Dashboard
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 10.12%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 10.12% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
Company has a low Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
Poor long term growth as Operating profit has grown by an annual rate 0.95% of over the last 5 years
Flat results in Jul 25
Risky -
High Institutional Holdings at 98.51%
Consistent Underperformance against the benchmark over the last 3 years
Total Returns (Price + Dividend) 
The J. M. Smucker Co. for the last several years.
Risk Adjusted Returns v/s 
News

J. M. Smucker Co. Forms Golden Cross, Signaling Bullish Breakout Ahead
The J. M. Smucker Co. has recently achieved a Golden Cross, indicating potential upward momentum. Despite a one-year decline of 8.98%, the stock gained 5.71% weekly, outperforming the S&P 500. The company, valued at around $11.6 billion, shows mixed technical signals in the market.
Read MoreIs The J. M. Smucker Co. technically bullish or bearish?
As of 10 September 2025, the technical trend for The J. M. Smucker Co. has changed from sideways to mildly bearish. The current stance is mildly bearish, driven by bearish signals from the daily moving averages and Bollinger Bands, alongside a mildly bearish indication from the Dow Theory on a weekly basis. While the MACD and KST show mildly bullish trends on the weekly and monthly time frames, these are outweighed by the bearish signals. The company has underperformed the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a 1-year return of -11.45% compared to the S&P 500's 17.14%....
Read MoreIs The J. M. Smucker Co. overvalued or undervalued?
As of 27 February 2025, the valuation grade for The J. M. Smucker Co. has moved from attractive to risky, indicating a shift in perceived value. The company appears to be overvalued, with a P/E ratio of 23, significantly higher than peers such as Conagra Brands, Inc. at 8.91 and Ingredion, Inc. at 12.88. Additionally, the EV to EBITDA ratio stands at 11.27, which is also higher than many competitors, suggesting that the market may be pricing in growth that is not currently supported by the company's performance metrics. The PEG ratio is notably low at 0.01, which typically indicates a potential undervaluation relative to growth, but in this context, it may reflect skepticism about future earnings growth. The company has underperformed against the S&P 500 across multiple time frames, with a one-year return of -11.45% compared to the S&P's 17.14%, further reinforcing the notion that the stock is currently ov...
Read More Announcements 
Corporate Actions 
Quality key factors 
Valuation key factors
Technicals key factors
Shareholding Snapshot : Jul 2025
Shareholding Compare (%holding) 
Domestic Funds
Held in 131 Schemes (41.04%)
Held by 332 Foreign Institutions (22.46%)
Quarterly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Jul'25 - QoQ
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Jul 2025 is -1.42% vs -1.93% in Apr 2025
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Jul 2025 is 93.98% vs -10.06% in Apr 2025
Annual Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Apr'25
YoY Growth in year ended Apr 2025 is 6.69% vs -4.11% in Apr 2024
YoY Growth in year ended Apr 2025 is -265.46% vs 915.57% in Apr 2024






