As of 17 October 2025, the valuation grade for Freight Technologies, Inc. has moved from fair to attractive, indicating a more favorable assessment. The company appears to be undervalued, particularly given its Price to Book Value of 0.92 and EV to Sales ratio of 0.67, which suggest that the market may not be fully recognizing its potential. Additionally, the EV to Capital Employed ratio stands at 0.95, further supporting the notion of undervaluation relative to its assets. In comparison to peers, Freight Technologies, Inc. shows a stark contrast with TradeUP Acquisition Corp., which has a significantly lower EV to EBITDA of -2.7957, and Fat Projects Acquisition Corp. with an EV to EBITDA of -0.9135. The recent stock performance has been challenging, with a year-to-date return of -83.86% compared to the S&P 500's 13.30%, highlighting the disconnect between market perception and intrinsic value....

As of 17 October 2025, the valuation grade for Freight Technologies, Inc. moved from fair to attractive, indicating a more favorable assessment of its value. The company appears to be undervalued, particularly given its Price to Book Value of 0.92 and EV to Sales ratio of 0.67, which suggest that the market may not be fully recognizing its potential. Additionally, the EV to Capital Employed ratio stands at 0.95, further reinforcing the notion that the company's assets are not being adequately valued. In comparison to its peers, Freight Technologies, Inc. shows a stark contrast with TradeUP Acquisition Corp., which has an EV to EBITDA of -2.7957, and Fat Projects Acquisition Corp., with an EV to EBITDA of -0.9135. This highlights the relative undervaluation of Freight Technologies, Inc. despite its negative returns. Over the past year, the company's stock has declined by 84.03%, significantly underperformin...

As of 17 October 2025, the valuation grade for Freight Technologies, Inc. has moved from fair to attractive, indicating a potential undervaluation. The company appears to be undervalued, especially given its Price to Book Value of 0.92 and EV to Sales ratio of 0.67, which suggest that the market may not be fully recognizing its asset value and revenue potential. Additionally, the EV to Capital Employed ratio stands at 0.95, further supporting the notion that the company is trading below its intrinsic value. In comparison to peers, Freight Technologies, Inc. has a less favorable valuation profile, with TradeUP Acquisition Corp. showing a significantly lower EV to EBITDA of -2.7957, while Fat Projects Acquisition Corp. has an EV to EBITDA of -0.9135. Despite the recent struggles reflected in its stock performance, with a year-to-date return of -83.86% compared to the S&P 500's 13.30%, the long-term outlook a...