Comparison
Company
Score
Quality
Valuation
Financial
Technical
Why is Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. ?
1
Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of -20.11% and Operating profit at 12.98% over the last 5 years
2
The company has declared Negative results for the last 4 consecutive quarters
- RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Grown by 54.91% (YoY)
- CASH AND EQV(HY) Lowest at HKD 5,801.85 MM
- DEBT-EQUITY RATIO (HY) Highest at -24.23 %
3
Risky -
- The stock is trading risky as compared to its average historical valuations
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of -13.13%, its profits have fallen by -39.8%
4
Below par performance in long term as well as near term
- Along with generating -13.13% returns in the last 1 year, the stock has also underperformed Hang Seng Hong Kong in the last 3 years, 1 year and 3 months
How much should you sell?
- All quantity irrespective of whether you are making profits or losses
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Automobiles)
When to re-enter? - We will constantly monitor the company and review our call based on new data
Is Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. for you?
High Risk, High Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
-13.13%
3.84
40.35%
Hang Seng Hong Kong
8.76%
0.45
19.63%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
-20.11%
EBIT Growth (5y)
12.98%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
-70.21
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
Negative Net Debt
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
-0.42
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0.04
Tax Ratio
100.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
0
ROE (avg)
16.92%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
6
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
0.74
EV to EBIT
-47.91
EV to EBITDA
-278.99
EV to Capital Employed
0.64
EV to Sales
10.05
PEG Ratio
NA
Dividend Yield
0.51%
ROCE (Latest)
-1.33%
ROE (Latest)
13.17%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Bearish
Bearish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Bearish
Mildly Bearish
Moving Averages
Bearish (Daily)
KST
Bearish
Bullish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bullish
No Trend
OBV
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bullish
Technical Movement
3What is working for the Company
OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)
Highest at HKD 12,102.05 MM
NET SALES(Q)
Highest at HKD 679.01 MM
-9What is not working for the Company
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 54.91% (YoY
CASH AND EQV(HY)
Lowest at HKD 5,801.85 MM
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Highest at -24.23 %
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO(HY)
Lowest at 2.59 times
NET PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at HKD 323.77 MM
EPS(Q)
Lowest at HKD 0.06
Here's what is working for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
Operating Cash Flow
Highest at HKD 12,102.05 MM
in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company has generated higher cash revenues from business operations
Operating Cash Flows (HKD MM)
Net Sales
Highest at HKD 679.01 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is positive
Net Sales (HKD MM)
Here's what is not working for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
Net Profit
Lowest at HKD 323.77 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is negative
Net Profit (HKD MM)
Net Profit
Fallen at -81.67%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is negative
Net Profit (HKD MM)
EPS
Lowest at HKD 0.06
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Declining profitability; company has created lower earnings for shareholders
EPS (HKD)
Cash and Eqv
Lowest at HKD 5,801.85 MM
in the last six Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Short Term liquidity is deteriorating
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at -24.23 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Lowest at 2.59 times
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company's pace of selling inventory has slowed
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 54.91% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






