With a market capitalisation of just ₹27 crores and trading at ₹2.98 per share, Ashirwad Capital finds itself in a precarious position. Despite the Q2 profit spike, the company's long-term fundamentals remain deeply concerning, with an average return on equity of 0.0%, minimal scale, and a quality grade that "does not qualify" by institutional standards. The stock's bearish technical trend and "Strong Sell" rating from proprietary analysis underscore the challenging outlook facing this struggling NBFC.
The micro-cap NBFC, which has been in operation since 1985, reported net sales of ₹1.13 crores in Q2 FY26, representing an extraordinary 5,550% quarter-on-quarter increase from the meagre ₹0.02 crores recorded in Q1 FY26. On a year-on-year basis, revenue grew 175.61% from ₹0.41 crores in Q2 FY24. However, this volatility reflects the company's minimal operational scale rather than sustainable growth momentum. For context, Ashirwad Capital's quarterly revenue remains below ₹1.5 crores—a fraction of what established NBFCs generate.
| Quarter | Revenue (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 (Q2) | 1.13 | +5,550.00% | 0.85 | +4,150.00% | 75.22% |
| Jun'25 (Q1) | 0.02 | -88.89% | 0.02 | -71.43% | 100.00% |
| Mar'25 (Q4) | 0.18 | +125.00% | 0.07 | +40.00% | 38.89% |
| Dec'24 (Q3) | 0.08 | -80.49% | 0.05 | -87.50% | 62.50% |
| Sep'24 (Q2) | 0.41 | +10.81% | 0.40 | +25.00% | 97.56% |
| Jun'24 (Q1) | 0.37 | +146.67% | 0.32 | +68.42% | 86.49% |
| Mar'24 (Q4) | 0.15 | — | 0.19 | — | 126.67% |
Financial Performance: Extreme Volatility Raises Sustainability Questions
Ashirwad Capital's Q2 FY26 financial performance showcases extreme swings that reflect operational instability rather than healthy business dynamics. The company's net sales surged from a negligible ₹0.02 crores in Q1 FY26 to ₹1.13 crores in Q2 FY26—a percentage increase that, whilst mathematically impressive, highlights the company's inability to maintain consistent revenue generation. This pattern of feast-or-famine quarters has persisted throughout FY25 and into FY26, with quarterly revenues oscillating wildly between ₹0.02 crores and ₹1.13 crores.
The company's profit before tax stood at ₹1.00 crore in Q2 FY26, compared to ₹0.03 crores in the previous quarter. After accounting for taxes of ₹0.16 crores (representing a 16.00% effective tax rate), net profit reached ₹0.85 crores. The PAT margin of 75.22% in Q2 FY26, whilst seemingly robust, actually declined from the 100% margin achieved in Q1 FY26—an unsustainable figure that underscores the company's minimal revenue base and erratic cost structure.
Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income reached ₹1.00 crore in Q2 FY26, representing an 88.5% operating margin. However, this metric's volatility is evident when compared to the -50.0% margin recorded in Q1 FY26. Other income contributed ₹0.14 crores to Q2 FY26 results, up from ₹0.04 crores in Q1 FY26, suggesting the company relies significantly on non-operating income streams—a red flag for NBFCs that should primarily generate revenue from core lending activities.
Interest expenses of ₹0.14 crores appeared in Q2 FY26, compared to negligible interest costs in Q1 FY26, suggesting the company may have taken on debt to fund operations. With minimal depreciation charges across all quarters, Ashirwad Capital appears to operate with limited fixed assets—typical for a micro-cap financial services entity but concerning given the lack of scale and infrastructure investment.
Critical Concern: Revenue Sustainability
Extreme Quarterly Volatility: Ashirwad Capital's revenue swings from ₹0.02 crores to ₹1.13 crores between quarters indicate a lack of recurring revenue streams and predictable business operations. This volatility makes financial forecasting nearly impossible and raises serious questions about the company's ability to sustain even minimal profitability. For an NBFC, such erratic performance suggests either a very small, concentrated loan book or irregular fee-based income rather than steady interest income from a diversified portfolio.
Return on Equity: A Fundamental Weakness
Perhaps the most damning metric for Ashirwad Capital is its return on equity (ROE), which stands at an abysmal 0.0% on average. This figure indicates that the company has generated virtually no returns for shareholders relative to the equity capital employed over the measurement period. The latest ROE of 5.10%, whilst marginally positive, remains far below acceptable thresholds for financial services companies, where double-digit ROEs are considered baseline expectations.
For context, healthy NBFCs typically maintain ROEs above 15%, with leading players achieving 18-25%. Ashirwad Capital's 5.10% ROE suggests fundamental issues with capital allocation, business model viability, or operational efficiency. The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) of 3.93% further reinforces this concern, indicating that management has struggled to generate adequate returns on the total capital deployed in the business.
The company's balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹19.40 crores as of March 2025, comprising ₹9.00 crores in share capital and ₹10.40 crores in reserves and surplus. Current assets stood at ₹21.89 crores, whilst current liabilities totalled ₹3.17 crores, providing a current ratio of approximately 6.9—indicating adequate short-term liquidity but also suggesting underutilised capital. With negligible long-term debt, the company maintains a conservative capital structure, though this has not translated into meaningful profitability or growth.
Balance Sheet Snapshot: Capital Efficiency Concerns
Ashirwad Capital's March 2025 balance sheet shows shareholder funds of ₹19.40 crores supporting current assets of ₹21.89 crores, with minimal fixed assets (₹0.15 crores). The company operates with zero long-term debt, suggesting a conservative approach to leverage. However, this capital-light structure has failed to generate meaningful returns, with the company's ROE languishing at 5.10% and ROCE at 3.93%—both well below industry standards and indicative of poor capital deployment.
Quality Assessment: Does Not Qualify
Ashirwad Capital's quality grade tells a sobering story: the company "does not qualify" as a quality investment based on long-term financial performance. This assessment, which has been in place since August 2025 (downgraded from "Below Average"), reflects the company's inability to demonstrate consistent profitability, adequate scale, or sustainable competitive advantages.
The company's five-year sales growth rate of 2.29% and EBIT growth of 4.23% lag far behind inflation, indicating real revenue and earnings decline over the medium term. With institutional holdings at 0.0%, professional investors have shown no interest in accumulating shares—a clear vote of no confidence in the company's prospects. The absence of mutual fund, foreign institutional investor (FII), or insurance company participation speaks volumes about the perceived quality and growth potential of this micro-cap NBFC.
Cash flow analysis reveals further concerns. Operating cash flow for FY25 stood at ₹2.00 crores, a positive development compared to negative cash flows in FY24 (₹-1.00 crore). However, cash flow from investing activities showed an outflow of ₹4.00 crores in FY25, suggesting capital deployment that has yet to translate into meaningful revenue or profit growth. The company's cash flow volatility mirrors its income statement instability, reinforcing concerns about business model sustainability.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity | Market Cap (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashirwad Capital | 27.09 | 1.38 | 0.0% | 0.14 | 27.00 |
| IndiaNivesh | NA (Loss Making) | -0.67 | 0.0% | -3.25 | — |
| Jindal Capital | 34.67 | 2.47 | 7.04% | 0.70 | — |
| MPIL Corporation | NA (Loss Making) | 2.07 | 0.0% | -0.27 | — |
| Apex Capital & Fin. | 71.04 | — | — | — | — |
| Navigant Corp. | 16.53 | — | — | — | — |
Peer Comparison: Struggling Amongst Strugglers
When compared to its micro-cap NBFC peers, Ashirwad Capital occupies an unenviable position. Trading at a P/E ratio of 27.09x, the company commands a valuation premium to some peers like Navigant Corporation (16.53x) but trades at a discount to Apex Capital & Finance (71.04x). However, this comparison offers limited insight given that several peers are loss-making entities with negative or unavailable P/E ratios.
More tellingly, Ashirwad Capital's ROE of 0.0% matches IndiaNivesh and MPIL Corporation—both troubled entities—whilst falling short of Jindal Capital's 7.04%. The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.38x suggests the market values the company at a modest premium to its net asset value, though this premium appears unjustified given the poor return profile. With a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.14, Ashirwad Capital maintains lower leverage than Jindal Capital (0.70), though this conservative approach has not translated into superior returns.
The peer comparison underscores a harsh reality: Ashirwad Capital operates in a segment of the NBFC market characterised by minimal scale, poor profitability, and limited growth prospects. The company's market capitalisation of ₹27 crores ranks it amongst the smallest publicly traded NBFCs, limiting institutional interest and liquidity whilst exposing shareholders to heightened volatility.
Valuation Analysis: "Very Expensive" Despite Weak Fundamentals
Despite its challenged fundamentals, Ashirwad Capital carries a "Very Expensive" valuation grade—a paradox that reflects the disconnect between market pricing and underlying business quality. At a P/E ratio of 27.09x, the company trades at a premium to the NBFC sector average of 24x, despite generating negligible returns and demonstrating extreme earnings volatility.
The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.38x might appear reasonable in isolation, but when considered alongside the 5.10% ROE, it becomes clear that shareholders are paying above net asset value for a business that barely covers its cost of equity. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 25.06x and EV/Sales ratio of 20.97x further highlight the valuation stretch, particularly given the company's minimal revenue base and uncertain growth trajectory.
Ashirwad Capital's valuation grade history reveals persistent overvaluation, with the stock oscillating between "Very Expensive," "Expensive," and briefly "Fair" over the past year. The most recent change to "Very Expensive" from "Expensive" occurred on January 20, 2025, suggesting deteriorating value even as the stock price declined. This pattern indicates that earnings and book value have deteriorated faster than the share price, compressing valuation metrics despite the stock's 39.55% decline over the past year.
Shareholding Pattern: Zero Institutional Confidence
Ashirwad Capital's shareholding pattern reveals a complete absence of institutional participation—a glaring red flag that underscores the market's lack of confidence in the company's prospects. Promoters hold a stable 51.00% stake, unchanged over the past five quarters, providing controlling interest but no indication of conviction through increased ownership.
The remaining 49.00% is held entirely by non-institutional investors, with zero participation from foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, or other domestic institutional investors (DIIs). This complete institutional void is extraordinary even for a micro-cap stock and suggests that professional fund managers have conducted due diligence and concluded the investment opportunity is unattractive.
| Category | Sep'25 | Jun'25 | Mar'25 | QoQ Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter | 51.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% | 0.00% |
| FII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Mutual Funds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Insurance | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Other DII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-Institutional | 49.00% | 49.00% | 49.00% | 0.00% |
The promoter group comprises the Poddar family, with Dinesh Ramprasad Poddar (16.11%) and Rajesh Ramprasad Poddar (15.59%) holding the largest individual stakes. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, eliminating concerns about forced selling or margin calls. However, the static shareholding pattern over multiple quarters suggests neither promoters nor public shareholders see sufficient value to increase their stakes—a concerning signal for potential investors.
Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes
Ashirwad Capital's stock performance paints a grim picture of wealth destruction across multiple timeframes. Trading at ₹2.98 as of November 17, 2025, the stock has declined 39.55% over the past year, dramatically underperforming the Sensex's 9.50% gain by a staggering 49.05 percentage points. This alpha of -49.05% represents one of the worst relative performances in the NBFC sector.
The deterioration has accelerated in recent months. Over the past six months, Ashirwad Capital has plummeted 30.37% whilst the Sensex gained 3.18%, producing negative alpha of 33.55%. The three-month performance shows a decline of 18.80% against the Sensex's 5.40% gain, whilst the one-month performance reveals an 8.87% drop versus the benchmark's 1.19% rise. Even on a one-week and one-day basis, the stock has underperformed, declining 1.00% and 1.65% respectively whilst the Sensex advanced.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Day | -1.65% | +0.46% | -2.11% |
| 1 Week | -1.00% | +1.69% | -2.69% |
| 1 Month | -8.87% | +1.19% | -10.06% |
| 3 Months | -18.80% | +5.40% | -24.20% |
| 6 Months | -30.37% | +3.18% | -33.55% |
| Year-to-Date | -40.04% | +8.72% | -48.76% |
| 1 Year | -39.55% | +9.50% | -49.05% |
| 2 Years | +16.97% | +29.12% | -12.15% |
| 3 Years | +26.45% | +37.57% | -11.12% |
| 5 Years | +250.83% | +93.28% | +157.55% |
Longer-term returns offer little solace. Whilst the two-year return of 16.97% and three-year return of 26.45% appear positive in absolute terms, they significantly lag the Sensex's 29.12% and 37.57% gains respectively. The five-year return of 250.83% outperforms the Sensex's 93.28%, but this primarily reflects a very low base effect from 2020 rather than sustained value creation.
The stock's technical position has deteriorated sharply. Trading below all key moving averages—5-day (₹3.01), 20-day (₹3.13), 50-day (₹3.35), 100-day (₹3.60), and 200-day (₹3.97)—Ashirwad Capital exhibits a clear bearish trend. The stock has fallen 43.98% from its 52-week high of ₹5.32, though it remains 12.45% above its 52-week low of ₹2.65. With a beta of 1.50, the stock exhibits high volatility, amplifying both gains and losses relative to the broader market.
Technical Analysis: Entrenched Bearish Trend
Ashirwad Capital's technical indicators uniformly point to sustained bearish momentum with no signs of reversal. The overall technical trend is classified as "Bearish," a designation that has been in place since July 11, 2025, when the stock was trading at ₹3.96. Since then, the stock has declined over 24%, validating the bearish signal.
Key technical indicators paint a consistently negative picture. The MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) shows bearish signals on both weekly and monthly timeframes, indicating downward momentum across multiple time horizons. Bollinger Bands also flash bearish signals on both weekly and monthly charts, suggesting the stock is trading in the lower band with continued downward pressure. The KST (Know Sure Thing) indicator displays bearish readings weekly and mildly bearish monthly, reinforcing the negative technical outlook.
Moving averages provide clear resistance levels. The immediate resistance sits at ₹3.13 (20-day moving average), followed by major resistance at ₹3.60 (100-day moving average) and strong resistance at ₹3.97 (200-day moving average). The 52-week high of ₹5.32 represents a distant resistance level that appears increasingly out of reach. On the downside, immediate support rests at ₹2.65, the 52-week low, which if breached could trigger further selling pressure.
Delivery volumes have shown some increase, with one-month delivery volume rising 2.35% and one-day delivery spiking 55.73% above the five-day average. However, this increased delivery participation has occurred alongside price declines, suggesting potential capitulation selling rather than accumulation by informed investors.
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Single Quarter Bounce
Ashirwad Capital's investment thesis remains fundamentally challenged despite the Q2 FY26 profit surge. The company's proprietary score of 29 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting a comprehensive assessment of valuation, quality, financial trends, and technical factors. This score, whilst currently showing as "Not Rated" as of November 17, 2025, previously stood at 21 (Strong Sell) as recently as February 2025, indicating persistent weakness.
The Mojo 4 Dots analysis reveals a mixed picture with predominantly negative factors. Near-term drivers show a "Mixed" assessment, with positive quarterly financial trends offset by bearish technicals. Quality is rated "Below Average," reflecting the company's failure to meet institutional standards for financial performance and operational excellence. Valuation is deemed "Attractive" at current prices, though this reflects the stock's severe decline rather than compelling upside potential. The overall assessment remains "Mixed," with concerns significantly outweighing positives.
"A single quarter's profit surge cannot mask the structural weaknesses that plague Ashirwad Capital: negligible scale, zero institutional backing, abysmal return on equity, and extreme operational volatility that makes sustainable profitability appear more accidental than systematic."
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
Key Strengths
- Strong Q2 FY26 profit recovery to ₹0.85 crores from ₹0.02 crores in Q1 FY26
- Conservative capital structure with zero long-term debt and debt-to-equity of just 0.14
- Healthy current ratio of approximately 6.9 indicating adequate short-term liquidity
- No promoter pledging, eliminating concerns about forced selling
- Stable promoter holding at 51.00% providing management continuity
- Attractive valuation grade following steep stock price decline
- Positive operating cash flow of ₹2.00 crores in FY25
Key Concerns
- Abysmal average ROE of 0.0% and latest ROE of just 5.10%, far below industry standards
- Extreme quarterly revenue volatility ranging from ₹0.02 crores to ₹1.13 crores
- Micro-cap status with market capitalisation of only ₹27 crores limiting liquidity
- Zero institutional holdings indicating complete lack of professional investor confidence
- Quality grade of "Does Not Qualify" based on long-term financial performance
- Stock down 39.55% over past year with negative alpha of -49.05% vs Sensex
- Bearish technical trend across all major indicators and timeframes
- Minimal revenue scale with quarterly sales below ₹1.5 crores
- Poor five-year growth rates: 2.29% sales growth and 4.23% EBIT growth
- Trading below all key moving averages with high beta of 1.50
Outlook: What Lies Ahead
Ashirwad Capital faces a challenging path forward, with the burden of proof resting squarely on management to demonstrate that Q2 FY26's profit surge represents the beginning of sustainable improvement rather than another fleeting spike in an otherwise erratic performance history. The company must address fundamental issues around scale, operational consistency, and capital efficiency to merit serious investor consideration.
Positive Catalysts to Watch
- Sustained quarterly revenue above ₹1 crore for three consecutive quarters
- ROE improvement above 10% on a consistent basis
- Entry of institutional investors (mutual funds or DIIs) signalling improved confidence
- Expansion of loan book or revenue-generating assets with disclosed AUM growth
- Stabilisation of operating margins above 70% for multiple quarters
Red Flags to Monitor
- Reversion to sub-₹0.50 crore quarterly revenue in Q3 FY26 or Q4 FY26
- Continued absence of institutional participation despite improved results
- Stock breaking below 52-week low of ₹2.65 on technical charts
- Further deterioration in quality grade or proprietary score
- Increase in promoter pledging or reduction in promoter stake
- Negative operating cash flow returning in FY26 annual results
For the stock to merit reconsideration, Ashirwad Capital must demonstrate consistent quarterly performance with revenues above ₹1 crore, margins stabilising around current levels, and most critically, a pathway to achieving industry-standard ROE above 15%. Until such evidence emerges across multiple quarters, the investment case remains unconvincing, and the risk-reward profile heavily skewed to the downside.
The Verdict: Strong Sell—Structural Weaknesses Outweigh Single Quarter Recovery
Score: 29/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation at current levels. Ashirwad Capital exhibits multiple red flags including negligible ROE (0.0% average, 5.10% latest), extreme revenue volatility, zero institutional backing, and micro-cap liquidity constraints. The Q2 FY26 profit surge appears opportunistic rather than structural, and the company's quality grade of "Does Not Qualify" reflects fundamental weaknesses that a single quarter cannot overcome. The bearish technical trend and 39.55% one-year decline underscore ongoing wealth destruction.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any technical bounce towards ₹3.13-₹3.35 resistance levels. The stock's -49.05% alpha versus Sensex over the past year, combined with deteriorating fundamentals and complete institutional absence, suggests limited near-term recovery prospects. Whilst the conservative balance sheet provides downside protection at net asset value, the opportunity cost of holding a non-performing asset with 5.10% ROE remains substantial.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹2.16 (book value per share), representing -27.52% downside from current price of ₹2.98. Given the poor return profile, fair value approximates book value with no premium justified for a business generating sub-standard returns on equity.
Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.
