United Nilgiri Tea Q3 FY26: Modest Growth Amid Margin Pressures

2 hours ago
share
Share Via
The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Ltd., a seventy-four-year-old tea producer operating under the Chamraj group, reported a modest performance for Q3 FY26 ended December 2025, with net profit rising 17.70% quarter-on-quarter to ₹5.32 crores, though the year-on-year comparison showed more subdued growth of 3.57%. The ₹240 crore market capitalisation micro-cap company, which specialises in growing and manufacturing tea across green, black, herbal, and flavoured varieties, saw its stock trading at ₹489.10, reflecting a gain of 2.70% following the results announcement.
United Nilgiri Tea Q3 FY26: Modest Growth Amid Margin Pressures
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹5.32 Cr
▲ 17.70% QoQ
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹23.76 Cr
▲ 12.45% QoQ
Operating Margin
21.97%
▲ 63 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
22.39%
▼ 99 bps QoQ

The company's quarterly performance reflects a sequential recovery from the previous quarter's softness, with net sales climbing to ₹23.76 crores from ₹21.13 crores in Q2 FY26. However, the year-on-year revenue growth of 3.57% compared to December 2024's ₹22.94 crores suggests the company is navigating a challenging operating environment in the tea industry. The nine-month performance for FY26 shows net profit at ₹18.28 crores, representing growth of 24.52% over the corresponding period last year, indicating resilience despite quarterly fluctuations.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin
Dec'25 23.76 +12.45% 5.32 +7.69% 21.97%
Sep'25 21.13 -4.60% 4.94 -38.41% 21.34%
Jun'25 22.15 +17.07% 8.02 +109.40% 30.07%
Mar'25 18.92 -17.52% 3.83 -15.27% 13.90%
Dec'24 22.94 -8.17% 4.52 -29.81% 19.05%
Sep'24 24.98 +8.80% 6.44 +73.12% 20.46%
Jun'24 22.96 3.72 14.20%

Financial Performance: Sequential Recovery Masks YoY Weakness

In Q3 FY26, United Nilgiri Tea posted net sales of ₹23.76 crores, marking a sequential improvement of 12.45% from Q2 FY26's ₹21.13 crores. However, the year-on-year comparison reveals a more modest expansion of 3.57% from December 2024's ₹22.94 crores, highlighting the company's struggle to generate meaningful top-line momentum. The operating profit excluding other income stood at ₹5.22 crores with a margin of 21.97%, representing a marginal improvement of 63 basis points sequentially from 21.34%, though down from the 30.07% achieved in Q1 FY26.

The company's profitability metrics present a mixed picture. Operating profit including other income reached ₹7.46 crores in Q3 FY26, up from ₹6.79 crores in the previous quarter. Net profit at ₹5.32 crores showed quarter-on-quarter growth of 7.69%, though the PAT margin contracted by 99 basis points to 22.39% from 23.38% in Q2 FY26. This margin compression despite revenue growth suggests rising operational costs or changes in product mix that merit close monitoring.

Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹23.76 Cr
▲ 3.57% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹5.32 Cr
▲ 17.70% YoY
Operating Margin
21.97%
▲ 292 bps YoY
PAT Margin
22.39%
▲ 269 bps YoY

Employee costs rose to ₹6.54 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹6.03 crores in Q2 FY26, representing a sequential increase of 8.46%. On a year-on-year basis, employee expenses climbed 9.55% from ₹5.97 crores in December 2024, outpacing revenue growth and indicating wage inflation pressures in the plantation sector. Interest costs remained negligible at ₹0.03 crores, whilst depreciation held steady at ₹0.88 crores, reflecting the company's asset-light operational model.

The tax rate in Q3 FY26 stood at 18.78%, up from 16.30% in the previous quarter but higher than the 16.45% reported in December 2024. This variability in effective tax rates across quarters warrants attention, as it impacts bottom-line predictability. For the nine-month period ended December 2025, the company reported net profit of ₹18.28 crores, up 24.52% from the corresponding period last year, suggesting that despite quarterly volatility, the full-year trajectory remains positive.

Key Insight: Other Income Dependency

Other income contributed ₹2.24 crores in Q3 FY26, representing 34.20% of profit before tax. This substantial reliance on non-operating income raises questions about the sustainability of reported profitability and underscores the importance of monitoring core operational performance. The company's other income has fluctuated between ₹1.93 crores and ₹3.39 crores over the past seven quarters, adding volatility to earnings.

Operational Challenges: Weak Returns on Capital

United Nilgiri Tea's return on equity stands at a modest 7.31% on average, with the latest figure at 9.17%, indicating weak capital efficiency relative to shareholder expectations. The return on capital employed averages 6.07%, with the most recent reading at 7.32%, suggesting the company generates limited returns from its deployed capital base. These subdued profitability metrics reflect the capital-intensive nature of tea cultivation and processing, combined with pricing pressures in the commoditised tea market.

The company's balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹116.19 crores as of March 2018, comprising share capital of ₹5.00 crores and reserves of ₹111.19 crores. With zero long-term debt and minimal current liabilities of ₹6.34 crores, United Nilgiri maintains a conservative financial structure. Fixed assets stood at ₹21.37 crores, whilst investments totalled ₹78.73 crores, indicating significant treasury deployment that contributes to the other income stream but also suggests limited reinvestment in core operations.

⚠️ Capital Efficiency Concerns

The company's average ROCE of 6.07% and ROE of 7.31% fall well below the cost of equity for most investors, indicating value destruction at current operational levels. The sales to capital employed ratio of just 0.42x suggests underutilisation of assets or insufficient pricing power to generate adequate returns. With five-year sales growth at 5.12% and EBIT growth at 6.92%, the company faces structural challenges in scaling profitably.

Cash flow generation presents another area of concern. For the year ended March 2018, cash flow from operations stood at ₹6.32 crores, down from ₹9.48 crores in the previous year. After accounting for investing activities of ₹6.25 crores and financing outflows of ₹1.60 crores, the company reported a net cash outflow of ₹1.53 crores. The closing cash balance declined to ₹1.41 crores from ₹2.93 crores, highlighting the working capital intensity of the business.

Industry Context: Navigating a Commoditised Market

The tea industry in India operates in a highly fragmented and price-sensitive environment, with demand influenced by changing consumer preferences, competition from coffee and other beverages, and export market dynamics. United Nilgiri Tea competes in both domestic and international markets, producing green tea, black tea, herbal tea, aroma tea, flavoured tea, and iced tea variants. However, the company's modest market capitalisation of ₹240 crores positions it as a micro-cap player in an industry dominated by larger conglomerates.

The company's operational footprint in the Nilgiri region provides access to premium tea-growing terroir, potentially supporting higher realisations for specialty teas. However, the quarterly revenue volatility—ranging from ₹18.92 crores to ₹24.98 crores over the past seven quarters—suggests exposure to seasonal production cycles and weather-related risks inherent to plantation businesses. The company's ability to diversify into value-added products like herbal and flavoured teas represents a strategic response to commoditisation, though the financial impact of this diversification remains unclear from available data.

"With ROE below 10% and single-digit sales growth, United Nilgiri Tea faces the classic challenge of commodity businesses: generating adequate returns whilst navigating margin pressures in a competitive market."

Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Performance Gap

Comparing United Nilgiri Tea with its FMCG sector peers reveals a valuation discount that appears justified by performance differentials. The company trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 11.47x and price-to-book value of 1.05x, both below peer averages. However, its return on equity of 7.31% significantly lags peers like Goyal Salt (23.87%), Sheetal Universal (21.26%), and even Megastar Foods (12.28%), explaining the subdued valuation multiples.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Div Yield Debt/Equity
United Nilgiri 11.47 1.05 7.31% 0.61% -0.13
Megastar Foods 32.49 2.77 12.28% 1.68
Jay Shree Tea 11.87 0.57 3.74% 0.59% 0.71
Goyal Salt 18.41 3.94 23.87% 0.76
Sheetal Universal 26.05 5.35 21.26% 0.24% 0.55
The Peria Karama 38.94 1.09 1.88% 0.15% 0.04

United Nilgiri Tea's debt-free status (net debt to equity of -0.13) stands out positively, indicating conservative financial management and providing balance sheet flexibility. The dividend yield of 0.61% compares favourably with most peers, though the payout ratio of just 3.11% suggests significant earnings retention with limited shareholder distribution. Jay Shree Tea, another tea-focused peer, trades at a similar P/E of 11.87x but delivers even weaker ROE of 3.74%, suggesting sector-wide profitability challenges.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?

At the current price of ₹489.10, United Nilgiri Tea trades at 11.47 times trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a discount to the broader market and even to FMCG sector averages. The price-to-book value of 1.05x suggests the stock trades close to its net asset value, providing some downside protection. However, valuation attractiveness must be weighed against the company's weak return profile and limited growth visibility.

The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 11.77x and EV to EBIT of 14.48x appear reasonable for a stable cash-generating business, though these multiples assume earnings sustainability. The PEG ratio of 0.53x suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to growth prospects, though this metric's reliability depends on the quality and sustainability of earnings growth. With sales growth averaging just 5.12% over five years, the growth runway appears limited without significant operational improvements or market expansion.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
11.47x
Below Market
Price to Book
1.05x
Near NAV
Dividend Yield
0.61%
Modest
Valuation Grade
Very Attractive
Fair Previously

The stock's valuation grade recently changed to "Very Attractive" from "Fair" on October 29, 2025, following price corrections that brought multiples down to more compelling levels. However, investors must distinguish between statistical cheapness and genuine value creation potential. With ROE below 10% and modest growth rates, the company faces the challenge of proving it can generate shareholder value at current operational levels.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Concentrated

The shareholding structure of United Nilgiri Tea has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 49.79% and no changes across any investor category. This stability provides continuity but also suggests limited institutional interest, with FII and mutual fund holdings at zero. Insurance companies hold 3.87% whilst other domestic institutional investors maintain a minimal 0.05% stake, leaving 46.28% with non-institutional investors.

Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24
Promoter 49.79% 49.79% 49.79% 49.79% 49.79%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 3.87% 3.87% 3.87% 3.87% 3.87%
Other DII 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05%
Non-Institutional 46.28% 46.28% 46.28% 46.28% 46.28%

The promoter group comprises entities from the Chamraj group, including Tractors And Farm Equipment Ltd. (17.12%), T Stanes And Company Ltd. (16.82%), and Amalgamations Private Ltd. (8.19%), along with individual promoters. The absence of promoter pledging provides comfort regarding financial stability, whilst the lack of institutional participation reflects the stock's micro-cap status and limited liquidity. Total institutional holdings of just 3.92% underscore the stock's retail-dominated investor base.

Stock Performance: Outperformance Driven by Low Base

United Nilgiri Tea's stock has delivered mixed returns across different time horizons, with recent performance showing strength but longer-term results proving disappointing. Over the past year, the stock gained 7.46%, marginally outperforming the Sensex's 7.07% return with an alpha of 0.39%. However, this modest outperformance pales compared to the FMCG sector's 14.03% return over the same period, indicating significant underperformance versus industry peers.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week 3.34% 1.59% +1.75%
1 Month 1.04% -1.74% +2.78%
3 Months 13.35% 0.32% +13.03%
6 Months 7.78% 3.77% +4.01%
YTD 6.79% -1.92% +8.71%
1 Year 7.46% 7.07% +0.39%
2 Years 45.87% 15.78% +30.09%
3 Years 71.67% 38.13% +33.54%
5 Years 58.03% 64.75% -6.72%
10 Years 8.14% 239.52% -231.38%

The two-year and three-year returns of 45.87% and 71.67% respectively represent strong outperformance versus the Sensex, with alpha generation of 30.09% and 33.54%. However, these gains must be contextualised against the stock's prolonged underperformance over five and ten years, where it delivered returns of 58.03% and 8.14% respectively, dramatically lagging the Sensex's 64.75% and 239.52% gains over the same periods.

The stock's technical profile shows a bullish trend that emerged on February 2, 2026, at ₹474.70, transitioning from a previously mildly bullish stance. The stock trades above all key moving averages—5-day (₹475.89), 20-day (₹474.05), 50-day (₹460.12), 100-day (₹458.75), and 200-day (₹452.66)—indicating positive momentum. However, with a beta of 1.50, the stock exhibits significantly higher volatility than the market, categorising it as a high-risk investment with volatility of 30.96% compared to the Sensex's 11.53%.

Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal

United Nilgiri Tea presents a complex investment case where statistical valuation attractiveness collides with fundamental quality concerns. The company's proprietary investment score stands at 57 out of 100, placing it in the "HOLD" category with a recommendation against fresh purchases whilst suggesting existing holders can maintain positions. This score reflects the tension between reasonable valuations (P/E of 11x, P/BV of 1.05x) and weak operational metrics (ROE of 7.31%, five-year sales growth of 5.12%).

Valuation Grade
Very Attractive
Statistical Cheapness
Quality Grade
Average
Weak Returns
Financial Trend
Flat
No Momentum
Technical Trend
Bullish
Positive

The quality assessment reveals an "average" grade, with the company characterised as delivering average quality based on long-term financial performance. Key quality concerns include weak average ROCE of 6.07% and ROE of 7.31%, both falling well below acceptable thresholds for value creation. The five-year EBIT growth of 6.92% suggests limited operating leverage, whilst the sales to capital employed ratio of 0.42x indicates inefficient asset utilisation.

On the positive side, the company maintains a debt-free balance sheet with net cash position (net debt to equity of -0.13), zero promoter pledging, and negligible interest burden. The dividend yield of 0.61%, whilst modest, provides some income component, though the payout ratio of just 3.11% indicates management's preference for earnings retention over shareholder distribution. The financial trend classification as "flat" for December 2025 reflects the absence of meaningful momentum in operational performance.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

✓ Key Strengths

  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Zero long-term debt and net cash position provide financial flexibility and eliminate solvency risks
  • Stable Promoter Base: Consistent 49.79% promoter holding with no pledging demonstrates long-term commitment from the Chamraj group
  • Reasonable Valuation: P/E of 11.47x and P/BV of 1.05x offer statistical cheapness compared to broader market multiples
  • Diversified Product Portfolio: Presence across green, black, herbal, flavoured, and iced tea segments provides some insulation from single-product risk
  • Nine-Month Growth: Net profit growth of 24.52% for the first nine months of FY26 indicates resilience despite quarterly volatility
  • Strong Technical Momentum: Bullish trend with stock trading above all key moving averages suggests positive near-term sentiment
  • Nilgiri Terroir: Operations in premium tea-growing region potentially support higher realisations for specialty products

⚠ Key Concerns

  • Weak Return Profile: ROE of 7.31% and ROCE of 6.07% fall well below cost of equity, indicating value destruction
  • Limited Growth Trajectory: Five-year sales growth of 5.12% and EBIT growth of 6.92% suggest structural growth constraints
  • High Other Income Dependency: Other income representing 34.20% of PBT raises sustainability concerns about reported profitability
  • Micro-Cap Liquidity: Market capitalisation of ₹240 crores with zero institutional interest creates liquidity challenges
  • Quarterly Volatility: Revenue fluctuating between ₹18.92 crores and ₹24.98 crores reflects seasonal and operational unpredictability
  • Margin Compression: PAT margin declined 99 bps QoQ despite revenue growth, indicating cost pressures
  • Sector Underperformance: One-year return of 7.46% lags FMCG sector's 14.03%, highlighting competitive weakness

Outlook: What to Watch

Positive Catalysts

  • Margin Expansion: Sustained improvement in operating margins above 25% would signal pricing power or cost efficiency gains
  • Revenue Acceleration: Quarterly sales consistently above ₹25 crores with double-digit YoY growth would indicate market share gains
  • ROE Improvement: Return on equity climbing above 12% would demonstrate better capital productivity
  • Reduced Other Income Reliance: Core operating profit accounting for 80%+ of PBT would strengthen earnings quality

Red Flags

  • Further Margin Deterioration: Operating margins falling below 20% would signal intensifying competitive or cost pressures
  • Negative Revenue Growth: Consecutive quarters of YoY sales decline would indicate market share loss
  • Cash Burn: Negative operating cash flows or declining cash balances would raise working capital concerns
  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Any decline in promoter holding below 45% could signal loss of confidence

The Verdict: Statistical Cheapness Doesn't Equal Investment Merit

HOLD

Score: 57/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. Whilst the stock trades at attractive multiples (P/E 11x, P/BV 1.05x), the underlying business generates sub-par returns (ROE 7.3%) with limited growth visibility. The micro-cap nature, zero institutional interest, and high volatility (beta 1.50) create significant risks that outweigh valuation appeal.

For Existing Holders: Maintain positions with close monitoring of quarterly performance. The debt-free balance sheet and stable promoter base provide downside protection, whilst recent technical momentum offers hope for near-term gains. However, set strict exit criteria if operating margins fall below 20% or if two consecutive quarters show YoY revenue decline.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹450-480 (7-9% downside from current levels of ₹489), reflecting weak return profile partially offset by balance sheet strength

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News