{{scheme.chgp}}%
{{scheme.chgp}}%
No Matches Found
{{scheme.chgp}}%
No Matches Found
No Matches Found
Teleflex, Inc.
Teleflex, Inc. Stock Plummets to New 52-Week Low of $102.58
Teleflex, Inc. has reached a new 52-week low, reflecting a significant decline in its stock performance over the past year compared to the S&P 500. The company, with a market cap of approximately USD 5,892 million, faces challenges in long-term growth despite some positive financial metrics.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of October 31, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. shows a mildly bearish trend with mixed technical indicators, underperforming the S&P 500 significantly, having a year-to-date return of -30.10% compared to the index's 16.30%.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of October 31, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is in a mildly bearish trend overall, with mixed technical indicators and a year-to-date decline of 30.98%, significantly underperforming the S&P 500's gain of 16.30%.
Teleflex, Inc. Experiences Valuation Adjustment Amidst Market Challenges and Competitive Landscape
Teleflex, Inc. has recently adjusted its valuation, with its current price at $124.47. Over the past year, the company has faced challenges, posting a return of -38.09%. Key financial metrics include a P/E ratio of 13 and a dividend yield of 1.15%, indicating competitive positioning but room for improvement.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of October 31, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is in a mildly bearish trend, with daily moving averages and monthly MACD indicating bearishness, while significantly underperforming the S&P 500 with a year-to-date return of -30.07%.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of October 31, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is in a mildly bearish trend, indicated by daily moving averages, while mixed signals from MACD and RSI across different time frames and significant underperformance against the S&P 500 raise uncertainty.
Teleflex, Inc. Experiences Revision in Stock Evaluation Amid Competitive Market Landscape
Teleflex, Inc. has recently adjusted its valuation, showcasing a P/E ratio of 13 and a price-to-book value of 1.36. The company’s financial metrics, including a PEG ratio of 0.39 and a dividend yield of 1.15%, highlight its positioning amid varied competitor valuations in the Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology sector.
Teleflex, Inc. Experiences Evaluation Revision Amidst Mixed Market Performance Indicators
Teleflex, Inc. has recently revised its evaluation amid fluctuating stock performance, closing at $132.35. The company has faced significant challenges over the past year, with a notable decline compared to the S&P 500. Mixed technical indicators suggest varied momentum as it navigates current market dynamics.
Is Teleflex, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of October 17, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is considered very expensive and overvalued, with a P/E ratio of 13 and significant underperformance compared to the S&P 500, showing a year-to-date return of -28.01% and a 5-year return of -64.93%.
Teleflex, Inc. Experiences Revision in Its Stock Evaluation Amid Market Challenges
Teleflex, Inc. has recently adjusted its valuation, with a P/E ratio of 13 and a low PEG ratio of 0.39. Key financial metrics include an EV to EBIT of 13.16 and a dividend yield of 1.15%. The company has faced significant stock declines compared to the S&P 500.
Is Teleflex, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of October 17, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is considered very expensive and overvalued at $128.13, despite a low P/E ratio of 13 and a favorable PEG ratio of 0.39, due to poor recent performance with a year-to-date return of -28.01% and a five-year return of -64.93%.
Teleflex, Inc. Experiences Revision in Its Stock Evaluation Amid Competitive Market Landscape
Teleflex, Inc., a small-cap company in the Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology sector, has adjusted its valuation metrics, showing a P/E ratio of 13 and a PEG ratio of 0.39. Its financial indicators, including ROCE and ROE, reflect its competitive positioning amid varying valuations from industry peers.
Is Teleflex, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of October 10, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is considered very expensive and overvalued with a P/E ratio of 13, underperforming the S&P 500 with a year-to-date return of -32.90%, despite being relatively less overvalued compared to peers like The Cooper Cos. and Revvity.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of August 12, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. shows a mildly bearish technical trend with mixed signals across various time frames, underperforming the S&P 500 significantly year-to-date and over the past year.
Is Teleflex, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of August 15, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is considered very expensive and overvalued with a P/E ratio of 13, underperforming the S&P 500 significantly with a year-to-date return of -29.32% and a 10-year return of -62.78%.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of June 27, 2025, the trend is mildly bearish due to daily moving averages indicating bearish momentum, despite some mildly bullish signals from the weekly MACD and KST, while overall sentiment remains cautious due to bearish indicators from Bollinger Bands and Dow Theory.
Is Teleflex, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of June 13, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. has a bearish technical trend with moderate strength, driven by bearish daily moving averages and Bollinger Bands, despite some mildly bullish signals from the weekly MACD and KST, indicating a negative outlook compared to the broader market.
Is Teleflex, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of April 25, 2025, Teleflex, Inc. is considered overvalued with a valuation grade of very expensive, reflected by a P/E ratio of 13 and poor stock performance, showing a year-to-date return of -33.67% compared to the S&P 500's 2.44%.
Who are in the management team of Teleflex, Inc.?
As of March 2022, the management team of Teleflex, Inc. includes Liam Kelly as Chairman, President, and CEO, with George Babich as Lead Independent Director and several Independent Directors: Candace Duncan, Gretchen Haggerty, John Heinmiller, and Stephen Klasko.
{{list.post_title}}
{{list.post_excerpt}}
{{list.post_title}}
{{list.post_excerpt}}
