Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd Quality Grade Downgrade: A Detailed Fundamental Analysis

Feb 17 2026 08:01 AM IST
share
Share Via
Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd has recently experienced a downgrade in its quality grade from good to average, accompanied by a shift in its Mojo Grade from Hold to Sell as of 11 Nov 2025. This article analyses the underlying business fundamentals, including profitability metrics, debt levels, and growth consistency, to understand the factors driving this change and its implications for investors.
Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd Quality Grade Downgrade: A Detailed Fundamental Analysis

Overview of Recent Market Performance and Rating Changes

The company, operating in the Garments & Apparels sector, currently trades at ₹67.48, down sharply by 10.03% on the day, with a 52-week high of ₹120.00 and a low of ₹63.20. Over the past year, Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd has delivered a negative stock return of -34.49%, significantly underperforming the Sensex, which gained 9.66% in the same period. Year-to-date, the stock is down 12.12%, while the Sensex is down 2.28%. This underperformance has coincided with a downgrade in the company’s Mojo Grade from Hold to Sell, reflecting deteriorating investor sentiment and concerns over business quality.

Decline in Quality Grade: What Does It Mean?

The quality grade downgrade from good to average signals a weakening in the company’s core business fundamentals. This shift is based on a comprehensive evaluation of key financial metrics such as return on equity (ROE), return on capital employed (ROCE), debt levels, and growth consistency over the past five years. Saraswati Saree’s current Mojo Score stands at 31.0, indicating a relatively weak overall fundamental profile.

Profitability Metrics: ROE and ROCE Analysis

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) remains a bright spot for Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd, with an average ROCE of 28.96%. This figure suggests the company is generating strong returns on the capital invested in its operations, which is a positive indicator of operational efficiency. However, the average Return on Equity (ROE) is 16.84%, which, while respectable, is moderate compared to industry peers and has not shown significant improvement over the last five years.

Despite decent ROCE and ROE levels, the lack of upward momentum in these profitability ratios may have contributed to the downgrade. Investors typically favour companies demonstrating consistent improvement in returns, and Saraswati Saree’s relatively flat ROE trend suggests limited value creation for shareholders over time.

Growth Consistency: Sales and EBIT Trends

Examining the company’s growth trajectory reveals subdued performance. The five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for sales stands at a mere 1.00%, indicating stagnation in top-line expansion. Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) have grown at a slightly better but still modest rate of 6.45% over the same period. This slow growth contrasts with the dynamic nature of the Garments & Apparels sector, where innovation and market expansion are critical for sustained success.

The sluggish sales growth, coupled with only moderate EBIT improvement, points to challenges in scaling the business or expanding market share. This lack of robust growth undermines confidence in the company’s future earnings potential and likely influenced the quality grade downgrade.

Our current monthly pick, this Mid Cap from Automobile Two & Three Wheelers, survived rigorous evaluation against dozens of contenders. See why experts are backing this one!

  • - Rigorous evaluation cleared
  • - Expert-backed selection
  • - Mid Cap conviction pick

See Expert Backing →

Debt and Interest Coverage: A Mixed Picture

On the leverage front, Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd maintains a relatively conservative debt profile. The average Debt to EBITDA ratio is 0.55, indicating low reliance on debt to finance operations. Net Debt to Equity is effectively zero, signalling a net cash or negligible debt position, which is favourable for financial stability.

However, the EBIT to Interest coverage ratio is negative at -9.01, which is unusual and suggests that the company’s EBIT is insufficient to cover interest expenses, or there may be accounting anomalies or one-off charges affecting this metric. This negative coverage ratio raises concerns about the company’s ability to service debt comfortably, despite low absolute debt levels. Such a scenario can strain liquidity and increase financial risk, contributing to the downgrade in quality assessment.

Operational Efficiency: Sales to Capital Employed

The average sales to capital employed ratio is 3.81, reflecting moderate efficiency in using capital to generate revenue. While this is not alarming, it does not indicate exceptional capital productivity either. Combined with slow sales growth, this metric suggests that the company is not optimally leveraging its capital base to drive expansion or profitability gains.

Dividend Policy and Shareholding Patterns

Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd currently shows no dividend payout ratio data, implying either no dividends have been paid recently or inconsistent dividend policy. This can be a deterrent for income-focused investors seeking steady returns. Institutional holding is minimal at 0.03%, and pledged shares stand at zero, indicating limited institutional interest and no promoter share pledging risk. Low institutional participation may reflect cautious sentiment towards the company’s prospects.

Comparative Industry Position and Peer Quality Grades

Within the Garments & Apparels industry, Saraswati Saree’s quality grade now aligns with peers such as Macfos, Patel Retail, and Credo Brands, all rated as average. Some competitors like Spencer’s Retail and Logica Infoway are rated below average, while others have no assigned quality grade. This positioning suggests Saraswati Saree is no longer a standout performer in its sector, further justifying the downgrade.

Investor Implications and Outlook

The downgrade in quality grade and Mojo Grade to Sell reflects a confluence of factors: stagnant sales growth, moderate profitability without clear improvement, questionable interest coverage, and subdued investor interest. The stock’s significant underperformance relative to the Sensex over the past year underscores these fundamental weaknesses.

Investors should exercise caution and closely monitor upcoming quarterly results for signs of operational turnaround or margin improvement. Without a clear catalyst for growth or profitability enhancement, the stock may continue to face downward pressure. Diversification into higher-quality or better-performing peers within the Garments & Apparels sector may be prudent at this juncture.

Why settle for Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd? SwitchER evaluates this Garments & Apparels micro-cap against peers, other sectors, and market caps to find you superior investment opportunities!

  • - Comprehensive evaluation done
  • - Superior opportunities identified
  • - Smart switching enabled

Discover Superior Stocks →

Summary of Key Financial Metrics

To recap, Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd’s key average financial metrics over the last five years are:

  • Sales Growth (5 years): 1.00%
  • EBIT Growth (5 years): 6.45%
  • EBIT to Interest Coverage (average): -9.01
  • Debt to EBITDA (average): 0.55
  • Net Debt to Equity (average): 0.00
  • Sales to Capital Employed (average): 3.81
  • Tax Ratio: 26.08%
  • Pledged Shares: 0.00%
  • Institutional Holding: 0.03%
  • ROCE (average): 28.96%
  • ROE (average): 16.84%

These figures illustrate a company with stable but uninspiring growth, solid capital returns, low leverage, but potential concerns around interest coverage and investor confidence.

Conclusion

The downgrade of Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd’s quality grade from good to average and the shift to a Sell Mojo Grade reflect a deterioration in key business fundamentals. While the company maintains strong capital returns and low debt, its lack of meaningful sales growth, moderate profitability trends, and negative interest coverage ratio raise red flags. Coupled with poor stock price performance relative to the broader market, these factors suggest investors should reassess their exposure to this stock and consider alternatives with stronger growth and financial health.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News