Muller & Phipps (India) Ltd Stock Hits 52-Week Low at Rs.202

Jan 29 2026 09:57 AM IST
share
Share Via
Muller & Phipps (India) Ltd, a player in the Trading & Distributors sector, touched a new 52-week low of Rs.202 today, marking a significant decline in its share price amid broader market fluctuations and company-specific factors.
Muller & Phipps (India) Ltd Stock Hits 52-Week Low at Rs.202

Stock Performance and Market Context

The stock opened the day with a gap down of -2.61% and further declined to an intraday low of Rs.202, representing a sharp fall of -7.34% on the day. This performance notably underperformed its sector by -6.95%, reflecting heightened selling pressure relative to peers. The current price is substantially below the stock’s 52-week high of Rs.385, indicating a depreciation of nearly 47.5% from that peak.

Muller & Phipps is trading below all key moving averages, including the 5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day averages, signalling a sustained downtrend. This technical positioning suggests that the stock has struggled to regain momentum over multiple time horizons.

Meanwhile, the broader market saw the Sensex open flat with a marginal gain of 24.28 points but subsequently declined by -567.13 points to close at 81,801.83, down -0.66%. Despite this, several indices such as NIFTY CPSE, NIFTY METAL, and S&P BSE PSU reached new 52-week highs, highlighting a mixed market environment where certain sectors outperformed while others, including Trading & Distributors, faced headwinds.

Financial and Fundamental Overview

Over the past year, Muller & Phipps has delivered a negative return of -42.92%, contrasting sharply with the Sensex’s positive 6.79% gain during the same period. This underperformance extends beyond the short term, with the stock also lagging the BSE500 index over the last three years, one year, and three months.

The company’s financial metrics reveal several areas of concern. It currently holds a negative book value, indicating that its liabilities exceed its assets, which is a sign of weak long-term fundamental strength. Despite a modest net sales growth rate of 11.20% annually over the last five years, operating profit has remained flat, showing no expansion in operating margins.

Debt levels remain elevated, with an average debt-to-equity ratio of 0 times, reflecting a high reliance on debt financing. This financial structure adds to the risk profile, especially given the company’s negative EBITDA, which further underscores profitability challenges.

Just announced: This Small Cap from Tyres & Allied with precise target price is our pick for the week. Get the pre-market insights that informed this selection!

  • - Just announced pick
  • - Pre-market insights shared
  • - Tyres & Allied weekly focus

Get Pre-Market Insights →

Recent Operational and Cash Flow Indicators

The company reported flat results in the September 2025 quarter, with operating cash flow for the year reaching a low of Rs. -0.42 crore. This negative cash flow position highlights liquidity constraints and limited internal cash generation capacity.

Additionally, the debtor turnover ratio for the half-year period stood at 2.73 times, the lowest in recent history, suggesting slower collection cycles and potential working capital inefficiencies. These factors contribute to the overall cautious outlook on the company’s near-term financial health.

Despite the stock’s negative return over the past year, the company’s profits have risen by 40%, resulting in a PEG ratio of 1.4. This indicates that while earnings growth has been positive, it has not translated into share price appreciation, possibly due to concerns over sustainability and balance sheet strength.

Valuation and Risk Assessment

Muller & Phipps is currently rated with a Mojo Score of 12.0 and assigned a Mojo Grade of Strong Sell, upgraded from a previous Sell rating on 14 February 2025. This grading reflects the company’s weak fundamentals and elevated risk profile. The market capitalisation grade stands at 4, indicating a relatively small market cap compared to larger peers.

The stock’s valuation is considered risky relative to its historical averages, with the negative EBITDA and high debt levels contributing to this assessment. The majority ownership by promoters remains unchanged, which may influence strategic decisions but does not mitigate the financial challenges faced.

Holding Muller & Phipps (India) Ltd from Trading & Distributors? See if there's a smarter choice! SwitchER compares it with peers and suggests superior options across market caps and sectors!

  • - Peer comparison ready
  • - Superior options identified
  • - Cross market-cap analysis

Switch to Better Options →

Summary of Key Concerns

The stock’s fall to Rs.202 marks a continuation of a downward trajectory that has seen a near 43% decline over the past year. The combination of a negative book value, flat operating profit growth, negative cash flows, and a low debtor turnover ratio paints a picture of a company facing multiple financial headwinds.

Trading below all major moving averages and underperforming both its sector and broader market indices, Muller & Phipps currently exhibits characteristics of a stock under pressure from both fundamental and technical perspectives.

While the company has shown some profit growth, this has not been sufficient to offset concerns related to its balance sheet and cash flow generation, factors that continue to weigh on investor sentiment and share price performance.

Market and Sector Positioning

Within the Trading & Distributors sector, Muller & Phipps’ performance contrasts with some indices that have reached new highs, underscoring sectoral divergence. The Sensex’s mixed movement, with a decline of -0.66% on the day, reflects broader market volatility but does not fully explain the stock’s sharper decline.

The company’s market cap grade of 4 and strong sell Mojo Grade highlight its relatively small size and elevated risk compared to larger, more stable peers in the sector.

Ownership and Governance

The majority shareholding remains with promoters, which may influence strategic direction and capital allocation decisions. However, this ownership structure has not translated into improved market performance or financial metrics in recent periods.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News