Why is City Service SE ?
1
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 12.69%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 12.69% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
2
The company is Net-Debt Free
- Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of -5.80% and Operating profit at 13.38% over the last 5 years
- The company is Net-Debt Free
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Equity (avg) of 12.76% signifying low profitability per unit of shareholders funds
3
Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of -5.80% and Operating profit at 13.38% over the last 5 years
4
Flat results in Mar 26
- INTEREST(Q) At PLN 1.59 MM has Grown at 18.64%
- RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Grown by 7.41% (YoY)
- DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO(HY) Lowest at 2.8 times
5
With ROE of 27.22%, it has a very expensive valuation with a 1.40 Price to Book Value
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of 5.00%, its profits have risen by 29.7% ; the PEG ratio of the company is 0.2
How much should you sell?
- All quantity irrespective of whether you are making profits or losses
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Miscellaneous)
When to re-enter? - We will constantly monitor the company and review our call based on new data
Is City Service SE for you?
High Risk, Low Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
City Service SE
5.0%
0.46
43.89%
Poland WIG
37.09%
2.22
16.70%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
-5.80%
EBIT Growth (5y)
13.38%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
1.89
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
1.60
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0.77
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
2.12
Tax Ratio
11.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
15.13%
ROE (avg)
12.76%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
5
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
1.40
EV to EBIT
5.95
EV to EBITDA
4.91
EV to Capital Employed
1.25
EV to Sales
0.59
PEG Ratio
0.17
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
21.00%
ROE (Latest)
27.22%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bullish
RSI
No Signal
Bearish
Bollinger Bands
Bullish
Mildly Bullish
Moving Averages
Bullish (Daily)
KST
Mildly Bearish
Bullish
Dow Theory
No Trend
No Trend
OBV
Mildly Bullish
No Trend
Technical Movement
6What is working for the Company
OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)
Highest at PLN 35.52 MM
NET PROFIT(HY)
At PLN 17.1 MM has Grown at 104.71%
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO(HY)
Highest at 141.33 times
-6What is not working for the Company
INTEREST(Q)
At PLN 1.59 MM has Grown at 18.64%
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 7.41% (YoY
DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO(HY)
Lowest at 2.8 times
NET PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at PLN 6.57 MM
EPS(Q)
Lowest at PLN 0.21
Here's what is working for City Service SE
Operating Cash Flow
Highest at PLN 35.52 MM and Grown
In each year in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company has generated higher cash revenues from business operations
Operating Cash Flows (PLN MM)
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Highest at 141.33 times
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company has been able to sell its inventory faster
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Depreciation
Highest at PLN 3.09 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
The expenditure on assets done by the company may have gone into operation
Depreciation (PLN MM)
Here's what is not working for City Service SE
Interest
At PLN 1.59 MM has Grown at 18.64%
period on period (QoQ)MOJO Watch
Rising interest cost signifies increased borrowings
Interest Paid (PLN MM)
Net Profit
Lowest at PLN 6.57 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is negative
Net Profit (PLN MM)
EPS
Lowest at PLN 0.21
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Declining profitability; company has created lower earnings for shareholders
EPS (PLN)
Debtors Turnover Ratio
Lowest at 2.8 times
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company's pace of selling Debtors has slowed
Debtors Turnover Ratio
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 7.41% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






