Is Minerals Technologies, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
2025-10-28 11:39:45As of 24 October 2025, the technical trend for Minerals Technologies, Inc. has changed from mildly bearish to bearish. The current stance is bearish, with key indicators supporting this view including bearish MACD readings on both the weekly and monthly time frames, and bearish moving averages on the daily chart. Additionally, Bollinger Bands indicate a bearish trend on the monthly level. The KST shows a bullish signal on the weekly but is bearish monthly, while Dow Theory presents a mildly bearish stance weekly and mildly bullish monthly. In terms of performance, the stock has underperformed the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a year-to-date return of -21.65% compared to the S&P 500's 15.47%, and a one-year return of -23.41% versus 16.90% for the index....
Read MoreIs Minerals Technologies, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
2025-10-27 11:50:51As of 24 October 2025, the technical trend for Minerals Technologies, Inc. has changed from mildly bearish to bearish. The current stance is bearish, with key indicators supporting this view including bearish MACD readings on both weekly and monthly time frames, a bearish daily moving average, and a bearish monthly Bollinger Band. The KST shows a bullish weekly signal but is bearish monthly, indicating mixed signals. The Dow Theory reflects a mildly bearish weekly and mildly bullish monthly stance. In terms of performance, the stock has underperformed the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a year-to-date return of -21.65% compared to the S&P 500's 15.47%, and a one-year return of -23.41% versus 16.90% for the index....
Read MoreIs Minerals Technologies, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
2025-10-26 11:25:32As of 24 October 2025, the technical trend for Minerals Technologies, Inc. has changed from mildly bearish to bearish. The current technical stance is bearish, with key indicators supporting this view including bearish MACD readings on both weekly and monthly time frames, and a bearish daily moving average. The Bollinger Bands also indicate a bearish trend on a monthly basis. Although the KST shows a bullish signal weekly, it is bearish monthly, which adds to the overall bearish sentiment. The Dow Theory reflects a mildly bearish stance weekly and mildly bullish monthly, indicating some mixed signals. In terms of performance, the stock has underperformed against the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a year-to-date return of -21.65% compared to the S&P 500's 15.47%, and a one-year return of -23.41% versus 16.90% for the benchmark....
Read MoreIs Minerals Technologies, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
2025-09-20 19:02:21As of 5 August 2025, the technical trend for Minerals Technologies, Inc. has changed from bearish to mildly bearish. The current stance is mildly bearish, driven by a mix of indicators. The MACD shows a mildly bullish signal on the weekly chart but is bearish on the monthly. The Bollinger Bands indicate a bullish trend weekly but bearish monthly. Moving averages are mildly bearish on the daily timeframe. The KST and Dow Theory are both mildly bullish on the weekly and monthly charts, while the OBV is mildly bullish weekly but bearish monthly. In terms of performance, the stock has underperformed the S&P 500 across multiple periods, with a year-to-date return of -15.13% compared to the S&P 500's 12.22%, and a one-year return of -10.27% versus 17.14%....
Read MoreIs Minerals Technologies, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
2025-09-20 17:35:36As of 31 July 2025, the valuation grade for Minerals Technologies, Inc. has moved from attractive to fair, indicating a shift in its perceived value. The company appears to be fairly valued based on its current metrics, with a P/E ratio of 13, an EV to EBITDA of 8.96, and a Price to Book Value of 1.70. In comparison to peers, Avantor, Inc. has a lower P/E of 11.82 and a higher EV to EBITDA of 11.86, while NewMarket Corp. shows a higher P/E of 16.30 but a similar EV to EBITDA of 11.85. Despite the fair valuation, the stock has underperformed relative to the S&P 500, with a year-to-date return of -15.13% compared to the index's 12.22%. This underperformance, along with the recent grade change, suggests that while the company is not overvalued, it may face challenges in regaining investor confidence....
Read More





