How has been the historical performance of Flomic Global?

Answer:Flomic Global has shown a fluctuating financial performance over the years, with net sales and total operating income remaining at zero from March 2008 to March 2011. Employee costs decreased from 0.05 Cr in March 2008 to 0.02 Cr in March 2011, while manufacturing expenses increased from 0.03 Cr in March 2008 to 0.02 Cr in March 2011. The total expenditure, excluding depreciation, decreased from 0.08 Cr in March 2008 to 0.02 Cr in March 2011. Operating profit (PBDIT) fluctuated, showing a profit of 0.29 Cr in March 2008, a loss of 0.17 Cr in March 2009, and a profit of 0.18 Cr in March 2011. Profit before tax showed a similar trend, with a high of 0.29 Cr in March 2008, dropping to a loss of 0.03 Cr in March 2009, and recovering to 0.18 Cr in March 2011. Profit after tax also followed this pattern, peaking at 0.27 Cr in March 2008, dipping to a loss of 0.06 Cr in March 2009, and then rising to 0.15 Cr in March 2011. The earnings per share (EPS) peaked at 0.37 in March 2008, fell to -0.08 in March 2009, and was 0.21 in March 2011. The company experienced negative cash flow from operating activities, with a significant outflow of -4.37 Cr in March 2012, while cash flow from investing activities showed a positive trend, increasing to 4.99 Cr in March 2012.

Breakdown:
Flomic Global's financial history reveals a challenging trajectory, with net sales and total operating income consistently at zero from March 2008 to March 2011. Employee costs and manufacturing expenses fluctuated, reflecting a decrease in operational costs, while total expenditure saw a decline over the same period. Operating profit (PBDIT) varied, indicating periods of both profit and loss, with a notable recovery in March 2011. Profit before tax and profit after tax mirrored this volatility, with significant losses in March 2009 followed by a rebound in March 2011. The earnings per share (EPS) also demonstrated this pattern, highlighting the company's struggle to maintain profitability. Despite negative cash flow from operating activities in recent years, cash flow from investing activities showed improvement, suggesting a potential for future growth.