{{scheme.chgp}}%
{{scheme.chgp}}%
No Matches Found
{{scheme.chgp}}%
No Matches Found
No Matches Found
CoreCivic, Inc. Hits 52-Week Low at $15.73 Amid Declining Performance
CoreCivic, Inc. has hit a new 52-week low, trading at USD 15.73. The company has underperformed the broader market over the past year, with a return of -13.31%. Financial metrics include a P/E ratio of 18.00 and a market capitalization of USD 1,751 million.
CoreCivic, Inc. Experiences Revision in Stock Evaluation Amid Market Challenges
CoreCivic, Inc. has experienced notable fluctuations in its stock price, with a recent close of $16.21. Technical indicators suggest a bearish sentiment, and the company's performance has lagged behind the S&P 500 over various time frames, highlighting challenges in the current market environment.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of November 21, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27 and an EV to EBITDA of 10.70, despite a year-to-date decline of 20.24%, while outperforming the S&P 500 by 6.91% over the past week.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of November 21, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27, an EV to EBITDA of 10.70, and a Price to Book Value of 1.63, showing resilience with a 5-year return of 151.03% despite recent challenges.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of November 7, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27 and an EV to EBITDA of 10.70, despite underperforming the S&P 500 over the past year with a return of -22.51%, though it has significantly outperformed over five years with a return of 173.51%.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of November 7, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27, a Price to Book Value of 1.63, and an EV to EBITDA of 10.70, although it is priced higher than peers like Howard Hughes Holdings and Cushman & Wakefield, and its performance does not significantly outperform the S&P 500.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of November 7, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27 and an EV to EBITDA of 10.70, both above industry averages, but has underperformed the S&P 500 with a year-to-date return of -22.03%.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of October 17, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27, an EV to EBITDA ratio of 10.70, and a Price to Book Value of 1.63, reflecting a shift from very attractive to fair investment quality despite a year-to-date return of -17.39% compared to the S&P 500's 13.30%, while still demonstrating strong long-term performance with a 3-year return of 88.66%.
CoreCivic, Inc. Experiences Valuation Adjustment Amidst Competitive Market Landscape
CoreCivic, Inc. has recently adjusted its valuation, with a current P/E ratio of 27 and a Price to Book Value of 1.63. Its operational efficiency is indicated by an EV to EBIT of 18.18 and an EV to EBITDA of 10.70, alongside a ROCE of 7.64% and ROE of 6.06%.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of October 17, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27 and an EV to EBITDA ratio of 10.70, both above peer averages, despite strong long-term returns of 88.66% over three years, while facing a year-to-date decline of 17.39%.
CoreCivic, Inc. Experiences Revision in Stock Evaluation Amid Market Fluctuations
CoreCivic, Inc. has recently seen its stock price decline, reflecting significant fluctuations over the past year. Despite recent challenges, the company has demonstrated resilience with notable long-term returns. Current technical indicators suggest a cautious market environment, with mixed sentiments influencing investor outlook.
CoreCivic, Inc. Experiences Valuation Adjustment Amid Strong Yearly Performance Metrics
CoreCivic, Inc. has recently adjusted its valuation, with its current price at $19.82. Over the past year, the company has achieved a return of 58.43%, outperforming the S&P 500. Key financial metrics include a P/E ratio of 27 and a return on equity of 6.06%, reflecting its operational efficiency.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of October 3, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is in a bearish trend with moderate strength, indicated by bearish signals from the MACD, KST, and RSI, while underperforming the S&P 500 year-to-date with a return of -8.83%, despite a strong 3-year return of 111.08%.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of October 3, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is in a bearish trend with moderate strength, underperforming the S&P 500 in the short term but significantly outperforming it over the past year and three years.
CoreCivic, Inc. Experiences Valuation Adjustment Amid Strong Market Performance
CoreCivic, Inc. has recently adjusted its valuation metrics, showing a P/E ratio of 27 and a price-to-book value of 1.63. The company has achieved a stock return of 70.22% over the past year, significantly outperforming the S&P 500, indicating strong market positioning within its sector.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of September 11, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is in a mildly bearish trend according to technical indicators, with year-to-date performance at -3.73% compared to the S&P 500's 12.22%, but it has outperformed over the past year with a return of 62.50% versus the S&P's 17.14%.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of August 22, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27, higher than the peer average, despite recent short-term underperformance, but it has demonstrated strong long-term growth potential with a 5-year return of 144.22%.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of June 10, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. shows a mildly bullish trend overall, supported by daily moving averages and monthly KST, but caution is advised due to mixed signals from weekly MACD and Bollinger Bands.
Is CoreCivic, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of May 7, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. is fairly valued with a P/E ratio of 27, lower than some peers, and has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past year despite recent underperformance.
{{list.post_title}}
{{list.post_excerpt}}
{{list.post_title}}
{{list.post_excerpt}}
