Dashboard
With a Negative Book Value, the company has a Weak Long Term Fundamental Strength
- Poor long term growth as Operating profit has grown by an annual rate -287.24% of over the last 5 years
- High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
The company has declared Negative results for the last 4 consecutive quarters
Risky - Negative Operating Profits
Consistent Underperformance against the benchmark over the last 3 years
Stock DNA
Leisure Services
USD 34 Million (Micro Cap)
NA (Loss Making)
NA
6.83%
-2.52
33.72%
-0.06
Total Returns (Price + Dividend) 
FAT Brands, Inc. for the last several years.
Risk Adjusted Returns v/s 
News

FAT Brands Hits New 52-Week Low at $1.65 Amid Ongoing Struggles
FAT Brands, Inc. has reached a new 52-week low, reflecting a significant decline in its stock value over the past year. The company faces ongoing financial challenges, including negative quarterly results, a concerning debt-to-equity ratio, and a drastic drop in operating profit, raising concerns about its long-term viability.
Read MoreIs FAT Brands, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of 31 July 2025, the technical trend for FAT Brands, Inc. has changed from mildly bearish to bearish. The current stance is bearish with a strong indication from the weekly and monthly MACD, both showing bearish signals. The daily moving averages also confirm a bearish outlook. While the weekly RSI is bullish, it is offset by the overall bearish trends in MACD, KST, and Bollinger Bands, which are mildly bearish on both weekly and monthly time frames. The Dow Theory indicates no trend in both weekly and monthly periods. Overall, the technical indicators suggest a bearish sentiment with no multi-period return data available for comparison against the S&P 500....
Read MoreIs FAT Brands, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of 26 March 2019, the valuation grade for FAT Brands, Inc. has moved from expensive to risky, indicating a deterioration in its financial health. The company appears to be overvalued given its negative P/E ratio and troubling metrics, such as a Price to Book Value of -0.09 and an EV to EBIT of -48.47. Additionally, the EV to EBITDA ratio stands at an alarming 103.14, further supporting the conclusion that the stock is not a sound investment at its current price of 1.93. In comparison to its peers, FAT Brands, Inc. has a significantly worse EV to EBITDA ratio than Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., which is at 6.9076 and considered fair, and Potbelly Corp., which is very expensive at 19.3463. The company's recent stock performance has also been poor, with a year-to-date return of -34.89% compared to the S&P 500's positive return of 12.22%, reinforcing the notion that FAT Brands is struggling in the current ...
Read More Announcements 
Corporate Actions 
Quality key factors 
Valuation key factors
Technicals key factors
Shareholding Snapshot : Mar 2025
Shareholding Compare (%holding) 
Domestic Funds
Held in 3 Schemes (1.66%)
Held by 5 Foreign Institutions (0.24%)
Quarterly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Jun'25 - YoY
YoY Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is -3.42% vs 42.32% in Jun 2024
YoY Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is -40.61% vs -454.93% in Jun 2024
Annual Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Dec'24
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is 23.35% vs 18.00% in Dec 2023
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is -110.65% vs 28.61% in Dec 2023






