Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore)

How big is Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore)?

As of Jun 18, Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) has a market capitalization of 19,558.27 million, with net sales of 2,917.00 million and a net profit of -32.00 million for the latest four quarters. The company reported shareholder's funds of 6,399.00 million and total assets of 9,295.00 million as of Dec 24.

Market Cap: As of Jun 18, Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) has a market capitalization of 19,558.27 million, categorizing it as a Mid Cap company.<BR><BR>Recent Quarterly Performance: For the latest four quarters, Grab Holdings reported net sales of 2,917.00 million and a net profit of -32.00 million.<BR><BR>Balance Sheet Snapshot: As of Dec 24, the company reported shareholder's funds of 6,399.00 million and total assets of 9,295.00 million.

What does Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) do?

Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) is a mid-cap company in the transport services industry, with recent net sales of $773 million and a net profit of $10 million. It has a market cap of approximately $19.56 billion and key metrics include a P/E ratio of 403.00 and a return on equity of 0.81%.

Overview:<BR>Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) operates in the transport services industry and is classified as a mid-cap company.<BR><BR>Financial Snapshot:<BR>Most recent Net Sales: 773 Million (Quarterly Results - Mar 2025) <BR>Most recent Net Profit: 10 Million (Quarterly Results - Mar 2025) <BR>Market cap: USD 19,558.27 Million (Mid Cap)<BR><BR>Key Metrics:<BR>P/E: 403.00 <BR>Dividend Yield: 0.00% <BR>Debt Equity: -0.85 <BR>Return on Equity: 0.81% <BR>Price to Book: 3.02 <BR><BR>Contact Details:<BR>Registrar Address: Not available.

Should I buy, sell or hold Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore)?

Is Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) overvalued or undervalued?

As of August 7, 2025, Grab Holdings Ltd. is considered undervalued with a high P/E ratio of 403 compared to peers, despite strong recent performance, indicating potential growth that the market may not fully recognize.

As of 7 August 2025, the valuation grade for Grab Holdings Ltd. has moved from expensive to attractive, indicating a shift in its perceived value. The company appears to be undervalued, particularly when considering its P/E ratio of 403, which is significantly higher than peers like Sysco Corp. at 28.18 and Performance Food Group Co. at 40.48. Additionally, Grab's EV to EBITDA stands at 113.65, while its PEG ratio is 3.21, suggesting that despite high growth expectations, the current valuation may not be justified.<BR><BR>In comparison to its peers, Grab's valuation metrics highlight a stark contrast, with its EV to EBIT at -1729.99 indicating potential operational challenges. Despite these concerns, the company's recent performance has been strong, with a 1-year return of 73.50% compared to the S&P 500's 17.14%, reinforcing the notion that the market may be undervaluing its growth potential.

Is Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore) technically bullish or bearish?

As of October 24, 2025, Grab Holdings has shifted to a bullish trend, supported by positive MACD indicators and moving averages, despite a bearish monthly RSI and mildly bearish weekly Dow Theory, while outperforming the S&P 500 with a 41.65% return over the past year.

As of 24 October 2025, the technical trend has changed from mildly bullish to bullish. The current stance is bullish, supported by weekly and monthly MACD indicators, which are both bullish, and daily moving averages that also indicate bullish momentum. Weekly Bollinger Bands are bullish, while monthly Bollinger Bands are mildly bullish. The KST is bullish on both weekly and monthly time frames. However, the RSI shows a bearish signal on the monthly timeframe and no signal on the weekly, and Dow Theory indicates a mildly bearish stance on the weekly with no trend on the monthly.<BR><BR>In terms of performance, Grab Holdings has outperformed the S&P 500 over the year with a return of 41.65% compared to the S&P 500's 16.90%, and has also shown strong performance over 3 years with a return of 153.25% versus 78.85% for the benchmark.