How big is Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc.?

As of Jun 16, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. has a market capitalization of 0.00, categorizing it as a Micro Cap company, with net sales of 212.20 million and a net profit of -616.02 million over the latest four quarters. As of Dec 23, the balance sheet shows shareholder's funds of -503.41 million and total assets of 422.30 million.

As of Jun 16, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. has a market capitalization of 0.00, categorizing it as a Micro Cap company.<BR><BR>As of Jun 16, the company reported net sales of 212.20 million for the latest four quarters, while the net profit for the same period was -616.02 million.<BR><BR>As of Dec 23, the balance sheet shows shareholder's funds of -503.41 million and total assets of 422.30 million.

Should I buy, sell or hold Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc.?

Who are in the management team of Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc.?

As of March 2022, the management team of Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. includes Chairman and CEO William Rouhana, Vice Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer Scott Seaton, and several Independent Directors: Amy Newmark, Fred Cohen, Cosmo DeNicola, Christina Lurie, and Martin Pompadur. They are responsible for the company's strategic direction and governance.

As of March 2022, the management team of Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. includes:<BR><BR>- Mr. William Rouhana, who serves as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.<BR>- Mr. Scott Seaton, who is the Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Strategy Officer.<BR>- Ms. Amy Newmark, who holds the position of Director.<BR>- Mr. Fred Cohen, who is an Independent Director.<BR>- Mr. Cosmo DeNicola, also an Independent Director.<BR>- Ms. Christina Lurie, serving as an Independent Director.<BR>- Mr. Martin Pompadur, who is another Independent Director. <BR><BR>This team plays a crucial role in guiding the company's strategic direction and governance.

Is Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?

As of March 29, 2019, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. is considered risky and overvalued due to poor financial metrics, including a P/E ratio of 0.00 and negative EV ratios, especially when compared to peers like CuriosityStream and Cineverse.

As of 29 March 2019, the valuation grade for Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. moved from very attractive to risky, indicating a significant shift in its perceived investment quality. The company appears to be overvalued based on its financial metrics, particularly with a P/E ratio of 0.00, an EV to EBIT of -3.43, and an EV to EBITDA of -6.70. These figures suggest that the company is struggling to generate positive earnings and cash flow, which is concerning for potential investors.<BR><BR>In comparison to its peers, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. stands out unfavorably. For instance, CuriosityStream, Inc. has a P/E ratio of -32.36 and an EV to EBITDA of 30.14, while Cineverse Corp. shows a P/E of 16.25 and an EV to EBITDA of 5.77. The stark contrast in these ratios highlights the challenges faced by Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. in maintaining a competitive valuation within its industry. Overall, the company's financial performance and ratios indicate that it is overvalued relative to its peers and the broader market.

Is Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?

As of October 15, 2024, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. shows a mildly bearish trend with conflicting signals from moving averages and MACD, while significantly underperforming the S&P 500 with a -100% return over the past year.

As of 15 October 2024, the technical trend for Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. has changed from sideways to mildly bearish. The daily moving averages indicate a mildly bearish stance, while the weekly MACD and KST are mildly bullish, suggesting some conflicting signals. The RSI shows no signal on both weekly and monthly time frames, and Bollinger Bands are sideways, indicating a lack of volatility. <BR><BR>In terms of performance, the stock has returned -100% over the past year, significantly underperforming the S&P 500, which returned 17.14% in the same period. Overall, the current technical stance is mildly bearish, with key indicators reflecting a lack of momentum and significant underperformance compared to the benchmark.