Why is Beijing Electronic Zone High-tech Group Co., Ltd. ?
1
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 3.56%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 3.56% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
2
High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
- Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of -0.70% and Operating profit at -202.22% over the last 5 years
- High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Equity (avg) of 3.05% signifying low profitability per unit of shareholders funds
3
Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of -0.70% and Operating profit at -202.22% over the last 5 years
4
The company has declared Negative results for the last 7 consecutive quarters
- NET SALES(9M) At CNY 795.7 MM has Grown at -48.25%
- DEBT-EQUITY RATIO (HY) Highest at 103.61 %
- RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Grown by 56.21% (YoY)
5
Risky -
- The stock is trading risky as compared to its average historical valuations
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of 11.34%, its profits have fallen by -791%
How much should you sell?
- All quantity irrespective of whether you are making profits or losses
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Realty)
When to re-enter? - We will constantly monitor the company and review our call based on new data
Is Beijing Electronic Zone High-tech Group Co., Ltd. for you?
High Risk, High Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Beijing Electronic Zone High-tech Group Co., Ltd.
-6.84%
0.73
50.73%
China Shanghai Composite
21.43%
1.58
14.20%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
-17.90%
EBIT Growth (5y)
-210.72%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
1.01
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
Negative Net Debt
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0
Tax Ratio
46.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
3.56%
ROE (avg)
3.05%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
NA (Loss Making)
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
1.22
EV to EBIT
-8.92
EV to EBITDA
-13.38
EV to Capital Employed
1.09
EV to Sales
9.00
PEG Ratio
NA
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
-12.25%
ROE (Latest)
-45.62%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Bearish
Mildly Bearish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Mildly Bearish
Bearish
Moving Averages
Bearish (Daily)
KST
Bearish
Mildly Bearish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bearish
OBV
No Trend
Mildly Bullish
Technical Movement
0What is working for the Company
NO KEY POSITIVE TRIGGERS
-25What is not working for the Company
NET PROFIT(Q)
At CNY -117.15 MM has Fallen at -74.87%
ROCE(HY)
Lowest at -38.77%
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Highest at 148.1 %
PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)
At CNY -128.74 MM has Fallen at -48.15%
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 73.92% (YoY
CASH AND EQV(HY)
Lowest at CNY 2,329.74 MM
NET SALES(Q)
Lowest at CNY 197.39 MM
Here's what is not working for Beijing Electronic Zone High-tech Group Co., Ltd.
Net Sales
At CNY 197.39 MM has Fallen at -29.66%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is extremely negative
Net Sales (CNY MM)
Net Profit
At CNY -117.15 MM has Fallen at -74.87%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is very negative
Net Profit (CNY MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
At CNY -128.74 MM has Fallen at -48.15%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is very negative
Pre-Tax Profit (CNY MM)
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at 148.1 % and Grown
In each half year in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Net Sales
Lowest at CNY 197.39 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is negative
Net Sales (CNY MM)
Cash and Eqv
Lowest at CNY 2,329.74 MM
in the last six Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Short Term liquidity is deteriorating
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 73.92% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






