Is Franklin Leasing overvalued or undervalued?

Valuation Metrics Paint a Mixed Picture

At first glance, Franklin Leasing’s price-to-earnings (PE) ratio stands at an elevated 82.7, signalling a high premium relative to its earnings. This figure is significantly above many of its peers in the NBFC sector, indicating that the market is pricing in substantial future growth or other positive expectations. However, the company’s price-to-book (P/B) value is notably low at 0.46, which traditionally suggests the stock is trading below its net asset value. This divergence between PE and P/B ratios is unusual and warrants deeper scrutiny.

Further valuation multiples such as enterprise value to EBIT and EBITDA both hover around 5.35, which are comparatively modest and suggest that operational earnings are not being priced excessively. The EV to sales ratio is also low at 0.39, indicating that the market values the company at less than half its annual sales, a sign that revenue generation is not fully reflected in the share price.

Profitability and Returns Remain Weak

One of the key concerns with Franklin Leasing is its return metrics. The latest return on capital employed (ROCE) is a mere 1.08%, while return on equity (ROE) is even lower at 0.55%. These figures highlight the company’s limited ability to generate profits from its capital base and shareholder equity, which is a critical factor for investors seeking sustainable growth and dividend potential. The absence of a dividend yield further emphasises the lack of immediate shareholder returns.

Peer Comparison Highlights Valuation Extremes

When compared with peers, Franklin Leasing’s valuation appears stretched. While some companies in the NBFC and financial services sector also carry high PE ratios, such as Jio Financial and HDFC Life Insurance, their operational metrics and growth prospects differ markedly. For instance, Bajaj Finance, another very expensive stock, has a PE ratio less than half of Franklin Leasing’s and a more balanced PEG ratio, indicating a more justified premium based on growth expectations.

Conversely, some peers like Life Insurance companies and SBI Life Insurance are rated as very attractive or fair, with significantly lower PE and PEG ratios, reflecting more reasonable valuations relative to their earnings and growth potential. This contrast suggests that Franklin Leasing’s current market price may not be fully supported by its fundamentals.

Stock Price Performance Reflects Investor Sentiment

Franklin Leasing’s share price has struggled over the past year, with a decline of over 42%, significantly underperforming the Sensex, which has gained around 8.4% in the same period. The year-to-date return also shows a steep negative trend of approximately 39%, while the broader market has advanced close to 10%. This underperformance signals investor concerns about the company’s growth prospects and profitability.

Over a longer horizon, the three-year return of nearly 44% slightly outpaces the Sensex’s 37%, but the five-year return remains deeply negative, contrasting sharply with the Sensex’s robust gains. This inconsistency in returns further complicates the valuation narrative, suggesting that while there may be some recovery potential, the company has yet to demonstrate consistent value creation.

Is Franklin Leasing Overvalued or Undervalued?

Taking all factors into account, Franklin Leasing appears to be overvalued at its current price level. The extremely high PE ratio and PEG ratio imply that the market expects rapid earnings growth, yet the company’s weak profitability metrics and subdued operational returns do not currently justify such optimism. The low price-to-book ratio might hint at undervaluation, but this is likely reflective of asset quality concerns or market scepticism about the company’s ability to convert assets into earnings.

Moreover, the stock’s poor recent price performance relative to the broader market reinforces the view that investors are cautious. While the valuation multiples based on enterprise value suggest some operational efficiency, these are overshadowed by the lack of meaningful returns on capital and equity.

Investors should approach Franklin Leasing with caution, recognising that the current valuation implies significant growth expectations that the company has yet to demonstrate. Unless there is a clear turnaround in profitability and capital efficiency, the stock’s premium valuation may not be sustainable.

Conclusion

In summary, Franklin Leasing’s valuation is best characterised as very expensive relative to its fundamentals and peer group. The market appears to be pricing in a growth story that is not yet supported by earnings or returns. For investors seeking value and sustainable returns in the NBFC sector, alternative companies with stronger profitability and more reasonable valuations may offer better opportunities.

Get 2 full years of MojoOne Premium for only Rs. 12,999. Subscribe for 1 year and we'll add another year FREE. Offer valid for a limited time. Start Saving Now →