Who are the top shareholders of the Celebrity Fash.?

The top shareholders of Celebrity Fash include individual investors with 40.61% ownership, led by promoter Venkatesh Rajagopal at 19.38%. Additionally, four foreign institutional investors hold 15.12%, and the highest public shareholder is Ares Diversified with 6.48%.

The top shareholders of Celebrity Fash include a mix of individual and institutional investors. The majority of the shares are held by non-institutional investors, with individual investors collectively owning 40.61% of the company. The promoter with the highest holding is Venkatesh Rajagopal, who holds 19.38%. Additionally, there are four foreign institutional investors (FIIs) that collectively own 15.12% of the company. The highest public shareholder is Ares Diversified, with a stake of 6.48%. It's also noteworthy that the pledged promoter holdings stand at 77.6311%.

how big is Celebrity Fash.?

As of October 2023, Celebrity Fashions Ltd has a market capitalization of 74.78 Cr, with net sales of 165.26 Cr and a net loss of 18.26 Cr over the last four quarters. Shareholder's funds are 33.97 Cr, and total assets amount to 142.63 Cr.

Market Cap: Celebrity Fashions Ltd has a market capitalization of 74.78 Cr, which categorizes it as a Micro Cap company.<BR><BR>Recent Quarterly Performance: The sum of Net Sales for the latest 4 quarters, which is standalone data, amounts to 165.26 Cr. In contrast, the sum of Net Profit for the same period shows a loss of 18.26 Cr.<BR><BR>Balance Sheet Snapshot: This is standalone data for the latest annual period ending in March 2024. Shareholder's Funds are reported at 33.97 Cr, while Total Assets stand at 142.63 Cr.

Has Celebrity Fash. declared dividend?

Celebrity Fashions Ltd has declared a 10% dividend, but the dividend yield is 0%. Total returns have varied significantly, with negative returns in the short term and positive returns over longer periods.

Celebrity Fashions Ltd has declared a 10% dividend.<BR><BR>Dividend Details:<BR>- Percentage announced: 10%<BR>- Ex-date: 30 Aug 06<BR><BR>Dividend Yield: 0%<BR><BR>Total Returns by Period:<BR>In the last 6 months, the price return was -15.84%, the dividend return was 0%, resulting in a total return of -15.84%.<BR><BR>Over the past year, the price return was -27.31%, with a dividend return of 0%, leading to a total return of -27.31%.<BR><BR>For the 2-year period, the price return was -10.08%, the dividend return was 0%, resulting in a total return of -10.08%.<BR><BR>In the 3-year period, the price return was -9.96%, with a dividend return of 0%, leading to a total return of -9.96%.<BR><BR>Over the last 4 years, the price return was 84.78%, the dividend return was 0%, resulting in a total return of 84.78%.<BR><BR>In the 5-year period, the price return was 166.18%, with a dividend return of 0%, leading to a total return of 166.18%.<BR><BR>Overall, while Celebrity Fashions Ltd has declared a dividend, the dividend yield remains at 0%. The total returns show significant fluctuations, with positive returns over longer periods but negative returns in the shorter terms.

Who are the peers of the Celebrity Fash.?

Celebrity Fash.'s peers include Trent, Page Industries, K P R Mill Ltd, Vedant Fashions, Trident, APM Industries, Digjam, Acknit Indus., and Riba Textiles. In terms of management risk, growth, and capital structure, Celebrity Fash. ranks below average compared to its peers, with a 1-year return of -25.46%.

Peers: The peers of Celebrity Fash. are Trent, Page Industries, K P R Mill Ltd, Vedant Fashions, Trident, APM Industries, Digjam, Acknit Indus., and Riba Textiles.<BR><BR>Quality Snapshot: Excellent management risk is observed at Page Industries, K P R Mill Ltd, and Vedant Fashions, while Good management risk is found at Trent. Average management risk is noted for Trident, APM Industries, and Acknit Indus., and the rest have Below Average management risk, including Celebrity Fash., Digjam, and Riba Textiles. In terms of growth, Excellent growth is seen at K P R Mill Ltd, while Good growth is noted for Trent, and the rest, including Page Industries, Vedant Fashions, Trident, APM Industries, Digjam, Celebrity Fash., Acknit Indus., and Riba Textiles, have Below Average growth. For capital structure, Excellent capital structure is found at K P R Mill Ltd, Page Industries, and Vedant Fashions, while Good capital structure is noted for Trent and APM Industries, and the rest, including Celebrity Fash., Digjam, Acknit Indus., and Riba Textiles, have Below Average capital structure.<BR><BR>Return Snapshot: The peer with the highest 1-year return is Page Industries at 26.58%, while the lowest is Digjam at -54.65%. Celebrity Fash. has a 1-year return of -25.46%, which is higher than Digjam's but lower than Page Industries'. Additionally, the six-month return is negative for Trent, Vedant Fashions, APM Industries, Digjam, and Riba Textiles.

Is Celebrity Fash. overvalued or undervalued?

As of August 2, 2024, Celebrity Fash. is overvalued and classified as risky, with a negative PE ratio of -4.10, an EV to EBITDA ratio of -18.32, a troubling ROE of -85.97%, and a year-to-date stock return of -22.48%, significantly underperforming its peers and the Sensex.

As of 2 August 2024, Celebrity Fash. has moved from a fair to a risky valuation grade. The company is currently overvalued, as indicated by its negative PE ratio of -4.10 and an EV to EBITDA ratio of -18.32, which suggest significant financial distress. Additionally, the return on equity (ROE) stands at a concerning -85.97%, highlighting the company's struggles in generating profit relative to shareholder equity.<BR><BR>In comparison to its peers, Celebrity Fash. lags significantly behind K P R Mill Ltd, which has a PE ratio of 47.51, and Trident, with a PE ratio of 42.6. This stark contrast emphasizes the challenges Celebrity Fash. faces in the garments and apparel industry. The company's recent stock performance has also been disappointing, with a year-to-date return of -22.48%, significantly underperforming the Sensex, which has returned 5.63% in the same period.

What is the technical trend for Celebrity Fash.?

As of May 12, 2025, Celebrity Fash's technical trend is mildly bearish, influenced by mixed signals across time frames, with weekly indicators showing mild bullishness while monthly indicators remain bearish.

As of 12 May 2025, the technical trend for Celebrity Fash has changed from bearish to mildly bearish. The weekly MACD and Bollinger Bands indicate a mildly bullish stance, while the monthly indicators, including MACD and KST, remain bearish. The daily moving averages are mildly bearish, suggesting short-term weakness. The RSI shows no signal in both weekly and monthly time frames, indicating a lack of momentum. Overall, the current technical stance is mildly bearish, driven primarily by the mixed signals across different time frames and the bearish monthly indicators.

Who are in the management team of Celebrity Fash.?

As of March 2019, the management team of Celebrity Fash includes V Rajagopal (Chairman), Vidyuth Rajagopal (Managing Director), and several independent directors: N K Ranganath, Nidhi Reddy, K Sridhar, and Manoj Mohanka, along with Rama Rajagopal (Director) and A Rishi Kumar (Company Secretary).

As of March 2019, the management team of Celebrity Fash includes the following individuals:<BR><BR>1. V Rajagopal - Chairman<BR>2. Rama Rajagopal - Director<BR>3. N K Ranganath - Independent Director<BR>4. Nidhi Reddy - Independent Director<BR>5. A Rishi Kumar - Company Secretary<BR>6. K Sridhar - Independent Director<BR>7. Vidyuth Rajagopal - Managing Director<BR>8. Manoj Mohanka - Additional Independent Director<BR><BR>Each member holds a specific designation within the company, contributing to its governance and operations.

What does Celebrity Fash. do?

Celebrity Fashions Ltd is a garment exporter specializing in trousers, incorporated in 1988 and publicly listed since 2005. As of March 2025, it reported net sales of 515 Cr and a net loss of 22 Cr, with a market cap of INR 88 Cr.

Overview: <BR>Celebrity Fashions Ltd is a garment exporter specializing in the manufacturing of trousers, operating in the Garments & Apparels industry within the Micro Cap market-cap bracket.<BR><BR>History: <BR>The company was incorporated on April 28, 1988, as Celebrity Fashions Pvt Ltd, became a deemed public company in 1998, and converted to a public limited company in September 2005, changing its name to Celebrity Fashions Ltd. The latest quarterly results reported net sales and profit for the period ending March 2025.<BR><BR>Financial Snapshot: <BR>Net Sales: 515 Cr (Quarterly Results - Mar 2025) <BR>Net Profit: -22 Cr (Quarterly Results - Mar 2025) <BR>Market Cap: INR 88 Cr (Micro Cap)<BR><BR>Key Metrics: <BR>P/E: N/A <BR>Industry P/E: 23 <BR>Dividend Yield: 0.00% <BR>Debt-Equity: 2.19 <BR>Return on Equity: -85.97% <BR>Price to Book: 4.11<BR><BR>Contact Details: <BR>Address: SDF IV & C2 Third Main Road, MEPZ SEZ Tambaram Chennai Tamil Nadu : 600045 <BR>Tel: 91-044-4343 2200 <BR>Email: investor@celebritygroup.com <BR>Website: http://www.celebritygroup.com

When is the next results date for Celebrity Fash.?

The next results date for Celebrity Fash. is 12 August 2025.

The next results date for Celebrity Fash. is scheduled for 12 August 2025.

Are Celebrity Fash. latest results good or bad?

Celebrity Fashions' latest Q2 FY26 results show a mixed performance with a net loss of ₹3.95 crores, an improvement from the previous quarter, but ongoing negative margins and high debt levels raise concerns about its financial health and sustainability. Despite an 8.06% year-on-year revenue growth, the company's challenges suggest caution for investors.

Celebrity Fashions' latest results for Q2 FY26 reflect a mixed performance, but overall, the outlook appears concerning. The company reported a net loss of ₹3.95 crores, which is a significant improvement from the previous quarter's loss of ₹6.73 crores, indicating a narrowing of losses. However, this is overshadowed by persistent operational challenges, as the company continues to operate at negative margins, with an operating margin of -3.81% and a PAT margin of -9.29%.<BR><BR>On the positive side, revenue for the quarter increased to ₹42.52 crores, marking an 8.06% year-on-year growth and a 4.55% sequential improvement. This suggests some resilience in order book execution. However, the inability to convert this revenue growth into profitability raises serious questions about the sustainability of its business model.<BR><BR>The company's financial health is further complicated by high leverage, with a debt to EBITDA ratio of 9.50x and an interest coverage ratio below 1x, indicating difficulties in servicing its debt. Additionally, the stock has significantly underperformed the market, with a year-to-date decline of 36.90%.<BR><BR>In summary, while there are slight improvements in revenue and a reduction in losses, the overall financial performance is still troubling, characterized by negative margins and high debt levels. Investors should be cautious, as the company faces ongoing operational and financial challenges.

Should I buy, sell or hold Celebrity Fash.?

How has been the historical performance of Celebrity Fash.?

Celebrity Fash. has experienced significant declines in net sales and profitability, with net sales dropping from 364.21 Cr in Mar'23 to 165.26 Cr in Mar'25, resulting in a profit after tax of -18.26 Cr. The company's financial metrics indicate a challenging year, marked by reduced revenues and negative earnings per share.

Answer:<BR>The historical performance of Celebrity Fash. shows significant fluctuations over the years, particularly in net sales and profitability. <BR><BR>Breakdown:<BR>In Mar'25, Celebrity Fash. reported net sales of 165.26 Cr, a sharp decline from 342.62 Cr in Mar'24 and 364.21 Cr in Mar'23, indicating a downward trend in revenue. The total operating income mirrored this decline, falling to 165.26 Cr in Mar'25 from 342.62 Cr in the previous year. The company's total expenditure also decreased to 171.89 Cr in Mar'25 from 323.26 Cr in Mar'24, yet it still resulted in an operating profit (PBDIT) of -6.63 Cr, contrasting with a profit of 19.36 Cr in Mar'24. Consequently, the profit before tax dropped to -18.26 Cr in Mar'25 from 1.85 Cr in Mar'24, leading to a profit after tax of -18.26 Cr, down from 1.85 Cr the previous year. The earnings per share (EPS) reflected this downturn, falling to -3.06 in Mar'25 from 0.33 in Mar'24. On the balance sheet, total assets decreased to 147.03 Cr in Mar'25 from 142.63 Cr in Mar'24, while total liabilities increased slightly to 147.03 Cr from 142.63 Cr. The cash flow from operating activities also showed a decline, with a cash flow of 3.00 Cr in Mar'25 compared to 29.00 Cr in Mar'24. Overall, the financial metrics indicate a challenging year for Celebrity Fash., marked by declining revenues and profitability.

Which are the latest news on Celebrity Fash.?

Why is Celebrity Fash. falling/rising?

As of 16-Dec, Celebrity Fashions Ltd's stock price is Rs. 8.43, down 0.71%, and has significantly underperformed the Sensex, with a year-to-date decline of 49.34%. The stock is at a 52-week low, showing weak momentum and reduced investor interest.

As of 16-Dec, Celebrity Fashions Ltd's stock price is falling, currently at Rs. 8.43, reflecting a decrease of Rs. 0.06 or 0.71%. The stock has been underperforming significantly compared to the benchmark Sensex, with a 1-week decline of 5.39% against a slight increase of 0.02% for the index. Over the past month, the stock has dropped 17.03%, while the Sensex has only increased by 0.14%. Year-to-date, Celebrity Fashions has seen a substantial decline of 49.34%, contrasting sharply with the Sensex's gain of 8.37%.<BR><BR>Today, the stock reached a new 52-week low of Rs. 8.16, indicating ongoing negative sentiment. It has been on a consecutive downward trend for the last three days, with a total decline of 2.2% during this period. Additionally, the stock is trading below its moving averages across various time frames, including the 5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day averages, which typically signals weakness in price momentum.<BR><BR>Investor participation has also diminished, with delivery volume dropping by 55.76% compared to the 5-day average, suggesting a lack of interest from investors. Overall, these factors contribute to the stock's falling price.