The Mumbai-based company, incorporated in July 1993, has been grappling with severe operational challenges that have brought its barrel manufacturing business to a complete standstill. With accumulated losses of ₹101.46 crores eroding shareholder equity entirely, Yashraj Containeurs represents a cautionary tale of financial distress in the small-cap packaging sector. The company's 74.89% promoter holding remains unchanged, whilst institutional investors have maintained zero exposure to the stock.
Financial Performance: A Business in Suspended Animation
The Q3 FY26 results paint a stark picture of a company with no operating activities. Net sales stood at zero for the third consecutive quarter, following the last recorded revenue of ₹0.35 crores in Q2 FY25 (Jun'24). Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excl OI) came in at negative ₹0.13 crores, representing ongoing fixed costs without corresponding revenue generation. The loss before tax for Q3 FY26 was ₹0.15 crores, marginally better than Q2 FY26's loss of ₹0.22 crores, suggesting some cost rationalisation efforts.
On a year-on-year basis, the deterioration is evident. In Q3 FY25 (Dec'24), the company had also reported zero sales with a net loss of ₹0.23 crores. The sequential improvement in losses from ₹0.22 crores in Q2 FY26 to ₹0.15 crores in Q3 FY26 reflects a 31.82% reduction, primarily driven by lower operating expenses. Employee costs in Q3 FY26 stood at ₹0.01 crores, down from ₹0.12 crores in both Q3 and Q2 FY25, indicating significant workforce reduction or salary deferrals.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | Operating Profit (₹ Cr) | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3 FY26) | 0.00 | -0.13 | -0.15 | Loss narrowed 31.82% |
| Sep'25 (Q2 FY26) | 0.00 | -0.19 | -0.22 | Loss widened 4.35% |
| Jun'25 (Q1 FY26) | 0.00 | -0.23 | -0.23 | From profit to loss |
| Mar'25 (Q4 FY25) | 0.00 | -0.04 | -24.83 | Exceptional loss |
| Dec'24 (Q3 FY25) | 0.00 | -0.20 | -0.23 | From profit to loss |
| Sep'24 (Q2 FY25) | 0.00 | -0.29 | 0.40 | -18.33% |
| Jun'24 (Q1 FY25) | 0.35 | -0.42 | 0.49 | Last operating quarter |
The quarterly trend reveals a company that ceased operations after Q1 FY25. Notably, Q4 FY25 (Mar'25) recorded an exceptional loss of ₹24.83 crores, likely reflecting asset write-downs or provisioning for liabilities. Other income provided some relief at ₹0.04 crores in Q3 FY26, down from ₹0.06 crores in Q1 FY26, suggesting minimal treasury operations or asset monetisation.
⚠️ Critical Financial Distress Indicators
Zero Revenue: No sales recorded for three consecutive quarters (Q1-Q3 FY26), indicating complete operational shutdown.
Negative Equity: Shareholder funds stood at negative ₹84.46 crores as of March 2024, with accumulated losses of ₹101.46 crores against share capital of ₹17.00 crores.
Insolvency Risk: Current liabilities of ₹90.92 crores vastly exceed current assets of ₹2.56 crores, creating severe working capital stress.
Balance Sheet Erosion: A Decade of Value Destruction
The balance sheet as of March 2024 reflects years of accumulated losses and operational failure. Shareholder funds stood at negative ₹84.46 crores, comprising share capital of ₹17.00 crores offset by reserves and surplus of negative ₹101.46 crores. This represents a deterioration from negative ₹78.95 crores in March 2023, as losses continued to mount. The company has been technically insolvent for several years, with liabilities exceeding assets.
On the asset side, fixed assets declined to ₹1.79 crores from ₹2.04 crores a year earlier, reflecting depreciation on idle manufacturing capacity. Investments stood at a nominal ₹0.03 crores, down from ₹0.08 crores, suggesting some liquidation of marketable securities. Current assets of ₹2.56 crores remained largely unchanged from ₹2.54 crores, but were dwarfed by current liabilities of ₹90.92 crores. This included trade payables of ₹0.84 crores and other current liabilities of ₹12.70 crores, creating an impossible working capital situation.
The company carries no long-term debt as of March 2024, having cleared its ₹11.12 crores borrowing that existed in March 2019. However, this debt reduction came not through profitable operations but through asset sales and equity erosion. The debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful given the negative equity base, but the company can be characterised as having net cash only in the technical sense that it has no formal borrowings whilst being deeply insolvent.
Profitability Collapse: From Modest Margins to Total Shutdown
The annual financial statements reveal a company that has steadily lost its ability to generate profits. In FY24 (Mar'24), net sales collapsed to ₹1.00 crore, down 75.00% from ₹4.00 crores in FY23, which itself was down 81.82% from ₹22.00 crores in FY22. This represents a catastrophic five-year sales decline of 100.00% from the FY19 level of ₹19.00 crores. The company's barrel manufacturing business, once generating ₹23.00 crores in FY20, has essentially ceased to exist.
Operating margins have been negative for the past two years. In FY24, operating profit before other income stood at negative ₹3.00 crores on sales of ₹1.00 crore, translating to a margin of negative 300.00%. This compared to negative ₹1.00 crore in FY23 (negative 25.00% margin) and positive ₹2.00 crores in FY22 (9.09% margin). The deterioration reflects both revenue collapse and inability to reduce fixed costs proportionately. Employee costs remained elevated at ₹2.00 crores in FY24 despite minimal operations.
| Year | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | YoY Growth | Operating Margin | PAT Margin | Net Profit (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY24 (Mar'24) | 1.00 | -75.00% | -300.00% | -500.00% | -5.00 |
| FY23 (Mar'23) | 4.00 | -81.82% | -25.00% | -125.00% | -5.00 |
| FY22 (Mar'22) | 22.00 | +4.76% | 9.09% | 18.18% | 4.00 |
| FY21 (Mar'21) | 21.00 | -8.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 |
| FY20 (Mar'20) | 23.00 | +21.05% | 4.35% | 34.78% | 8.00 |
| FY19 (Mar'19) | 19.00 | — | 15.79% | 31.58% | 6.00 |
Net profit turned deeply negative in FY24 and FY23, with losses of ₹5.00 crores in each year. This followed a brief return to profitability in FY22 (₹4.00 crores profit) after breaking even in FY21. The company had been reasonably profitable in FY19 and FY20, earning ₹6.00 crores and ₹8.00 crores respectively on sales of ₹19.00-23.00 crores. The five-year EBIT growth rate of negative 196.57% quantifies the complete destruction of operating profitability.
Packaging Sector Context: Struggling in a Growing Industry
The packaging industry in India has been experiencing steady growth driven by increased consumption, e-commerce expansion, and regulatory requirements for safe transportation of chemicals and liquids. Industrial packaging, including steel barrels, serves critical sectors such as chemicals, pharmaceuticals, petroleum products, and food processing. However, this growth has bypassed Yashraj Containeurs entirely, as the company has lost market share to larger, more efficient competitors.
The company's product portfolio—closed top steel barrels, open top steel barrels, and composite steel-plastic barrels in the 180-235 litre capacity range—addresses genuine market needs. However, the complete revenue collapse suggests either loss of key customers, quality issues, pricing uncompetitiveness, or inability to meet working capital requirements for raw material procurement. The packaging sector has also faced challenges from rising steel prices and competition from alternative materials like high-density polyethylene (HDPE) containers.
Peer Performance Divergence
Whilst Yashraj Containeurs has seen its business evaporate, the broader packaging sector showed mixed but generally more stable performance. The company's 27.61% stock decline over the past year significantly underperformed the packaging sector's 0.73% return, creating a negative alpha of 28.34 percentage points. This underperformance reflects company-specific operational failures rather than sector-wide headwinds.
Peer Comparison: Bottom of the Barrel
A comparison with packaging sector peers reveals Yashraj Containeurs' extreme financial distress relative to industry standards. The company's negative book value of ₹84.46 crores and price-to-book ratio of negative 0.08x places it in the worst position amongst comparable firms. Its return on equity (ROE) of 0.00% (calculated on the basis that losses on negative equity yield a non-meaningful figure) compares poorly with peers, though several other micro-cap packaging companies also show financial stress.
| Company | Market Cap | P/E Ratio (TTM) | Price/Book | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yashraj Containeurs | ₹9.00 Cr | NA (Loss Making) | -0.08x | 0.00% | -0.89x |
| Anuroop Packaging | — | 2.90x | 0.34x | 16.14% | 0.42x |
| Jauss Polymers | — | NA (Loss Making) | 1.53x | 0.00% | -0.43x |
| Union Qual. Plastics | — | NA (Loss Making) | -1.44x | 0.00% | -0.73x |
| MPL Plastics | — | NA (Loss Making) | -2.62x | 0.00% | -0.92x |
The peer comparison reveals a troubled segment of micro-cap packaging companies, with several firms showing negative book values and loss-making operations. However, Yashraj Containeurs distinguishes itself through complete operational cessation rather than merely weak profitability. Anuroop Packaging stands out as the only peer with positive ROE of 16.14% and a modest P/E ratio of 2.90x, demonstrating that profitability is achievable in this space for well-managed firms.
Valuation Analysis: Price Reflects Terminal Decline
At ₹5.40 per share with a market capitalisation of ₹9.00 crores, Yashraj Containeurs trades at a price-to-book value of negative 0.08x. This valuation reflects the market's assessment that the company has minimal recovery value. The P/E ratio is not applicable given consistent losses. The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of negative 106.35x is similarly meaningless in the context of negative EBITDA and negative enterprise value.
The stock has declined 42.86% from its 52-week high of ₹9.45, reached before the extent of operational collapse became fully apparent. From its 52-week low of ₹4.58, the stock has recovered 17.90%, though this modest bounce likely reflects speculative trading rather than fundamental improvement. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹5.41), 20-day (₹5.17), 50-day (₹5.36), 100-day (₹5.70), and 200-day (₹6.40)—indicating sustained downward pressure.
The valuation grade of "RISKY" assigned by market assessment tools reflects the company's negative book value, consistent losses, and operational shutdown. Any valuation framework based on earnings, cash flows, or book value yields negative or non-meaningful results. The current market price appears to embed expectations of either liquidation at minimal recovery rates or a highly uncertain turnaround scenario.
Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Commitment Unchanged
The shareholding pattern has remained completely static over the past five quarters, with promoters holding 74.89% and non-institutional investors holding the remaining 25.11%. Notably, there is zero institutional participation—no foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, or other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) hold any stake in the company. This absence of institutional interest reflects the company's micro-cap status, poor fundamentals, and lack of liquidity.
| Quarter | Promoter | FII | MF | Insurance | DII | Non-Inst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3 FY26) | 74.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.11% |
| Sep'25 (Q2 FY26) | 74.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.11% |
| Jun'25 (Q1 FY26) | 74.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.11% |
| Mar'25 (Q4 FY25) | 74.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.11% |
| Dec'24 (Q3 FY25) | 74.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.11% |
The promoter group, led by the Valia family with key holdings by Sangeeta Jayesh Valia (17.74%), Vas Infrastructure Ltd (12.95%), and Vasparr Trading Private Ltd (10.30%), has maintained its stake despite the company's deteriorating financial position. Pledged shares stand at 10.56% of total equity, indicating some promoter borrowing against shares, though the extent and purpose of this pledging is unclear. The unchanged promoter holding could reflect either commitment to turnaround efforts or inability to find buyers for a meaningful stake.
Stock Performance: Consistent Underperformance
Yashraj Containeurs has delivered negative returns across most timeframes, significantly underperforming the Sensex benchmark. Over the past year, the stock declined 27.61% compared to the Sensex's 8.96% gain, creating negative alpha of 36.57 percentage points. The underperformance extends to longer periods: over three years, the stock fell 61.70% versus the Sensex's 37.28% gain, representing a staggering 98.98 percentage point underperformance.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +1.50% | -0.74% | +2.24% | Short-term bounce |
| 1 Month | +0.19% | -0.80% | +0.99% | Marginal outperformance |
| 3 Months | -10.89% | -1.80% | -9.09% | Significant underperformance |
| 6 Months | -14.56% | +3.01% | -17.57% | Severe underperformance |
| 1 Year | -27.61% | +8.96% | -36.57% | Major value destruction |
| 2 Years | -51.53% | +15.94% | -67.47% | Catastrophic decline |
| 3 Years | -61.70% | +37.28% | -98.98% | Near-total loss |
| 5 Years | +103.01% | +60.95% | +42.06% | Historic outperformance |
Interestingly, over a five-year horizon, the stock shows a positive return of 103.01%, outperforming the Sensex by 42.06 percentage points. This reflects a much higher base price five years ago before the operational collapse began. The 10-year return of 9.98% vastly underperforms the Sensex's 260.92% gain, indicating that any earlier outperformance has been more than erased by recent declines.
The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates higher volatility than the market, with a volatility measure of 56.42% compared to the Sensex's 11.46%. This high beta and volatility classify the stock as "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN"—the worst possible risk-return profile. The risk-adjusted return of negative 0.49 over one year compares unfavourably with the Sensex's positive 0.78, confirming that investors have been penalised rather than compensated for taking on additional risk.
Technical Analysis: Entrenched Bearish Trend
The technical outlook for Yashraj Containeurs remains firmly bearish across multiple timeframes. The overall technical trend is classified as "BEARISH" as of February 12, 2026, having deteriorated from "Mildly Bearish" the previous day. This bearish trend has persisted with brief interruptions since October 2025, reflecting sustained selling pressure and lack of buying interest.
Key technical indicators paint a uniformly negative picture. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) shows "Mildly Bullish" signals on the weekly chart but "Bearish" on the monthly chart, suggesting any short-term strength is countered by longer-term weakness. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) provides no signal on the weekly timeframe but shows "Bullish" on the monthly chart, indicating the stock may be oversold on longer timeframes. Bollinger Bands indicate "Bearish" on both weekly and monthly charts, confirming downward momentum.
The stock trades below all major moving averages, a classic sign of sustained downtrend. It sits 42.86% below its 52-week high of ₹9.45 and just 17.90% above its 52-week low of ₹4.58. Immediate support lies at the 52-week low level, whilst resistance emerges at the 20-day moving average of ₹5.17, followed by the 50-day moving average at ₹5.36. The 200-day moving average at ₹6.40 represents major overhead resistance, 18.52% above current levels.
Investment Quality Assessment: Below Average Fundamentals
The overall quality grade for Yashraj Containeurs is "BELOW AVERAGE," reflecting long-term financial underperformance across multiple dimensions. The company fails to qualify on management risk, growth, and capital structure parameters. The five-year sales growth of negative 100.00% and EBIT growth of negative 196.57% quantify the complete collapse of business operations. Average return on equity (ROE) of 0.00% and return on capital employed (ROCE) of 12.66% indicate minimal value creation even in historical periods.
Company carries no long-term debt, having cleared ₹11.12 crores of borrowings that existed in FY19.
Promoters maintain 74.89% stake with no dilution over the past five quarters, suggesting commitment.
Fixed assets of ₹1.79 crores represent potential liquidation value, though likely impaired.
Zero sales for three consecutive quarters with no clear path to operational restart.
Book value of negative ₹84.46 crores with accumulated losses of ₹101.46 crores indicates technical insolvency.
Current liabilities of ₹90.92 crores vastly exceed current assets of ₹2.56 crores, creating severe liquidity stress.
No FII, mutual fund, or insurance company holdings reflect lack of confidence in recovery prospects.
Net losses in FY24, FY23, and all quarters of FY26 with no improvement trajectory visible.
Stock volatility of 56.42% with high beta of 1.50 creates extreme risk for investors.
The company's debt-to-equity ratio of negative 0.89x reflects net cash position only because equity itself is negative—this is not a sign of financial strength but rather of balance sheet distress. The average EBIT to interest coverage ratio of 0.0x indicates inability to service even minimal interest costs from operations. Pledged shares at 10.56% suggest promoters have borrowed against their holdings, potentially for personal needs or to fund operations.
Outlook: Uncertain Path Forward
The outlook for Yashraj Containeurs remains highly uncertain with limited visibility on operational restart. The company faces fundamental questions about business viability, working capital availability, and strategic direction. Without a clear turnaround plan, fresh capital infusion, or asset monetisation strategy, the company risks continued value erosion or eventual liquidation proceedings.
Asset Sale: Monetisation of fixed assets or land could provide some recovery value to shareholders.
Strategic Investor: Entry of a new investor or acquirer with operational expertise in packaging sector.
Debt Restructuring: Settlement of current liabilities at discounted rates could improve balance sheet.
Business Restart: Securing working capital to restart barrel manufacturing operations with existing customer base.
Continued Zero Revenue: Further quarters without sales would confirm permanent operational cessation.
Creditor Actions: Legal proceedings by unpaid creditors could trigger insolvency process.
Promoter Stake Sale: Any reduction in promoter holding would signal abandonment of turnaround efforts.
Delisting Risk: Failure to meet minimum listing requirements could lead to exchange delisting.
Further Equity Erosion: Mounting quarterly losses will deepen negative book value.
The Verdict: Avoid This Distressed Asset
Score: 12/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The company has ceased operations with no clear path to recovery, negative book value, and severe working capital constraints. The risk of permanent capital loss is extremely high.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting at current levels despite losses already incurred. The probability of meaningful recovery appears remote given three quarters of zero revenue and deepening insolvency. Any residual value is more likely to accrue through liquidation proceedings than operational turnaround.
Fair Value Estimate: Not applicable. With negative book value and no operating cash flows, traditional valuation frameworks yield no meaningful fair value. Current market price of ₹5.40 appears to embed speculative premium over likely liquidation value.
Risk Profile: Extreme risk with minimal upside potential and substantial downside risk. Suitable only for highly speculative investors with capital they can afford to lose entirely.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The analysis presented is based on publicly available information as of February 13, 2026, and circumstances may change materially. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in distressed companies carry substantial risk of permanent capital loss.
