The stock, currently trading at ₹534.00 as of November 14, 2025, has declined 1.30% in the latest session and remains firmly in bearish technical territory. With an overall Mojo score of just 3 out of 100 and a "STRONG SELL" advisory, the company faces mounting concerns about its core business viability and sustainability of earnings quality.
The quarter's results paint a picture of a company struggling with its core trading operations whilst relying heavily on windmill power generation and investment income to maintain profitability. The dramatic revenue volatility—swinging from ₹154.61 crores in Q1 FY26 to ₹32.10 crores in Q2 FY26—raises serious questions about business stability and management's ability to sustain consistent operational performance.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Consol. PAT (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 32.10 | ▼ 79.24% | 13.54 | ▲ 63.53% | 47.79% |
| Jun'25 | 154.61 | ▲ 451.78% | 8.28 | ▲ 128.10% | 6.21% |
| Mar'25 | 28.02 | ▼ 36.79% | 3.63 | ▼ 110.07% | 9.46% |
| Dec'24 | 44.33 | ▼ 9.35% | -36.05 | ▼ 367.04% | 42.95% |
| Sep'24 | 48.90 | ▲ 242.92% | 13.50 | ▼ 44.03% | 30.92% |
| Jun'24 | 14.26 | ▼ 71.87% | 24.12 | ▲ 5.10% | 183.94% |
| Mar'24 | 50.69 | — | 22.95 | — | 56.93% |
Financial Performance: Operational Weakness Behind Accounting Profits
Whilst the consolidated net profit of ₹13.54 crores appears impressive on the surface, a deeper examination reveals profound operational distress. Net sales for Q2 FY26 plummeted to ₹32.10 crores, down 79.24% from the previous quarter's ₹154.61 crores and declining 34.36% year-on-year from ₹48.90 crores. This dramatic revenue contraction reflects the highly volatile nature of the company's commodity trading business, which lacks predictability and sustainable growth momentum.
The operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) stood at a meagre ₹1.55 crores in Q2 FY26, translating to an operating margin of just 4.83%. Whilst this represents an improvement from the negative margins of the previous quarter, it remains far below the 13.11% margin achieved in the year-ago period. The company's core business generated minimal cash flow, with operating cash flow for FY25 registering a concerning negative ₹37.48 crores.
The profit after tax margin of 47.79% in Q2 FY26, whilst superficially attractive, is entirely misleading. This elevated margin stems almost exclusively from other income of ₹22.13 crores—comprising windmill power generation revenue and investment income—which dwarfs the operational profit contribution. The company's profit before tax of ₹16.49 crores would have been a loss of ₹5.64 crores without this non-operating income, highlighting the fundamental weakness of the core trading business.
Interest costs have escalated to ₹5.13 crores in Q2 FY26, the highest quarterly level in recent periods, up from ₹3.74 crores in the previous quarter. This rising interest burden, coupled with weak operational cash generation, raises concerns about the company's ability to service debt obligations from business operations alone. The tax rate of 6.97% in Q2 FY26 appears anomalously low, suggesting potential tax adjustments or credits that may not be sustainable in future periods.
Critical Concern: Earnings Quality Crisis
Other income represents 134.21% of profit before tax in Q2 FY26, meaning the company's reported profitability is entirely dependent on non-operating sources. Without windmill revenue and investment income, the core trading business would be deeply unprofitable. This raises fundamental questions about the sustainability and quality of reported earnings.
Operational Challenges: A Business Model Under Severe Stress
The company's return on equity (ROE) of just 2.64% over the average period reflects extraordinarily weak capital efficiency. For a trading business, this anaemic ROE suggests management is unable to generate meaningful returns from the substantial shareholder capital of ₹1,549.09 crores deployed in the business. The return on capital employed (ROCE) is even more concerning at negative 1.00%, indicating that the company is destroying value on the capital employed in operations.
The balance sheet reveals a company that has essentially transformed from an active trading enterprise into a passive investment holding vehicle. With investments of ₹306.54 crores and fixed assets (primarily windmills) of ₹432.86 crores as of March 2025, the company's asset base is heavily skewed towards non-trading activities. Current assets of ₹610.24 crores include minimal working capital deployment in the core trading business, as evidenced by the erratic revenue patterns.
Long-term debt has been reduced to near zero (₹0.00 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹0.71 crores in March 2024), which on the surface appears positive. However, this deleveraging has occurred alongside a dramatic shrinkage in trading operations, suggesting the company has essentially exited meaningful business activity rather than achieving genuine operational improvement. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06 is low, but this metric becomes less relevant when the underlying business generates negligible operating profits.
The Structural Problem: Five-Year Decline
Over the past five years, Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols has experienced a sales contraction of 12.22% annually, whilst operating profits (EBIT) have collapsed at an alarming 172.63% compound annual decline. This isn't a cyclical downturn—it's a structural deterioration of the core business model. The company's trading operations in agriculture and metal commodities have proven unable to generate consistent volumes or margins, forcing increasing reliance on windmill income to maintain headline profitability.
Valuation Analysis: Risky Despite Low Multiples
At the current price of ₹534.00, Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 5.92 times trailing twelve-month earnings, which appears superficially cheap compared to the broader market. However, this low multiple is entirely justified—and arguably still too high—given the poor quality of earnings and deteriorating business fundamentals. The company's valuation grade is classified as "RISKY" by proprietary metrics, reflecting concerns that extend beyond simple multiple analysis.
The price-to-book ratio of 0.25 times indicates the market values the company at just one-quarter of its book value of ₹2,172.72 per share. This substantial discount reflects investor scepticism about the realisable value of assets and the company's ability to generate economic returns. With a market capitalisation of ₹390.00 crores against shareholder equity of ₹1,549.09 crores, the company is valued at approximately 25% of its accounting book value—a severe discount that speaks to fundamental concerns about asset quality and business viability.
The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 245.50 times appears absurdly high, but this is a mathematical artefact of the company's minimal operating EBITDA relative to its enterprise value. When a business generates negligible operating cash flow, traditional valuation multiples become meaningless. The EV to EBIT ratio is negative at -74.83 times, reflecting negative operating profits when other income is excluded—further evidence that conventional valuation frameworks break down for a company with such poor operational fundamentals.
The dividend yield of 0.56% based on the latest dividend of ₹3.00 per share provides minimal income support, whilst the negative dividend payout ratio of -17.58% suggests the company paid dividends in excess of earnings in certain periods—an unsustainable practice that raises governance concerns. Fair value estimation becomes challenging when the core business model is fundamentally impaired, but based on normalised operating earnings (excluding windmill income), the stock appears overvalued even at current depressed levels.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity | Div Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riddhi Siddhi Gluco | 5.92 | 0.25 | 2.64% | 0.06 | 0.56% |
| Kothari Products | NA (Loss Making) | 0.46 | 0.90% | 0.04 | NA |
| Sunrise Efficient | 51.97 | 9.57 | 28.64% | -0.03 | NA |
| Sakuma Exports | 37.01 | 0.56 | 5.53% | 0.11 | NA |
| Balgopal Commercial | 94.82 | 6.91 | 0.00% | 0.00 | NA |
| Chandrima Mercantiles | 749.96 | 3.76 | 1.44% | 0.03 | NA |
Compared to trading and distribution peers, Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols trades at the lowest P/E and P/BV multiples in the group, but also exhibits the second-lowest ROE at 2.64%. Sunrise Efficient, with an ROE of 28.64%, justifies its premium valuation of 51.97 times earnings and 9.57 times book value through superior profitability. Riddhi Siddhi's discount is not a bargain—it's a value trap reflecting genuine business deterioration.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Uninspiring Institutional Interest
The shareholding structure has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 74.54% and no changes in any category. This stability, whilst providing some governance comfort, also reflects a complete absence of institutional interest or confidence. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) hold 0.00%, mutual funds hold a negligible 0.01%, and insurance companies have zero exposure—a telling indication of how professional investors view the company's prospects.
| Category | Sep'25 | Jun'25 | Mar'25 | Dec'24 | QoQ Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter | 74.54% | 74.54% | 74.54% | 74.54% | 0.00% |
| FII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Mutual Funds | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Insurance | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Other DII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-Institutional | 25.45% | 25.45% | 25.45% | 25.45% | 0.00% |
The absence of institutional buying or selling suggests the stock is simply not on the radar of professional fund managers. With just two mutual funds holding a combined 0.01% stake and zero participation from FIIs or insurance companies, the stock suffers from severe liquidity constraints and lacks the credibility that institutional sponsorship typically provides. The non-institutional holding of 25.45% represents primarily retail investors, who may lack the resources to conduct deep fundamental analysis.
Positively, there is no promoter pledging, which eliminates one potential governance risk. However, the static shareholding pattern over multiple quarters, combined with the absence of any institutional accumulation despite the low valuation, speaks volumes about market perception of the company's investment merits.
Stock Performance: Underperformance Across All Timeframes
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols has significantly underperformed the broader market across virtually all meaningful timeframes. Over the past year, the stock has declined 19.07% whilst the Sensex gained 9.00%, resulting in negative alpha of 28.07 percentage points. Year-to-date performance shows a decline of 16.43% against the Sensex's gain of 8.22%, with negative alpha of 24.65 percentage points.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +0.90% | +1.62% | -0.72% |
| 1 Month | -3.93% | +3.09% | -7.02% |
| 3 Months | -1.68% | +4.92% | -6.60% |
| 6 Months | -8.83% | +3.97% | -12.80% |
| YTD | -16.43% | +8.22% | -24.65% |
| 1 Year | -19.07% | +9.00% | -28.07% |
| 2 Years | +26.39% | +30.23% | -3.84% |
| 3 Years | +30.72% | +37.22% | -6.50% |
The stock is currently trading below all key moving averages—the 5-day (₹538.42), 20-day (₹546.42), 50-day (₹557.45), 100-day (₹563.38), and 200-day (₹559.47) moving averages—a clear technical indication of sustained downward momentum. The stock hit a 52-week high of ₹707.75 and is currently 24.55% below that peak, whilst trading just 13.11% above the 52-week low of ₹472.10.
Technical indicators across the board flash warning signals. The MACD shows bearish signals on both weekly and monthly timeframes, whilst moving averages indicate a bearish trend. The stock's beta of 1.50 suggests it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. However, with negative risk-adjusted returns of -0.46 over the past year and volatility of 41.13%, investors are being penalised with high risk without commensurate returns—a classic "high risk, low return" profile.
"When a company's profitability depends more on windmill income than trading operations, it's no longer a trading business—it's an asset monetisation story with a deteriorating core."
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Override Low Valuation
The investment case for Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols is severely compromised by a constellation of fundamental weaknesses that far outweigh the superficial attraction of low valuation multiples. The company's quality grade is classified as "BELOW AVERAGE" based on long-term financial performance, with negative sales growth of 12.22% over five years and catastrophic EBIT decline of 172.63% annually. These aren't temporary setbacks—they represent structural erosion of business viability.
The financial trend is classified as "NEGATIVE" as of September 2025, with key concerns including the revenue collapse in Q2 FY26, deteriorating operating cash flows (negative ₹37.48 crores in FY25), and excessive dependence on non-operating income. The debt-to-equity ratio has risen to 0.14 times on a half-yearly basis, whilst interest costs have reached record quarterly highs of ₹5.13 crores despite minimal debt on the balance sheet—suggesting off-balance-sheet obligations or working capital financing pressures.
From a technical perspective, the stock remains firmly in bearish territory, having changed to a bearish trend on October 28, 2025 at ₹549. With the stock trading below all moving averages and technical indicators uniformly negative, there is no evidence of buying support or trend reversal. The combination of negative financial trends and bearish technicals creates a particularly unfavourable setup for investors.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
KEY STRENGTHS
- Zero Promoter Pledging: Promoters have not pledged any shares, eliminating one governance risk factor
- Stable Promoter Holding: Consistent 74.54% promoter stake demonstrates long-term commitment to the business
- Low Debt Levels: Minimal long-term debt of ₹0.00 crores reduces financial risk from leverage
- Alternative Income Streams: Windmill power generation provides consistent non-operating income of ₹20-22 crores quarterly
- Dividend Payment: Company continues to pay dividends of ₹3.00 per share despite operational challenges
KEY CONCERNS
- Revenue Collapse: Net sales crashed 79.24% QoQ to ₹32.10 crores, showing extreme business volatility
- Earnings Quality Crisis: Other income represents 134.21% of PBT—profitability entirely dependent on non-operating sources
- Structural Decline: Five-year sales CAGR of -12.22% and EBIT CAGR of -172.63% indicate fundamental business deterioration
- Weak Returns: ROE of 2.64% and negative ROCE of -1.00% demonstrate poor capital efficiency
- Zero Institutional Interest: FII holding 0.00%, MF holding 0.01%—professional investors avoid the stock
- Negative Cash Generation: Operating cash flow of negative ₹37.48 crores in FY25 raises sustainability concerns
- High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 41.13% create high-risk profile without compensating returns
Outlook: What to Watch
POSITIVE CATALYSTS
- Stabilisation of quarterly revenue above ₹100 crores consistently
- Operating margins (excluding other income) expanding above 10%
- Positive operating cash flow generation for two consecutive quarters
- Institutional investor accumulation or analyst coverage initiation
- Strategic business pivot or asset monetisation announcement
RED FLAGS
- Further revenue decline below ₹30 crores in coming quarters
- Operating losses (excluding other income) for multiple consecutive quarters
- Rising debt levels or deteriorating interest coverage
- Dividend cut or suspension signalling cash flow stress
- Promoter stake reduction or pledging of shares
- Stock breaking below 52-week low of ₹472.10
The forward outlook for Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols remains deeply challenged. Without a fundamental transformation of the trading business model or a strategic pivot towards asset monetisation, the company faces continued erosion of shareholder value. The reliance on windmill income, whilst providing short-term profitability support, cannot substitute for a viable core business. Investors should monitor whether management can articulate and execute a credible turnaround strategy, though the five-year track record of deterioration suggests this is increasingly unlikely.
The Verdict: Avoid This Value Trap
Score: 3/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation entirely. The combination of collapsing revenues, poor earnings quality, structural business decline, and negative technical momentum creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The low P/E ratio of 5.92 times is a value trap, not a bargain—the market is correctly pricing in fundamental deterioration and lack of growth prospects.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any technical bounce towards the ₹560-570 zone (20-day and 200-day moving average resistance). The company's transformation from an active trading business to a passive windmill income generator, combined with five years of operational decline, suggests limited probability of meaningful recovery. The 0.56% dividend yield provides insufficient compensation for the capital risk.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹420-450 (21.43% to 15.73% downside from current levels), reflecting the minimal value of core operations and discounted windmill asset value. Even this estimate assumes no further deterioration in the trading business.
Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed are based on data available as of November 15, 2025, and are subject to change.
