Dashboard
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROE of 0.92%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Equity (avg) of 0.92% signifying low profitability per unit of shareholders funds
Negative results in Jun 25
Risky - Negative Operating Profits
Consistent Underperformance against the benchmark over the last 3 years
Stock DNA
Electronics & Appliances
USD 80 Million (Micro Cap)
NA (Loss Making)
NA
0.00%
-0.18
-9.26%
0.67
Total Returns (Price + Dividend) 
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. for the last several years.
Risk Adjusted Returns v/s 
News
Is CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of 25 August 2025, the technical trend for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has changed from mildly bullish to sideways. The current stance is neutral, with mixed signals across various indicators. The MACD shows a bearish signal on the weekly chart while being mildly bullish on the monthly chart. The Bollinger Bands indicate a mildly bearish trend weekly and bearish monthly. Moving averages are mildly bullish on the daily timeframe, but the KST and OBV are both mildly bearish weekly and bearish monthly. In terms of performance, the stock has underperformed compared to the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a year-to-date return of -3.19% versus the S&P 500's 12.22%, and a 3-year return of -32.59% compared to the S&P 500's 70.41%....
Read MoreIs CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of 19 May 2025, the valuation grade for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has moved from attractive to risky, indicating a shift in perception regarding its financial health and market position. The company appears to be overvalued given its current metrics, particularly with a Price to Book Value of 0.78 and an EV to Sales ratio of 0.50, which suggest that despite a low valuation relative to its assets and sales, the underlying financial performance remains weak. Additionally, the EV to EBITDA ratio stands at 14.98, which is relatively high for a company in this sector, further reinforcing the notion of overvaluation. In comparison to its peers, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a significantly worse EV to EBITDA ratio than companies like SKYX Platforms Corp. at -4.9578 and Beam Global at -2.8970, both of which are also considered risky. This highlights the challenges faced by CBAK in achieving profitability...
Read More Announcements 
Corporate Actions 
Quality key factors 
Valuation key factors
Technicals key factors
Shareholding Snapshot : Mar 2025
Shareholding Compare (%holding) 
Domestic Funds
Held in 3 Schemes (0.94%)
Held by 8 Foreign Institutions (0.23%)
Quarterly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Jun'25 - QoQ
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is 16.05% vs 37.40% in Mar 2025
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is -61.90% vs 60.38% in Mar 2025
Annual Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Dec'24
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is -13.60% vs -17.81% in Dec 2023
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is 212.94% vs 24.78% in Dec 2023






