
Baker Hughes Co. Adjusts Valuation Amid Strong Financial Performance and Market Position
2025-10-23 15:51:26Baker Hughes Co. has recently adjusted its valuation grade, reflecting its strong financial metrics and market position. The company has shown consistent positive performance, with significant operating cash flow and net profit, alongside effective debt management and a competitive valuation compared to industry standards.
Read MoreIs Baker Hughes Co. overvalued or undervalued?
2025-10-21 12:10:07As of 17 October 2025, the valuation grade for Baker Hughes Co. has moved from attractive to very attractive, indicating a strong improvement in its valuation outlook. The company appears to be undervalued, supported by a P/E ratio of 12, a PEG ratio of 0.23, and an EV to EBITDA ratio of 8.48, which are all favorable compared to its peers. For instance, SLB has a higher P/E of 12.04 and an EV to EBITDA of 8.41, suggesting that Baker Hughes Co. is trading at a discount relative to its competition. In terms of performance, Baker Hughes Co. has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past year with a return of 22.51% compared to the index's 14.08%. This strong performance, combined with its attractive valuation ratios, reinforces the view that the stock is undervalued in the current market....
Read More
Baker Hughes Co. Experiences Revision in Its Stock Evaluation Amid Strong Financial Metrics
2025-10-20 15:33:53Baker Hughes Co. has recently adjusted its valuation, showcasing strong financial metrics such as a competitive P/E ratio of 12 and an EV to EBITDA ratio of 8.48. The company reports a ROCE of 18.66% and a ROE of 17.96%, along with a dividend yield of 2.35%.
Read MoreIs Baker Hughes Co. overvalued or undervalued?
2025-10-20 12:27:25As of 17 October 2025, the valuation grade for Baker Hughes Co. moved from attractive to very attractive, indicating a strong improvement in its valuation outlook. The company appears undervalued based on its key ratios, including a P/E ratio of 12, a PEG ratio of 0.23, and an EV to EBITDA ratio of 8.48, which are favorable compared to its peers. For instance, SLB has a P/E of 12.04 and an EV to EBITDA of 8.41, suggesting that Baker Hughes Co. is trading at a discount relative to its industry. In terms of performance, Baker Hughes Co. has shown impressive returns over multiple periods, with a 1Y return of 22.51% compared to the S&P 500's 14.08%, and a remarkable 5Y return of 243.84% against the S&P 500's 91.29%. This performance reinforces the notion that the stock is currently undervalued, as it has outpaced the benchmark significantly over the longer term....
Read MoreIs Baker Hughes Co. overvalued or undervalued?
2025-10-19 12:04:55As of 17 October 2025, the valuation grade for Baker Hughes Co. has moved from attractive to very attractive, indicating a strong improvement in its valuation outlook. The company appears to be undervalued, supported by a P/E ratio of 12, a PEG ratio of 0.23, and an EV to EBITDA ratio of 8.48, which are favorable compared to its peers. For instance, SLB has a higher P/E ratio of 12.04 and an EV to EBITDA of 8.41, suggesting that Baker Hughes Co. is trading at a discount relative to its industry. In terms of performance, Baker Hughes Co. has delivered a 1-year return of 22.51%, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's return of 14.08% over the same period, reinforcing the notion that the stock is undervalued. With a solid ROCE of 18.66% and a dividend yield of 2.35%, the company presents a compelling investment opportunity....
Read More
Baker Hughes Co. Experiences Evaluation Revision Amid Strong Market Performance and Trends
2025-10-14 15:41:27Baker Hughes Co. has recently revised its evaluation amid changing market dynamics. The stock has shown strong performance over the past year, significantly outperforming the S&P 500. Despite mixed technical indicators, the company has demonstrated resilience, particularly over the last five years, highlighting its adaptability in the construction industry.
Read MoreIs Baker Hughes Co. technically bullish or bearish?
2025-10-14 11:38:08As of 10 October 2025, the technical trend for Baker Hughes Co. has changed from bullish to mildly bullish. The weekly MACD is bullish, and the monthly MACD is also bullish, supporting a positive outlook. The Bollinger Bands indicate a mildly bullish stance on both weekly and monthly time frames. Daily moving averages are mildly bullish, while the KST shows a bullish weekly signal but is mildly bearish on a monthly basis. Dow Theory reflects a mildly bullish trend on the weekly chart with no trend on the monthly. In terms of performance, Baker Hughes has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past year, returning 20.66% compared to the S&P 500's 13.36%, and has also shown significant strength over the 5-year period with a return of 253.73% versus the S&P 500's 88.45%. Overall, the current technical stance is mildly bullish, driven by the positive signals from MACD and Bollinger Bands....
Read More
Baker Hughes Co. Experiences Revision in Its Stock Evaluation Amid Strong Financial Metrics
2025-10-13 15:27:44Baker Hughes Co. has recently adjusted its valuation, showcasing a competitive P/E ratio of 12 and a price-to-book value of 2.20. The company demonstrates strong profitability with a ROCE of 18.66% and a ROE of 17.96%, alongside a dividend yield of 2.35%, indicating effective resource management.
Read MoreIs Baker Hughes Co. technically bullish or bearish?
2025-10-13 11:39:42As of 10 October 2025, the technical trend for Baker Hughes Co. has changed from bullish to mildly bullish. The weekly MACD is bullish, and the monthly MACD is also bullish, indicating positive momentum. The Bollinger Bands show a mildly bullish stance on both weekly and monthly time frames. Daily moving averages are mildly bullish, while the KST indicates a bullish weekly trend but a mildly bearish monthly trend. Dow Theory reflects a mildly bullish weekly outlook with no trend on the monthly scale. In terms of performance, Baker Hughes has outperformed the S&P 500 over the 1-year (19.76% vs. 13.36%) and 3-year (101.34% vs. 81.39%) periods, but has underperformed in the 1-week (-7.13% vs. -2.43%) and 1-month (-4.01% vs. 0.31%) comparisons. Overall, the current technical stance is mildly bullish, supported by several indicators, though recent short-term performance has been weak....
Read More





