Is Construction Partners, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?

Sep 20 2025 06:13 PM IST
share
Share Via
As of July 7, 2025, Construction Partners, Inc. is considered very expensive with a P/E ratio of 75 and significant premiums over peers, despite delivering an impressive 1-year return of 83.12%, which warrants caution for potential investors.
As of 7 July 2025, the valuation grade for Construction Partners, Inc. has moved from expensive to very expensive. The company is currently overvalued, as indicated by a P/E ratio of 75, a Price to Book Value of 7.65, and an EV to EBITDA of 50.88. In comparison, peers such as MasTec, Inc. have a P/E of 57.22 and EV to EBITDA of 20.31, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. shows a more reasonable P/E of 28.27 and EV to EBITDA of 21.61, highlighting the significant premium at which Construction Partners is trading.

Despite its overvaluation, Construction Partners, Inc. has delivered impressive returns, outperforming the S&P 500 with a 1-year return of 83.12% compared to the S&P 500's 17.14%. This strong performance may attract investors, but the high valuation ratios suggest caution moving forward.
{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News