Comparison
Why is Dynagas LNG Partners LP ?
1
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 7.93%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 7.93% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
2
Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of 3.87% and Operating profit at 4.74% over the last 5 years
3
The company has declared Positive results for the last 6 consecutive quarters
- OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y) Highest at USD 100.92 MM
- ROCE(HY) Highest at 11.69%
- DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO(Y) Highest at 13.07%
4
With ROE of 10.14%, it has a attractive valuation with a 0.27 Price to Book Value
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of -15.04%, its profits have risen by 60.6% ; the PEG ratio of the company is 0
5
Majority shareholders : Mutual Funds
6
Below par performance in long term as well as near term
- Along with generating -15.04% returns in the last 1 year, the stock has also underperformed S&P 500 in the last 3 years, 1 year and 3 months
How much should you hold?
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Dynagas LNG Partners LP should be less than 10%
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Transport Services should be less than 30%
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Transport Services)
When to exit? - We will constantly monitor the company and suggest at the appropriate time to exit from the stock
Is Dynagas LNG Partners LP for you?
Medium Risk, Low Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
-2.75%
-0.05
33.62%
S&P 500
25.41%
0.70
20.15%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
2.92%
EBIT Growth (5y)
3.49%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
2.44
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
4.09
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0.49
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0.19
Tax Ratio
0
Dividend Payout Ratio
4.67%
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
12.11%
ROCE (avg)
7.93%
ROE (avg)
8.68%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
3
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
0.34
EV to EBIT
5.39
EV to EBITDA
3.78
EV to Capital Employed
0.57
EV to Sales
2.58
PEG Ratio
0.14
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
10.62%
ROE (Latest)
12.30%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Bullish
Bullish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Mildly Bullish
Mildly Bullish
Moving Averages
Mildly Bullish (Daily)
KST
Bullish
Mildly Bearish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bearish
No Trend
OBV
Mildly Bearish
No Trend
Technical Movement
8What is working for the Company
OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)
Highest at USD 101.56 MM
ROCE(HY)
Highest at 13.02%
INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO(Q)
Highest at 615.73
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Lowest at 43.77 %
-4What is not working for the Company
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 11.59% (YoY
CASH AND EQV(HY)
Lowest at USD 94.07 MM
OPERATING PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at USD 24.47 MM
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN(Q)
Lowest at 61.27 %
Here's what is working for Dynagas LNG Partners LP
Operating Cash Flow
Highest at USD 101.56 MM and Grown
In each year in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company has generated higher cash revenues from business operations
Operating Cash Flows (USD MM)
Interest Coverage Ratio
Highest at 615.73
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
The company's ability to manage interest payments is improving
Operating Profit to Interest
Debt-Equity Ratio
Lowest at 43.77 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company has been reducing its borrowing as compared to equity capital
Debt-Equity Ratio
Here's what is not working for Dynagas LNG Partners LP
Operating Profit
Lowest at USD 24.47 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Operating Profit trend is negative
Operating Profit (USD MM)
Operating Profit Margin
Lowest at 61.27 %
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Company's profit margin has deteriorated
Operating Profit to Sales
Cash and Eqv
Lowest at USD 94.07 MM
in the last six Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Short Term liquidity is deteriorating
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 11.59% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






