The quarterly results paint a grim picture of a company struggling with fundamental operational challenges. Despite marginal revenue growth of 10.34% quarter-on-quarter to ₹0.32 crores, operating losses widened dramatically to ₹4.71 crores from ₹2.71 crores in Q2 FY26. Interest expenses of ₹0.96 crores further compressed profitability, whilst employee costs of ₹0.24 crores consumed a disproportionate share of the company's meagre revenue base. The company's inability to generate positive operating cash flows has raised serious questions about its business model and strategic direction.
Trading at a price-to-book value of just 0.34x, well below its book value of ₹8.67 per share, the market is signalling deep scepticism about the company's ability to recover shareholder value. The stock has underperformed its NBFC sector peers by 17.58 percentage points over the past year, with a negative return of 28.56% compared to the sector's decline of 10.98%. Technical indicators remain firmly bearish, with the stock trading below all key moving averages and exhibiting high volatility of 76.17%.
Financial Performance: Accelerating Deterioration
The company's financial performance in Q3 FY26 represents a marked acceleration in its downward trajectory. Net sales of ₹0.32 crores, whilst showing modest sequential growth of 10.34%, remain at anaemic levels that are wholly insufficient to support the company's cost structure. The year-on-year comparison of 6.67% revenue growth pales in significance when set against the backdrop of operating losses that have ballooned by over 2,000%.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 0.32 | +10.34% | -5.66 | +2472.73% |
| Sep'25 | 0.29 | -23.68% | -3.88 | +1285.71% |
| Jun'25 | 0.38 | -99.82% | -2.68 | +665.71% |
| Mar'25 | 214.22 | +71306.67% | 0.36 | — |
| Dec'24 | 0.30 | +30.43% | -0.22 | — |
| Sep'24 | 0.23 | +15.00% | -0.28 | — |
| Jun'24 | 0.20 | — | -0.35 | — |
The quarterly trend reveals a disturbing pattern: the anomalous Q4 FY25 revenue spike of ₹214.22 crores has not been sustained, with subsequent quarters reverting to sub-₹1 crore revenue levels. This suggests the Q4 FY25 figure may have been a one-off transaction rather than evidence of sustainable business momentum. Operating profit margins remain deeply negative, with the Q3 FY26 operating loss representing a margin of negative 1,471.88% on sales – a mathematically unsustainable position that signals fundamental business model failure.
Interest expenses have emerged as a new pressure point, with ₹0.96 crores in Q3 FY26 marking the first significant interest burden in recent quarters. This development indicates rising leverage and suggests the company has been forced to tap debt markets to fund ongoing operations, further compromising its already fragile financial position. With zero tax payments due to persistent losses, the company is unable to benefit from any tax shields, whilst the lack of other income (₹0.00 crores) demonstrates an absence of treasury management or alternative revenue streams.
Operational Distress: Structural Challenges Mount
The operational metrics reveal a company in severe distress, with structural challenges that extend far beyond cyclical headwinds. Return on equity has plummeted to negative 20.42% in the latest period, a dramatic deterioration from the already weak five-year average of 0.49%. This catastrophic erosion of shareholder value reflects not merely poor profitability but active destruction of the equity base, with losses consuming the company's net worth at an alarming rate.
The balance sheet has weakened materially, with long-term debt rising to ₹57.96 crores as of March 2025 from ₹45.17 crores a year earlier – a 28.31% increase that signals growing reliance on external financing. Net debt to equity stands at an elevated 1.75x, whilst the company's negative cash flow from operations of ₹255.00 crores in FY25 underscores its inability to self-fund even basic working capital requirements. Current assets of ₹136.94 crores are offset by current liabilities of ₹71.45 crores, but the quality of these current assets remains questionable given the company's operational challenges.
Critical Red Flags
Operational Viability Crisis: With operating losses of ₹4.71 crores on revenue of just ₹0.32 crores, the company is burning cash at an unsustainable rate. The emergence of significant interest expenses (₹0.96 crores) whilst generating negligible revenue suggests a dangerous debt spiral. Return on capital employed has collapsed to negative 7.60%, indicating the business is actively destroying capital rather than generating returns. Without immediate and dramatic operational restructuring, the company faces existential risk.
The company's sales to capital employed ratio of 0.82x indicates extremely poor asset utilisation, with each rupee of capital employed generating less than one rupee of sales. This metric, combined with negative operating margins, suggests fundamental inefficiencies in the business model. The five-year EBIT growth of negative 253.00% confirms that operational performance has deteriorated rather than improved over time, despite management's claims of being "one of the fastest growing organisations in India."
Valuation Analysis: Distressed Territory
Trading at ₹6.43 per share against a book value of ₹8.67, Yogi Infra Projects commands a price-to-book ratio of 0.34x – a valuation that reflects the market's deep pessimism about the company's prospects. The stock's classification as "RISKY" by proprietary valuation models is well-justified, with the company exhibiting characteristics of a distressed asset rather than a viable going concern.
| Valuation Metric | Current Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | NA (Loss Making) | Not meaningful |
| Price to Book Value | 0.34x | Deep discount to book |
| EV/EBITDA | -10.17x | Negative (loss-making) |
| EV/Sales | 0.31x | Below replacement cost |
| Dividend Yield | NA | No dividends |
The absence of a meaningful price-to-earnings ratio due to persistent losses removes a key valuation anchor, whilst negative enterprise value multiples for EBITDA and EBIT reflect the company's loss-making status. The EV/Sales ratio of 0.31x suggests the market is valuing the company at less than one-third of its annual revenue – a metric typically reserved for distressed situations or terminal decline scenarios. With no dividend payments and zero institutional interest (0.0% institutional holdings), the stock lacks both income appeal and quality endorsement from sophisticated investors.
Peer Comparison: Lagging Across All Metrics
| Company | P/E (TTM) | ROE % | Debt/Equity | P/BV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yogi Infra Proj. | NA (Loss Making) | 0.49% | 1.75 | 0.34x |
| Goenka Business | NA (Loss Making) | 3.61% | 0.00 | 0.38x |
| Prism Medico | 17.98 | 0.59% | 0.00 | 0.73x |
| Longspur Intl | 14.37 | 1.20% | 0.12 | 0.39x |
| Vani Commercials | 16.97 | 4.00% | 0.00 | 0.77x |
| Rajputana Invest | 49.00 | 5.28% | 0.00 | 2.66x |
Relative to its NBFC peer group, Yogi Infra Projects ranks at the bottom across virtually every financial metric. Its ROE of 0.49% trails the peer average of approximately 2.50%, whilst its debt-to-equity ratio of 1.75x stands as the highest in the group – most peers operate with zero or minimal leverage. The company's price-to-book ratio of 0.34x, whilst appearing "cheap," actually reflects appropriate risk discounting given the company's deteriorating fundamentals and lack of profitability visibility.
The peer comparison underscores a critical reality: even within a group of micro-cap NBFCs, Yogi Infra Projects stands out for its poor capital efficiency and elevated leverage. Profitable peers like Rajputana Invest command P/BV multiples of 2.66x, reflecting investor confidence in sustainable returns. Yogi Infra Projects' inability to generate positive returns on equity, combined with rising debt levels, places it in a distinctly different risk category from its peers – one that justifies its valuation discount rather than suggesting a buying opportunity.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Uninspiring
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Non-Inst % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 44.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.40% |
| Sep'25 | 44.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.40% |
| Jun'25 | 44.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.40% |
| Mar'25 | 44.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.40% |
| Dec'24 | 44.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 55.40% |
The shareholding pattern has remained completely static over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 44.60% through Shiva Shakti Enclaves Pvt. Ltd. Whilst the absence of promoter pledging (0.0%) is marginally positive, the complete lack of institutional interest – zero FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings – speaks volumes about the company's investment appeal amongst sophisticated investors. The 55.40% non-institutional holding represents primarily retail investors, many of whom may be trapped at higher price levels.
The stability in shareholding, whilst avoiding the negative signal of promoter selling, also reflects an absence of positive catalysts. No institutional investors have seen fit to accumulate shares despite the stock's 63.65% decline from its 52-week high, suggesting professional investors view the risk-reward as unattractive even at distressed valuations. The lack of any meaningful change in ownership structure over five quarters indicates a market in equilibrium – but one characterised by pessimism rather than optimism.
Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | -3.16% | +2.30% | -5.46% |
| 1 Month | -17.35% | -2.36% | -14.99% |
| 3 Month | -36.84% | -0.29% | -36.55% |
| 6 Month | -53.47% | +3.89% | -57.36% |
| 1 Year | -28.56% | +8.49% | -37.05% |
| 3 Years | +79.11% | +37.63% | +41.48% |
| 5 Years | +144.49% | +66.63% | +77.86% |
The stock's recent performance has been catastrophic, with losses accelerating across all near-term timeframes. The six-month decline of 53.47% represents a loss of more than half the stock's value, whilst the three-month drawdown of 36.84% indicates selling pressure has intensified in recent months. Trading at ₹6.43, the stock sits just 10.86% above its 52-week low of ₹5.80, with the next support level offering little cushion against further declines.
Technical indicators paint a uniformly bearish picture, with the stock trading below all key moving averages: 5-day (₹6.27), 20-day (₹6.97), 50-day (₹7.77), 100-day (₹9.67), and 200-day (₹11.55). The bearish trend, which commenced on 19th November 2025 at ₹9.19, has shown no signs of reversal. With a beta of 1.50, the stock exhibits 50% more volatility than the broader market, amplifying downside risk in weak market conditions. The risk-adjusted return of negative 0.37 over one year, combined with volatility of 76.17%, places the stock firmly in "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" territory.
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags
The investment case for Yogi Infra Projects is severely compromised by a confluence of negative factors across all key parameters. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of just 23 out of 100, accompanied by a "STRONG SELL" rating, reflects systematic weaknesses that extend far beyond cyclical challenges. With a "BELOW AVERAGE" quality grade, "NEGATIVE" financial trend, "BEARISH" technical trend, and "RISKY" valuation assessment, the stock presents unfavourable risk-reward characteristics for virtually any investor profile.
The company's operational model appears fundamentally broken, with revenue generation insufficient to cover even basic operating expenses before considering interest and depreciation. The five-year sales growth of 282.95%, whilst superficially impressive, is rendered meaningless by the concurrent EBIT decline of 253.00% – the company has grown revenue whilst simultaneously destroying profitability. This pattern suggests either poor strategic execution, unfavourable industry dynamics, or both.
Key Investment Concerns
The deteriorating return on equity, now at negative 20.42%, indicates active destruction of shareholder capital. Rising debt levels (long-term debt up 28.31% to ₹57.96 crores) combined with negative cash flows from operations (₹255.00 crores outflow in FY25) suggest a company increasingly dependent on external financing to fund ongoing operations. The absence of any institutional investors, despite a 63.65% price decline from 52-week highs, signals that professional investors view the situation as unrectifiable within reasonable timeframes.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
KEY STRENGTHS ✓
KEY CONCERNS ⚠️
Outlook: Limited Visibility for Recovery
POSITIVE CATALYSTS
RED FLAGS
The Verdict: Exit Recommended
Score: 23/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The company exhibits characteristics of a distressed asset with operating losses exceeding revenue, rising leverage, negative cash flows, and zero institutional support. The risk of permanent capital loss substantially outweighs any theoretical recovery potential.
For Existing Holders: Exit positions at current levels to limit further losses. With operating losses accelerating, debt rising, and no credible path to profitability visible, the stock faces significant downside risk. The 63.65% decline from 52-week highs may represent only the beginning of a deeper correction if operational challenges persist.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹3.50 to ₹4.00 (45.58% to 37.79% downside from current price of ₹6.43), based on liquidation value of net assets and assuming continued operational deterioration.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.
