.45% appears respectable on the surface, but this growth has not translated into improved profitability or returns. EBIT growth of 10.31% over the same period lags sales growth, indicating deteriorating operational leverage and margin compression—a troubling sign for a business that should theoretically benefit from economies of scale as it grows.

Growth Without Profitability

Whilst TVS Electronics has achieved 15.45% sales CAGR over five years, this top-line expansion has failed to deliver commensurate bottom-line growth. The company's EBIT grew at only 10.31% annually, and net profit remains volatile and negligible. This disconnect between revenue growth and profit generation suggests fundamental issues with the business model, including inadequate pricing power, rising input costs, or operational inefficiencies that prevent the company from capturing value from its sales expansion.

The broader IT hardware industry in India returned -16.78% over the past year, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 8.83% gain. TVS Electronics outperformed its sector with a 15.64% one-year return, but this relative outperformance must be viewed in context—the stock remains 46.24% below its 52-week high and has experienced extreme volatility, with three-month returns of -39.91% highlighting the fragility of investor confidence.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Disconnect and Weak Fundamentals

A comparison with IT hardware peers reveals TVS Electronics' fundamental weaknesses and questionable valuation premium. The company's price-to-book value (P/BV) ratio of 8.39x stands out as exceptionally high, particularly given the company's loss-making status (P/E ratio not applicable) and weak return profile. This valuation appears divorced from fundamentals when compared to sector peers.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Div Yield Debt/Equity
TVS Electronics NA (Loss Making) 8.39 8.08 NA 0.57
Rashi Peripheral 10.10 1.32 10.87 0.54% 0.50
D-Link India 13.85 3.05 20.15 5.18% -0.51
Control Print 10.26 2.21 17.27 1.61% -0.17
NELCO 765.52 11.67 15.67 0.15% 0.32
Bharat Global 226.31 5.92 2.89 NA 0.46

TVS Electronics trades at a P/BV multiple significantly higher than most profitable peers (Rashi Peripheral at 1.32x, D-Link India at 3.05x, Control Print at 2.21x), despite delivering inferior ROE of 8.08% compared to the peer average of approximately 13%. This valuation anomaly becomes even more glaring when considering that TVS Electronics is currently loss-making on a trailing twelve-month basis, whilst most peers generate consistent profits.

The company's ROE of 8.08% ranks among the lowest in the peer group, with only Bharat Global (2.89%) performing worse. Meanwhile, better-managed peers like D-Link India (20.15% ROE) and Control Print (17.27% ROE) trade at more reasonable valuations relative to their superior return profiles. TVS Electronics' inability to pay dividends (dividend yield: NA) further distinguishes it negatively from income-generating peers like D-Link India (5.18% yield).

Valuation Analysis: Risky Premium Unjustified by Fundamentals

TVS Electronics' valuation metrics flash warning signals across multiple dimensions. The company's "Risky" valuation grade, assigned by proprietary analysis, accurately reflects the disconnect between market price and underlying business quality. With a P/BV ratio of 8.39x—more than double the peer average—investors are paying a substantial premium for a business that consistently fails to generate adequate returns on that book value.

The EV/EBITDA multiple of 69.94x appears extraordinarily expensive, particularly for a company with such volatile and marginal profitability. This valuation implies that investors are willing to pay nearly 70 times operating profit for a business that frequently slips into losses and shows no clear path to sustainable margin expansion. The negative EV/EBIT ratio of -168.52x further underscores the company's earnings challenges, as negative EBIT in recent periods renders traditional valuation metrics meaningless.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
NA
Loss Making
Price to Book Value
8.39x
Expensive vs ROE
EV/EBITDA
69.94x
Extremely Rich
Mojo Score
45/100
SELL Rating

The company's valuation grade history shows a consistent pattern of expensive to very expensive ratings since November 2022, with the recent downgrade to "Risky" in May 2024 reflecting deteriorating fundamentals. The stock's 46.24% decline from its 52-week high of ₹740.85 to the current ₹398.30 suggests that the market is beginning to reassess this valuation premium, though significant downside risk remains given the weak earnings trajectory and poor return metrics.

From a fair value perspective, TVS Electronics' book value per share of ₹46.74 implies that at the current price of ₹398.30, investors are paying ₹8.39 for every rupee of book value. For a company generating ROE of 8.08%—which translates to earning roughly ₹3.77 per share annually on that book value—this premium appears entirely unjustified. A more reasonable valuation would place the stock closer to 2-3 times book value, implying a fair value range of ₹93-140 per share, suggesting 65-76% downside from current levels.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Negligible Institutional Interest

The shareholding pattern of TVS Electronics reveals a stable promoter base but alarmingly low institutional participation, signalling limited confidence from sophisticated investors. Promoter holding stood at 59.77% as of December 2025, with a marginal decline of 0.14 percentage points from 59.91% in September 2025. This minor reduction, whilst not concerning in isolation, continues a pattern of gradual promoter stake dilution over recent quarters.

Quarter Promoter FII MF Insurance Other DII Non-Inst
Dec'25 59.77% 0.22% 0.01% 0.00% 0.02% 39.98%
Sep'25 59.91% 0.03% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 40.04%
Jun'25 59.91% 0.04% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 40.04%
Mar'25 59.91% 0.03% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 40.05%
Dec'24 59.91% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 40.08%

Foreign institutional investor (FII) holding increased to 0.22% in Q3 FY26 from 0.03% in Q2 FY26, representing a 0.19 percentage point uptick. However, the absolute level remains negligible, with only three FII entities holding stakes. Mutual fund exposure stands at a mere 0.01% with just three funds participating, whilst insurance companies have zero exposure. Other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) hold an insignificant 0.02%. The combined institutional holding of 0.25% ranks among the lowest in the listed universe and reflects institutional investors' assessment of the company's weak fundamentals and poor risk-reward profile.

The non-institutional shareholding of 39.98% consists primarily of retail investors and high-net-worth individuals, a shareholder base typically more susceptible to sentiment-driven volatility and less equipped to conduct rigorous fundamental analysis. The absence of meaningful institutional participation—which typically provides stability and validates investment theses—leaves the stock vulnerable to sharp price swings based on momentum and speculation rather than fundamental value.

Stock Performance: Volatile Returns Reflect Fundamental Uncertainty

TVS Electronics' stock price performance over various timeframes reveals extreme volatility and deteriorating momentum. The stock generated a one-year return of 15.64%, outperforming the Sensex's 8.83% gain by 6.81 percentage points. However, this relative outperformance masks significant turbulence, with the stock experiencing a brutal 39.91% decline over the past three months compared to the Sensex's modest 1.92% fall—an underperformance of 37.99 percentage points that signals a fundamental reassessment by market participants.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -0.24% -0.86% +0.62%
1 Month -8.28% -0.92% -7.36%
3 Months -39.91% -1.92% -37.99%
6 Months -3.72% +2.88% -6.60%
YTD -8.00% -2.77% -5.23%
1 Year +15.64% +8.83% +6.81%
2 Years +24.33% +15.80% +8.53%
3 Years +14.21% +37.11% -22.90%

The recent price action paints a concerning picture. Year-to-date, the stock has declined 8.00% compared to the Sensex's 2.77% fall, generating negative alpha of 5.23 percentage points. The one-month return of -8.28% versus the Sensex's -0.92% reflects accelerating negative momentum. Most alarmingly, the stock trades below all major moving averages—5-day (₹405.99), 20-day (₹401.36), 50-day (₹432.67), 100-day (₹515.57), and 200-day (₹466.31)—a technical configuration that typically signals sustained downtrend and lack of buying support.

The stock's volatility of 60.95% over the past year classifies it as "HIGH RISK," more than five times the Sensex's volatility of 11.46%. This extreme volatility, combined with a risk-adjusted return of just 0.26 compared to the Sensex's 0.77, indicates that investors are not being adequately compensated for the substantial risks inherent in holding TVS Electronics shares. The beta of 1.00 suggests the stock moves in line with the market on average, but the volatility metrics reveal much wider price swings around that trend.

Technical Analysis: Mildly Bearish Trend with Weak Support

The technical picture for TVS Electronics has deteriorated significantly, with the stock currently in a "Mildly Bearish" trend that began on February 10, 2026, at ₹402.45. This represents a slight improvement from the previous "Bearish" classification but offers little comfort given the stock's position relative to key technical levels and the overwhelming bearish signals from multiple indicators.

Key technical indicators paint a predominantly negative picture. The MACD indicator shows "Bearish" on the weekly timeframe and "Mildly Bearish" on monthly charts, suggesting sustained downward momentum. Bollinger Bands indicate "Mildly Bearish" on both weekly and monthly timeframes, with the stock trading near the lower band—a sign of oversold conditions that nonetheless has failed to trigger any meaningful bounce. The weekly moving averages indicator remains firmly "Bearish," whilst the KST oscillator shows "Bearish" on weekly charts, though it registers "Bullish" on monthly timeframes, creating conflicting signals.

Technical Outlook: Multiple Resistance Levels Ahead

Current Price: ₹398.30

Immediate Resistance: ₹401.36 (20-day MA)

Major Resistance: ₹432.67 (50-day MA), ₹466.31 (200-day MA), ₹515.57 (100-day MA)

Support: ₹272.35 (52-week low)

Interpretation: The stock faces a wall of resistance from multiple moving averages overhead, suggesting any rally attempts will encounter significant selling pressure. The 46.24% distance from the 52-week high indicates substantial technical damage.

The immediate support level sits at ₹272.35, the 52-week low, which lies 31.63% below current levels. A breach of this support would open the door to further downside, potentially testing the ₹250 psychological level. On the upside, the stock must first reclaim the 20-day moving average at ₹401.36, then overcome the formidable resistance cluster between ₹432-516, where the 50-day, 200-day, and 100-day moving averages converge. The 52-week high of ₹740.85 appears a distant prospect, requiring an 86.02% rally from current levels.

Investment Thesis: Weak Fundamentals, Risky Valuation, Bearish Technicals

The investment case for TVS Electronics faces significant headwinds across all critical parameters. The company's quality grade of "Average" reflects long-term financial performance that fails to distinguish it positively, with weak return metrics (8.08% ROE, 2.79% ROCE) that fall dramatically short of investor expectations. The financial trend classification of "Flat" in the latest quarter, following a "Negative" trend in Q1 FY26, suggests the company struggles to establish consistent positive momentum.

Valuation presents perhaps the most concerning aspect of the investment thesis. The "Risky" valuation grade accurately captures the disconnect between the company's P/BV multiple of 8.39x and its inability to generate commensurate returns on that book value. With the company currently loss-making on a trailing basis, traditional valuation metrics like P/E become meaningless, whilst the EV/EBITDA of 69.94x appears absurdly expensive for a business with such marginal and volatile profitability.

Valuation Grade
RISKY
P/BV: 8.39x vs ROE: 8.08%
Quality Grade
AVERAGE
Weak returns, moderate leverage
Financial Trend
FLAT
Inconsistent quarterly performance
Technical Trend
MILDLY BEARISH
Below all major moving averages

The technical trend of "Mildly Bearish" adds another layer of concern, with the stock trading below all key moving averages and showing sustained downward momentum over the past three months. The combination of weak fundamentals, expensive valuation, and deteriorating technical picture creates a challenging environment for investors seeking entry points or considering whether to hold existing positions.

The company's Mojo Score of 45 out of 100, resulting in a "SELL" advisory, synthesises these concerns into a clear recommendation. This score, which has fluctuated between "Strong Sell" and "Sell" territory over the past year, reflects the systematic challenges facing TVS Electronics and the limited near-term catalysts for meaningful improvement.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Key Strengths

  • Stable Promoter Base: Promoter holding of 59.77% provides governance stability and alignment of interests, with no pledging of shares indicating financial health of promoters
  • Improved Operating Margins: Q3 FY26 operating margin of 5.75% represents the highest level in seven quarters, suggesting some progress in cost management
  • Long-term Sales Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 15.45% demonstrates ability to expand top-line, albeit without corresponding profit growth
  • Low Institutional Pledging: Zero promoter pledging and absence of encumbrances on promoter shares reduces governance risks
  • Debt Manageability: Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 1.93 times remains manageable, though rising leverage warrants monitoring
  • Consistent Dividend History: Despite weak profitability, company maintains dividend payments, though the 690.74% payout ratio appears unsustainable

Key Risk Factors

  • Value-Destructive Returns: ROE of 8.08% and ROCE of 2.79% fall dramatically short of cost of capital, with latest quarter showing negative returns of -3.53% and -3.38% respectively
  • Razor-Thin Profitability: PAT margin of 0.36% in Q3 FY26 and history of quarterly losses indicate inability to generate meaningful profits despite revenue growth
  • Volatile Revenue Pattern: Sequential revenue swings of -10.90% (Q3 vs Q2) and +31.81% (Q2 vs Q1) suggest lumpy, project-dependent business model
  • Risky Valuation: P/BV of 8.39x appears unjustified for a loss-making company with weak ROE, suggesting 65-76% downside to fair value
  • Deteriorating Liquidity: Cash position declined to ₹3.35 crores in H1 FY26 whilst debt-to-equity ratio increased to 0.69 times, constraining financial flexibility
  • Negligible Institutional Support: Combined institutional holding of just 0.25% signals lack of confidence from sophisticated investors
  • Rising Interest Burden: Interest costs increased 20.34% in nine months to ₹4.91 crores, eroding already thin margins
  • Weak Working Capital: Debtors turnover ratio declined to 5.53 times, indicating slower collections and increased working capital stress

Outlook: What to Watch

Positive Catalysts

  • Sustained Margin Improvement: If Q3's 5.75% operating margin proves sustainable rather than an aberration, could signal improved operational efficiency
  • Revenue Stabilisation: Consistent quarterly revenue above ₹110-115 crores without wild swings would indicate more predictable business model
  • Working Capital Improvement: Reversal of the declining debtors turnover ratio and improvement in cash generation from operations
  • Institutional Interest: Any meaningful increase in FII or mutual fund holdings would validate improving fundamentals
  • Return on Equity Recovery: Consistent positive ROE trending towards double digits would indicate genuine value creation

Red Flags to Monitor

  • Return to Losses: Any quarter with negative net profit would confirm inability to sustain even marginal profitability
  • Further Margin Compression: Operating margins falling below 3-4% would signal renewed pressure on pricing power or cost structure
  • Liquidity Crisis: Cash position declining below ₹2-3 crores or debt-to-equity exceeding 0.75 times would indicate financial stress
  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Accelerated decline in promoter holding or any pledging of shares would raise governance concerns
  • Technical Breakdown: Break below ₹272.35 (52-week low) would open door to ₹250-230 downside targets
  • Institutional Exit: Further decline in already negligible institutional holdings would confirm deteriorating investment case
"TVS Electronics exemplifies a company where top-line growth fails to translate into bottom-line value creation—a cautionary tale of how revenue expansion without operational excellence and pricing power leads to value destruction rather than wealth generation."

The Verdict: Avoid This Value Trap

SELL

Score: 45/100

For Fresh Investors: Stay away. The combination of weak return metrics (8.08% ROE, 2.79% ROCE), risky valuation (P/BV of 8.39x for a loss-making company), and deteriorating technical momentum creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. With the stock appearing overvalued by 65-76% based on fundamental analysis, fresh capital deployment carries substantial downside risk.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce towards ₹430-450 levels. The company's inability to generate consistent profits despite 15.45% sales growth over five years indicates fundamental business model challenges unlikely to resolve in the near term. The 39.91% decline over three months reflects market recognition of these weaknesses. Use any relief rally to reduce exposure.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹93-140 per share (65-76% downside from current ₹398.30), based on 2-3x book value multiple appropriate for a company with 8.08% ROE and inconsistent profitability.

Rationale: TVS Electronics scores poorly across all critical investment parameters—quality (weak ROE/ROCE), valuation (risky P/BV premium), financial trend (flat to negative), and technicals (mildly bearish below all moving averages). The negligible institutional holding of 0.25% validates concerns about fundamental quality. Whilst the stable promoter base and absence of pledging provide some governance comfort, these factors cannot offset the systematic value destruction evidenced by returns well below the cost of capital. The company requires dramatic operational transformation to justify current valuations—a low-probability outcome given historical performance patterns.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments carry risk, including potential loss of principal.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News