Panasonic Energy India: Valuation Shifts Signal Changing Price Attractiveness

Feb 10 2026 08:02 AM IST
share
Share Via
Panasonic Energy India Company Ltd has witnessed a notable shift in its valuation parameters, moving from an attractive to a fair valuation grade amid fluctuating market dynamics. Despite a recent downgrade in its mojo grade to 'Sell' from 'Strong Sell', the stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-book value (P/BV) ratios reveal a nuanced picture of its price attractiveness relative to peers and historical benchmarks.
Panasonic Energy India: Valuation Shifts Signal Changing Price Attractiveness

Valuation Metrics and Market Positioning

As of 10 Feb 2026, Panasonic Energy India trades at ₹340.25, down 2.59% from the previous close of ₹349.30. The stock's 52-week range spans from ₹280.35 to ₹416.00, indicating a considerable volatility band. The company’s P/E ratio stands at 40.18, a figure that has shifted its valuation grade from 'attractive' to 'fair'. This P/E multiple is notably higher than some peers such as High Energy Battery, which trades at a P/E of 29.14 but is classified as 'Very Expensive' due to other valuation factors.

In terms of price-to-book value, Panasonic Energy's ratio is 2.47, reflecting a moderate premium over its book value. This is consistent with its sector positioning within FMCG, where asset-light models and brand equity often justify elevated P/BV multiples. However, when compared to companies like ATC Energies, which trades at a P/BV of 5.55 but 'Does not qualify' due to other financial metrics, Panasonic's valuation appears more balanced.

Enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) is another critical metric where Panasonic Energy posts a ratio of 19.53, which is lower than Goldstar Power’s 32.89 but higher than High Energy Battery’s 26.93. This suggests that while the company is not the most expensive in terms of operational earnings, it is priced at a premium relative to some competitors.

Financial Performance and Returns Analysis

Return metrics over various periods provide further context to the valuation changes. Over the past week, Panasonic Energy’s stock declined by 2.77%, contrasting with the Sensex’s 2.94% gain. However, over the last month and year-to-date (YTD), the stock outperformed the benchmark with returns of 10.69% and 12.63%, respectively, compared to Sensex’s 0.59% and -1.36%. This short-term outperformance is tempered by a 17.21% decline over the past year, lagging the Sensex’s 7.97% gain.

Longer-term returns over three and five years show Panasonic Energy lagging the Sensex, with 32.83% and 51.26% gains versus 38.25% and 63.78% for the benchmark. The 10-year return of 14.37% is significantly below the Sensex’s 249.97%, highlighting challenges in sustaining growth momentum over the long haul.

Profitability and Efficiency Metrics

Profitability ratios further elucidate the valuation context. The company’s return on capital employed (ROCE) is 8.54%, while return on equity (ROE) stands at 6.14%. These figures are modest and may contribute to the cautious market sentiment reflected in the downgrade from 'Strong Sell' to 'Sell' mojo grade on 27 Jan 2026. Dividend yield at 2.76% offers some income cushion but is unlikely to be a primary attraction for growth-focused investors.

From struggle to strength! This Small Cap from Textile - Machinery is showing early turnaround signals that look promising. Position yourself now for explosive growth potential ahead!

  • - Early turnaround signals
  • - Explosive growth potential
  • - Textile - Machinery recovery play

Position for Explosive Growth →

Comparative Valuation: Peer Analysis

When benchmarked against its industry peers within the FMCG sector, Panasonic Energy’s valuation appears relatively fair but not compelling. High Energy Battery, despite a lower P/E of 29.14, is considered 'Very Expensive' due to its elevated EV/EBIT and EV/EBITDA multiples of 26.93 and 19.53 respectively. Indo National is classified as 'Risky' due to loss-making status, rendering valuation comparisons less meaningful.

Maxvolt Energy, with a P/E of 33.4 and EV/EBITDA of 23.67, is also priced expensively relative to earnings, while Goldstar Power’s P/E of 60.25 and EV/EBITDA of 32.89 place it firmly in the 'Expensive' category. ATC Energies, trading at a P/E of 5.55 and EV/EBITDA of 1.46, does not qualify for direct comparison due to differing business fundamentals and financial health.

These comparisons highlight that Panasonic Energy’s current valuation is neither a bargain nor excessively stretched, but rather sits in a middle ground that reflects moderate investor confidence amid sector challenges.

Market Sentiment and Mojo Grade Implications

The downgrade in the company’s mojo grade from 'Strong Sell' to 'Sell' on 27 Jan 2026 signals a slight improvement in market sentiment, albeit still negative. The mojo score of 31.0 remains low, indicating limited enthusiasm from the market and suggesting that investors should approach the stock with caution. The market cap grade of 4 further underscores the company’s modest size and liquidity constraints, which may impact investor interest and valuation multiples.

Given the stock’s recent price decline of 2.59% on 10 Feb 2026 and its underperformance relative to the Sensex over the past week, short-term volatility is likely to persist. However, the positive returns over the month and YTD periods suggest some underlying resilience that could be explored by value-oriented investors.

Panasonic Energy India Company Ltd or something better? Our SwitchER feature analyzes this micro-cap FMCG stock and recommends superior alternatives based on fundamentals, momentum, and value!

  • - SwitchER analysis complete
  • - Superior alternatives found
  • - Multi-parameter evaluation

See Smarter Alternatives →

Outlook and Investor Considerations

Investors analysing Panasonic Energy India should weigh the company’s fair valuation against its modest profitability and mixed return profile. The elevated P/E ratio of 40.18, while not extreme in the FMCG context, suggests that growth expectations are priced in, yet the company’s recent financial performance and return metrics do not fully justify a premium rating.

Moreover, the stock’s underperformance relative to the Sensex over the past year and longer-term horizons raises questions about its ability to deliver sustained shareholder value. The dividend yield of 2.76% provides some income appeal but is unlikely to offset concerns over earnings growth and capital efficiency.

Given these factors, Panasonic Energy India appears to be a stock for cautious investors who may consider it as part of a diversified portfolio but should remain vigilant about sector headwinds and company-specific risks. The recent mojo grade downgrade reinforces the need for careful monitoring of operational and market developments.

Historical Valuation Context

Historically, Panasonic Energy’s valuation parameters have oscillated in line with sector cycles and company performance. The shift from an attractive to a fair valuation grade reflects a recalibration of market expectations amid evolving fundamentals. The current P/E and P/BV ratios are elevated compared to historical lows but remain below peak valuations seen during bullish phases in the FMCG sector.

This valuation adjustment aligns with broader market trends where investors are increasingly discerning about growth sustainability and return on capital. Panasonic Energy’s ROCE of 8.54% and ROE of 6.14% are below sector averages, which typically range higher for leading FMCG companies, thereby justifying a more tempered valuation stance.

Conclusion

In summary, Panasonic Energy India Company Ltd’s valuation shift from attractive to fair signals a nuanced change in market perception. While the stock offers some upside potential given its recent outperformance over the month and YTD periods, its elevated P/E ratio, modest profitability, and mixed long-term returns counsel prudence. The downgrade in mojo grade to 'Sell' further highlights ongoing challenges.

Investors should consider these factors alongside peer comparisons and sector dynamics before making allocation decisions. The company’s fair valuation status suggests it is neither a clear bargain nor excessively overvalued, positioning it as a stock for selective interest rather than broad-based enthusiasm.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News
Most Read
Has Aarti Pharmalabs Ltd declared dividend?
18 minutes ago
share
Share Via
Has Uniparts India Ltd declared dividend?
18 minutes ago
share
Share Via
Has Route Mobile Ltd declared dividend?
18 minutes ago
share
Share Via
Has DCW Ltd declared dividend?
18 minutes ago
share
Share Via
Has NRB Bearings Ltd declared dividend?
18 minutes ago
share
Share Via