Is C J Gelatine overvalued or undervalued?

Dec 02 2025 08:07 AM IST
share
Share Via
As of December 1, 2025, C J Gelatine's valuation has shifted from attractive to fair, with a PE ratio of 67.47 and a year-to-date return of -35.75%, indicating challenges in growth despite being fairly valued compared to peers.




Valuation Metrics and What They Indicate


C J Gelatine’s price-to-earnings (PE) ratio stands at a notably high 67.5, signalling that investors are paying a premium for each unit of earnings. This is considerably above the typical market average and suggests elevated expectations for future growth. The price-to-book (P/B) ratio of 1.94 indicates the stock is trading nearly twice its book value, which is moderate but not excessive in the context of specialty chemicals.


The enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio of 15.2 is also telling. While not as stretched as the PE ratio, it is higher than many traditional benchmarks, implying the market values the company’s operating cash flow at a premium. The EV to EBIT ratio of 22 further supports this view, reflecting expectations of sustained profitability despite the company’s modest returns.


However, the company’s return on capital employed (ROCE) and return on equity (ROE) are relatively low at 4.14% and 2.87% respectively. These figures suggest that the firm is generating limited returns on the capital invested, which could be a concern for value-focused investors.



Under the radar no more! This Large Cap from Cement is emerging from turnaround with solid fundamentals intact. Discover it while it's still relatively hidden!



  • - Hidden turnaround gem

  • - Solid fundamentals confirmed

  • - Large Cap opportunity



Discover This Hidden Gem →



Peer Comparison: Contextualising C J Gelatine’s Valuation


When compared with its industry peers, C J Gelatine’s valuation appears fair but on the higher side. Several competitors in the specialty chemicals sector, such as Solar Industries and Gujarat Fluorochemicals, are classified as very expensive with PE ratios ranging from mid-20s to over 50. In contrast, Godrej Industries is considered attractive with a PE ratio below 40, despite having a higher EV/EBITDA ratio than C J Gelatine.


Notably, C J Gelatine’s EV/EBITDA ratio is lower than many peers, which could indicate some relative value in terms of operating earnings. However, the absence of a PEG ratio (price/earnings to growth) figure for C J Gelatine complicates growth-adjusted valuation comparisons, as this metric helps balance high PE ratios against expected earnings growth.


Market Performance and Price Movements


The stock’s recent price action has been subdued. It closed at ₹16.82, just marginally above the previous close, and remains significantly below its 52-week high of ₹29.70. Over the past year, the stock has declined by nearly 12%, underperforming the Sensex, which gained over 7% in the same period. The year-to-date return is even more stark, with a drop of 35.75% compared to the Sensex’s positive 9.6%.


Longer-term returns also highlight underperformance. Over three years, C J Gelatine’s stock has fallen by 41.5%, while the Sensex has risen by more than 35%. Even over five and ten years, the company’s returns lag the broader market significantly. This weak relative performance raises questions about the sustainability of the current valuation premium.



Is C J Gelatine your best bet? SwitchER suggests better alternatives across peers, market caps, and sectors. Discover stocks that could deliver more for your portfolio!



  • - Better alternatives suggested

  • - Cross-sector comparison

  • - Portfolio optimization tool



Find Better Alternatives →



Balancing Valuation with Fundamentals


Despite the high valuation multiples, C J Gelatine’s fundamentals present a mixed picture. The company’s low ROCE and ROE suggest limited efficiency in generating profits from its capital base. The absence of dividend yield further reduces the attractiveness for income-focused investors. Meanwhile, the EV to capital employed ratio of 1.16 and EV to sales of 0.68 indicate the market is not excessively pricing in sales or capital utilisation.


Given these factors, the recent shift from an attractive to a fair valuation grade seems justified. The market appears to be pricing in some growth potential but remains cautious due to the company’s underwhelming returns and relative underperformance against benchmarks.


Conclusion: Fair Valuation Reflecting Cautious Optimism


In summary, C J Gelatine is currently neither clearly overvalued nor undervalued but sits at a fair valuation level. Its high PE ratio and moderate EV/EBITDA multiples suggest investors expect growth, yet the company’s weak profitability metrics and disappointing relative returns temper enthusiasm. Compared to peers, it is more reasonably priced than many very expensive specialty chemical stocks but lacks the compelling fundamentals to be rated attractive.


Investors should weigh the company’s potential for operational improvement and market recovery against its current valuation premium. Those seeking growth exposure in specialty chemicals might consider C J Gelatine cautiously, while value investors may find better opportunities elsewhere in the sector or broader market.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News