Dashboard
With a Negative Book Value, the company has a Weak Long Term Fundamental Strength
- Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of 2.11% and Operating profit at 1.56% over the last 5 years
With a fall in EPS of -1.6%, the company declared Very Negative results in Jun 25
Risky - Negative Book Value
Consistent Underperformance against the benchmark over the last 3 years
Total Returns (Price + Dividend) 
Dine Brands Global, Inc. for the last several years.
Risk Adjusted Returns v/s 
News

Dine Brands Forms Golden Cross, Signaling Potential Bullish Breakout Ahead
Dine Brands Global, Inc. has recently achieved a Golden Cross, indicating a potential shift in momentum. Despite past performance challenges, recent trends show a stronger monthly increase, suggesting a possible turnaround. The current bullish signals may influence investor sentiment and the company's future in the leisure services sector.
Read MoreIs Dine Brands Global, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of 5 September 2025, the technical trend for Dine Brands Global, Inc. has changed from bearish to mildly bearish. The current stance is mildly bearish, driven by daily moving averages indicating a bearish trend, while the weekly MACD and Dow Theory show a mildly bullish signal. However, the monthly indicators present a mixed picture with the MACD and Dow Theory both mildly bearish. The Bollinger Bands are bullish on the weekly but mildly bearish on the monthly, adding to the uncertainty. In terms of performance, Dine Brands has underperformed the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a year-to-date return of -19.1% compared to the S&P 500's 12.22%, and a 1-year return of -18.97% versus 17.14% for the index....
Read MoreIs Dine Brands Global, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of 9 November 2017, the valuation grade for Dine Brands Global, Inc. has moved from very attractive to risky, indicating a shift in investor sentiment. The company appears to be overvalued, particularly given its P/E ratio of 9, which is higher than its peer Bloomin' Brands, Inc. at 4.10, and its EV to EBITDA ratio of 7.99, which is also higher than the peer average. Additionally, the negative price to book value of -2.69 raises further concerns about its valuation. In comparison to its peers, Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a higher P/E ratio than Jack in the Box, Inc. at 10.02, and a significantly higher EV to EBIT ratio of 9.95 compared to Bloomin' Brands, which stands at 4.53. The company's stock has underperformed against the S&P 500, with a year-to-date return of -19.1% compared to the index's 12.22%, reflecting a challenging market position....
Read More Announcements 
Corporate Actions 
Quality key factors 
Valuation key factors
Technicals key factors
Shareholding Snapshot : Mar 2025
Shareholding Compare (%holding) 
Domestic Funds
Held in 52 Schemes (50.81%)
Held by 86 Foreign Institutions (17.91%)
Quarterly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Jun'25 - QoQ
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is 7.45% vs 4.88% in Mar 2025
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is 69.23% vs 56.00% in Mar 2025
Annual Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Dec'24
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is -2.26% vs -8.61% in Dec 2023
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is -33.61% vs 20.28% in Dec 2023






