TCFC Finance Ltd Valuation Shifts Amid NBFC Sector Dynamics

Valuation Metrics and Comparative Analysis

As of the latest assessment dated 16 Feb 2026, TCFC Finance’s P/E ratio stands at 28.67, a figure that, while lower than some of its highly priced peers, still signals a premium valuation relative to the broader NBFC sector. For context, companies such as Mufin Green and Ashika Credit exhibit P/E ratios of 101.28 and 170.67 respectively, categorised as 'very expensive'. Conversely, more attractively valued peers like Satin Creditcare and SMC Global Securities trade at P/E multiples of 8.86 and 19.85, indicating more reasonable price levels relative to earnings.

Price-to-book value for TCFC Finance is notably low at 0.25, which might superficially suggest undervaluation. However, this figure must be interpreted cautiously given the company’s weak return on equity (ROE) of 0.60% and return on capital employed (ROCE) of just 0.74%. These returns are significantly below industry averages, reflecting operational inefficiencies and limited profitability, which undermine the value of the underlying book.

Enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio of 23.41 further underscores the premium at which TCFC Finance is trading. This multiple is substantially higher than more attractively valued NBFCs such as Satin Creditcare (6.07) and SMC Global Securities (3.92), indicating that investors are paying a steep price for each unit of operating cash flow generated.

Shift in Valuation Grade and Market Sentiment

TCFC Finance’s valuation grade has been downgraded from 'very expensive' to 'expensive' as per the latest MarketsMOJO assessment, accompanied by a Strong Sell mojo grade of 17.0. This downgrade reflects a reassessment of the company’s fundamentals and market positioning, signalling deteriorating price attractiveness despite the slight moderation in multiples.

The downgrade is particularly significant given the company’s lacklustre financial performance. The ROCE and ROE figures, both below 1%, highlight the company’s struggle to generate adequate returns on capital, which is a critical factor for investors assessing long-term value. The absence of dividend yield data further diminishes the stock’s appeal for income-focused investors.

Moreover, the PEG ratio stands at zero, indicating either a lack of earnings growth or insufficient data to calculate meaningful growth-adjusted valuation. This contrasts with peers like Ashika Credit, which, despite a very high P/E, shows a PEG of 0.62, suggesting some growth expectations are priced in.

Peer Comparison Highlights Risks and Opportunities

Within the NBFC sector, TCFC Finance’s valuation multiples place it in a precarious position. While it is less expensive than some of the sector’s most overpriced stocks, it remains significantly pricier than companies with more robust fundamentals and healthier profitability metrics. For instance, Satin Creditcare and SMC Global Securities, both rated as 'attractive', offer substantially lower P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples, signalling better value propositions for investors.

On the other end of the spectrum, companies like LKP Finance and Avishkar Infra are classified as 'risky' due to loss-making operations, which TCFC Finance currently avoids. However, the company’s weak returns and high valuation multiples do not justify a premium rating, especially when more attractively priced and fundamentally stronger alternatives exist.

Market Capitalisation and Trading Activity

TCFC Finance holds a market cap grade of 4, indicating a relatively small market capitalisation within the NBFC universe. Unfortunately, trading data such as current price, previous close, and 52-week high/low are unavailable, limiting the ability to analyse recent price trends or volatility. The absence of return data over various periods further restricts performance benchmarking against the Sensex or sector indices.

Investment Implications and Outlook

Given the current valuation profile and weak profitability metrics, TCFC Finance appears to be a challenging proposition for investors seeking value or growth within the NBFC sector. The downgrade to a Strong Sell mojo grade reflects heightened caution, suggesting that the stock may underperform relative to peers and broader market indices.

Investors should weigh the elevated P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples against the company’s subpar ROCE and ROE, which indicate limited operational efficiency and capital utilisation. The low price-to-book ratio, while superficially attractive, does not compensate for the underlying earnings weakness and lack of dividend income.

Conclusion: Valuation Remains a Concern Despite Grade Adjustment

While TCFC Finance Ltd’s valuation grade has improved marginally from 'very expensive' to 'expensive', the company continues to trade at elevated multiples that are not supported by its weak profitability and returns. The Strong Sell mojo grade and low mojo score of 17.0 reinforce the cautious stance investors should adopt.

Comparative analysis with sector peers reveals that more attractively valued NBFCs with stronger fundamentals exist, offering better risk-reward profiles. Until TCFC Finance can demonstrate improved operational efficiency, higher returns on capital, and sustainable earnings growth, its price attractiveness is likely to remain subdued.

Investors are advised to carefully consider these valuation dynamics and explore alternative opportunities within the NBFC sector or broader financial services space that offer superior fundamentals and more compelling valuations.

Limited Period Only. Start at Rs. 9,999 - Get MojoOne for 1 Year + 3 Months FREE (60% Off) Get 71% Off →