Following the results, the stock has declined 2.68% to ₹76.00, extending its one-year decline to 44.12% and significantly underperforming the Sensex, which gained 10.33% over the same period. The micro-cap NBFC now trades at 1.39 times book value with a trailing twelve-month P/E ratio of 15 times, reflecting growing concerns about earnings quality and business sustainability.
Financial Performance: Volatility Undermines Investor Confidence
The third quarter of FY2026 exposed the fundamental instability plaguing Upsurge Investment & Finance's business model. Revenue collapsed to ₹7.46 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹21.32 crores in Q2 FY26, marking a severe 65.01% sequential decline. This represents the lowest quarterly revenue since Q1 FY26, when the company reported ₹18.11 crores. Year-on-year performance was equally troubling, with revenue declining 57.76% compared to ₹17.66 crores in Q3 FY25.
Net profit for Q3 FY26 stood at ₹0.85 crores, down 51.70% from ₹0.94 crores in the previous quarter and 51.70% lower than ₹1.76 crores reported in Q3 FY25. The profit decline would have been more severe had operating margins not expanded significantly to 21.45% from 5.49% in Q2 FY26, suggesting improved operational efficiency on a much smaller revenue base. However, this margin improvement appears unsustainable given the erratic revenue patterns.
| Quarter | Revenue (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3) | 7.46 | -65.01% | 0.85 | -9.57% | 11.39% |
| Sep'25 (Q2) | 21.32 | +17.73% | 0.94 | -87.76% | 4.41% |
| Jun'25 (Q1) | 18.11 | -50.49% | 7.68 | +2,377.42% | 42.41% |
| Mar'25 (Q4) | 36.58 | +107.13% | 0.31 | -82.39% | 0.85% |
| Dec'24 (Q3) | 17.66 | -53.09% | 1.76 | -81.26% | 9.97% |
| Sep'24 (Q2) | 37.65 | +94.67% | 9.39 | +109.13% | 24.94% |
| Jun'24 (Q1) | 19.34 | — | 4.49 | — | 23.22% |
The quarterly trend table reveals a disturbing pattern of extreme revenue and profit swings, with quarterly revenue oscillating between ₹7.46 crores and ₹37.65 crores over the past seven quarters. This volatility makes it nearly impossible for investors to establish reliable earnings forecasts or assess the company's true run-rate profitability. The PAT margin has ranged from a mere 0.85% to an extraordinary 42.41%, further underscoring the unpredictable nature of the business.
For the nine-month period ending December 2025 (9M FY26), the company has generated total revenue of ₹46.89 crores and net profit of ₹9.47 crores, compared to ₹74.65 crores in revenue and ₹15.64 crores in profit for the same period in FY25. This represents a 37.17% decline in revenue and a 39.47% decline in profit year-on-year, indicating that the full-year FY26 performance will likely fall significantly short of FY25 levels.
Critical Concern: Earnings Sustainability
The extreme quarter-to-quarter volatility in both revenue and profitability raises fundamental questions about the sustainability and predictability of Upsurge Investment's business model. The company's inability to maintain consistent revenue streams suggests either a lack of recurring business, lumpy deal flow, or operational challenges that prevent stable performance.
Operational Analysis: Margin Strength Cannot Offset Revenue Weakness
Despite the challenging revenue environment, Upsurge Investment demonstrated improved operational efficiency in Q3 FY26. The operating margin (excluding other income) expanded dramatically to 21.45% from 5.49% in Q2 FY26, suggesting better cost control and possibly a shift in business mix towards higher-margin activities. The PAT margin also improved to 11.39% from 4.41% in the previous quarter.
However, these margin improvements must be viewed with scepticism given the context of sharply declining absolute revenues. Operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) stood at ₹1.60 crores in Q3 FY26, up from ₹1.17 crores in Q2 FY26 but significantly below the ₹9.28 crores reported in Q1 FY26. The company's ability to maintain margins appears tied more to the specific nature of transactions completed in each quarter rather than systematic operational improvements.
Employee costs remained stable at ₹0.22 crores in Q3 FY26, consistent with previous quarters, suggesting a lean operational structure. Interest costs increased to ₹0.43 crores from ₹0.23 crores in Q2 FY26, potentially indicating increased borrowing to support operations or working capital requirements. The tax rate normalised to 27.59% in Q3 FY26 after being nil in Q2 FY26, reflecting the restoration of taxable profits.
The company's average return on equity (ROE) of 16.67% remains a relative bright spot, demonstrating reasonable capital efficiency over the long term. However, the latest quarterly ROE has declined to 9.51%, reflecting the recent profit deterioration. The return on capital employed (ROCE) stands at 11.64%, indicating moderate returns on the capital deployed in the business.
Balance Sheet Strength: A Silver Lining
Upsurge Investment maintains a relatively healthy balance sheet with shareholder funds of ₹104.83 crores as of March 2025, up significantly from ₹47.70 crores in March 2024. The company carries no long-term debt, with a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.23, providing financial flexibility. Current assets stood at ₹57.88 crores, more than adequate to cover current liabilities of ₹4.59 crores, indicating strong liquidity.
NBFC Sector Context: Underperforming Amidst Favourable Conditions
Upsurge Investment's struggles stand in stark contrast to the broader NBFC sector's performance. Over the past year, the NBFC sector has delivered returns of 26.61%, whilst Upsurge has declined 44.12%, resulting in a massive underperformance of 70.73 percentage points. This divergence suggests company-specific challenges rather than sector-wide headwinds.
The Indian NBFC sector has generally benefited from robust credit growth, improving asset quality, and expanding margins over the past year. Larger, well-established NBFCs have demonstrated consistent AUM growth, stable net interest margins, and improving return ratios. Upsurge Investment's inability to capitalise on these favourable sector dynamics raises questions about its competitive positioning, business model differentiation, and execution capabilities.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upsurge Investment | 14.66 | 1.39 | 16.67 | 0.23 |
| Keynote Financial | 17.85 | 1.15 | 11.97 | 0.01 |
| Fundviser Capital | 101.45 | 6.43 | 7.90 | 0.39 |
| Reliable Data | 13.32 | 2.62 | 11.97 | 0.59 |
| Available Finance | 1.38 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Credent Global | 14.31 | 1.80 | 6.65 | 0.24 |
Relative to its micro-cap NBFC peers, Upsurge Investment demonstrates superior ROE of 16.67% compared to the peer average of approximately 8%, suggesting better historical capital efficiency. The company's P/E ratio of 14.66 times and P/BV ratio of 1.39 times appear reasonable relative to peers, with the stock trading at a discount to some comparables. However, the superior valuation metrics must be weighed against the significant earnings volatility and recent deterioration in financial performance.
Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Mask Fundamental Concerns
At the current market price of ₹76.00, Upsurge Investment trades at a trailing P/E ratio of 14.66 times, well below the industry average P/E of 23 times. The stock's price-to-book value of 1.39 times also appears reasonable given the company's ROE profile. The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 12.04 times and EV-to-sales ratio of 1.54 times suggest the stock is not egregiously overvalued on traditional metrics.
The company's valuation grade has been classified as "Very Attractive" since October 2025, upgraded from "Attractive" in July 2025. However, this attractive valuation primarily reflects the sharp decline in stock price rather than any improvement in fundamentals. The stock has fallen 47.57% from its 52-week high of ₹144.95, now trading much closer to its 52-week low of ₹61.60.
The Valuation Paradox
Whilst Upsurge Investment appears statistically cheap on conventional valuation metrics, investors must recognise that low multiples often reflect underlying business challenges rather than investment opportunities. The company's erratic earnings, declining financial trend, and lack of institutional interest suggest the market is correctly pricing in significant uncertainty about future performance. A "cheap" valuation does not automatically translate to an attractive investment when fundamental quality is questionable.
The absence of any dividend yield further reduces the stock's appeal for income-focused investors. The company declared a dividend of ₹0.50 per share in August 2024, but with the current challenging earnings environment, dividend sustainability remains uncertain.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Holdings, Zero Institutional Interest
The shareholding pattern has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 50.62% and non-institutional investors holding the remaining 49.37%. Notably, the company has zero institutional holdings, with no participation from foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, or other domestic institutional investors (DIIs).
| Shareholder Category | Dec'25 | Sep'25 | Jun'25 | Mar'25 | Dec'24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter | 50.62% | 50.62% | 50.62% | 50.62% | 50.62% |
| FII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Mutual Funds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Insurance | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Other DII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-Institutional | 49.37% | 49.37% | 49.37% | 49.37% | 49.37% |
The complete absence of institutional participation is a significant red flag. Professional investors with substantial research capabilities and due diligence processes have shown no interest in accumulating the stock, despite its ostensibly attractive valuation. This lack of institutional confidence likely reflects concerns about business model sustainability, earnings quality, corporate governance, or growth visibility that are not immediately apparent from financial statements alone.
Positively, there is no promoter pledging, indicating the promoter group maintains confidence in the business and has not leveraged their holdings for external financing. However, the static shareholding pattern with zero sequential changes over five quarters suggests a lack of conviction from both promoters (not increasing stake) and sophisticated investors (not initiating positions).
Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes
Upsurge Investment's stock performance has been deeply disappointing across most relevant time periods. The stock has declined 44.12% over the past year, whilst the Sensex gained 10.33%, resulting in negative alpha of 54.45 percentage points. Over the past six months, the stock has plummeted 29.10% compared to a 4.43% gain in the Sensex, underperforming by 33.53 percentage points.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +8.57% | +0.42% | +8.15% |
| 1 Month | +5.16% | +0.71% | +4.45% |
| 3 Months | -8.85% | +0.36% | -9.21% |
| 6 Months | -29.10% | +4.43% | -33.53% |
| Year-to-Date | +9.04% | -1.23% | +10.27% |
| 1 Year | -44.12% | +10.33% | -54.45% |
| 2 Years | +60.74% | +17.57% | +43.17% |
| 3 Years | +75.12% | +38.71% | +36.41% |
The longer-term picture provides some context, with the stock delivering positive returns over two-year (+60.74%) and three-year (+75.12%) periods, outperforming the Sensex by 43.17 and 36.41 percentage points respectively. However, this longer-term outperformance appears to be eroding rapidly, with recent quarters marked by severe underperformance.
The stock exhibits high volatility with a beta of 1.50, indicating it moves 50% more than the broader market. Combined with a risk-adjusted return of -0.85 over the past year and volatility of 51.73%, the stock falls into the "high risk, low return" category—an unattractive risk-reward profile for most investors. The stock currently trades below all major moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), confirming the weak technical setup.
Technical Outlook: Mildly Bearish Trend with Limited Upside Visibility
From a technical perspective, Upsurge Investment remains in a "mildly bearish" trend as of February 3, 2026, having transitioned from a "bearish" trend. The stock trades at ₹76.00, significantly below its 200-day moving average of ₹90.71 and 100-day moving average of ₹79.15, indicating sustained downward pressure.
The immediate support level sits at ₹61.60 (the 52-week low), whilst immediate resistance is at ₹70.80 (20-day moving average area). Major resistance levels include ₹79.15 (100-day moving average) and ₹90.71 (200-day moving average), with the 52-week high of ₹144.95 representing a distant target that appears unrealistic given current fundamentals.
Technical indicators present a mixed picture, with MACD showing mildly bullish signals on a weekly basis but mildly bearish on a monthly basis. RSI indicates bullish momentum on a monthly timeframe but no clear signal weekly. The overall technical setup suggests limited upside potential in the near term, with the stock likely to face resistance at higher levels until fundamental performance improves meaningfully.
Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal
Upsurge Investment presents a classic value trap scenario where ostensibly cheap valuation metrics mask fundamental business challenges. The company's overall quality grade of "Below Average" reflects long-term financial performance concerns, whilst the current financial trend is classified as "Negative." The technical trend remains "Mildly Bearish," and the overall Mojo Score of 32 out of 100 places the stock firmly in "Sell" territory.
The investment thesis is undermined by several critical factors: extreme quarterly earnings volatility that prevents reliable forecasting, declining revenue and profit trends over the past nine months, complete absence of institutional investor interest despite attractive valuations, underperformance of 70.73 percentage points versus the NBFC sector over one year, and high volatility (51.73%) combined with negative risk-adjusted returns.
Key Strengths
- Strong average ROE of 16.67% demonstrating historical capital efficiency
- Debt-free balance sheet with debt-to-equity ratio of only 0.23
- Attractive valuation at P/E of 14.66x versus industry average of 23x
- Reasonable price-to-book value of 1.39x given ROE profile
- Stable promoter holding at 50.62% with no pledging
- Improved operating margins to 21.45% in Q3 FY26
- Strong liquidity with current assets of ₹57.88 crores
Key Concerns
- Severe revenue volatility with Q3 revenue down 65.01% QoQ
- Net profit declined 51.70% QoQ and 51.70% YoY in Q3 FY26
- Nine-month revenue down 37.17% and profit down 39.47% YoY
- Zero institutional holdings indicating lack of sophisticated investor confidence
- Massive underperformance of 70.73% versus NBFC sector over one year
- High volatility (51.73%) with negative risk-adjusted returns
- Below average quality grade and negative financial trend
- Mildly bearish technical trend with stock below all moving averages
Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points for Turnaround Assessment
For investors monitoring Upsurge Investment, several key factors will determine whether the company can stabilise and potentially recover, or whether the current challenges will deepen further.
Positive Catalysts to Watch
- Stabilisation of quarterly revenue above ₹20 crores consistently
- Reduction in earnings volatility with predictable quarter-on-quarter performance
- Entry of institutional investors (FII/MF) signalling improved confidence
- Sustained operating margins above 20% with stable revenue base
- Clear articulation of business strategy and growth drivers by management
Red Flags to Monitor
- Further sequential revenue decline below ₹7 crores in Q4 FY26
- Full-year FY26 profit declining more than 50% versus FY25
- Deterioration in ROE below 10% on a sustained basis
- Any promoter stake reduction or initiation of pledging
- Increase in debt levels or deterioration in current ratio
The Verdict: Avoid Until Fundamental Stability Returns
Score: 32/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The extreme earnings volatility, deteriorating financial trends, and complete absence of institutional interest create an unfavourable risk-reward profile despite attractive valuation multiples. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of stable revenue and profit performance before reconsidering.
For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure or exiting positions, particularly if holding at higher cost bases. The stock has declined 44.12% over the past year and shows limited signs of stabilisation. Only long-term investors with high risk tolerance and conviction in management's turnaround ability should maintain holdings.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹65.00 (14.47% downside from current price of ₹76.00). The fair value reflects the company's historical ROE profile adjusted for increased uncertainty about earnings sustainability and lack of institutional validation.
Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in micro-cap stocks carry substantial risks including liquidity risk, volatility, and potential loss of capital.
