Maruti Securities Q2 FY26: Micro-Cap NBFC Posts Modest Profit Amid Structural Challenges

Feb 11 2026 08:03 PM IST
share
Share Via
Maruti Securities Ltd., a Hyderabad-based micro-cap non-banking financial company, reported a net profit of ₹0.13 crores for Q2 FY26 (Jul-Sep'25), marking a sequential improvement from ₹0.06 crores in Q1 FY26 but remaining negligible in absolute terms. With a market capitalisation of just ₹23.00 crores and a current price of ₹50.00, the stock surged 7.85% following the results announcement, though it continues to trade 43.19% below its 52-week high of ₹88.02.
Maruti Securities Q2 FY26: Micro-Cap NBFC Posts Modest Profit Amid Structural Challenges
Net Profit (Q2 FY26)
₹0.13 Cr
▲ 116.67% QoQ
Net Sales (Q2 FY26)
₹3.32 Cr
▲ 315.00% QoQ
PAT Margin
3.92%
▼ 3.58 ppts QoQ
Book Value per Share
-₹43.30
Negative BV

The company's quarterly performance, whilst showing sequential revenue growth, reveals deeper structural challenges that have plagued the organisation for years. With negative shareholder equity of ₹21.65 crores as of March 2025 and a negative book value per share of ₹43.30, Maruti Securities operates from a position of profound financial weakness that raises serious questions about long-term viability.

The stock's dramatic price movements—up 7.85% on the day but down 22.71% over three months—reflect the extreme volatility characteristic of micro-cap stocks with minimal institutional participation and questionable fundamental quality. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of just 9 out of 100, coupled with a "STRONG SELL" advisory rating, underscores the significant risks inherent in this investment.

Financial Performance: Modest Recovery from Negligible Base

Maruti Securities' Q2 FY26 results demonstrate sequential improvement, albeit from an exceptionally low base. Net sales surged 315.00% quarter-on-quarter to ₹3.32 crores from ₹0.80 crores in Q1 FY26, whilst net profit more than doubled to ₹0.13 crores from ₹0.06 crores. However, these percentage gains mask the minuscule absolute figures that characterise the company's operations.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change PAT Margin
Sep'25 3.32 ▲ 315.00% 0.13 ▲ 116.67% 3.92%
Jun'25 0.80 0.06 7.50%
Mar'25 0.00 -1.09 0.00%
Dec'24 0.00 14.22 0.00%
Sep'24 0.00 -0.06 0.00%
Jun'24 0.00 -0.06 0.00%
Mar'24 0.00 -0.05 0.00%

The quarterly trend reveals an erratic operational pattern. For multiple quarters through FY24 and into FY25, the company reported zero sales, only to register a sudden profit of ₹14.22 crores in Q3 FY25 (Dec'24) before reverting to losses and then posting minimal profits in recent quarters. This volatility suggests irregular business activity rather than sustainable revenue generation.

Operating margins present a concerning picture. The operating profit margin of 4.22% in Q2 FY26 declined from 7.50% in the previous quarter, indicating deteriorating operational efficiency despite higher absolute revenues. The PAT margin similarly compressed to 3.92% from 7.50%, reflecting the company's struggle to convert top-line growth into bottom-line profitability.

Notably, the company operates with zero interest expense and minimal depreciation, suggesting a capital-light model. However, this structure has failed to generate consistent profits, with employee costs remaining negligible at ₹0.01 crores per quarter. The absence of meaningful operational infrastructure raises questions about the company's capacity to scale operations sustainably.

Critical Financial Weakness

Negative Shareholder Equity: The company's balance sheet shows shareholder funds of negative ₹21.65 crores as of March 2025, representing a fundamental erosion of capital. With reserves and surplus at negative ₹26.65 crores against share capital of ₹5.00 crores, the company has destroyed more than five times its paid-up capital through accumulated losses. This negative net worth renders traditional valuation metrics meaningless and signals severe financial distress.

Balance Sheet Distress: Negative Net Worth Raises Viability Concerns

Maruti Securities' balance sheet reveals a company in profound financial distress. As of March 2025, shareholder funds stood at negative ₹21.65 crores, comprising share capital of ₹5.00 crores offset by reserves and surplus of negative ₹26.65 crores. This negative net worth position indicates that accumulated losses have completely wiped out shareholder equity, leaving the company technically insolvent from an accounting perspective.

The erosion of shareholder value has been progressive. From negative ₹33.46 crores in March 2020, the deficit improved marginally to ₹21.65 crores by March 2025, primarily due to the unusual ₹13.00 crores profit before tax recorded in FY25. However, this improvement appears insufficient to restore financial health, particularly given the minimal profitability demonstrated in recent quarters.

Current liabilities of ₹22.00 crores as of March 2025 represent the company's primary funding source, given the absence of long-term debt and the negative equity position. The company maintains zero fixed assets and zero investments, operating with a completely asset-light model that generates minimal cash flow. This structure, whilst avoiding debt servicing costs, has proven incapable of generating sustainable returns.

The cash flow statement for FY25 shows cash flow from operations of ₹14.00 crores, entirely offset by cash outflow from financing activities of ₹14.00 crores, resulting in zero net cash generation. This pattern suggests that any operational cash generated is immediately deployed to service liabilities rather than being retained for business growth or balance sheet repair.

Return on Equity: Meaningless Metric for Loss-Making Entity

With negative shareholder equity, calculating a meaningful return on equity becomes impossible. The reported average ROE of 0.00% understates the severity of the situation. A company destroying shareholder capital cannot generate positive returns for equity holders. The ROCE of 1,131.30% appears artificially inflated due to the distorted capital structure and should be disregarded as a performance indicator.

Peer Comparison: Weakest Fundamentals in NBFC Universe

When compared against peers in the non-banking financial company sector, Maruti Securities ranks at the bottom across virtually every meaningful metric. The company's negative book value, negligible profitability, and absence of institutional participation position it as the weakest entity in its peer group.

Company P/E (TTM) Price to Book ROE (%) Debt to Equity
Maruti Securities 1.92 -1.17 0.00% -1.06
Oasis Securities 25.60 1.79 18.19% 0.00
KJMC Financial 19.51 0.16 0.39% 0.09
Sulabh Engineers 9.06 0.68 4.24% 0.05
GSB Finance NA (Loss Making) 1.73 3.85% 0.00
Smart Finsec 23.97 1.50 14.23% 0.03

Maruti Securities' negative price-to-book ratio of -1.17x stands in stark contrast to peers trading at positive multiples ranging from 0.16x to 1.79x. This negative valuation reflects the company's negative net worth and represents a fundamental red flag that distinguishes it from healthier competitors. Whilst the P/E ratio of 1.92x appears attractive superficially, it is rendered meaningless by the company's unstable earnings profile and negative equity base.

The ROE comparison proves particularly damning. Whilst peer companies generate returns ranging from 0.39% to 18.19%, Maruti Securities reports 0.00%, reflecting its inability to generate meaningful returns on the non-existent equity capital. Oasis Securities leads the group with an 18.19% ROE, demonstrating the capital efficiency that eludes Maruti Securities entirely.

With a market capitalisation of merely ₹23.00 crores, Maruti Securities ranks sixth and last amongst its peer group, reflecting the market's assessment of its inferior quality and limited growth prospects. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of -1.06x (technically a net cash position due to negative equity) offers no comfort given the overall financial weakness.

Valuation Analysis: "Risky" Grade Reflects Fundamental Weakness

Maruti Securities carries an overall valuation assessment of "RISKY" from the Mojo platform, a designation that accurately captures the precarious nature of this investment. The company's valuation grade has oscillated between "Very Expensive" and "Risky" over recent months, reflecting the extreme volatility in both business performance and market perception.

Traditional valuation multiples provide limited insight given the company's distressed fundamentals. The P/E ratio of 2.00x appears superficially attractive compared to the industry average of 23.00x, but this discount reflects justified concerns about earnings quality and sustainability rather than representing a bargain opportunity. The negative price-to-book value of -1.17x renders this metric unusable for valuation purposes.

Enterprise value multiples paint an equally concerning picture. The EV/EBITDA of 3.66x and EV/Sales of 3.33x might appear reasonable in isolation, but they fail to account for the company's negative equity, erratic revenue generation, and absence of sustainable competitive advantages. The EV/Capital Employed ratio of 41.40x appears distorted by the minimal capital employed given the negative net worth position.

Valuation Metric Current Value Assessment
P/E Ratio (TTM) 2.00x Misleading due to earnings volatility
Price to Book Value -1.17x Negative BV renders metric meaningless
EV/EBITDA 3.66x Distorted by irregular operations
EV/Sales 3.33x Fails to reflect quality concerns
Market Cap ₹23.00 Cr Micro-cap with minimal liquidity
52-Week Range ₹11.47 - ₹88.02 Extreme volatility (667% range)

The stock's 52-week trading range from ₹11.47 to ₹88.02 represents a staggering 667% spread, illustrating the speculative nature of trading in this security. At the current price of ₹50.00, the stock sits 43.19% below its recent high but 335.92% above its low, suggesting neither clear value nor momentum support.

"With negative shareholder equity of ₹21.65 crores and erratic quarterly performance, Maruti Securities represents a value trap rather than a value opportunity—the low valuation multiples reflect justified concerns about fundamental viability."

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter-Dominated with Zero Institutional Interest

The shareholding structure of Maruti Securities reveals a company entirely dominated by promoters with complete absence of institutional participation. As of December 2025, promoter holding stands at 59.77%, unchanged from the previous quarter, with the remaining 40.23% held by non-institutional investors.

Shareholder Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter Holding 59.77% 59.77% 59.77% 59.61% 0.00%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance Holdings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII Holdings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 40.23% 40.23% 40.23% 40.39% 0.00%

The complete absence of foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors speaks volumes about the company's investment quality. Professional fund managers, who conduct rigorous due diligence before deploying capital, have universally avoided this stock, signalling deep concerns about governance, financial stability, and growth prospects.

Promoter holdings have remained stable around 59.77%, with key promoters Rama Swamy Reddy Pedinekaluva holding 59.57% and Narsing Balwanth Singh holding 0.20%. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, suggesting promoters are not using their shares as collateral for borrowings. However, this offers limited comfort given the overall financial weakness of the enterprise.

The static nature of shareholding—with virtually no movement across quarters—indicates an illiquid stock with minimal trading interest from sophisticated investors. The non-institutional holding of 40.23% likely comprises retail investors and speculators attracted by the stock's extreme price volatility rather than fundamental value.

Stock Performance: Extreme Volatility Masks Weak Fundamentals

Maruti Securities' stock price performance exemplifies the extreme volatility characteristic of fundamentally weak micro-cap stocks. Whilst long-term returns appear impressive on paper, they reflect speculative trading dynamics rather than genuine wealth creation from business fundamentals.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day 7.85% -0.05% +7.90%
1 Week 4.19% 0.50% +3.69%
1 Month 6.00% 0.79% +5.21%
3 Month -22.71% 0.43% -23.14%
6 Month 17.95% 4.50% +13.45%
YTD -2.42% -1.16% -1.26%
3 Years 614.29% 38.81% +575.48%
5 Years 3,084.71% 63.46% +3,021.25%

The recent performance shows sharp reversals. After gaining 7.85% on the day of results and 6.00% over one month, the stock has declined 22.71% over three months and 2.42% year-to-date. This whipsaw pattern reflects speculative positioning rather than investor conviction in the business model.

Long-term returns appear extraordinary, with five-year gains of 3,084.71% vastly outperforming the Sensex return of 63.46%. However, these gains must be contextualised against the stock's starting point from extremely depressed levels and the minimal absolute market capitalisation. A micro-cap stock rising from ₹1.50 to ₹50.00 generates impressive percentage returns but creates minimal absolute wealth given the tiny float.

The technical picture offers little support. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹46.96), 20-day (₹48.23), 50-day (₹50.92), 100-day (₹56.14), and 200-day (₹52.32)—indicating weak momentum across all timeframes. The current technical trend is classified as "MILDLY BEARISH," having deteriorated from "Bullish" in early October 2025.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Override Any Apparent Value

The investment thesis for Maruti Securities is overwhelmingly negative, with fundamental, quality, valuation, and technical factors all pointing towards significant risk. The company's Mojo Score of 9 out of 100 places it in the "STRONG SELL" category, reflecting the convergence of multiple adverse factors.

The quality assessment of "BELOW AVERAGE" understates the severity of concerns. With zero sales growth over five years, zero EBIT growth, average ROE of 0.00%, and negative shareholder equity, the company fails to meet even minimum quality standards. The complete absence of institutional holdings—0.00% from FIIs, mutual funds, and insurance companies—signals that professional investors have uniformly rejected this stock after due diligence.

The financial trend is classified as "NEGATIVE," driven by the 34.83% decline in net sales and PAT over the latest six months when measured on a half-yearly basis. This deterioration contradicts the sequential quarterly improvement, suggesting that the recent uptick may prove temporary rather than representing a sustainable turnaround.

Technical indicators provide no support for accumulation. The "MILDLY BEARISH" trend, combined with the stock trading below all moving averages and showing a bearish MACD on the weekly timeframe, suggests further downside risk. The 52-week high of ₹88.02 appears increasingly distant, whilst the 52-week low of ₹11.47 serves as a reminder of how far the stock can fall during periods of selling pressure.

Marginal Positives

  • Zero debt structure eliminates interest burden and default risk
  • Sequential quarterly improvement in Q2 FY26 vs Q1 FY26
  • No promoter pledging of shares
  • Low P/E ratio of 2.00x vs industry average of 23.00x
  • Recent price momentum with 7.85% gain on results day

Critical Risk Factors

  • Negative shareholder equity of ₹21.65 crores signals technical insolvency
  • Negative book value per share of ₹43.30 renders valuation metrics meaningless
  • Erratic revenue generation with multiple quarters of zero sales
  • Zero institutional participation reflects quality concerns
  • Micro-cap status (₹23 crores) limits liquidity and increases volatility
  • Below average quality grade with 0.00% ROE
  • Negative financial trend with 34.83% decline in half-yearly metrics
  • Mildly bearish technical trend with stock below all moving averages
  • Extreme price volatility (52-week range: ₹11.47 to ₹88.02)
  • Zero sales growth and zero EBIT growth over five years

Outlook: What to Monitor—Though Exit Recommended

For investors who disregard the strong sell recommendation and choose to maintain exposure, several monitoring points become critical. However, it must be emphasised that the fundamental weaknesses are so severe that monitoring for improvement offers limited value compared to simply exiting the position.

Potential Improvement Signals

  • Sustained quarterly revenue growth above ₹3 crores for four consecutive quarters
  • Reduction in negative reserves from current ₹26.65 crores towards breakeven
  • Entry of institutional investors (FII/MF) signalling improved credibility
  • Consistent positive PAT margins above 5% for multiple quarters
  • Capital infusion to restore positive net worth

Red Flags Warranting Immediate Exit

  • Return to quarterly losses in Q3 or Q4 FY26
  • Further deterioration in shareholder equity below current ₹21.65 crores deficit
  • Promoter stake reduction or emergence of pledging
  • Stock breaking below ₹40 (20% below current price)
  • Regulatory actions or compliance failures
  • Continued absence of institutional buying for next two quarters

The path to recovery appears extraordinarily challenging. To restore shareholder confidence, Maruti Securities would need to demonstrate sustained profitability over multiple years to eliminate the ₹26.65 crores deficit in reserves. At the current quarterly profit run rate of ₹0.13 crores, this would require over 200 quarters—or 50 years—making a turnaround practically impossible without significant capital infusion or transformational business changes.

The Verdict: Avoid This Fundamentally Broken Micro-Cap

STRONG SELL

Score: 9/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The negative shareholder equity, erratic business performance, zero institutional participation, and below-average quality grade create an unacceptable risk-reward profile. The apparently low P/E ratio is a value trap, not a value opportunity. Numerous higher-quality NBFCs with positive net worth and sustainable business models deserve consideration instead.

For Existing Holders: Exit at the earliest opportunity. The 7.85% post-results bounce provides a window to minimise losses. The stock's negative financial trend, mildly bearish technicals, and fundamental weakness suggest limited upside and substantial downside risk. The negative book value means shareholders have no tangible asset backing, making the investment purely speculative.

Fair Value Estimate: Not applicable. With negative net worth and unsustainable earnings, traditional valuation frameworks break down. The stock's value derives entirely from speculative trading dynamics rather than discounted cash flows or asset backing.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The analysis presented reflects conditions as of February 11, 2026, and may change materially with subsequent developments.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News
Are Maruti Securities Ltd latest results good or bad?
Feb 12 2026 07:57 PM IST
share
Share Via
When is the next results date for Maruti Securities Ltd?
Feb 04 2026 11:17 PM IST
share
Share Via
Maruti Securities Ltd is Rated Sell
Dec 26 2025 03:12 PM IST
share
Share Via
Why is Maruti Sec. falling/rising?
Dec 06 2025 01:31 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Maruti Sec. overvalued or undervalued?
Dec 05 2025 08:21 AM IST
share
Share Via